Švarc–Milnor lemma explained
In the mathematical subject of geometric group theory, the Švarc–Milnor lemma (sometimes also called Milnor–Švarc lemma, with both variants also sometimes spelling Švarc as Schwarz) is a statement which says that a group
, equipped with a "nice" discrete isometric
action on a
metric space
, is
quasi-isometric to
.
This result goes back, in different form, before the notion of quasi-isometry was formally introduced, to the work of Albert S. Schwarz (1955)[1] and John Milnor (1968).[2] Pierre de la Harpe called the Švarc–Milnor lemma "the fundamental observation in geometric group theory"[3] because of its importance for the subject. Occasionally the name "fundamental observation in geometric group theory" is now used for this statement, instead of calling it the Švarc–Milnor lemma; see, for example, Theorem 8.2 in the book of Farb and Margalit.[4]
Precise statement
Several minor variations of the statement of the lemma exist in the literature (see the Notes section below). Here we follow the version given in the book of Bridson and Haefliger (see Proposition 8.19 on p. 140 there).[5]
Let
be a group acting by isometries on a proper
length space
such that the action is properly discontinuous and
cocompact.
Then the group
is finitely generated and for every finite generating set
of
and every point
the orbit map
fp:(G,dS)\toX, g\mapstogp
is a
quasi-isometry.
Here
is the
word metric on
corresponding to
.
Sometimes a properly discontinuous cocompact isometric action of a group
on a proper geodesic metric space
is called a
geometric action.
[6] Explanation of the terms
Recall that a metric space
is
proper if every closed ball in
is
compact.
An action of
on
is
properly discontinuous if for every compact
the set
\{g\inG\midgK\capK\ne\varnothing\}
is finite.
The action of
on
is
cocompact if the quotient space
, equipped with the
quotient topology, is compact.Under the other assumptions of the Švarc–Milnor lemma, the cocompactness condition is equivalent to the existence of a closed ball
in
such that
Examples of applications of the Švarc–Milnor lemma
For Examples 1 through 5 below see pp. 89–90 in the book of de la Harpe.[3] Example 6 is the starting point of the part of the paper of Richard Schwartz.[7]
- For every
the group
is quasi-isometric to the Euclidean space
.
- If
is a closed connected oriented surface of negative
Euler characteristic then the
fundamental group
is quasi-isometric to the hyperbolic plane
.
- If
is a closed connected smooth manifold with a smooth Riemannian metric
then
is quasi-isometric to
, where
is the universal cover of
, where
is the pull-back of
to
, and where
is the path metric on
defined by the Riemannian metric
.
- If
is a connected finite-dimensional
Lie group equipped with a left-invariant Riemannian metric and the corresponding path metric, and if
is a uniform lattice then
is quasi-isometric to
.
- If
is a closed hyperbolic 3-manifold, then
is quasi-isometric to
.
- If
is a complete finite volume hyperbolic 3-manifold with cusps, then
is quasi-isometric to
, where
is a certain
-invariant collection of
horoballs, and where
is equipped with the induced path metric.
Notes and References
- A. S. Švarc, A volume invariant of coverings, Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, vol. 105, 1955, pp. 32–34.
- J. Milnor, A note on curvature and fundamental group, Journal of Differential Geometry, vol. 2, 1968, pp. 1–7
- Pierre de la Harpe, Topics in geometric group theory. Chicago Lectures in Mathematics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 2000. ; p. 87
- Benson Farb, and Dan Margalit, A primer on mapping class groups. Princeton Mathematical Series, 49. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2012. ; p. 224
- M. R. Bridson and A. Haefliger, Metric spaces of non-positive curvature. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol. 319. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999.
- I. Kapovich, and N. Benakli, Boundaries of hyperbolic groups. Combinatorial and geometric group theory (New York, 2000/Hoboken, NJ, 2001), pp. 39–93, Contemp. Math., 296, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2002, ; Convention 2.22 on p. 46
- [Richard Schwartz (mathematician)|Richard Schwartz]