Military medicine explained
The term military medicine has a number of potential connotations. It may mean:
- A medical specialty, specifically a branch of occupational medicine attending to the medical risks and needs (both preventive and interventional) of soldiers, sailors and other service members. This disparate arena has historically involved the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases (especially tropical diseases), and, in the 20th century, the ergonomics and health effects of operating military-specific machines and equipment such as submarines, tanks, helicopters and airplanes. Undersea and aviation medicine can be understood as subspecialties of military medicine, or in any case originated as such. Few countries certify or recognize "military medicine" as a formal speciality or subspeciality in its own right.
- The planning and practice of the surgical management of mass battlefield casualties and the logistical and administrative considerations of establishing and operating combat support hospitals. This involves military medical hierarchies, especially the organization of structured medical command and administrative systems that interact with and support deployed combat units. (See Battlefield medicine.)
- The administration and practice of health care for military service members and their dependents in non-deployed (peacetime) settings. This may (as in the United States) consist of a medical system paralleling all the medical specialties and sub-specialties that exist in the civilian sector. (See also Veterans Health Administration which serves U.S. veterans.)
- Medical research and development specifically bearing upon problems of military medical interest. Historically, this encompasses all of the medical advances emerging from medical research efforts directed at addressing the problems encountered by deployed military forces (e.g., vaccines or drugs for soldiers, medical evacuation systems, drinking water chlorination, etc.) many of which ultimately prove important beyond the purely military considerations that inspired them.
Legal status
Military medical personnel engage in humanitarian work and are "protected persons" under international humanitarian law in accordance with the First and Second Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols, which established legally binding rules guaranteeing neutrality and protection for wounded soldiers, field or ship's medical personnel, and specific humanitarian institutions in an armed conflict. International humanitarian law makes no distinction between medical personnel who are members of the armed forces (and who hold military ranks) and those who are civilian volunteers. All medical personnel are considered non-combatants under international humanitarian law because of their humanitarian duties, and they may not be attacked and not be taken as prisoners of war; hospitals and other medical facilities and transports identified as such, whether they are military or civilian, may not be attacked either. The red cross, the red crescent and the red crystal are the protective signs recognised under international humanitarian law, and are used by military medical personnel and facilities for this purpose. Attacking military medical personnel, patients in their care, or medical facilities or transports legitimately marked as such is a war crime. Likewise, misusing these protective signs to mask military operations is the war crime of perfidy. Military medical personnel may be armed, usually with service pistols, for the purpose of self defense or the defense of patients.
Historical significance
The significance of military medicine for combat strength goes far beyond treatment of battlefield injuries; in every major war fought until the late 19th century disease claimed more soldier casualties than did enemy action. During the American Civil War (1860–65), for example, about twice as many soldiers died of disease as were killed or mortally wounded in combat.[1] The Franco-Prussian War (1870–71) is considered to have been the first conflict in which combat injury exceeded disease, at least in the German coalition army which lost 3.47% of its average headcount to combat and only 1.82% to disease.[2] In new world countries, such as Australia, New Zealand, the United States and Canada, military physicians and surgeons contributed significantly to the development of civilian health care.[3] [4]
Improvements in military medicine have increased the survival rates in successive wars, due to improvements in medical evacuation, battlefield medicine and trauma care.[4] [5] Similar improvements have been seen in trauma practices during the Iraq war.[6] Some military trauma care practices are disseminated by citizen soldiers who return to civilian practice.[4] [7] [8] One such practice is where major trauma patients are transferred to an operating theater as soon as possible, to stop internal bleeding, increasing the survival rate. Within the United States, the survival rate for gunshot wounds has increased, leading to apparent declines in the gun death rate in states that have stable rates of gunshot hospitalizations.[9] [10] [11] [12]
Military medicine by country
North America
Canada
United States
- U.S. Army
- U.S. Navy
- U.S. Air Force
Europe
France
Belgium
Germany
Italy
- Corpo sanitario dell'Esercito Italiano
- Corpo sanitario militare marittimo
- Corpo sanitario aeronautico
- Servizio sanitario dell'Arma dei carabinieri
Russia
Serbia
Sweden
United Kingdom
Asia
India
Israel
Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka Army Medical Corps
Thailand
Phramongkutklao College of Medicine
Vietnam
- Vietnam Military Medical University (Học Viện Quân Y) in Hanoi
Other regions
Australia
South Africa
International
See also
Further reading
- Bowlby, Sir Anthony and Colonel Cuthbert Wallace. "The Development of British Surgery at the Front." The British Medical Journal 1 (1917): 705–721.
- Churchill, Edward D. "Healing by First Intention and with Suppuration: Studies in the History of Wound Healing.” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 19 (1964): 193–214.
- Churchill, Edward D. “The Surgical Management of the wounded at the time of the Fall of Rome.” Annals of Surgery 120 (1944): 268–283.
- Cowdrey, Albert E. Fighting for Life: American Military Medicine in World War II (1994), scholarly history, 400 pp
- Cowdrey, Albert E. United States Army in the Korean War: The Medics War (1987), full-scale scholarly official history; online free
- Fauntleroy, A.M. "The Surgical Lessons of the European War." Annals of Surgery 64 (1916): 136–150.
- Fazal, Tanisha M. (2024). Military Medicine and the Hidden Costs of War. Oxford University Press.
- Grissinger, Jay W. "The Development of Military Medicine." Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 3 (1927): 301–356. online
- Harrison, Mark. Medicine and victory: British military medicine in the Second World War (Oxford UP, 2004).
- Whayne, Col. Tom F. and Colonel Joseph H. McNinch. “Fifty Years of Medical Progress: Medicine as a Social Instrument: Military Medicine.” The New England Journal of Medicine 244 (1951): 591–601.
- Wintermute, Bobby A. Public health and the US military: a history of the Army Medical Department, 1818–1917 (2010).
Primary sources
- Kendrick, Douglas B. Memoirs of a Twentieth-Century Army Surgeon (Sunflower University Press, 19920, U.S. Army
External links
U.S. military medicine
Australian military medicine
International Magazine for Military Medicine
NATO Centre of Excellence for Military Medicine
Notes and References
- Book: McPherson, James M.. 1988. Battlecry of Freedom. Ballantine Books, New York. 0-345-35942-9. registration., p. 485
- Brockhaus' Konversations-Lexikon
- 14th ed., Leipzig, Berlin and Vienna 1894; Vol. 8, p. 939.
- Vivian Charles McAlister. "Origins of the Canadian School of Surgery" Canadian Journal of Surgery (2007) 50 (5) : 357–363. Available at: https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/handle/1807/17633
- Manring MM, Hawk A, Calhoun JH, Andersen RC . Treatment of war wounds: a historical review. . Clin Orthop Relat Res . 2009 . 467 . 8 . 2168–91 . 19219516 . 10.1007/s11999-009-0738-5 . 2706344 .
- Web site: Chapter 3 – Medical Support 1965–1970 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20160606042103/http://www.history.army.mil/books/vietnam/MedSpt/chpt3.htm . 2016-06-06 .
- Web site: Iraq War 10 year anniversary: Survival rate of wounded soldiers better than previous wars. Lee Bowman, Scripps Howard News. Service. 16 March 2013. 13 June 2016. https://web.archive.org/web/20180904084833/https://www.kjrh.com/news/local-news/iraq-war-10-year-anniversary-survival-rate-of-wounded-soldiers-better-than-previous-wars. 4 September 2018. dead.
- Web site: Military medical techniques saving lives at home – News stories – GOV.UK.
- Web site: The role of the gun in the advancement of medicine. 8 January 2015. 13 June 2016. https://web.archive.org/web/20180106121802/http://www.gunbabygun.com/role-gun-advancement-medicine/. 6 January 2018. dead.
- Jena. Anupam B.. Sun. Eric C.. Prasad. Vinay. Does the Declining Lethality of Gunshot Injuries Mask a Rising Epidemic of Gun Violence in the United States?. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 29. 7. 2014. 1065–1069. 0884-8734. 10.1007/s11606-014-2779-z. 24452421. 4061370.
- Web site: Lower murder rate linked to medical advance, not less violence.
- News: In Medical Triumph, Homicides Fall Despite Soaring Gun Violence. Gary. Fields. Cameron. McWhirter. 8 December 2012. Wall Street Journal.
- Harris . Anthony R. . Thomas . Stephen H. . Fisher . Gene A. . Hirsch . David J. . Murder and Medicine: The Lethality of Criminal Assault 1960–1999 . Homicide Studies . May 2002 . 6 . 2 . 128–166 . 10.1177/108876790200600203 . 51845968 . 1 December 2022 . en-us.
