Morgan v Fry explained

Morgan v Fry
Court:Court of Appeal
Citations:[1968] 2 QB 710
Judges:Lord Denning MR, Davies LJ and Russell LJ
Keywords:Right to strike, common law, fundamental right

Morgan v Fry [1968] 2 QB 710 is a UK labour law case, concerning the right to strike at common law.

It is notable as Lord Denning MR said the following:

Facts

The Port of London Authority negotiated with a single union. Morgan, a lockman, was a member of a breakaway union. The first union threatened to strike unless the breakaway union members were dismissed, Fry arguing it was a genuine threat to industrial peace. He did not intend for anyone to be dismissed in particular. Morgan was dismissed because of the threat, and sued for intimidation and conspiracy.

Judgment

Lord Denning MR held that if proper notice, the length of time to terminate a contract, was given then a strike was lawful, and because the strike was lawful there was no tort of intimidation. The defendants’ honest belief they were acting in the interests of the union negatived any allegation of conspiracy.

Lord Denning MR said the following.[1]

Davies LJ, agreeing with Lord Denning MR, said the following:

Russell LJ dissented in reasoning:

See also

Notes and References

  1. 1968