The moment distribution method is a structural analysis method for statically indeterminate beams and frames developed by Hardy Cross. It was published in 1930 in an ASCE journal.[1] The method only accounts for flexural effects and ignores axial and shear effects. From the 1930s until computers began to be widely used in the design and analysis of structures, the moment distribution method was the most widely practiced method.
In the moment distribution method, every joint of the structure to be analysed is fixed so as to develop the fixed-end moments. Then each fixed joint is sequentially released and the fixed-end moments (which by the time of release are not in equilibrium) are distributed to adjacent members until equilibrium is achieved. The moment distribution method in mathematical terms can be demonstrated as the process of solving a set of simultaneous equations by means of iteration.
The moment distribution method falls into the category of displacement method of structural analysis.
In order to apply the moment distribution method to analyse a structure, the following things must be considered.
Fixed end moments are the moments produced at member ends by external loads.Spanwise calculation is carried out assuming each support to be fixed and implementing formulas as per the nature of load,i.e. point load (mid span or unequal),udl,uvl or couple.
The bending stiffness (EI/L) of a member is represented as the flexural rigidity of the member (product of the modulus of elasticity (E) and the second moment of area (I)) divided by the length (L) of the member. What is needed in the moment distribution method is not the specific values but the ratios of bending stiffnesses between all members.
When a joint is being released and begins to rotate under the unbalanced moment, resisting forces develop at each member framed together at the joint. Although the total resistance is equal to the unbalanced moment, the magnitudes of resisting forces developed at each member differ by the members' bending stiffness. Distribution factors can be defined as the proportions of the unbalanced moments carried by each of the members. In mathematical terms, the distribution factor of member
k
j
Djk=
| ||||||||||||
|
When a joint is released, balancing moment occurs to counterbalance the unbalanced moment. The balancing moment is initially the same as the fixed-end moment. This balancing moment is then carried over to the member's other end. The ratio of the carried-over moment at the other end to the fixed-end moment of the initial end is the carryover factor.
Let one end (end A) of a fixed beam be released and applied a moment
MA
\thetaA
MB
MB
MA
CAB=
MB | |
MA |
EI
MA=4
EI | |
L |
\thetaA+2
EI | |
L |
\thetaB=4
EI | |
L |
\thetaA
MB=2
EI | |
L |
\thetaA+4
EI | |
L |
\thetaB=2
EI | |
L |
\thetaA
CAB=
MB | |
MA |
=
1 | |
2 |
Once a sign convention has been chosen, it has to be maintained for the whole structure. The traditional engineer's sign convention is not used in the calculations of the moment distribution method although the results can be expressed in the conventional way. In the BMD case, the left side moment is clockwise direction and other is anticlockwise direction so the bending is positive and is called sagging.
Framed structure with or without sidesway can be analysed using the moment distribution method.
The statically indeterminate beam shown in the figure is to be analysed.
The beam is considered to be three separate members, AB, BC, and CD, connected by fixed end (moment resisting) joints at B and C.
L=10 m
P=10 kN
a=3 m
q=1 kN/m
P=10 kN
See also: Fixed end moment.
MABf=-
Pb2a | |
L2 |
=-
10 x 72 x 3 | |
102 |
=-14.700 kN ⋅ m
MBAf=
Pa2b | |
L2 |
=
10 x 32 x 7 | |
102 |
=+6.300 kN ⋅ m
MBCf=-
qL2 | |
12 |
=-
1 x 102 | |
12 |
=-8.333 kN ⋅ m
MCBf=
qL2 | |
12 |
=
1 x 102 | |
12 |
=+8.333 kN ⋅ m
MCDf=-
PL | |
8 |
=-
10 x 10 | |
8 |
=-12.500 kN ⋅ m
MDCf=
PL | = | |
8 |
10 x 10 | |
8 |
=+12.500 kN ⋅ m
The bending stiffness of members AB, BC and CD are
3EI | |
L |
4 x 2EI | |
L |
4EI | |
L |
DBA=
| |||||||
|
=
| |||||||
|
=
3 | |
11 |
=0.(27)
DBC=
| |||||||
|
=
| |||||||
|
=
8 | |
11 |
=0.(72)
DCB=
| |||||||
|
=
| |||||||
|
=
8 | |
12 |
=0.(66)
DCD=
| |||||||
|
=
| |||||||
|
=
4 | |
12 |
=0.(33)
The distribution factors of joints A and D are
DAB=1
DDC=0
The carryover factors are
1 | |
2 |
Joint | A | Joint | B | Joint | C | Joint | D | |||||||
Distrib. factors | 0 | 1 | 0.2727 | 0.7273 | 0.6667 | 0.3333 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Fixed-end moments | style="text-align:left; width:82px; padding:1px;" | -14.700 | +6.300 | style="text-align:left; width:82px; padding:1px;" | -8.333 | +8.333 | style="text-align:left; width:82px; padding:1px;" | -12.500 | +12.500 | |||||
Step 1 | +14.700 | → | +7.350 | |||||||||||
Step 2 | style="text-align:right; width:82px; background-color:#F8F8F8; padding:1px;" | -1.450 | style="text-align:left; width:82px; background-color:#F8F8F8; padding:1px;" | -3.867 | → | style="text-align:right; width:82px; padding:1px;" | -1.934 | |||||||
Step 3 | +2.034 | ← | +4.067 | +2.034 | → | +1.017 | ||||||||
Step 4 | style="text-align:right; width:82px; background-color:#F8F8F8; padding:1px;" | -0.555 | style="text-align:left; width:82px; background-color:#F8F8F8; padding:1px;" | -1.479 | → | style="text-align:right; width:82px; padding:1px;" | -0.739 | |||||||
Step 5 | +0.246 | ← | +0.493 | +0.246 | → | +0.123 | ||||||||
Step 6 | style="text-align:right; width:82px; background-color:#F8F8F8; padding:1px;" | -0.067 | style="text-align:left; width:82px; background-color:#F8F8F8; padding:1px;" | -0.179 | → | style="text-align:right; width:82px; padding:1px;" | -0.090 | |||||||
Step 7 | +0.030 | ← | +0.060 | +0.030 | → | +0.015 | ||||||||
Step 8 | style="text-align:right; width:82px; background-color:#F8F8F8; padding:1px;" | -0.008 | style="text-align:left; width:82px; background-color:#F8F8F8; padding:1px;" | -0.022 | → | style="text-align:right; width:82px; background-color:#F8F8F8; padding:1px;" | -0.011 | |||||||
Step 9 | +0.004 | ← | +0.007 | +0.004 | → | +0.002 | ||||||||
Step 10 | style="text-align:right; width:82px; background-color:#F8F8F8; padding:1px;" | -0.001 | style="text-align:left; width:82px; background-color:#F8F8F8; padding:1px;" | -0.003 | ||||||||||
Sum of moments | 0 | +11.569 | style="text-align:left; width:82px; padding:1px;" | -11.569 | +10.186 | style="text-align:left; width:82px; padding:1px;" | -10.186 | +13.657 | ||||||
Numbers
in grey are balanced moments; arrows ( → / ← ) represent the carry-over of moment from one end to the other end of a member.* Step 1: As joint A is released, balancing moment of magnitude equal to the fixed end momentf | |
M | |
AB |
=14.700kNm
f | |
M | |
BA |
f | |
M | |
BC |
DBA=0.2727
DBC=0.7273
MBC=3.867kNm
f | |
M | |
CB |
f | |
M | |
CD |
MA=0 kN ⋅ m
MB=-11.569 kN ⋅ m
MC=-10.186 kN ⋅ m
MD=-13.657 kN ⋅ m
The conventional engineer's sign convention is used here, i.e. positive moments cause elongation at the bottom part of a beam member.
For comparison purposes, the following are the results generated using a matrix method. Note that in the analysis above, the iterative process was carried to >0.01 precision. The fact that the matrix analysis results and the moment distribution analysis results match to 0.001 precision is mere coincidence.
MA=0 kN ⋅ m
MB=-11.569 kN ⋅ m
MC=-10.186 kN ⋅ m
MD=-13.657 kN ⋅ m
Note that the moment distribution method only determines the moments at the joints. Developing complete bending moment diagrams require additional calculations using the determined joint moments and internal section equilibrium.
As the Hardy Cross method provides only approximate results, with a margin of error inversely proportionate to the number of iterations, it is important to have an idea of how accurate this method might be. With this in mind, here is the result obtained by using an exact method: the displacement method
For this, the displacements method equation assumes the following form:
\left[K\right]\left\{d\right\}=\left\{-f\right\}
For the structure described in this example, the stiffness matrix is as follows:
\left[K\right]=\begin{bmatrix}3
EI | |
L |
+4
2EI | |
L |
&2
2EI | \\ 2 | |
L |
2EI | |
L |
&4
2EI | |
L |
+4
EI | |
L |
\end{bmatrix}
The equivalent nodal force vector:
\left\{f\right\}T=\left\{-P
ab(L+a) | +q | |
2L2 |
L2 | |
12 |
,-q
L2 | |
12 |
+P
L | |
8 |
\right\}
Replacing the values presented above in the equation and solving it for
\left\{d\right\}
\left\{d\right\}T=\left\{6.9368;-5.7845\right\}
Hence, the moments evaluated in node B are as follows:
MBA=3
EI | |
L |
d1-P
ab(L+a) | |
2L2 |
=-11.569
MBC=-4
2EI | |
L |
d1-2
2EI | |
L |
d2-q
L2 | |
12 |
=-11.569
The moments evaluated in node C are as follows:
MCB=2
2EI | |
L |
d1+4
2EI | |
L |
d2-q
L2 | |
12 |
=-10.186
MCD=-4
EI | |
L |
d2-P
L | |
8 |
=-10.186