Minimum effort game explained

In Game theory, the minimum effort game or weakest link game is a game in which each person decides how much effort to put in and is rewarded based on the least amount of effort anyone puts in.[1] It is assumed that the reward per unit of effort is greater than the cost per unit effort, otherwise there would be no reason to put in effort.

Examples

Nash equilibria

If there are n players, it costs each player c dollars to put in one unit of effort, and each player is rewarded b dollars for each unit of effort the laziest person put in, then the only pure-strategy Nash equilibrium is each player putting in the same amount of effort, because putting more effort costs more money without extra rewards, and because putting less effort reduces the reward earned.[2]

The other Nash equilibrium is when each person chooses two numbers

k<l

and puts in

k

units of effort with probability
(c
b
1
n-1
)
and

l

units of effort with probability
1-(c
b
1
n-1
)
.

In practice

The amount of effort players put in depends on the amount of effort they think other players will put in.[3] In addition, some players will put more effort than expected in an attempt to get others to put in more effort.

References

  1. Riedl . Arno . Rohde . Ingrid M. T. . Strobel . Martin . Efficient Coordination in Weakest-Link Games . The Review of Economic Studies . 83 . 2 . April 2016 . 0034-6527 . 10.1093/restud/rdv040 . 737–767.
  2. Cartwright . Edward . The Optimal Strategy in the Minimum Effort Game . Games . . 9 . 3 . 9 June 2018 . 2073-4336 . 10.3390/g9030042 . free . 42.
  3. Feri . Francesco . Gantner . Anita . Moffatt . Peter G. . Erharter . Dominik . Leading to efficient coordination: Individual traits, beliefs and choices in the minimum effort game . Games and Economic Behavior . 136 . 13 October 2022 . 10.1016/j.geb.2022.10.003 . 403–427.