Nanocellulose Explained

Nanocellulose is a term referring to a familly of cellulosic materials that have at least one of their dimensions in the nanoscale. Examples of nanocellulosic materials are microfibrilated cellulose, cellulose nanofibers or cellulose nanocrystals. Nanocellulose may be obtained from natural cellulose fibers through different production processes. This family of materials possess various interesting properties for a wide range of potential applications.

Terminology

Microfibrilated cellulose

Microfibrilated cellulose (MFC) is a type of nanocellulose that is more heterogeneous than cellulose nanofibers or nanocrystals as it contains a mixture of nano- and micron-scale particles. The term is sometimes misused to refer to cellulose nanofibers instead.[1]

Cellulose nanofibers

Cellulose nanofibers (CNF), also called nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC), are nanosized cellulose fibrils with a high aspect ratio (length to width ratio). Typical fibril widths are 5–20 nanometers with a wide range of lengths, typically several micrometers.

The fibrils can be isolated from natural cellulose, generally wood pulp, through high-pressure, high temperature and high velocity impact homogenization, grinding or microfluidization (see manufacture below).[2] [3] [4]

Cellulose nanocrystals (CNC or NCC)

Cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs), or nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC), are highly crystalline, rod-like nanoparticles.[5] [6] They are usually covered by negatively charged groups that rendeer them colloidally stable in water. They are typically shorter than CNFs, with a typical length of 100 to 1000 nanometers.[7]

Bacterial nanocellulose

Some cellulose producing bacteria have also been used to produce nanocellulosic materials that are then referred to as bacterial nanocellulose. The most common examples being Medusomyces gisevii (the bacteria involved in the making of Kombucha) and Komagataeibacter xylinus (involve in the fabrication of Nata de coco), see bacterial cellulose for more details. This naming distinction might arise from the very peculiar morphology of these materials compared to the more traditional ones made of wood or cotton cellulose. In practice, bacterial nanocellulosic materials are often larger than their wood or cotton counterparts.

History of nanocellulosic materials

The discovery of nanocellulosic materials can be traced back to late 1940s studies on the hydrolysis of cellulose fibers. Eventually it was noticed that cellulose hydrolysis seemed to occur preferentially at some disordered intercrystalline portions of the fibers.[8] This led to the obtention of colloidally stable and highly crystalline nanorods particles.[9] [10] [11] These particles were first referred to as micelles, before being given multiple names including cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs), nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC), or cellulose (nano)whiskers, though this last term is less used today. Later studies by O. A. Battista showed that in milder hydrolysis conditions, the crystalline nanorods stay aggregated as micron size objects.[12] [13] This material was later referred to as microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) and commercialised under the name Avicel® by FMC Corporation.[14]

Microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) was discovered later, in the 1980s, by Turbak, Snyder and Sandberg at the ITT Rayonier labs in Shelton, Washington.[15] [16] This terminology was used to describe a gel-like material prepared by passing wood pulp through a Gaulin type milk homogenizer at high temperatures and high pressures followed by ejection impact against a hard surface. In later work, F. W. Herrick at ITT Rayonier Eastern Research Division (ERD) Lab in Whippany also published work on making a dry powder form of the gel.[17] Rayonier, as a company, never pursued scale-up and gave free license to whoever wanted to pursue this new use for cellulose. Rather, Turbak et al. pursued 1) finding new uses for the MFC, including using as a thickener and binder in foods, cosmetics, paper formation, textiles, nonwovens, etc. and 2) evaluate swelling and other techniques for lowering the energy requirements for MFC production.[18] The first MFC pilot production plant of MFC was established in 2010 by Innventia AB (Sweden).[19]

Manufacture

Cellulose Sources

Nanocellulose materials can be prepared from any natural cellulose source including wood, cotton, agricultural[20] or household wastes,[21] algae,[22] bacteria or tunicate. Wood, in the form of wood pulp is currently the most commonly used starting material for the industrial production of nanocellulosic materials.

MFC and CNFs

Nanocellulose fibrils (MFC and CNFs) may be isolated from the cellulose fibers using mechanical methods that expose the fibers to high shear forces, delaminating them into nano-fibers. For this purpose, high-pressure homogenizers, grinders or microfluidizers can be used. This process consumes very large amounts of energy and values over 30 MWh/tonne are not uncommon.

To address this problem, sometimes enzymatic/mechanical pre-treatments and introduction of charged groups for example through carboxymethylation or TEMPO-mediated oxidation are used.[23] These pre-treatments can decrease energy consumption below 1 MWh/tonne. "Nitro-oxidation" has been developed to prepare carboxycellulose nanofibers directly from raw plant biomass. Owing to fewer processing steps to extract nanocellulose, the nitro-oxidation method has been found to be a cost-effective, less-chemically oriented and efficient method to extract carboxycellulose nanofibers.[24] [25] Functionalized nanofibers obtained using nitro-oxidation have been found to be an excellent substrate to remove heavy metal ion impurities such as lead,[26] cadmium,[27] and uranium.[28]

A chemo-mechanical process for production of nanocellulose from cotton linters has been demonstrated with a capacity of 10 kg per day.[29]

CNCs

CNCs are formed by the acid hydrolysis of native cellulose fibers, most commonly using sulfuric or hydrochloric acid. Disordered sections of native cellulose are hydrolysed and after careful timing, the remaining crystalline sections can be retrieved from the acid solution by centrifugation and dialysis against water. Their final dimensions depend on the cellulose source, its history, the hydrolysis conditions and the purification procedures.[30] CNCs are commercialised by various companies that use different sources and processes, leading to a range of available products.[31] [32]

Other cellulose based nanoparticles

Spherical shaped carboxycellulose nanoparticles prepared by nitric acid-phosphoric acid treatment are stable in dispersion in its non-ionic form.[33]

Structure and properties

Dimensions and crystallinity

The ultrastructure of nanocellulose derived from various sources has been extensively studied. Techniques such as transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), wide angle X-ray scattering (WAXS), small incidence angle X-ray diffraction and solid state 13C cross-polarization magic angle spinning (CP/MAS), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and spectroscopy have been used to characterize typically dried nanocellulose morphology.

A combination of microscopic techniques with image analysis can provide information on fibril widths, it is more difficult to determine fibril lengths, because of entanglements and difficulties in identifying both ends of individual nanofibrils.[34] [35] Also, nanocellulose suspensions may not be homogeneous and can consist of various structural components, including cellulose nanofibrils and nanofibril bundles.[36]

In a study of enzymatically pre-treated nanocellulose fibrils in a suspension the size and size-distribution were established using cryo-TEM. The fibrils were found to be rather mono-dispersed mostly with a diameter of ca. 5 nm although occasionally thicker fibril bundles were present. By combining ultrasonication with an "oxidation pretreatment", cellulose microfibrils with a lateral dimension below 1 nm has been observed by AFM. The lower end of the thickness dimension is around 0.4 nm, which is related to the thickness of a cellulose monolayer sheet.[37]

Aggregate widths can be determined by CP/MAS NMR developed by Innventia AB, Sweden, which also has been demonstrated to work for nanocellulose (enzymatic pre-treatment). An average width of 17 nm has been measured with the NMR-method, which corresponds well with SEM and TEM. Using TEM, values of 15 nm have been reported for nanocellulose from carboxymethylated pulp. However, thinner fibrils can also be detected. Wågberg et al. reported fibril widths of 5–15 nm for a nanocellulose with a charge density of about 0.5 meq./g. The group of Isogai reported fibril widths of 3–5 nm for TEMPO-oxidized cellulose having a charge density of 1.5 meq./g.

Pulp chemistry has a significant influence on nanocellulose microstructure. Carboxymethylation increases the numbers of charged groups on the fibril surfaces, making the fibrils easier to liberate and results in smaller and more uniform fibril widths (5–15 nm) compared to enzymatically pre-treated nanocellulose, where the fibril widths were 10–30 nm. The degree of crystallinity and crystal structure of nanocellulose. Nanocellulose exhibits cellulose crystal I organization and the degree of crystallinity is unchanged by the preparation of the nanocellulose. Typical values for the degree of crystallinity were around 63%.

Viscosity

The rheology of nanocellulose dispersions has been investigated. and revealed that the storage and loss modulus were independent of the angular frequency at all nanocellulose concentrations between 0.125% to 5.9%. The storage modulus values are particularly high (104 Pa at 3% concentration) compared to results for CNCs (102 Pa at 3% concentration). There is also a strong concentration dependence as the storage modulus increases 5 orders of magnitude if the concentration is increased from 0.125% to 5.9%. Nanocellulose gels are also highly shear thinning (the viscosity is lost upon introduction of the shear forces). The shear-thinning behaviour is particularly useful in a range of different coating applications.

It is pseudo-plastic and exhibits thixotropy, the property of certain gels or fluids that are thick (viscous) under normal conditions, but become less viscous when shaken or agitated. When the shearing forces are removed the gel regains much of its original state.

Mechanical properties

Crystalline cellulose has a stiffness about 140–220 GPa, comparable with that of Kevlar and better than that of glass fiber, both of which are used commercially to reinforce plastics. Films made from nanocellulose have high strength (over 200 MPa), high stiffness (around 20 GPa) but lack of high strain (12%). Its strength/weight ratio is 8 times that of stainless steel. Fibers made from nanocellulose have high strength (up to 1.57 GPa) and stiffness (up to 86 GPa).

Barrier properties

In semi-crystalline polymers, the crystalline regions are considered to be gas impermeable. Due to relatively high crystallinity, in combination with the ability of the nanofibers to form a dense network held together by strong inter-fibrillar bonds (high cohesive energy density), it has been suggested that nanocellulose might act as a barrier material. Although the number of reported oxygen permeability values are limited, reports attribute high oxygen barrier properties to nanocellulose films. One study reported an oxygen permeability of 0.0006 (cm3 μm)/(m2 day kPa) for a ca. 5 μm thin nanocellulose film at 23 °C and 0% RH. In a related study, a more than 700-fold decrease in oxygen permeability of a polylactide (PLA) film when a nanocellulose layer was added to the PLA surface was reported.

The influence of nanocellulose film density and porosity on film oxygen permeability has been explored.[38] Some authors have reported significant porosity in nanocellulose films, which seems to be in contradiction with high oxygen barrier properties, whereas Aulin et al. measured a nanocellulose film density close to density of crystalline cellulose (cellulose Iß crystal structure, 1.63 g/cm3) indicating a very dense film with a porosity close to zero.

Changing the surface functionality of the cellulose nanoparticle can also affect the permeability of nanocellulose films. Films constituted of negatively charged CNCs could effectively reduce permeation of negatively charged ions, while leaving neutral ions virtually unaffected. Positively charged ions were found to accumulate in the membrane.

Multi-parametric surface plasmon resonance is one of the methods to study barrier properties of natural, modified or coated nanocellulose. The different antifouling, moisture, solvent, antimicrobial barrier formulation quality can be measured on the nanoscale. The adsorption kinetics as well as the degree of swelling can be measured in real-time and label-free.[39] [40]

Liquid crystals, colloidal glasses, and hydrogels

Owed to their anisotropic shape and surface charge, nanocelluloses (mostly rigid CNCs) have a high excluded volume and self-assemble into cholesteric liquid crystals beyond a critical volume fraction.[41] Nanocellulose liquid crystals are left-handed due to the right-handed twist on particle level.[42] Nanocellulose phase behavior is susceptible to ionic charge screening. An increase in ionic strength induces the arrest of nanocellulose dispersions into attractive glasses.[43] At further increasing ionic strength, nanocelluloses aggregate into hydrogels.[44] The interactions within nanocelluloses are weak and reversible, wherefore nanocellulose suspensions and hydrogels are self-healing and may be applied as injectable materials[45] or 3D printing inks.[46]

Bulk foams and aerogels

Nanocellulose can also be used to make aerogels/foams, either homogeneously or in composite formulations. Nanocellulose-based foams are being studied for packaging applications in order to replace polystyrene-based foams. Svagan et al. showed that nanocellulose has the ability to reinforce starch foams by using a freeze-drying technique. The advantage of using nanocellulose instead of wood-based pulp fibers is that the nanofibrils can reinforce the thin cells in the starch foam. Moreover, it is possible to prepare pure nanocellulose aerogels applying various freeze-drying and super critical drying techniques. Aerogels and foams can be used as porous templates. Tough ultra-high porosity foams prepared from cellulose I nanofibril suspensions were studied by Sehaqui et al. a wide range of mechanical properties including compression was obtained by controlling density and nanofibril interaction in the foams. CNCs could also be made to gel in water under low power sonication giving rise to aerogels with the highest reported surface area (>600m2/g) and lowest shrinkage during drying (6.5%) of cellulose aerogels. In another study by Aulin et al., the formation of structured porous aerogels of nanocellulose by freeze-drying was demonstrated. The density and surface texture of the aerogels was tuned by selecting the concentration of the nanocellulose dispersions before freeze-drying. Chemical vapour deposition of a fluorinated silane was used to uniformly coat the aerogel to tune their wetting properties towards non-polar liquids/oils. The authors demonstrated that it is possible to switch the wettability behaviour of the cellulose surfaces between super-wetting and super-repellent, using different scales of roughness and porosity created by the freeze-drying technique and change of concentration of the nanocellulose dispersion. Structured porous cellulose foams can however also be obtained by utilizing the freeze-drying technique on cellulose generated by Gluconobacter strains of bacteria, which bio-synthesize open porous networks of cellulose fibers with relatively large amounts of nanofibrils dispersed inside. Olsson et al.[47] demonstrated that these networks can be further impregnated with metalhydroxide/oxide precursors, which can readily be transformed into grafted magnetic nanoparticles along the cellulose nanofibers. The magnetic cellulose foam may allow for a number of novel applications of nanocellulose and the first remotely actuated magnetic super sponges absorbing 1 gram of water within a 60 mg cellulose aerogel foam were reported. Notably, these highly porous foams (>98% air) can be compressed into strong magnetic nanopapers, which may find use as functional membranes in various applications.

Pickering emulsions and foams

Nanocelluloses can stabilize emulsions and foams by a Pickering mechanism, i.e. they adsorb at the oil-water or air-water interface and prevent their energetic unfavorable contact. Nanocelluloses form oil-in-water emulsions with a droplet size in the range of 4-10 μm that are stable for months and can resist high temperatures and changes in pH.[48] [49] Nanocelluloses decrease the oil-water interface tension[50] and their surface charge induces electrostatic repulsion within emulsion droplets. Upon salt-induced charge screening the droplets aggregate but do not undergo coalescence, indicating strong steric stabilization.[51] The emulsion droplets even remain stable in the human stomach and resist gastric lipolysis, thereby delaying lipid absorption and satiation.[52] [53] In contrast to emulsions, native nanocelluloses are generally not suitable for the Pickering stabilization of foams, which is attributed to their primarily hydrophilic surface properties that results in an unfavorable contact angle below 90° (they are preferably wetted by the aqueous phase).[54] Using hydrophobic surface modifications or polymer grafting, the surface hydrophobicity and contact angle of nanocelluloses can be increased, allowing also the Pickering stabilization of foams.[55] By further increasing the surface hydrophobicity, inverse water-in-oil emulsions can be obtained, which denotes a contact angle higher than 90°.[56] [57] It was further demonstrated that nanocelluloses can stabilize water-in-water emulsions in presence of two incompatible water-soluble polymers.[58]

Cellulose nanofiber plate (CNFP)

A bottom up approach can be used to create a high-performance bulk material with low density, high strength and toughness, and great thermal dimensional stability. Cellulose nanofiber hydrogel is created by biosynthesis. The hydrogels can then be treated with a polymer solution or by surface modification and then are hot-pressed at 80 °C. The result is bulk material with excellent machinability. “The ultrafine nanofiber network structure in CNFP results in more extensive hydrogen bonding, the high in-plane orientation, and “three way branching points” of the microfibril networks”. This structure gives CNFP its high strength by distributing stress and adding barriers to crack formation and propagation. The weak link in this structure is bond between the pressed layers which can lead to delamination. To reduce delamination, the hydrogel can be treated with silicic acid, which creates strong covalent cross-links between layers during hot pressing.

Surface modification

The surface modification of nanocellulose is currently receiving a large amount of attention. Nanocellulose displays a high concentration of hydroxyl groups at the surface which can be reacted. However, hydrogen bonding strongly affects the reactivity of the surface hydroxyl groups. In addition, impurities at the surface of nanocellulose such as glucosidic and lignin fragments need to be removed before surface modification to obtain acceptable reproducibility between different batches.

Safety aspects

Processing of nanocellulose does not cause significant exposure to fine particles during friction grinding or spray drying. No evidence of inflammatory effects or cytotoxicity on mouse or human macrophages can be observed after exposure to nanocellulose. The results of toxicity studies suggest that nanocellulose is not cytotoxic and does not cause any effects on inflammatory system in macrophages. In addition, nanocellulose is not acutely toxic to Vibrio fischeri in environmentally relevant concentrations.

Despite intensified research on oral food or pharmaceutical formulations containing nanocelluloses they are not generally recognized as safe. Nanocelluloses were demonstrated to exhibit limited toxicity and oxidative stress in in vitro intestinal epithelium[59] [60] [61] or animal models.[62] [63] [64]

Potential applications

The properties of nanocellulose (e.g. mechanical properties, film-forming properties, viscosity etc.) makes it an interesting material for many applications.[65]

Paper and paperboard

In the area of paper and paperboard manufacture, nanocelluloses are expected to enhance the fiber-fiber bond strength and, hence, have a strong reinforcement effect on paper materials.[66] [67] [68] Nanocellulose may be useful as a barrier in grease-proof type of papers and as a wet-end additive to enhance retention, dry and wet strength in commodity type of paper and board products.[69] [70] It has been shown that applying CNF as a coating material on the surface of paper and paperboard improves the barrier properties, especially air resistance and grease/oil resistance. It also enhances the structure properties of paperboards (smoother surface).[71] Very high viscosity of MFC/CNF suspensions at low solids content limits the type of coating techniques that can be utilized to apply these suspensions onto paper/paperboard. Some of the coating methods utilized for MFC surface application onto paper/paperboard have been rod coating, size press, spray coating,[72] foam coating [73] and slot-die coating. Wet-end surface application of mineral pigments and MFC mixture to improve barrier, mechanical and printing properties of paperboard are also being explored.[74]

Nanocellulose can be used to prepare flexible and optically transparent paper. Such paper is an attractive substrate for electronic devices because it is recyclable, compatible with biological objects, and easily biodegrades.

Composite

As described above the properties of the nanocellulose makes an interesting material for reinforcing plastics. Nanocellulose can be spun into filaments that are stronger and stiffer than spider silk.[75] Nanocellulose has been reported to improve the mechanical properties of thermosetting resins, starch-based matrixes, soy protein, rubber latex, poly(lactide). Hybrid cellulose nanofibrils-clay minerals composites present interesting mechanical, gas barrier and fire retardancy properties.[76] The composite applications may be for use as coatings and films,[77] paints, foams, packaging.

Food

Nanocellulose can be used as a low calorie replacement for carbohydrate additives used as thickeners, flavour carriers, and suspension stabilizers in a wide variety of food products.[78] It is useful for producing fillings, crushes, chips, wafers, soups, gravies, puddings etc. The food applications arise from the rheological behaviour of the nanocellulose gel.

Hygiene and absorbent products

Applications in this field include: super water absorbent material (e.g. for incontinence pads material), nanocellulose used together with super absorbent polymers, nanocellulose in tissue, non-woven products or absorbent structures and as antimicrobial films.

Emulsion and dispersion

Nanocellulose has potential applications in the general area of emulsion and dispersion applications in other fields.[79] [80]

Medical, cosmetic and pharmaceutical

The use of nanocellulose in cosmetics and pharmaceuticals has been suggested:

Bio-based electronics and energy storage

Nanocellulose can pave the way for a new type of "bio-based electronics" where interactive materials are mixed with nanocellulose to enable the creation of new interactive fibers, films, aerogels, hydrogels and papers.[82] E.g. nanocellulose mixed with conducting polymers such as show synergetic effects resulting in extraordinary[83] mixed electronic and ionic conductivity, which is important for energy storage applications. Filaments spun from a mix of nanocellulose and carbon nanotubes show good conductivity and mechanical properties.[84] Nanocellulose aerogels decorated with carbon nanotubes can be constructed into robust compressible 3D supercapacitor devices.[85] Structures from nanocellulose can be turned into bio-based triboelectric generators[86] and sensors.

In April 2013 breakthroughs in nanocellulose production, by algae, were announced at an American Chemical Society conference, by speaker R. Malcolm Brown, Jr., Ph.D, who has pioneered research in the field for more than 40 years, spoke at the First International Symposium on Nanocellulose, part of the American Chemical Society meeting. Genes from the family of bacteria that produce vinegar, Kombucha tea and nata de coco have become stars in a project — which scientists said has reached an advanced stage - that would turn algae into solar-powered factories for producing the “wonder material” nanocellulose.

Bio-based coloured materials

Cellulose nanocrystals have shown the possibility to self organize into chiral nematic structures[87] with angle-dependent iridescent colours. It is thus possible to manufacture totally bio-based pigments and glitters, films including sequins having a metallic glare and a small footprint compared to fossil-based alternatives.

Other potential applications

Related materials

Nanochitin is similar in its nanostructure to cellulose nanocrystals but extracted from chitin.

See also

Notes and References

  1. Osong SH, Norgren S, Engstrand P . February 2016 . Processing of wood-based microfibrillated cellulose and nanofibrillated cellulose, and applications relating to papermaking: a review . Cellulose . en . 23 . 1 . 93–123 . 10.1007/s10570-015-0798-5 . 0969-0239.
  2. Zhu H, Luo W, Ciesielski PN, Fang Z, Zhu JY, Henriksson G, Himmel ME, Hu L . Wood-Derived Materials for Green Electronics, Biological Devices, and Energy Applications . Chemical Reviews . 116 . 16 . 9305–9374 . August 2016 . 27459699 . 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00225.
  3. Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindström T, Ankerfors M, Gray D, Dorris A . Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials . Angewandte Chemie . 50 . 24 . 5438–5466 . June 2011 . 21598362 . 10.1002/anie.201001273.
  4. Habibi Y . Key advances in the chemical modification of nanocelluloses . Chemical Society Reviews . 43 . 5 . 1519–1542 . March 2014 . 24316693 . 10.1039/C3CS60204D.
  5. Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ . Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications . Chemical Reviews . 110 . 6 . 3479–3500 . June 2010 . 20201500 . 10.1021/cr900339w.
  6. George J, Sabapathi SN . Cellulose nanocrystals: synthesis, functional properties, and applications . English . Nanotechnology, Science and Applications . 8 . 45–54 . 2015-11-04 . 26604715 . 4639556 . 10.2147/NSA.S64386 . free.
  7. Peng BL, Dhar N, Liu HL, Tam KC . 2011 . Chemistry and applications of nanocrystalline cellulose and its derivatives: A nanotechnology perspective . dead . The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering . 89 . 5 . 1191–1206 . 10.1002/cjce.20554 . https://web.archive.org/web/20161024021059/http://www.arboranano.ca/pdfs/Chemistry%20and%20applications%20of%20nanocrystalline%20cellulose%20and%20its%20derivatives%20A%20nanotechnology%20perspective-2011.pdf . 2016-10-24 . 2012-08-28.
  8. Nickerson RF, Habrle JA . November 1947 . Cellulose Intercrystalline Structure . Industrial & Engineering Chemistry . en . 39 . 11 . 1507–1512 . 10.1021/ie50455a024 . 0019-7866.
  9. Rånby BG . 1949 . Aqueous Colloidal Solutions of Cellulose Micelles . Acta Chemica Scandinavica . 3 . 649–650. 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.03-0649.
  10. Morehead FF . August 1950 . Ultrasonic Disintegration of Cellulose Fibers Before and After Acid Hydrolysis . Textile Research Journal . en . 20 . 8 . 549–553 . 10.1177/004051755002000803 . 0040-5175.
  11. Mukherjee SM, Woods HJ . X-ray and electron microscope studies of the degradation of cellulose by sulphuric acid . Biochimica et Biophysica Acta . 10 . 4 . 499–511 . April 1953 . 13059015 . 10.1016/0006-3002(53)90295-9.
  12. US . 2,978,446 . Battista . Hill . Smith . Level-off D.P cellulose products . 1961-04-04 . American Viscose Corporation .
  13. US . 3,141,875 . Battista . Hill . Smith . Crystallite aggregates disintegrated in acid medium . 1964-07-21 . FMC Corporation .
  14. https://www.fmc.com/en/company/our-history
  15. Turbak AF, Snyder FW, Sandberg KR . 1983 . Microfibrillated Cellulose, a New Cellulose Product: Properties, Uses, and Commercial Potential . Journal of Applied Polymer Science: Applied Polymer Symposium . 37 . 815–827.
  16. Web site: Birth of Nanocellulose .
  17. Microfibrillated cellulose: Morphology and accessibility . 5039044 . J. Appl. Polym. Sci.: Appl. Polym. Symp.; (United States) . January 1983 . 37 . Herrick FW, Casebier RL, Hamilton JK, Sandberg KR.
  18. Turbak, A.F., Snyder, F.W. and Sandberg, K.R. (1984) "Microfibrillated Cellulose—A New Composition of Commercial Significance," 1984 Nonwovens Symposium, Myrtle Beach, SC, Apr. 16–19. TAPPI Press, Atlanta, GA. pp 115–124.
  19. Ankerfors M . Microfibrillated cellulose: Energy-efficient preparation techniques and key properties . Licentiate . Royal Institute of Technology . Sweden . 2012 . 978-91-7501-464-7 .
  20. Almashhadani AQ, Leh CP, Chan SY, Lee CY, Goh CF . Nanocrystalline cellulose isolation via acid hydrolysis from non-woody biomass: Importance of hydrolysis parameters . Carbohydrate Polymers . 286 . 119285 . June 2022 . 35337507 . 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119285.
  21. Abbasi A, Makhtoumi Y, Wu Y, Chen G . 2024-06-01 . Characterization of cellulose nanocrystal extracted from household waste and its application for seed germination . Carbohydrate Polymer Technologies and Applications . 7 . 100409 . 10.1016/j.carpta.2023.100409 . 2666-8939 . free.
  22. El Achaby M, Kassab Z, Aboulkas A, Gaillard C, Barakat A . Reuse of red algae waste for the production of cellulose nanocrystals and its application in polymer nanocomposites . International Journal of Biological Macromolecules . 106 . 681–691 . January 2018 . 28823511 . 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.067 .
  23. Web site: Marcus Wallenberg Prize: 2015 – Akira Isogai, Tsuguyuki Saito, Japan, and Yoshiharu Nishiyama, France. mwp.org/. 16 March 2015 . 23 January 2018.
  24. Sharma PR, Joshi R, Sharma SK, Hsiao BS . A Simple Approach to Prepare Carboxycellulose Nanofibers from Untreated Biomass . Biomacromolecules . 18 . 8 . 2333–2342 . August 2017 . 28644013 . 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b00544.
  25. Sharma PR, Zheng B, Sunil KS, Zhan C, Wang R, Bhatia SR, Benjamin SH. 2018 . High Aspect Ratio Carboxycellulose Nanofibers Prepared by Nitro-Oxidation Method and Their Nanopaper Properties. ACS Applied Nano Materials. 1. 3969–3980. 10.1021/acsanm.8b00744. 8. 139513681.
  26. Sharma PR, Chattopadhyay A, Sunil KS, Lihong GS, Benjamin SH . 103880950. 2018 . Lead removal from water using carboxycellulose nanofibers prepared by nitro-oxidation method. Cellulose. 25. 1961–1973. 10.1007/s10570-018-1659-9. 3.
  27. Sharma PR, Chattopadhyay A, Sharma SK, Geng L, Amiralian N, Martin D, Hsiao BS . 2018 . Nanocellulose from Spinifex as an Effective Adsorbent to Remove Cadmium(II) from Water. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 6. 3279–3290. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03473 . 3.
  28. Sharma PR, Chattopadhyay A, Sharma SK, Hsiao BS . 2017 . Efficient Removal of UO22+ from Water Using Carboxycellulose Nanofibers Prepared by the Nitro-Oxidation Method. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 56. 13885–13893. 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b03659 . 46.
  29. Web site: Nanocellulose - NaNo Research GROUP @ ICAR-CIRCOT, Mumbai .
  30. Web site: Nanowhiskers - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics.
  31. Reid . Michael S. . Villalobos . Marco . Cranston . Emily D. . 2017-02-21 . Benchmarking Cellulose Nanocrystals: From the Laboratory to Industrial Production . Langmuir . en . 33 . 7 . 1583–1598 . 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03765 . 0743-7463. 11375/21951 . free .
  32. Delepierre . Gwendoline . Vanderfleet . Oriana M. . Niinivaara . Elina . Zakani . Behzad . Cranston . Emily D. . 2021-07-20 . Benchmarking Cellulose Nanocrystals Part II: New Industrially Produced Materials . Langmuir . en . 37 . 28 . 8393–8409 . 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c00550 . 0743-7463.
  33. Sharma PR, Varma AJ . October 2013 . Functional nanoparticles obtained from cellulose: engineering the shape and size of 6-carboxycellulose . Chemical Communications . 49 . 78 . 8818–8820 . 10.1039/c3cc44551h . 23959448.
  34. Chinga-Carrasco G, Yu Y, Diserud O . Quantitative electron microscopy of cellulose nanofibril structures from Eucalyptus and Pinus radiata kraft pulp fibers . Microscopy and Microanalysis . 17 . 4 . 563–571 . August 2011 . 21740618 . 10.1017/S1431927611000444 . 2011MiMic..17..563C . 2010930.
  35. Book: Chinga-Carrasco G, Miettinen A, Luengo Hendriks CL, Gamstedt EK, Kataja M. Structural Characterisation of Kraft Pulp Fibres and Their Nanofibrillated Materials for Biodegradable Composite Applications. 2011. InTech. 978-953-307-352-1.
  36. Chinga-Carrasco G . Cellulose fibres, nanofibrils and microfibrils: The morphological sequence of MFC components from a plant physiology and fibre technology point of view . Nanoscale Research Letters . 6 . 1 . 417 . June 2011 . 21711944 . 3211513 . 10.1186/1556-276X-6-417 . 2011NRL.....6..417C . free.
  37. Li Q, Renneckar S . Supramolecular structure characterization of molecularly thin cellulose I nanoparticles . Biomacromolecules . 12 . 3 . 650–659 . March 2011 . 21210665 . 10.1021/bm101315y.
  38. Chinga-Carrasco G, Syverud K . On the structure and oxygen transmission rate of biodegradable cellulose nanobarriers . Nanoscale Research Letters . 7 . 1 . 192 . March 2012 . 22429336 . 3324384 . 10.1186/1556-276X-7-192 . 2012NRL.....7..192C . free.
  39. Mohan T, Niegelhell K, Zarth CS, Kargl R, Köstler S, Ribitsch V, Heinze T, Spirk S, Stana-Kleinschek K . Triggering protein adsorption on tailored cationic cellulose surfaces . Biomacromolecules . 15 . 11 . 3931–3941 . November 2014 . 25233035 . 10.1021/bm500997s.
  40. Vuoriluoto M, Orelma H, Johansson LS, Zhu B, Poutanen M, Walther A, Laine J, Rojas OJ . Effect of Molecular Architecture of PDMAEMA-POEGMA Random and Block Copolymers on Their Adsorption on Regenerated and Anionic Nanocelluloses and Evidence of Interfacial Water Expulsion . The Journal of Physical Chemistry B . 119 . 49 . 15275–15286 . December 2015 . 26560798 . 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b07628.
  41. Revol JF, Bradford H, Giasson J, Marchessault RH, Gray DG . Helicoidal self-ordering of cellulose microfibrils in aqueous suspension . International Journal of Biological Macromolecules . 14 . 3 . 170–172 . June 1992 . 1390450 . 10.1016/S0141-8130(05)80008-X.
  42. Nyström G, Arcari M, Adamcik J, Usov I, Mezzenga R . Nanocellulose Fragmentation Mechanisms and Inversion of Chirality from the Single Particle to the Cholesteric Phase . ACS Nano . 12 . 6 . 5141–5148 . June 2018 . 29758157 . 10.1021/acsnano.8b00512 . 1705.06620 . 29165853.
  43. Nordenström M, Fall A, Nyström G, Wågberg L . Formation of Colloidal Nanocellulose Glasses and Gels . Langmuir . 33 . 38 . 9772–9780 . September 2017 . 28853581 . 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b01832.
  44. Bertsch P, Isabettini S, Fischer P . Ion-Induced Hydrogel Formation and Nematic Ordering of Nanocrystalline Cellulose Suspensions . Biomacromolecules . 18 . 12 . 4060–4066 . December 2017 . 29028331 . 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b01119.
  45. Bertsch P, Schneider L, Bovone G, Tibbitt MW, Fischer P, Gstöhl S . Injectable Biocompatible Hydrogels from Cellulose Nanocrystals for Locally Targeted Sustained Drug Release . ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces . 11 . 42 . 38578–38585 . October 2019 . 31573787 . 10.1021/acsami.9b15896 . 203638916.
  46. Siqueira G, Kokkinis D, Libanori R, Hausmann MK, Gladman AS, Neels A, Tingaut P, Zimmermann T, Lewis JA, Studart AR . Cellulose Nanocrystal Inks for 3D Printing of Textured Cellular Architectures . Advanced Functional Materials . March 2017 . 27 . 12 . 1604619 . 10.1002/adfm.201604619. 33952694 .
  47. Olsson RT, Azizi Samir MA, Salazar-Alvarez G, Belova L, Ström V, Berglund LA, Ikkala O, Nogués J, Gedde UW . Making flexible magnetic aerogels and stiff magnetic nanopaper using cellulose nanofibrils as templates . Nature Nanotechnology . 5 . 8 . 584–588 . August 2010 . 20676090 . 10.1038/nnano.2010.155 . 2010NatNa...5..584O.
  48. Kalashnikova I, Bizot H, Cathala B, Capron I . New Pickering emulsions stabilized by bacterial cellulose nanocrystals . Langmuir . 27 . 12 . 7471–7479 . June 2011 . 21604688 . 10.1021/la200971f.
  49. Kalashnikova I, Bizot H, Bertoncini P, Cathala B, Capron I . Cellulosic nanorods of various aspect ratios for oil in water Pickering emulsions . Soft Matter . 2013 . 9 . 3 . 952–959 . 10.1039/C2SM26472B . 2013SMat....9..952K.
  50. Bergfreund J, Sun Q, Fischer P, Bertsch P . Adsorption of charged anisotropic nanoparticles at oil-water interfaces . Nanoscale Advances . 1 . 11 . 4308–4312 . November 2019 . 36134395 . 9419606 . 10.1039/C9NA00506D . free . 2019NanoA...1.4308B.
  51. Bai L, Lv S, Xiang W, Huan S, McClements DJ, Rojas OJ . Oil-in-water Pickering emulsions via microfluidization with cellulose nanocrystals: 1. Formation and stability . Food Hydrocolloids . November 2019 . 96 . 699–708 . 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.04.038 . free.
  52. Scheuble N, Schaffner J, Schumacher M, Windhab EJ, Liu D, Parker H, Steingoetter A, Fischer P . Tailoring Emulsions for Controlled Lipid Release: Establishing in vitro-in Vivo Correlation for Digestion of Lipids . ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces . 10 . 21 . 17571–17581 . May 2018 . 29708724 . 10.1021/acsami.8b02637.
  53. Bertsch P, Steingoetter A, Arnold M, Scheuble N, Bergfreund J, Fedele S, Liu D, Parker HL, Langhans W, Rehfeld JF, Fischer P . Lipid emulsion interfacial design modulates human in vivo digestion and satiation hormone response . Food & Function . 13 . 17 . 9010–9020 . August 2022 . 35942900 . 9426722 . 10.1039/D2FO01247B . free . free . 20.500.11850/564599.
  54. Bertsch P, Arcari M, Geue T, Mezzenga R, Nyström G, Fischer P . Designing Cellulose Nanofibrils for Stabilization of Fluid Interfaces . Biomacromolecules . 20 . 12 . 4574–4580 . December 2019 . 31714073 . 10.1021/acs.biomac.9b01384 . 207943524.
  55. Jin H, Zhou W, Cao J, Stoyanov SD, Blijdenstein TB, De Groot PW, Arnaudov LN, Pelan EG . Super stable foams stabilized by colloidal ethyl cellulose particles . Soft Matter . 2012 . 8 . 7 . 2194–2205 . 10.1039/c1sm06518a . 2012SMat....8.2194J.
  56. Lee KY, Blaker JJ, Murakami R, Heng JY, Bismarck A . Phase behavior of medium and high internal phase water-in-oil emulsions stabilized solely by hydrophobized bacterial cellulose nanofibrils . Langmuir . 30 . 2 . 452–460 . January 2014 . 24400918 . 10.1021/la4032514 . free.
  57. Saidane D, Perrin E, Cherhal F, Guellec F, Capron I . Some modification of cellulose nanocrystals for functional Pickering emulsions . Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences . 374 . 2072 . 20150139 . July 2016 . 27298429 . 4920285 . 10.1098/rsta.2015.0139 . 2016RSPTA.37450139S.
  58. Peddireddy KR, Nicolai T, Benyahia L, Capron I . Stabilization of Water-in-Water Emulsions by Nanorods . ACS Macro Letters . 5 . 3 . 283–286 . March 2016 . 35614722 . 10.1021/acsmacrolett.5b00953.
  59. Cao X, Zhang T, DeLoid GM, Gaffrey MJ, Weitz KK, Thrall BD, Qian WJ, Demokritou P . Cytotoxicity and cellular proteome impact of cellulose nanocrystals using simulated digestion and an in vitro small intestinal epithelium cellular model . NanoImpact . October 2020 . 20 . 100269 . 10.1016/j.impact.2020.100269 . free . 2020NanoI..2000269C.
  60. Mortensen NP, Moreno Caffaro M, Davis K, Aravamudhan S, Sumner SJ, Fennell TR . Investigation of eight cellulose nanomaterials' impact on Differentiated Caco-2 monolayer integrity and cytotoxicity . Food and Chemical Toxicology . 166 . 113204 . August 2022 . 35679974 . 10.1016/j.fct.2022.113204 . free.
  61. Lin YJ, Qin Z, Paton CM, Fox DM, Kong F . Influence of cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) on permeation through intestinal monolayer and mucus model in vitro . Carbohydrate Polymers . 263 . 117984 . July 2021 . 33858577 . 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117984 . free.
  62. DeLoid GM, Cao X, Molina RM, Silva DI, Bhattacharya K, Ng KW, Loo SC, Brain JD, Demokritou P . Toxicological effects of ingested nanocellulose in in vitro intestinal epithelium and in vivo rat models . Environmental Science: Nano . 6 . 7 . 2105–2115 . July 2019 . 32133146 . 7055654 . 10.1039/c9en00184k . free . 10356/150824.
  63. Ede JD, Ong KJ, Mulenos MR, Pradhan S, Gibb M, Sayes CM, Shatkin JA . Physical, chemical, and toxicological characterization of sulfated cellulose nanocrystals for food-related applications using in vivo and in vitro strategies . Toxicology Research . 9 . 6 . 808–822 . December 2020 . 33447365 . 7786165 . 10.1093/TOXRES/TFAA082.
  64. Khare S, DeLoid GM, Molina RM, Gokulan K, Couvillion SP, Bloodsworth KJ, Eder EK, Wong AR, Hoyt DW, Bramer LM, Metz TO, Thrall BD, Brain JD, Demokritou P . Effects of ingested nanocellulose on intestinal microbiota and homeostasis in Wistar Han rats . NanoImpact . 18 . 100216 . April 2020 . 32190784 . 7080203 . 10.1016/j.impact.2020.100216 . 2020NanoI..1800216K.
  65. Brown EE, Hu D, Abu Lail N, Zhang X . Potential of nanocrystalline cellulose-fibrin nanocomposites for artificial vascular graft applications . Biomacromolecules . 14 . 4 . 1063–1071 . April 2013 . 23421631 . 10.1021/bm3019467.
  66. Taipale T, Österberg M, Nykänen A, Ruokolainen J, Laine J . 137591806 . 2010 . Effect of microfibrillated cellulose and fines on the drainage of kraft pulp suspension and paper strength . Cellulose . 17 . 5. 1005–1020 . 10.1007/s10570-010-9431-9.
  67. Eriksen Ø, Syverud K, Gregersen ØW . 139009497 . 2008 . The use of microfibrillated cellulose produced from kraft pulp as strength enhancer in TMP paper . Nordic Pulp & Paper Research Journal. 23 . 3. 299–304 . 10.3183/npprj-2008-23-03-p299-304.
  68. Ahola S, Österberg M, Laine J . 136939100 . 2007 . Cellulose nanofibrils—adsorption with poly(amideamine) epichlorohydrin studied by QCM-D and application as a paper strength additive . Cellulose . 15 . 2. 303–314 . 10.1007/s10570-007-9167-3.
  69. Lavoine N, Desloges I, Dufresne A, Bras J . Microfibrillated cellulose - its barrier properties and applications in cellulosic materials: a review . Carbohydrate Polymers . 90 . 2 . 735–764 . October 2012 . 22839998 . 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.026.
  70. Missoum K, Martoïa F, Belgacem MN, Bras J . 2013 . Effect of chemically modified nanofibrillated cellulose addition on the properties of fiber-based materials . Industrial Crops and Products. 48 . 98–105 . 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.04.013.
  71. Mousavi SM, Bousfield D . 2016. Cellulose nanofibers with higher solid content as a coating material to improve structure and barrier properties of paperboard. TAPPI Conference Proceedings. 1–7.
  72. Beneventi D, Chaussy D, Curtil D, Zolin L, Gerbaldi C, Penazzi N . 2014-07-09. Highly Porous Paper Loading with Microfibrillated Cellulose by Spray Coating on Wet Substrates. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. en. 53. 27. 10982–10989. 10.1021/ie500955x. 0888-5885. free.
  73. Kinnunen-Raudaskoski K. Thin coatings for paper by foam coating. TAPPI Journal. 2014. 13. 7. 9–19. 10.32964/TJ13.7.9. free.
  74. Web site: Microfibrillated Cellulose in Barrier Coating Applications. October 2019. 27 January 2020.
  75. News: 17 October 2018. Threads of nanocellulose stronger than spider silk. 29 June 2020.
  76. Alves L, Ferraz E, Gamelas JA . Composites of nanofibrillated cellulose with clay minerals: A review . Advances in Colloid and Interface Science . 272 . 101994 . October 2019 . 31394436 . 10.1016/j.cis.2019.101994 . 199507603.
  77. Alves L, Ferraz E, Gamelas JA . 2015-08-05. Composite Films Based on Nanocellulose and Nanoclay Minerals as High Strength Materials with Gas Barrier Capabilities: Key Points and Challenges. BioResources. en. 10. 4. 6310–6313. 10.15376/biores.10.4.6310-6313. 1930-2126. free. 10400.26/38419. free.
  78. Gómez HC, Serpa A, Velásquez-Cock J, Gañán P, Castro C, Vélez L, Zuluaga R . 2016-06-01 . Vegetable nanocellulose in food science: A review . Food Hydrocolloids . en . 57 . 178–186 . 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.01.023 . 0268-005X.
  79. Xhanari K, Syverud K, Stenius P . 98317845. Emulsions stabilized by microfibrillated cellulose: the effect of hydrophobization, concentration and o/w ratio. Dispersion Science and Technology. 2011. 32. 3. 447–452. 10.1080/01932691003658942.
  80. Lif A, Stenstad P, Syverud K, Nydén M, Holmberg K . Fischer-Tropsch diesel emulsions stabilised by microfibrillated cellulose and nonionic surfactants . Journal of Colloid and Interface Science . 352 . 2 . 585–592 . December 2010 . 20864117 . 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.08.052 . 2010JCIS..352..585L.
  81. Syverud K, Kirsebom H, Hajizadeh S, Chinga-Carrasco G . Cross-linking cellulose nanofibrils for potential elastic cryo-structured gels . Nanoscale Research Letters . 6 . 1 . 626 . December 2011 . 22152032 . 3260332 . 10.1186/1556-276X-6-626 . 2011NRL.....6..626S . free.
  82. Book: Granberg H, Håkansson K, Fall A, Wågberg P . Electroactive papers, films, filaments, aerogels and hydrogels to realize the future of bio-based electronics. Indianapolis, USA . TAPPI Press. 5–8 May 2019. artikel-id PF4.1.
  83. Malti A, Edberg J, Granberg H, Khan ZU, Andreasen JW, Liu X, Zhao D, Zhang H, Yao Y, Brill JW, Engquist I, Fahlman M, Wågberg L, Crispin X, Berggren M . An Organic Mixed Ion-Electron Conductor for Power Electronics . Advanced Science . 3 . 2 . 1500305 . February 2016 . 27774392 . 5063141 . 10.1002/advs.201500305.
  84. Hamedi MM, Hajian A, Fall AB, Håkansson K, Salajkova M, Lundell F, Wågberg L, Berglund LA . Highly conducting, strong nanocomposites based on nanocellulose-assisted aqueous dispersions of single-wall carbon nanotubes . ACS Nano . 8 . 3 . 2467–2476 . March 2014 . 24512093 . 10.1021/nn4060368.
  85. Erlandsson J, López Durán V, Granberg H, Sandberg M, Larsson PA, Wågberg L . 2016-12-01. Macro- and mesoporous nanocellulose beads for use in energy storage devices. Applied Materials Today. en. 5. 246–254. 10.1016/j.apmt.2016.09.008. 2352-9407.
  86. Wu C, Wang AC, Ding W, Guo H, Wang ZL . 2019. Triboelectric Nanogenerator: A Foundation of the Energy for the New Era. Advanced Energy Materials. en. 9. 1. 1802906. 10.1002/aenm.201802906. 1614-6840. free. 2019AdEnM...902906W.
  87. Gray DG, Mu X . Chiral Nematic Structure of Cellulose Nanocrystal Suspensions and Films; Polarized Light and Atomic Force Microscopy . Materials . 8 . 11 . 7873–7888 . November 2015 . 28793684 . 5458898 . 10.3390/ma8115427 . free . 2015Mate....8.7873G.
  88. Toivonen MS, Onelli OD, Jacucci G, Lovikka V, Rojas OJ, Ikkala O, Vignolini S . Anomalous-Diffusion-Assisted Brightness in White Cellulose Nanofibril Membranes . Advanced Materials . 30 . 16 . e1704050 . April 2018 . 29532967 . 10.1002/adma.201704050 . free . 2018AdM....3004050T.
  89. WO . 2016174104 A1 . application . Modified bacterial nanocellulose and its uses in chip cards and medicine . 2016-11-03 . 2016-04-27 . 2015-04-27 . Dandekar T . Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg .
  90. Garner A . US . 9222174 . Corrosion inhibitor comprising cellulose nanocrystals and cellulose nanocrystals in combination with a corrosion inhibitor . 29 December 2015 . Nanohibitor Technology Inc..
  91. Garner A . US . 9359678 . Use of charged cellulose nanocrystals for corrosion inhibition and a corrosion inhibiting composition comprising the same . Nanohibitor Technology Inc. . 7 June 2016.
  92. Kokkonen M, Nelo M, Liimatainen H, Ukkola J, Tervo N, Myllymäki S, Juuti J, Jantunen H . Wood-based composite materials for ultralight lens antennas in 6G systems . Materials Advances . 7 February 2022 . 3 . 3 . 1687–1694 . 10.1039/D1MA00644D. 245723621 . free.