Misery index (economics) explained

The misery index is an economic indicator, created by economist Arthur Okun. The index helps determine how the average citizen is doing economically and is calculated by adding the seasonally adjusted unemployment rate to the annual inflation rate. It is assumed that both a higher rate of unemployment and a worsening of inflation create economic and social costs for a country.[1]

Misery index by US presidential administration

Index = Unemployment rate + Inflation rate (lower number is better)
President Time Period Average Low High Start End Change
1948 - 1952 7.88 03.45  - Dec 1952 13.63  - Jan 1948 13.63 3.45 -10.18
1953 - 1960 9.26 02.97  - Jul 1953 10.98  - Apr 1958 3.28 9.96 +5.68
1961 - 1963 7.14 06.40  - Jul 1962 08.38  - Jul 1961 8.31 6.82 -1.49
1963 - 1968 6.77 05.70  - Nov 1965 08.19  - Jul 1968 7.02 8.12 +1.10
1969 - 1974 10.57 07.80  - Jan 1969 17.01  - Jul 1974 7.80 17.01 +9.21
1974 - 1976 16.00 12.66  - Dec 1976 19.90  - Jan 1975 16.36 12.66 -3.70
1977 - 1980 16.26 12.60  - Apr 1978 21.98  - Jun 1980 12.72 19.72 +7.00
1981 - 1988 12.19 07.70  - Dec 1986 19.33  - Jan 1981 19.33 9.72 -9.61
1989 - 1992 10.68 09.64  - Sep 1989 14.47  - Nov 1990 10.07 10.30 +0.23
1993 - 2000 7.80 05.74  - Apr 1998 10.56  - Jan 1993 10.56 7.29 -3.27
2001 - 2008 8.11 05.71  - Oct 2006 11.47  - Aug 2008 7.93 7.39 -0.54
2009 - 2016 8.83 05.06  - Sep 2015
12.87  - Sep 2011 7.83 6.77 -1.06
2017 - 2020 6.91 05.21  - Sep 2019
15.03  - Apr 2020 7.30 8.06 +0.76
2021 - 2023 10.16 06.79  - Feb 2024
11.29  - Jun 2021 7.70 6.79 -0.91
[2]

Variations

Harvard Economist Robert Barro created what he dubbed the "Barro Misery Index" (BMI), in 1999.[3] The BMI takes the sum of the inflation and unemployment rates, and adds to that the interest rate, plus (minus) the shortfall (surplus) between the actual and trend rate of GDP growth.

In the late 2000s, Johns Hopkins economist Steve Hanke built upon Barro's misery index and began applying it to countries beyond the United States. His modified misery index is the sum of the interest, inflation, and unemployment rates, minus the year-over-year percent change in per-capita GDP growth.[4]

In 2013 Hanke constructed a World Table of Misery Index Scores by exclusively relying on data reported by the Economist Intelligence Unit.[5] This table includes a list of 89 countries, ranked from worst to best, with data as of December 31, 2013 (see table below).

Political economists Jonathan Nitzan and Shimshon Bichler found a negative correlation between a similar "stagflation index" and corporate amalgamation (i.e. mergers and acquisitions) in the United States since the 1930s. In their theory, stagflation is a form of political economic sabotage employed by corporations to achieve differential accumulation, in this case as an alternative to amalgamation when merger and acquisition opportunities have run out.[6]

Hanke's Misery Index

Ranked from worst to best
Country/Territory2020[7] 2022[8]
style=text-align:left3827.6 330.8
style=text-align:left547.0 414.7
style=text-align:leftN/A 225.4
style=text-align:leftN/A 116.2
style=text-align:leftN/A 86.8
style=text-align:leftN/A 31.5
style=text-align:left193.9 176.1
style=text-align:left177.1 190.337
style=text-align:left145.3 80.5
style=text-align:left105.7 60.3
style=text-align:left95.0 156.192
style=text-align:left92.1 73.3
style=text-align:left60.6 93.518
style=text-align:left60.4 63.6
style=text-align:left53.4 61.785
style=text-align:left49.3 83.492
style=text-align:left48.9 95.4
style=text-align:left47.1 40.977
style=text-align:left45.6 47.2
style=text-align:left42.7 63.1
style=text-align:left42.4 51.6
style=text-align:left42.2 34.835
style=text-align:left41.6 32
style=text-align:left41.2 176.1
style=text-align:left41.2 101.601
style=text-align:left40.7 55.7
style=text-align:left40.5 62.4
style=text-align:left40.3 61.5
style=text-align:left39.7 64.023
style=text-align:left39.5 42.3
style=text-align:left39.3 62.3
style=text-align:left39.1 26.32
style=text-align:left38.6 41
style=text-align:left37.9 63.5
style=text-align:left37.9 56.3
style=text-align:left36.8 38.9
style=text-align:left36.7 30.296
style=text-align:left36.7 33.7
style=text-align:left36.2 52.653
style=text-align:left36.1 46.905
style=text-align:left36.1 61
style=text-align:left35.8 42.2
style=text-align:left35.8 22.58
style=text-align:left35.7 19.21
style=text-align:left35.4 44.531
style=text-align:left35.4 42.98
style=text-align:left34.8 52.5
style=text-align:left34.1 44.4
style=text-align:left34.0 27.2
style=text-align:left33.5 110.003
style=text-align:left33.1 24.603
style=text-align:left32.7 50.2
style=text-align:left32.5 52.6
style=text-align:left32.4 37.077
style=text-align:left32.0 43.7
style=text-align:left31.5 21.98
style=text-align:left31.3 31.128
style=text-align:left30.4 29.884
style=text-align:left30.2 41.2
style=text-align:left29.9 26.3
style=text-align:left29.9 18.9
style=text-align:left29.5 43.854
style=text-align:left29.3 26.3
style=text-align:left28.7 41
style=text-align:left28.3 19.552
style=text-align:left28.2 38.131
style=text-align:left28.2 28.16
style=text-align:left28.1 50.4
style=text-align:left27.8
style=text-align:left27.4 38.64
style=text-align:left27.1 31.8
style=text-align:left26.2 37.1
style=text-align:left26.2 50.4
style=text-align:left26.0 28.4
style=text-align:left25.8 36.9
style=text-align:left25.7 18.725
style=text-align:left25.6 20.3
style=text-align:left24.3 99.634
style=text-align:left23.9 36.846
style=text-align:left23.8 25.6
style=text-align:left23.8 75.9
style=text-align:left23.5 21.525
style=text-align:left23.3 17.5
style=text-align:left23.2 17.5
style=text-align:left23.2 45.4
style=text-align:left22.8 36.565
style=text-align:left22.2 22.441
style=text-align:left22.0 39.2
style=text-align:left22.0 26.451
style=text-align:left21.6 11.3
style=text-align:left22.5 17.659
style=text-align:left20.9 41.832
style=text-align:left20.9 21.727
style=text-align:left20.8 29.264
style=text-align:left20.4 18.3
style=text-align:left20.3 8.6
style=text-align:left20.1 18
style=text-align:left19.9 33.202
style=text-align:left19.9 37.18
style=text-align:left18.5 32.271
style=text-align:left18.4 41.138
style=text-align:left18.4 19.935
style=text-align:left18.3 25.5
style=text-align:left18.2 18.191
style=text-align:left18.1 20.676
style=text-align:left18.0 11.062
style=text-align:left18.0 18.615
style=text-align:left17.6 35.235
style=text-align:left17.5 32.7
style=text-align:left17.1 34.692
style=text-align:left17.1 35.49
style=text-align:left17.0 19.919
style=text-align:left16.7 16.882
style=text-align:left16.4 52.9
style=text-align:left16.3 20.6
style=text-align:left16.2 32.051
style=text-align:left16.0 24.6
style=text-align:left16.0 52.16
style=text-align:left15.9 20.059
style=text-align:left15.9 26.3
style=text-align:left15.8 102
style=text-align:left15.7 22.2
style=text-align:left15.5 19
style=text-align:left15.4 20.608
style=text-align:left14.8 40.242
style=text-align:left14.6 15.986
style=text-align:left14.5 17.063
style=text-align:left14.5 32.87
style=text-align:left14.5 9.075
style=text-align:left14.4 17.2
style=text-align:left14.4 12.384
style=text-align:left14.3 18.316
style=text-align:left14.0 20.107
style=text-align:left13.9 33.761
style=text-align:left13.4 14.839
style=text-align:left13.2 22.2
style=text-align:left13.2 35.4
style=text-align:left13.0 14.973
style=text-align:left12.9 8.602
style=text-align:left12.8 21.629
style=text-align:left12.8 13.542
style=text-align:left12.7 29.198
style=text-align:left12.6 10.219
style=text-align:left11.8 15.785
style=text-align:left11.8 13
style=text-align:left11.6 25.132
style=text-align:left11.6 23.34
style=text-align:left11.4 88.1
style=text-align:left10.9 16.381
style=text-align:left10.8 11.622
style=text-align:left10.6 69.192
style=text-align:left10.5 9.77
style=text-align:left9.5 10.95
style=text-align:left8.6 8.518
style=text-align:left8.3 12.515
style=text-align:left8.3 13.1
style=text-align:left8.1 9.071
style=text-align:left5.3 13.591
style=text-align:left3.8 9.399
style=text-align:left−3.3

Criticism

A 2001 paper looking at large-scale surveys in Europe and the United States concluded that unemployment more heavily influences unhappiness than inflation. This implies that the basic misery index underweights the unhappiness attributable to the unemployment rate: "the estimates suggest that people would trade off a 1-percentage-point increase in the employment rate for a 1.7-percentage-point increase in the inflation rate."[9]

Misery and crime

Some economists, such as Hooi Hooi Lean, posit that the components of the Misery Index drive the crime rate to a degree. Using data from 1960 to 2005, they have found that the Misery Index and the crime rate correlate strongly and that the Misery Index seems to lead the crime rate by a year or so.[10] In fact, the correlation is so strong that the two can be said to be cointegrated, and stronger than correlation with either the unemployment rate or inflation rate alone.

Data sources

The data for the misery index is obtained from unemployment data published by the U.S. Department of Labor (U3) and the Inflation Rate (CPI-U) from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The exact methods used for measuring unemployment and inflation have changed over time, although past data is usually normalized so that past and future metrics are comparable.

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. Web site: The US Misery Index. Inflationdata.com.
  2. Web site: US Misery Index by President .
  3. News: Reagan Vs. Clinton: Who's The Economic Champ?. https://web.archive.org/web/20121022195246/http://www.businessweek.com/stories/1999-02-21/reagan-vs-dot-clinton-whos-the-economic-champ. October 22, 2012. Robert J. Barro . Bloomberg. 22 February 1999 .
  4. Web site: Misery in MENA. Steve H. Hanke. March 2011. Cato Institute: appeared in Globe Asia.
  5. Web site: Measuring Misery around the World. Steve H. Hanke. May 2014. Cato Institute: appeared in Globe Asia.
  6. Book: Capital as Power: A Study of Order and Creorder . Nitzan, Jonathan . Bichler, Shimshon . 2009. 384–386. Routledge. RIPE Series in Global Political Economy.
  7. Web site: Hanke . Steve H. . 14 April 2021 . Hanke's 2020 Misery Index: Who's Miserable and Who's Happy? . 23 March 2022 . National Review.
  8. Web site: Hanke’s 2022 Misery Index . May 18, 2023 . STEVE H. . HANKE .
  9. Di Tella, Rafael . MacCulloch, Robert J. . . 2001. Preferences over Inflation and Unemployment: Evidence from Surveys of Happiness. American Economic Review. 91. 1. 335–341, 340. 10.1257/aer.91.1.335. 14823969 .
  10. New evidence from the misery index in the crime function. Tang, Chor Foon . Lean, Hooi Hooi . Economics Letters. 2009. Hooi Hooi Lean. 102. 2. 112–115. 10.1016/j.econlet.2008.11.026.