| Litigants: | Mifflin v. R. H. White Company |
| Arguedatea: | April 30 |
| Arguedateb: | May 1 |
| Argueyear: | 1903 |
| Decidedate: | June 1 |
| Decideyear: | 1903 |
| Fullname: | Mifflin v. R. H. White Company |
| Usvol: | 190 |
| Uspage: | 260 |
| Parallelcitations: | 23 S. Ct. 769; 47 L. Ed. 1040 |
| Holding: | The authorized appearance of a work in a magazine without a copyright notice specifically dedicated to that work transfers that work into the public domain. |
| Majority: | Brown |
| Joinmajority: | unanimous |
Mifflin v. R. H. White Company, 190 U.S. 260 (1903), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the authorized appearance of a work in a magazine without a copyright notice specifically dedicated to that work transfers that work into the public domain.[1] Its opinion was also applied to the next case, Mifflin v. Dutton.[2]
The case concerned The Professor at the Breakfast-Table by Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr., published serially in Atlantic Monthly in 1859 without the appropriate copyright notice.[1] The works were later published in a single volume by Houghton Mifflin Co. with payment to Holmes but the R. H. White store also published the same volume claiming it was in the public domain.
Holmes v. Hurst was an earlier Supreme Court case dealing with similar circumstances for Holmes's earlier work, The Autocrat of the Breakfast-Table.[3]