Mycorrhiza Explained

A mycorrhiza (;, mycorrhiza, or mycorrhizas)[1] is a symbiotic association between a fungus and a plant.[2] The term mycorrhiza refers to the role of the fungus in the plant's rhizosphere, the plant root system and its surroundings. Mycorrhizae play important roles in plant nutrition, soil biology, and soil chemistry.

In a mycorrhizal association, the fungus colonizes the host plant's root tissues, either intracellularly as in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, or extracellularly as in ectomycorrhizal fungi.[3] The association is normally mutualistic. In particular species, or in particular circumstances, mycorrhizae may have a parasitic association with host plants.[4]

Definition

A mycorrhiza is a symbiotic association between a green plant and a fungus. The plant makes organic molecules by photosynthesis and supplies them to the fungus in the form of sugars or lipids, while the fungus supplies the plant with water and mineral nutrients, such as phosphorus, taken from the soil. Mycorrhizas are located in the roots of vascular plants, but mycorrhiza-like associations also occur in bryophytes[5] and there is fossil evidence that early land plants that lacked roots formed arbuscular mycorrhizal associations. Most plant species form mycorrhizal associations, though some families like Brassicaceae and Chenopodiaceae cannot. Different forms for the association are detailed in the next section. The most common is the arbuscular type that is present in 70% of plant species, including many crop plants such as cereals and legumes.[6]

Evolution

Fossil and genetic evidence indicate that mycorrhizae are ancient, potentially as old as the terrestrialization of plants. Genetic evidence indicates that all land plants share a single common ancestor,[7] which appears to have quickly adopted mycorrhizal symbiosis, and research suggests that proto-mycorrhizal fungi were a key factor enabling plant terrestrialization.[8] The 400 million year old Rhynie chert contains an assemblage of fossil plants preserved in sufficient detail that arbuscular mycorrhizae have been observed in the stems of Aglaophyton major, giving a lower bound for how late mycorrhizal symbiosis may have developed. Ectomycorrhizae developed substantially later, during the Jurassic period, while most other modern mycorrhizal families, including orchid and erchoid mycorrhizae, date to the period of angiosperm radiation in the Cretaceous period.[9] There is genetic evidence that the symbiosis between legumes and nitrogen-fixing bacteria is an extension of mycorrhizal symbiosis.[10] The modern distribution of mycorrhizal fungi appears to reflect an increasing complexity and competition in root morphology associated with the dominance of angiosperms in the Cenozoic Era, characterized by complex ecological dynamics between species.[11]

Types

The mycorrhizal lifestyle has independently convergently evolved multiple times in the history of Earth.[12] There are multiple ways to categorize mycorrhizal symbiosis. One major categorization is the division between ectomycorrhizas and endomycorrhizas. The two types are differentiated by the fact that the hyphae of ectomycorrhizal fungi do not penetrate individual cells within the root, while the hyphae of endomycorrhizal fungi penetrate the cell wall and invaginate the cell membrane.[13] [14]

Similar symbiotic relationships

Some forms of plant-fungal symbiosis are similar to mycorrhizae, but considered distinct. One example is fungal endophytes. Endophytes are defined as organisms that can live within plant cells without causing harm to the plant. They are distinguishable from mycorrhizal fungi by the absence of nutrient-transferring structures for bringing in nutrients from outside the plant.[12] Some lineages of mycorrhizal fungi may have evolved from endophytes into mycorrhizal fungi,[15] and some fungi can live as mycorrhizae or as endophytes.

Ectomycorrhiza

See main article: Ectomycorrhiza.

Ectomycorrhizae are distinct in that they do not penetrate into plant cells, but instead form a structure called a Hartig net that penetrates between cells.[16] Ectomycorrhizas consist of a hyphal sheath, or mantle, covering the root tip and the Hartig net of hyphae surrounding the plant cells within the root cortex. In some cases the hyphae may also penetrate the plant cells, in which case the mycorrhiza is called an ectendomycorrhiza. Outside the root, ectomycorrhizal extramatrical mycelium forms an extensive network within the soil and leaf litter. Other forms of mycorrhizae, including arbuscular, ericoid, arbutoid, monotropoid, and orchid mycorrhizas, are considered endomycorrhizae.[17]

Ectomycorrhizas, or EcM, are symbiotic associations between the roots of around 10% of plant families, mostly woody plants including the birch, dipterocarp, eucalyptus, oak, pine, and rose families, orchids,[18] and fungi belonging to the Basidiomycota, Ascomycota, and Zygomycota. Ectomycorrhizae associate with relatively few plant species, only about 2% of plant species on Earth, but the species they associate with are mostly trees and woody plants that are highly dominant in their ecosystems, meaning plants in ectomycorrhizal relationships make up a large proportion of plant biomass.[19] Some EcM fungi, such as many Leccinum and Suillus, are symbiotic with only one particular genus of plant, while other fungi, such as the Amanita, are generalists that form mycorrhizas with many different plants. An individual tree may have 15 or more different fungal EcM partners at one time. While the diversity of plants involved in EcM is low, the diversity of fungi involved in EcM is high. Thousands of ectomycorrhizal fungal species exist, hosted in over 200 genera. A recent study has conservatively estimated global ectomycorrhizal fungal species richness at approximately 7750 species, although, on the basis of estimates of knowns and unknowns in macromycete diversity, a final estimate of ECM species richness would probably be between 20,000 and 25,000.[20] Ectomycorrhizal fungi evolved independently from saprotrophic ancestors many times in the group's history.[21]

Nutrients can be shown to move between different plants through the fungal network. Carbon has been shown to move from paper birch seedlings into adjacent Douglas-fir seedlings, although not conclusively through a common mycorrhizal network,[22] thereby promoting succession in ecosystems.[23] The ectomycorrhizal fungus Laccaria bicolor has been found to lure and kill springtails to obtain nitrogen, some of which may then be transferred to the mycorrhizal host plant. In a study by Klironomos and Hart, Eastern White Pine inoculated with L. bicolor was able to derive up to 25% of its nitrogen from springtails.[24] [25] When compared with non-mycorrhizal fine roots, ectomycorrhizae may contain very high concentrations of trace elements, including toxic metals (cadmium, silver) or chlorine.[26]

The first genomic sequence for a representative of symbiotic fungi, the ectomycorrhizal basidiomycete L. bicolor, was published in 2008.[27] An expansion of several multigene families occurred in this fungus, suggesting that adaptation to symbiosis proceeded by gene duplication. Within lineage-specific genes those coding for symbiosis-regulated secreted proteins showed an up-regulated expression in ectomycorrhizal root tips suggesting a role in the partner communication. L. bicolor is lacking enzymes involved in the degradation of plant cell wall components (cellulose, hemicellulose, pectins and pectates), preventing the symbiont from degrading host cells during the root colonisation. By contrast, L. bicolor possesses expanded multigene families associated with hydrolysis of bacterial and microfauna polysaccharides and proteins. This genome analysis revealed the dual saprotrophic and biotrophic lifestyle of the mycorrhizal fungus that enables it to grow within both soil and living plant roots. Since then, the genomes of many other ectomycorrhizal fungal species have been sequenced further expanding the study of gene families and evolution in these organisms.[28]

Arbutoid mycorrhiza

This type of mycorrhiza involves plants of the Ericaceae subfamily Arbutoideae. It is however different from ericoid mycorrhiza and resembles ectomycorrhiza, both functionally and in terms of the fungi involved.[29] It differs from ectomycorrhiza in that some hyphae actually penetrate into the root cells, making this type of mycorrhiza an ectendomycorrhiza.[30]

Arbuscular mycorrhiza

See main article: Arbuscular mycorrhiza.

Arbuscular mycorrhizas, (formerly known as vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas), have hyphae that penetrate plant cells, producing branching, tree-like structures called arbuscules within the plant cells for nutrient exchange. Often, balloon-like storage structures, termed vesicles, are also produced. In this interaction, fungal hyphae do not in fact penetrate the protoplast (i.e. the interior of the cell), but invaginate the cell membrane, creating a so-called peri-arbuscular membrane. The structure of the arbuscules greatly increases the contact surface area between the hypha and the host cell cytoplasm to facilitate the transfer of nutrients between them. Arbuscular mycorrhizas are obligate biotrophs, meaning that they depend upon the plant host for both growth and reproduction; they have lost the ability to sustain themselves by decomposing dead plant material.[31] Twenty percent of the photosynthetic products made by the plant host are consumed by the fungi, the transfer of carbon from the terrestrial host plant is then exchanged by equal amounts of phosphate from the fungi to the plant host.[32]

Contrasting with the pattern seen in ectomycorrhizae, the species diversity of AMFs is very low, but the diversity of plant hosts is very high; an estimated 78% of all plant species associate with AMFs.[19] Arbuscular mycorrhizas are formed only by fungi in the division Glomeromycota. Fossil evidence and DNA sequence analysis[33] suggest that this mutualism appeared 400-460 million years ago, when the first plants were colonizing land. Arbuscular mycorrhizas are found in 85% of all plant families, and occur in many crop species. The hyphae of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi produce the glycoprotein glomalin, which may be one of the major stores of carbon in the soil.[34] Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi have (possibly) been asexual for many millions of years and, unusually, individuals can contain many genetically different nuclei (a phenomenon called heterokaryosis).[35]

Mucoromycotina fine root endophytes

Mycorrhizal fungi belonging to Mucoromycotina, known as “fine root endophytes" (MFREs), were mistakenly identified as arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi until recently. While similar to AMF, MFREs are from subphylum Mucoromycotina instead of Glomeromycotina. Their morphology when colonizing a plant root is very similar to AMF, but they form fine textured hyphae.[16] Effects of MFREs may have been mistakenly attributed to AMFs due to confusion between the two, complicated by the fact that AMFs and MFREs often colonize the same hosts simultaneously. Unlike AMFs, they appear capable of surviving without a host. This group of mycorrhizal fungi is little understood, but appears to prefer wet, acidic soils and forms symbiotic relationships with liverworts, hornworts, lycophytes, and angiosperms.[36]

Ericoid mycorrhiza

See main article: Ericoid mycorrhiza.

Ericoid mycorrhizae, or ErMs, involve only plants in Ericales and are the most recently evolved of the major mycorrhizal relationships. Plants that form ericoid mycorrhizae are mostly woody understory shrubs; hosts include blueberries, bilberries, cranberries, mountain laurels, rhododendrons, heather, neinei, and giant grass tree. ErMs are most common in boreal forests, but are found in two-thirds of all forests on Earth.[19] Ericoid mycorrhizal fungi belong to several different lineages of fungi. Some species can live as endophytes entirely within plant cells even within plants outside the Ericales, or live independently as saprotrophs that decompose dead organic matter. This ability to switch between multiple lifestyle types makes ericoid mycorrhizal fungi very adaptable.[12]

Plants that participate in these symbioses have specialized roots with no root hairs, which are covered with a layer of epidermal cells that the fungus penetrates into and completely occupies.[16] The fungi have a simple intraradical (growth in cells) phase, consisting of dense coils of hyphae in the outermost layer of root cells. There is no periradical phase and the extraradical phase consists of sparse hyphae that don't extend very far into the surrounding soil. They might form sporocarps (probably in the form of small cups), but their reproductive biology is poorly understood.[14]

Plants participating in ericoid mycorrhizal symbioses are found in acidic, nutrient-poor conditions.[12] Whereas AMFs have lost their saprotrophic capabilities, and EcM fungi have significant variation in their ability to produce enzymes needed for a saprotrophic lifestyle,[19] fungi involved in ErMs have fully retained the ability to decompose plant material for sustenance. Some ericoid mycorrhizal fungi have actually expanded their repertoire of enzymes for breaking down organic matter. They can extract nitrogen from cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, pectin, and chitin. This would increase the benefit they can provide to their plant symbiotic partners.[37]

Orchid mycorrhiza

See main article: Orchid mycorrhiza.

All orchids are myco-heterotrophic at some stage during their lifecycle, meaning that they can survive only if they form orchid mycorrhizae. Orchid seeds are so small that they contain no nutrition to sustain the germinating seedling, and instead must gain the energy to grow from their fungal symbiont.[16] The OM relationship is asymmetric; the plant seems to benefit more than the fungus, and some orchids are entirely mycoheterotrophic, lacking chlorophyll for photosynthesis. It is actually unknown whether fully autotrophic orchids that do not receive some of their carbon from fungi exist or not.[38] Like fungi that form ErMs, OM fungi can sometimes live as endophytes or as independent saprotrophs. In the OM symbiosis, hyphae penetrate into the root cells and form pelotons (coils) for nutrient exchange.

Monotropoid mycorrhiza

See main article: Myco-heterotrophy.

This type of mycorrhiza occurs in the subfamily Monotropoideae of the Ericaceae, as well as several genera in the Orchidaceae. These plants are heterotrophic or mixotrophic and derive their carbon from the fungus partner. This is thus a non-mutualistic, parasitic type of mycorrhizal symbiosis.

Function

Mycorrhizal fungi form a mutualistic relationship with the roots of most plant species. In such a relationship, both the plants themselves and those parts of the roots that host the fungi, are said to be mycorrhizal. Relatively few of the mycorrhizal relationships between plant species and fungi have been examined to date, but 95% of the plant families investigated are predominantly mycorrhizal either in the sense that most of their species associate beneficially with mycorrhizae, or are absolutely dependent on mycorrhizae. The Orchidaceae are notorious as a family in which the absence of the correct mycorrhizae is fatal even to germinating seeds.[39]

Recent research into ectomycorrhizal plants in boreal forests has indicated that mycorrhizal fungi and plants have a relationship that may be more complex than simply mutualistic. This relationship was noted when mycorrhizal fungi were unexpectedly found to be hoarding nitrogen from plant roots in times of nitrogen scarcity. Researchers argue that some mycorrhizae distribute nutrients based upon the environment with surrounding plants and other mycorrhizae. They go on to explain how this updated model could explain why mycorrhizae do not alleviate plant nitrogen limitation, and why plants can switch abruptly from a mixed strategy with both mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal roots to a purely mycorrhizal strategy as soil nitrogen availability declines.[40] It has also been suggested that evolutionary and phylogenetic relationships can explain much more variation in the strength of mycorrhizal mutualisms than ecological factors.

Formation

To successfully engage in mutualistic symbiotic relationships with other organisms, such as mycorrhizal fungi and any of the thousands of microbes that colonize plants, plants must discriminate between mutualists and pathogens, allowing the mutualists to colonize while activating an immune response towards the pathogens. Plant genomes code for potentially hundreds of receptors for detecting chemical signals from other organisms. Plants dynamically adjust their symbiotic and immune responses, changing their interactions with their symbionts in response to feedbacks detected by the plant.[41] In plants, the mycorrhizal symbiosis is regulated by the common symbiosis signaling pathway (CSSP), a set of genes involved in initiating and maintaining colonization by endosymbiotic fungi and other endosymbionts such as Rhizobia in legumes. The CSSP has origins predating the colonization of land by plants, demonstrating that the co-evolution of plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi is over 500 million years old.[42] In arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, the presence of strigolactones, a plant hormone, secreted from roots induces fungal spores in the soil to germinate, stimulates their metabolism, growth and branching, and prompts the fungi to release chemical signals the plant can detect.[43] Once the plant and fungus recognize one another as suitable symbionts, the plant activates the common symbiotic signaling pathway, which causes changes in the root tissues that enable the fungus to colonize.[44]

Experiments with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi have identified numerous chemical compounds to be involved in the "chemical dialog" that occurs between the prospective symbionts before symbiosis is begun. In plants, almost all plant hormones play a role in initiating or regulating AMF symbiosis, and other chemical compounds are also suspected to have a signaling function. While the signals emitted by the fungi are less understood, it has been shown that chitinaceous molecules known as Myc factors are essential for the formation of arbuscular mycorrhizae. Signals from plants are detected by LysM-containing receptor-like kinases, or LysM-RLKs. AMF genomes also code for potentially hundreds of effector proteins, of which only a few have a proven effect on mycorrhizal symbiosis, but many others likely have a function in communication with plant hosts as well.[45]

Many factors are involved in the initiation of mycorrhizal symbiosis, but particularly influential is the plant's need for phosphorus. Experiments involving rice plants with a mutation disabling their ability to detect P starvation show that arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi detection, recruitment and colonization is prompted when the plant detects that it is starved of phosphorous.[46] Nitrogen starvation also plays a role in initiating AMF symbiosis.[47]

Mechanisms

The mechanisms by which mycorrhizae increase absorption include some that are physical and some that are chemical. Physically, most mycorrhizal mycelia are much smaller in diameter than the smallest root or root hair, and thus can explore soil material that roots and root hairs cannot reach, and provide a larger surface area for absorption. Chemically, the cell membrane chemistry of fungi differs from that of plants. For example, they may secrete organic acids that dissolve or chelate many ions, or release them from minerals by ion exchange.[48] Mycorrhizae are especially beneficial for the plant partner in nutrient-poor soils.[49]

Sugar-water/mineral exchange

The mycorrhizal mutualistic association provides the fungus with relatively constant and direct access to carbohydrates, such as glucose and sucrose.[50] The carbohydrates are translocated from their source (usually leaves) to root tissue and on to the plant's fungal partners. In return, the plant gains the benefits of the mycelium's higher absorptive capacity for water and mineral nutrients, partly because of the large surface area of fungal hyphae, which are much longer and finer than plant root hairs, and partly because some such fungi can mobilize soil minerals unavailable to the plants' roots. The effect is thus to improve the plant's mineral absorption capabilities.[51]

Unaided plant roots may be unable to take up nutrients that are chemically or physically immobilised; examples include phosphate ions and micronutrients such as iron. One form of such immobilization occurs in soil with high clay content, or soils with a strongly basic pH. The mycelium of the mycorrhizal fungus can, however, access many such nutrient sources, and make them available to the plants they colonize.[52] Thus, many plants are able to obtain phosphate without using soil as a source. Another form of immobilisation is when nutrients are locked up in organic matter that is slow to decay, such as wood, and some mycorrhizal fungi act directly as decay organisms, mobilising the nutrients and passing some onto the host plants; for example, in some dystrophic forests, large amounts of phosphate and other nutrients are taken up by mycorrhizal hyphae acting directly on leaf litter, bypassing the need for soil uptake.[53] Inga alley cropping, an agroforestry technique proposed as an alternative to slash and burn rainforest destruction,[54] relies upon mycorrhiza within the root system of species of Inga to prevent the rain from washing phosphorus out of the soil.[55]

In some more complex relationships, mycorrhizal fungi do not just collect immobilised soil nutrients, but connect individual plants together by mycorrhizal networks that transport water, carbon, and other nutrients directly from plant to plant through underground hyphal networks.[56]

Suillus tomentosus, a basidiomycete fungus, produces specialized structures known as tuberculate ectomycorrhizae with its plant host lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia). These structures have been shown to host nitrogen fixing bacteria which contribute a significant amount of nitrogen and allow the pines to colonize nutrient-poor sites.

Disease, drought and salinity resistance and its correlation to mycorrhizae

Mycorrhizal plants are often more resistant to diseases, such as those caused by microbial soil-borne pathogens. These associations have been found to assist in plant defense both above and belowground. Mycorrhizas have been found to excrete enzymes that are toxic to soil borne organisms such as nematodes.[57] More recent studies have shown that mycorrhizal associations result in a priming effect of plants that essentially acts as a primary immune response. When this association is formed a defense response is activated similarly to the response that occurs when the plant is under attack. As a result of this inoculation, defense responses are stronger in plants with mycorrhizal associations.[58] Ecosystem services provided by mycorrhizal fungi may depend on the soil microbiome.[59] Furthermore, mycorrhizal fungi was significantly correlated with soil physical variable, but only with water level and not with aggregate stability[60] [61] and can lead also to more resistant to the effects of drought.[62] [63] [64] Moreover, the significance of mycorrhizal fungi also includes alleviation of salt stress and its beneficial effects on plant growth and productivity. Although salinity can negatively affect mycorrhizal fungi, many reports show improved growth and performance of mycorrhizal plants under salt stress conditions.[65]

Resistance to insects

Plants connected by mycorrhizal fungi in mycorrhizal networks can use these underground connections to communicate warning signals.[66] [67] For example, when a host plant is attacked by an aphid, the plant signals surrounding connected plants of its condition. Both the host plant and those connected to it release volatile organic compounds that repel aphids and attract parasitoid wasps, predators of aphids. This assists the mycorrhizal fungi by conserving its food supply.

Colonization of barren soil

Plants grown in sterile soils and growth media often perform poorly without the addition of spores or hyphae of mycorrhizal fungi to colonise the plant roots and aid in the uptake of soil mineral nutrients.[68] The absence of mycorrhizal fungi can also slow plant growth in early succession or on degraded landscapes.[69] The introduction of alien mycorrhizal plants to nutrient-deficient ecosystems puts indigenous non-mycorrhizal plants at a competitive disadvantage.[70] This aptitude to colonize barren soil is defined by the category Oligotroph.

Resistance to toxicity

Fungi have a protective role for plants rooted in soils with high metal concentrations, such as acidic and contaminated soils. Pine trees inoculated with Pisolithus tinctorius planted in several contaminated sites displayed high tolerance to the prevailing contaminant, survivorship and growth. One study discovered the existence of Suillus luteus strains with varying tolerance of zinc. Another study discovered that zinc-tolerant strains of Suillus bovinus conferred resistance to plants of Pinus sylvestris. This was probably due to binding of the metal to the extramatricial mycelium of the fungus, without affecting the exchange of beneficial substances.[70]

Occurrence of mycorrhizal associations

Mycorrhizas are present in 92% of plant families studied (80% of species),[71] with arbuscular mycorrhizas being the ancestral and predominant form, and the most prevalent symbiotic association found in the plant kingdom. The structure of arbuscular mycorrhizas has been highly conserved since their first appearance in the fossil record,[72] with both the development of ectomycorrhizas, and the loss of mycorrhizas, evolving convergently on multiple occasions.

Associations of fungi with the roots of plants have been known since at least the mid-19th century. However early observers simply recorded the fact without investigating the relationships between the two organisms.[73] This symbiosis was studied and described by Franciszek Kamieński in 1879–1882.[74] [75]

Climate change

CO2 released by human activities is causing climate change and possible damage to mycorrhizae, but the direct effect of an increase in the gas should be to benefit plants and mycorrhizae.[76] In Arctic regions, nitrogen and water are harder for plants to obtain, making mycorrhizae crucial to plant growth.[77] Since mycorrhizae tend to do better in cooler temperatures, warming could be detrimental to them.[78] Gases such as SO2, NO-x, and O3 produced by human activity may harm mycorrhizae, causing reduction in "propagules, the colonization of roots, degradation in connections between trees, reduction in the mycorrhizal incidence in trees, and reduction in the enzyme activity of ectomycorrhizal roots."[79]

Conservation and mapping

In 2021 the Society for the Protection of Underground Networks was launched. SPUN is a science-based initiative to map and protect the mycorrhizal networks that regulate the Earth’s climate and ecosystems. The stated goals of SPUN are mapping, protecting, and harnessing mycorrhizal fungi.

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Deacon . Jim . The Microbial World: Mycorrhizas . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20180427082137/http://archive.bio.ed.ac.uk/jdeacon/microbes/mycorrh.htm . 2018-04-27 . 11 January 2019 . bio.ed.ac.uk (archived).
  2. Book: Kirk . P. M. . P. F. . Cannon . J. C. . David . J. . Stalpers . 2001 . Ainsworth and Bisby's Dictionary of the Fungi . 9th . CAB International . Wallingford, UK .
  3. Book: Arbuscular Mycorrhizas and Stress Tolerance of Plants . Springer Singapore . 2017 . 978-981-10-4115-0 . Wu . Qiang-Sheng . 1st . 1 . en . 10.1007/978-981-10-4115-0.
  4. Johnson . N. C. . Graham . J. H. . Smith . F. A. . Functioning of mycorrhizal associations along the mutualism–parasitism continuum . . 1997 . 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1997.00729.x . 135 . 4 . 575–585. 42871574 . free .
  5. 2005 . I. . Kottke . M. . Nebel . The evolution of mycorrhiza-like associations in liverworts: An update . New Phytologist . 167 . 2 . 330–334 . 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01471.x . 15998388. free .
  6. Book: Fortin . J. André . etal . Les Mycorhizes . 2015 . Inra . Versaillles . 978-2-7592-2433-3 . 10 . second.
  7. Harris . Brogan J. . Clark . James W. . Schrempf . Dominik . Szöllősi . Gergely J. . Donoghue . Philip C. J. . Hetherington . Alistair M. . Williams . Tom A. . 2022-09-29 . Divergent evolutionary trajectories of bryophytes and tracheophytes from a complex common ancestor of land plants . Nature Ecology & Evolution . 6 . 11 . 1634–1643 . 10.1038/s41559-022-01885-x . 9630106 . 36175544. 2022NatEE...6.1634H .
  8. Puginier . Camille . Keller . Jean . Delaux . Pierre-Marc . 2022-08-29 . Plant–microbe interactions that have impacted plant terrestrializations . Plant Physiology . 190 . 1 . 72–84 . 10.1093/plphys/kiac258 . 35642902 . 9434271 .
  9. Miyauchi . Shingo . Kiss . Enikő . Kuo . Alan . Drula . Elodie . Kohler . Annegret . Sánchez-García . Marisol . Morin . Emmanuelle . Andreopoulos . Bill . Barry . Kerrie W. . Bonito . Gregory . Buée . Marc . Carver . Akiko . Chen . Cindy . Cichocki . Nicolas . Clum . Alicia . 3 . 2020 . Large-scale genome sequencing of mycorrhizal fungi provides insights into the early evolution of symbiotic traits . Nature Communications . 11 . 1 . 5125 . 10.1038/s41467-020-18795-w . 7550596 . 33046698 . 2020NatCo..11.5125M.
  10. Provorov . N. A. . Shtark . O. Yu . Dolgikh . E. A. . 2016 . [Evolution of nitrogen-fixing symbioses based on the migration of bacteria from mycorrhizal fungi and soil into the plant tissues] ]. Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii . 77 . 5 . 329–345 . 30024143.
  11. Brundrett . Mark C. . Tedersoo . Leho . 2018 . Evolutionary history of mycorrhizal symbioses and global host plant diversity . New Phytologist . 220 . 4 . 1108–1115 . 10.1111/nph.14976 . 29355963 . free .
  12. Perotto . Silvia . Daghino . Stefania . Martino . Elena . Ericoid mycorrhizal fungi and their genomes: another side to the mycorrhizal symbiosis? . New Phytologist . 2018 . 220 . 4.
  13. Harley, J. L.; Smith, S. E. 1983. Mycorrhizal symbiosis (1st ed.). Academic Press, London.
  14. Allen, Michael F. 1991. The ecology of mycorrhizae. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  15. Selosse . Marc-Andre . Petroli . Remi . Mujica . Maria . Laurent . Liam . Perez-Lamarque . Benoit . Figura . Tomas . Bourceret . Amelia . Jaquemyn . Hans . Li . Taiqiang . Gao . Jiangyun . Minasiewicz . Julita . Martos . Florent . The Waiting Room Hypothesis revisited by orchids: were orchid mycorrhizal fungi recruited among root endophytes? . Annals of Botany . 2021 . 129 . 3.
  16. Howard . Nathan . Pressel . Silvia . Kaye . Ryan S. . Daniell . Tim J. . Field . Katie J. . The potential role of Mucoromycotina ‘fine root endophytes’ in plant nitrogen nutrition . Physiologia Plantarum . 2022 . 174 . 3.
  17. Book: Peterson . R. L. . H. B. . Massicotte . amp . L. H. . Melville . 2004 . Mycorrhizas: anatomy and cell biology . National Research Council Research Press . 978-0-660-19087-7 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20071225163327/http://pubs.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/eng/books/books/9780660190877.html . 2007-12-25 .
  18. Web site: Orchids and fungi: An unexpected case of symbiosis . July 12, 2011 . American Journal of Botany . 24 July 2012 . https://web.archive.org/web/20110715013341/http://esciencenews.com/articles/2011/07/12/orchids.and.fungi.an.unexpected.case.symbiosis . 2011-07-15 . live .
  19. Ward . Elisabeth B. . Duguid . Marlyse C. . Kuebbing . Sara E. . Lendemer . James C. . Bradford . Mark A. . The functional role of ericoid mycorrhizal plants and fungi on carbon and nitrogen dynamics in forests . New Phytologist . 2022 . 235 . 5.
  20. Rinaldi . A. C. . Comandini . O. . Kuyper . T. W. . 2008 . Ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity: separating the wheat from the chaff . Fungal Diversity . 33 . 1–45 . 2011-05-23 . https://web.archive.org/web/20110724163606/http://www.fungaldiversity.org/fdp/sfdp/33-1.pdf . 2011-07-24 . live .
  21. Martin . Francis M. . van der Heijden . Marcel G. A. . The mycorrhizal symbiosis: research frontiers in genomics, ecology, and agricultural application . New Phytologist . 2024 . 242 . 4.
  22. Karst . Justine . Jones . Melanie D. . Hoeksema . Jason D. . 2023-02-13 . Positive citation bias and overinterpreted results lead to misinformation on common mycorrhizal networks in forests . Nature Ecology & Evolution . en . 7 . 4 . 501–511 . 10.1038/s41559-023-01986-1 . 36782032 . 2023NatEE...7..501K . 256845005 . 2397-334X.
  23. Simard . Suzanne W. . Perry . David A. . Jones . Melanie D. . Myrold . David D. . Durall . Daniel M. . Molina . Randy . amp . Net transfer of carbon between ectomycorrhizal tree species in the field . Nature . 388 . 6642 . 1997 . 579–582 . 10.1038/41557 . 1997Natur.388..579S . 4423207 . free .
  24. https://archive.today/20120710035451/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1200/is_14_159/ai_104730213/ Fungi kill insects and feed host plants
  25. Klironomos . J. N. . Hart . M. M. . 2001 . Animal nitrogen swap for plant carbon . Nature . 410 . 6829 . 651–652 . 10.1038/35070643 . 11287942 . 2001Natur.410..651K . 4418192 .
  26. Cejpková . J. . Gryndler . M. . Hršelová . H. . Kotrba . P. . Řanda . Z. . Greňová . I. . Borovička . J. . Bioaccumulation of heavy metals, metalloids, and chlorine in ectomycorrhizae from smelter-polluted area . Environmental Pollution . 218 . 176–185 . 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.08.009 . 27569718 . 2016. 2016EPoll.218..176C .
  27. Martin . F. . 2008 . The genome of Laccaria bicolor provides insights into mycorrhizal symbiosis . 10.1038/nature06556 . Nature . 452 . 7183 . 88–92 . 18322534 . A. . Ahrén . D. . Brun . A. . Danchin . E. G. J. . Duchaussoy . F. . Gibon . J. . Kohler . A. . Lindquist . E. . 2 . Aerts . 2008Natur.452...88M . free .
  28. Miyauchi . Shingo . Kiss . Enikő . Kuo . Alan . Drula . Elodie . Kohler . Annegret . Sánchez-García . Marisol . Morin . Emmanuelle . Andreopoulos . Bill . Barry . Kerrie W. . Bonito . Gregory . Buée . Marc . Carver . Akiko . Chen . Cindy . Cichocki . Nicolas . Clum . Alicia . 2020-10-12 . Large-scale genome sequencing of mycorrhizal fungi provides insights into the early evolution of symbiotic traits . Nature Communications . en . 11 . 1 . 5125 . 10.1038/s41467-020-18795-w . 2041-1723 . 7550596 . 33046698. 2020NatCo..11.5125M .
  29. Brundrett . Mark . Diversity and classification of mycorrhizal associations . Biological Reviews . Wiley . 79 . 3 . 2004 . 1464-7931 . 10.1017/s1464793103006316 . 473–495. 15366760 . 33371246 .
  30. News: Some plants may depend more on friendly fungi than own leaves: Study . Business Standard . 20 October 2019 . Press Trust of India .
  31. Lanfranco . Luisa . Bonfante . Paola . Genre . Andrea . 2016-12-23 . Heitman . Joseph . Howlett . Barbara J. . The Mutualistic Interaction between Plants and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi . Microbiology Spectrum . en . 4 . 6 . 4.6.14 . 10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0012-2016 . 28087942 . 2318/1627235 . 2165-0497. free .
  32. Kiers . E. Toby . Duhamel . Marie . Beesetty . Yugandhar . Mensah . Jerry A. . Franken . Oscar . Verbruggen . Erik . Fellbaum . Carl R. . Kowalchuk . George A. . Hart . Miranda M. . Bago . Alberto . Palmer . Todd M. . West . Stuart A. . Vandenkoornhuyse . Philippe . Jansa . Jan . Bücking . Heike . 2011-08-12 . Reciprocal Rewards Stabilize Cooperation in the Mycorrhizal Symbiosis . Science . en . 333 . 6044 . 880–882 . 10.1126/science.1208473 . 21836016 . 2011Sci...333..880K . 44812991 . 0036-8075.
  33. Simon . L. . Bousquet . J. . Lévesque . R. C. . Lalonde . M. . 1993 . Origin and diversification of endomycorrhizal fungi and coincidence with vascular land plants . Nature . 363 . 6424 . 67–69 . 10.1038/363067a0 . 1993Natur.363...67S . 4319766 .
  34. Web site: Plants and fungi together could slow climate change . International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis . 2019-11-07 . phys.org -us . 2019-11-12.
  35. Hijri . M. . Sanders . I. R. . 2005 . Low gene copy number shows that arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inherit genetically different nuclei . 10.1038/nature03069 . Nature . 433 . 7022 . 160–163 . 15650740 . 2005Natur.433..160H . 4416663 .
  36. Prout . James N. . Williams . Alex . Wanke . Alan . Schornack . Sebastian . Ton . Jurriaan . Field . Katie J. . Mucoromycotina ‘fine root endophytes’: a new molecular model for plant–fungal mutualisms? . Trends in Plant Science . 2023 . 29 . 6.
  37. Read . D. J. . amp . J. . Perez-Moreno . Mycorrhizas and nutrient cycling in ecosystems—a journey towards relevance? . New Phytologist . 2003 . 157 . 3 . 475–492 . 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00704.x . 33873410 . free .
  38. Li . Taiqiang . Yang . Wenke . Wu . Shimao . Selosse . Marc-Andre . Gao . Jiangyun . Progress and Prospects of Mycorrhizal Fungal Diversity in Orchids . Frontiers in Plant Science . 2021 . 12.
  39. Book: Trappe, J. M. . 1987 . Phylogenetic and ecologic aspects of mycotrophy in the angiosperms from an evolutionary standpoint . Ecophysiology of VA Mycorrhizal Plants . Safir . G. R. . CRC Press . Florida .
  40. Franklin . O. . Näsholm . T. . Högberg . P. . Högberg . M. N. . Forests trapped in nitrogen limitation - an ecological market perspective on ectomycorrhizal symbiosis . New Phytologist . 2014 . 203 . 2 . 657–666 . 24824576 . 10.1111/nph.12840 . 4199275.
  41. Thoms . David . Liang . Yan . Haney . Cara H. . Maintaining Symbiotic Homeostasis: How Do Plants Engage With Beneficial Microorganisms While at the Same Time Restricting Pathogens? . International Society for Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions . 2021 . 34 . 5.
  42. Martin . Francis M. . van der Heijden . Marcel G. A. . The mycorrhizal symbiosis: research frontiers in genomics, ecology, and agricultural application . New Phytologist . 2024 . 242 . 4.
  43. Ho-Plagaro . Tania . Garcia-Garrido . Jose Manuel . Molecular Regulation of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis . International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 2022 . 23 . 11.
  44. Nasir . Fahad . Bahadur . Ali . Lin . Xiaolong . Gao . Yingzhi . Tian . Chunjie . Novel insights into host receptors and receptor-mediated signaling that regulate arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis . Journal of Experimental Botany . 2021 . 72 . 5.
  45. Ho-Plagaro . Tania . Garcia-Garrido . Jose Manuel . Molecular Regulation of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis . International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 2022 . 23 . 11.
  46. Prout . James N. . Williams . Alex . Wanke . Alan . Schornack . Sebastian . Ton . Jurriaan . Field . Katie J. . Mucoromycotina ‘fine root endophytes’: a new molecular model for plant–fungal mutualisms? . Trends in Plant Science . 2023 . 29 . 6.
  47. Ho-Plagaro . Tania . Garcia-Garrido . Jose Manuel . Molecular Regulation of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis . International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 2022 . 23 . 11.
  48. Book: Overview of Mycorrhizal Symbioses . Principles and Applications of Soil Microbiology . 978-0-13-094117-6 . http://cropsoil.psu.edu/sylvia/mycorrhiza.htm . https://web.archive.org/web/20100623051447/http://cropsoil.psu.edu/sylvia/mycorrhiza.htm. June 23, 2010. Sylvia . David M. . Fuhrmann . Jeffry J. . Hartel . Peter G. . Zuberer . David A. . 2005 . Pearson Prentice Hall .
  49. Web site: Botany online: Interactions - Plants - Fungi - Parasitic and Symbiotic Relations - Mycorrhiza . Biologie.uni-hamburg.de . 2010-09-30 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20110606050759/http://www.biologie.uni-hamburg.de/b-online/e33/33b.htm . 2011-06-06 .
  50. Harrison . M. J. . 2005 . Signaling in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis . Annu Rev Microbiol . 59 . 19–42 . 16153162 . 10.1146/annurev.micro.58.030603.123749.
  51. Selosse . M. A. . Richard . F. . He . X. . Simard . S. W. . 2006 . Mycorrhizal networks: des liaisons dangereuses? . Trends in Ecology and Evolution . 21 . 621–628 . 16843567 . 10.1016/j.tree.2006.07.003 . 11. 2006TEcoE..21..621S .
  52. Li . H. . Smith . S. E. . Holloway . R. E. . Zhu . Y. . Smith . F. A. . 2006 . Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi contribute to phosphorus uptake by wheat grown in a phosphorus-fixing soil even in the absence of positive growth responses . New Phytologist . 172 . 536–543 . 17083683 . 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01846.x . 3 . free.
  53. Book: Hogan, C.M. . 2011 . http://www.eoearth.org/article/Phosphate?topic=49557 . Phosphate . Encyclopedia of Earth . Jorgensen, A. . Cleveland, C.J. . National Council for Science and the Environment. . Washington DC . https://web.archive.org/web/20121025180158/http://www.eoearth.org/article/Phosphate?topic=49557 . 2012-10-25 .
  54. Web site: Elkan . D. . Slash-and-burn farming has become a major threat to the world's rainforest . . 21 April 2004 .
  55. Web site: rainforestsaver.org . What is Inga alley cropping? . https://web.archive.org/web/20111101062913/http://www.rainforestsaver.org/what-is-it-all-about/what-is-inga-alley-cropping . 2011-11-01 .
  56. Simard . S.W. . Beiler, K.J. . Bingham, M.A. . Deslippe, J.R. . Philip, L.J. . Teste, F.P. . Mycorrhizal networks: mechanisms, ecology and modelling. . Fungal Biology Reviews . April 2012 . 26 . 1 . 39–60 . 10.1016/j.fbr.2012.01.001 . 2012FunBR..26...39S .
  57. Azcón-Aguilar . C. . Barea . J. M. . Arbuscular mycorrhizas and biological control of soil-borne plant pathogens – an overview of the mechanisms involved . Mycorrhiza . 29 October 1996 . 6 . 6 . 457–464 . 10.1007/s005720050147 . 25190159.
  58. Jung . Sabine C. . Martinez-Medina . Ainhoa . Lopez-Raez . Juan A. . Pozo . Maria J. . Mycorrhiza-Induced Resistance and Priming of Plant Defenses . J Chem Ecol . 24 May 2012 . 38 . 6 . 651–664 . 10.1007/s10886-012-0134-6 . 22623151 . 2012JCEco..38..651J . 12918193. 10261/344431 . free .
  59. Svenningsen . Nanna B . Watts-Williams . Stephanie J . Joner . Erik J . Battini . Fabio . Efthymiou . Aikaterini . Cruz-Paredes . Carla . Nybroe . Ole . Jakobsen . Iver . Suppression of the activity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi by the soil microbiota . The ISME Journal . May 2018 . 12 . 5 . 1296–1307 . 10.1038/s41396-018-0059-3 . 29382946 . 5931975 . free . 2018ISMEJ..12.1296S .
  60. Book: 10.1007/1-4020-4447-X_10 . Disease Resistance in Plants Through Mycorrhizal Fungi Induced Allelochemicals . Allelochemicals: Biological Control of Plant Pathogens and Diseases . Disease Management of Fruits and Vegetables . 2006 . Zeng . Ren-Sen . 2 . 181–192 . 1-4020-4445-3 .
  61. Web site: Dr. Susan Kaminskyj: Endorhizal Fungi . Usask.ca . 2010-09-30 . https://web.archive.org/web/20101104000757/http://www.usask.ca/biology/kaminskyj/arctic.html . 2010-11-04 . dead .
  62. Web site: Dr. Davies Research Page . Aggie-horticulture.tamu.edu . 2010-09-30 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20101019002159/http://aggie-horticulture.tamu.edu/faculty/davies/research/mycorrhizae.html . 2010-10-19 .
  63. Lehto . Tarja . 1992 . Mycorrhizas and Drought Resistance of Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr. I. In Conditions of Nutrient Deficiency . New Phytologist . 122 . 4 . 661–668 . 2557434 . 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb00094.x . free .
  64. Nikolaou . N. . Angelopoulos . K. . Karagiannidis . N. . 2003 . Effects of Drought Stress on Mycorrhizal and Non-Mycorrhizal Cabernet Sauvignon Grapevine, Grafted Onto Various Rootstocks . Experimental Agriculture . 39 . 3 . 241–252 . 10.1017/S001447970300125X . 84997899 .
  65. Porcel . Rosa . Aroca . Ricardo . Ruiz-Lozano . Juan Manuel . Salinity stress alleviation using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. A review . Agronomy for Sustainable Development . January 2012 . 32 . 1 . 181–200 . 10.1007/s13593-011-0029-x . 8572482 .
  66. Babikova . Zdenka . Gilbert . Lucy . Bruce . Toby J. A. . Birkett . Michael . Caulfield . John C. . Woodcock . Christine . Pickett . John A. . Johnson . David . Underground signals carried through common mycelial networks warn neighbouring plants of aphid attack . Ecology Letters . July 2013 . 16 . 7 . 835–843 . 10.1111/ele.12115 . 23656527 . 2013EcolL..16..835B .
  67. Johnson . David . Gilbert . Lucy . Interplant signalling through hyphal networks . New Phytologist . March 2015 . 205 . 4 . 1448–1453 . 10.1111/nph.13115 . 25421970 . free .
  68. Web site: Root fungi turn rock into soil . Planet Earth Online . https://web.archive.org/web/20090713022313/http://planetearth.nerc.ac.uk/news/story.aspx?id=470 . 2009-07-13 . 3 July 2009 .
  69. Jeffries . Peter . Gianinazzi . Silvio . Perotto . Silvia . Turnau . Katarzyna . Barea . José-Miguel . The contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in sustainable maintenance of plant health and soil fertility . Biology and Fertility of Soils . January 2003 . 37 . 1 . 1–16 . 10.1007/s00374-002-0546-5 . 2003BioFS..37....1J . . 20792333 .
  70. Book: Richardson, David M. . Ecology and biogeography of Pinus . Cambridge University Press . London . 2000 . 336 . 978-0-521-78910-3.
  71. Wang . B. . Qiu . Y.-L. . Phylogenetic distribution and evolution of mycorrhizas in land plants . Mycorrhiza . July 2006 . 16 . 5 . 299–363 . 10.1007/s00572-005-0033-6 . 16845554 . 2006Mycor..16..299W . 30468942 .
  72. Remy . W. . Taylor . T. N. . Hass . H. . Kerp . H. . Four hundred-million-year-old vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizae. . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 6 December 1994 . 91 . 25 . 11841–11843 . 10.1073/pnas.91.25.11841 . 11607500 . 45331 . 1994PNAS...9111841R . free .
  73. Rayner . M. Cheveley . Obligate Symbiosis in Calluna vulgaris . Annals of Botany . 1915 . 29 . 113 . 97–134 . 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a089540 .
  74. Kamieński . Franciszek . 1882 . Les organes végétatifs de Monotropa hypopitys L.". . The vegetative organs of Monotropa hypopitys L. . French . Mémoires de la Société nat. Des Sciences naturelles et mathém. De Cherbourg . 3 . 24 . . Berch . S. M. . Massicotte . H. B. . Tackaberry . L. E. . Re-publication of a translation of 'The vegetative organs of Monotropa hypopitys L.' published by F. Kamienski in 1882, with an update on Monotropa mycorrhizas . Mycorrhiza . 15 . 5 . 323–32 . July 2005 . 15549481 . 10.1007/s00572-004-0334-1 . 2005Mycor..15..323B . 3162281 .
  75. Kamieński . Franciszek . 1885 . Über die auf Wurzelsymbiose beruhende Ernährung gewisser Bäume durch unterirdische Pilze . On the nourishing, via root symbiosis, of certain trees by underground fungi. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft . 3 . 128–145 . de. From p. 129: "Der ganze Körper ist also weder Baumwurzel noch Pilz allein, sondern ähnlich wie der Thallus der Flechten, eine Vereinigung zweier verschiedener Wesen zu einem einheitlichen morphologischen Organ, welches vielleicht passend als Pilzwurzel, Mycorhiza bezeichnet werden kann." (The whole body is thus neither tree root nor fungus alone, but similar to the thallus of lichens, a union of two different organisms into a single morphological organ, which can be aptly designated as a "fungus root", a mycorrhiza.)
  76. Monz . C. A. . Hunt . H. W. . Reeves . F. B. . Elliott . E. T. . The response of mycorrhizal colonization to elevated CO2 and climate change in Pascopyrum smithii and Bouteloua gracilis . Plant and Soil . 165 . 1 . 1994 . 10.1007/bf00009964 . 75–80. 1994PlSoi.165...75M . 34893610 .
  77. Hobbie . John E. . Hobbie . Erik A. . Drossman . Howard . Conte . Maureen . Weber . J. C. . Shamhart . Julee . Weinrobe . Melissa . 3 . Mycorrhizal fungi supply nitrogen to host plants in Arctic tundra and boreal forests: 15N is the key signal. Canadian Journal of Microbiology . 55 . 1 . 2009 . 10.1139/w08-127 . 84–94. 19190704 . 1912/2902 . free .
  78. Heinemeyer . A. . Fitter . A. H. . Impact of temperature on the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis: growth responses of the host plant and its AM fungal partner . Journal of Experimental Botany . 55 . 396 . 22 January 2004 . 10.1093/jxb/erh049 . 525–534. 14739273 . free .
  79. Xavier . L. J. . Germida . J. J. . Impact of human activities on mycorrhizae . Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Microbial Ecology . 1999 .