Mountain Lake cluster explained

The Mountain Lake cluster consists of two diatremes or volcanic pipes in Northern Alberta, Canada. It was emplaced during a period of kimberlite volcanism in the Late Cretaceous epoch.[1]

Although they were originally described as kimberlite or kimberlitic, the Mountain Lake (ML) rocks were later reclassified as alkaline ultramafic volcanics, hybrid alkaline ultramafic rocks, basanite or alkali olivine basalt.[2] Due to extensive clay alteration that obliterated much of their original mineralogy, the question of their proper classification remains unsettled.[3]

Location and Geological Setting

The ML pipes form part of the Northern Alberta kimberlite province, along with the nearby Birch Mountains kimberlite field and the Buffalo Head Hills kimberlite field. They were discovered in 1989-90 just north of Mountain Lake (55.456291n 117.714510w), which lies about 75km (47miles) northeast of Grande Prairie, Alberta. The ML south pipe measures 400m (1,300feet) by 650m (2,130feet), covering an area of 29ha, and the north pipe measures 250m (820feet) by 350m (1,150feet), covering an area of 8.75ha.[4]

The ML pipes are hosted within the nonmarine sedimentary rocks of the Wapiti Formation and were erupted onto an inland alluvial plain. The uppermost strata of the Wapiti have been removed by erosion in the area, and most of the bedrock is covered by glacial and post-glacial sediments of Quaternary age. The ML volcaniclastic rocks are more resistant to erosion than the surrounding Wapiti Formation rocks, so the ML cluster forms a small hill.[5]

Age

Fossil pollen grains from mudstone clasts and laminated lacustrine sediments interbedded with the ML rocks are consistent with an emplacement age of from 68 to 76 Ma (million years ago), or the Campanian to early Maastrichtian stage of the Late Cretaceous. Fission track dating of apatite gives ages of 72 to 78 Ma.[4] Magnetostratigraphic polarity determinations, coupled with the palynostratigraphic results and radiometric dates, indicate that the ML rocks are not older than 79.1 Ma.[6]

Lithology and Mineralogy

The ML cluster consists of volcaniclastic rocks that are interpreted as representing volcanic crater or diatreme deposits. They include euhedral to broken and pellet-shaped grains of olivine that are supported in a fine-grained groundmass, along with xenoliths derived from sedimentary rocks, crystalline Precambrian rocks, and a variety of types of volcanic rocks. In many examples both the olivine and the groundmass have been totally altered to smectite clay, and in some specimens the clay has been further altered to zeolite minerals and quartz. Although they include diamond indicator minerals[7] such as chromite and several types of garnet (G5, G9, G11 and spessartine), the ML rocks are not considered to have a high potential for diamonds.

See also

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Petrogenetic considerations for the Late Cretaceous Northern Alberta kimberlite province. 8th International Kimberlite Conference, Extended Abstract, 5 p.. Eccles, D.R., Heaman, L.M., Luth, R.W. and Creaser, R.A.. 2003. 2014-08-13. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20110526054242/http://www.ags.gov.ab.ca/minerals/diamonds/8ikc_abstract.pdf. 2011-05-26.
  2. Web site: Northern Alberta kimberlite province: The first 20 years. Alberta Geological Survey, ERCB/AGS Bulletin 65, 116 p.. Eccles, D.R.. 2014. 2014-10-19. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20120225005906/http://www.ags.gov.ab.ca/publications/BUL/PDF/BUL_065.pdf. 2012-02-25.
  3. Skupinski, A. and Langenberg, C.W. 2002. Petrography of the Mountain Lake pipe, Grande Prairie area, Alberta, Canada. Alberta Geological Survey, Special Report 15, 39 p.
  4. 8th International Kimberlite Conference: Selected Papers: Volume 1: The C. Roger Clement Volume, Elsevier Science, 2004, p. 437 - 440 (accessed via Google books)
  5. Leckie, D.A., Kjarsgaard, B. et al. 1997. Geology of a Late Cretaceous possible kimberlite at Mountain Lake, Alberta – Chemistry, petrology, indicator minerals, aeromagnetic signature, age, stratigraphic position and setting. Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 3441, 202 p.
  6. Kravchinsky, V.A., Eccles, D.R., Zhang, R. and Cannon, M. 2009. Paleomagnetic dating of the northern Alberta kimberlites. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 46, no. 4, p. 231-245.
  7. http://www.ags.gov.ab.ca/minerals/diamonds/diamonds.html Alberta Geological Survey: Kimberlite, Indicator Minerals and Diamonds