| Conflict: | Mesopotamian campaigns of Ardashir I |
| Place: | Armenia and Mesopotamia |
| Partof: | the Roman-Sassanid wars (224-363) |
| Date: | 229 - 241 |
| Result: | inconclusive
|
| Combatant1: | Sassanids |
| Combatant2: | Roman Empire |
| Commander1: | Ardashir I |
| Commander2: | Severus Alexander |
| Strength1: | 100,000 soldiers along the eastern limes |
The Mesopotamian campaigns of Ardashir I represented the first episode in a new period of wars between the Romans and Sasanids. The war between the Roman Empire, ruled by the Roman emperor Severus Alexander (222-235), and the Sasanian rule, led by Ardashir I[1] (224[2] -241), lasted for more than a decade, from 229 to 241 when the Sasanian ruler died and was replaced by his son, Shapur I.
Between 224 and 226/227, an important episode changed the fate of relations between the Roman and Persian empires: in the East, the last Parthian ruler, Artabanus IV, was overthrown after being defeated in "three battles,"[3] and the insurgent, Ardashir I, founded the Sasanian dynasty,[4] destined to be the eastern adversary of the Romans until the 7th century.[5] [6] Specifically, beginning in 229/230, Sasanids and Romans clashed for the first time.On the Roman front, the new Severan dynasty that reigned over the Roman Empire between the end of the second and the first decades of the third century (from 193 to 235, with a brief interruption during the reign of Macrinus between 217 and 218), and which had had in Septimius Severus its progenitor, was now in the hands of a young emperor, Severus Alexander, who a few years later was killed, revealing himself to be the last descendant. The new dynasty had arisen on the ashes of a long period of civil wars, where three other contenders besides Septimius Severus (Didius Julianus, Pescennius Niger, and Clodius Albinus) had faced each other.
The casus belli was the claim by the Sasanids, who considered themselves descendants of the Persians, to possession of the entire Achaemenid Empire,including the territories, now Roman, of Asia Minor and the Near East as far as the Aegean Sea.[7] [8]
It is not known precisely how many and what armies were fielded by the Sasanids. Cassius Dio recounts that it was certainly a large army, ready to terrorize not only the Roman province of Mesopotamia but also that of Syria, west of the Euphrates.
What is known of this army is that it was not permanent like the Roman army, with professional soldiers paid regularly for their trade. There was only an eventual division of the final spoils.[9] Rather, the system was similar to the feudal one, where for each campaign it was necessary to assemble an army from time to time, composed of nobles at the head of their "clans," subjected then under the command of a prince of the royal house. Thus, there were no experienced weapons officers serving continuously, nor was there a lasting system of recruitment, as there were no permanent military units, although there were many nobles at the disposal of the Sasanian army. For these reasons, they often hired mercenary armies. They mainly used the bow and horse in warfare, unlike the Romans who favored infantry, so much so that the Sasanians are said to have grown up from childhood, riding and shooting with arrows, constantly living for war and hunting.[10]
However, unlike the Arsacid Parthians, they tried to keep their contingents under arms for more years during major military campaigns, speeding up the recruitment of their armies, as well as better assimilating the siege techniques of their Roman opponents, which they never really learned from their predecessors.[11]
It is known that for the Romans, the forces put in charge were represented by the legions and auxiliary troops stationed along the eastern limes, which, according to Cassius Dio, were not in an acceptable state of preparedness, discipline and morale to cope with this new eastern danger. Below is a list of the legions and their respective fortresses (to which one might later add the IV Italica, formed around 231 by Severus Alexander):
| No. of legionary fortresses of the eastern limes | Legionary unit | Ancient location | Modern location | Roman province | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Legio XV Apollinaris | Satala | Sadagh | Cappadocia | |
2 | Legio XII Fulminata | Melitene | Melitene | Cappadocia | |
3 | Legio III Parthica[12] | Nisibis | Nusaybin | Mesopotamia | |
4 | Legio I Parthica | Singara | Sinjar | Mesopotamia and Osroene | |
5 | Legio IV Scythica | Zeugma | Belkis | Syria Coele | |
6 | Legio XVI Flavia Firma | Sura | Sura | Syria Coele | |
7 | vexill. Legio II Parthica | Apamea | Syria Coele | ||
8 | Legio III Gallica | Danaba | Mehin | Syria Phoenicia | |
9 | Legio X Fretensis | Aelia Capitolina | Jerusalem | Syria Palaestina | |
10 | Legio VI Ferrata | Caparcotna | Kfar Otnay | Syria Palaestina | |
11 | Legio III Cyrenaica | Bostra | Bosra | Arabia Petraea |
229 ca.
With the rise of the first Sasanian ruler, Ardashir I, the Persian armies returned to unsuccessfully besiege the city of Hatra (to make it a base of attack against the Romans), which is not known whether it was under direct Roman control, or simply a "client" city of the Roman Empire.[13] [14] The failure of this siege forced the Sasanian ruler to go first to Media, where he succeeded in subduing its territories, and then to Armenia, where he was, however, repulsed by a son of the old Parthian ruler, Artabanus IV.[15] [16] [17]
230
In the course of this year, the Sasanian armies advanced into Roman Mesopotamia laying siege to many Roman garrisons along the Euphrates,[18] also attempting, unsuccessfully, to conquer Nisibis (an important center of trade with the East and China), and perhaps invading the Roman provinces of Syria and Cappadocia,[19] although there is insufficient archaeological evidence, at least in the present state of knowledge, to say that the raids also affected territories west of the Euphrates.
In addition, some detachments of the Roman army (Legio I Parthica and Cohors IX Maurorum [Gordiana]) were left at Hatra.[20] [21]
231
Emperor Severus Alexander then organized a new military expedition against the Sasanians, enlisting a new legion in Italy, Legio IIII Italica. Herodian reports the speech Alexander made in front of the deployed troops and tells how the soldiers were encouraged by the emperor's words. After distributing money to the troops, he went to the Senate to make a similar speech and make his intentions public. On the day of his departure (perhaps in the spring of that year), after attending the ritual sacrifices, Alexander left Rome (231),[22] to reach Antioch, his headquarters.
232
Once Alexander reached Antioch, he made a further attempt at mediation, offering peace and friendship to Ardashir, but the latter not only sent back the Roman envoys empty-handed, but also sent four hundred of his soldiers of imposing appearance and richly clothed to the Roman emperor with a renewed invitation to leave the Roman lands as far as the Bosporus. Alexander arrested the four hundred Sasanian envoys and sent them to cultivate lands in Phrygia, but did not put them to death.
The campaign began with a strategic plan to divide the Roman army into three different marching columns. Alexander chose the central one for himself, while the first was to advance northward and subdue Armenia and Media, and the third, was to descend the Euphrates River, joining with that of Alexander Severus near Ctesiphon. His indecision in advancing and the poor level of preparedness of the eastern Roman troops meant that the southern contingent was opposed by almost the entire Sasanian army, which defeated the Romans by inflicting heavy losses. Herodian relates that the cause of Alexander's indecision was his fear of putting his own life on the line or the "feminine fears" of his mother Julia Mamaea, who had followed him to the East. News of the defeat reached the emperor while he was ill, causing him to despair about the final outcome of the campaign. The soldiers themselves, undermined by illnesses caused by the unhealthy environment and the scarcity of provisions, accused the emperor of having caused the destruction of the army because of his lack of military ability, so much so that there was an attempt at usurpation, immediately foiled, by a certain Uranius. Alexander then ordered the two surviving groups of troops to winter in Antioch, and on the way back it seems that the Roman losses were considerable: the army from the north was practically decimated by the frigid temperatures in the mountains of Armenia, the southern one by the defeat suffered along the Euphrates because of an unequal number of Sasanian forces against which it had clashed.[23]
However, the campaign proved not entirely bad for the Romans, as the territories lost in Mesopotamia in the course of the Sasanian advance of 229-230 were recaptured and the Sasanids remained quiet until 239-240, while Alexander was able to boast the victorious titles of Parthicus maximus and Persicus.[24] [25]
237-238[26]
During the reign of Maximinus the Thracian, who succeeded the last emperor of the Severan dynasty, Alexander, the cities of the Roman province of Mesopotamia, Nisibis and Carrhae, were besieged and occupied by the Sasanids.[27] [28] Not surprisingly, Herodian also suggests that the Sasanids remained quiet for three or four years after Alexander Severus' campaigns of 232, the final outcome of which was highly uncertain for the two sides.[29]
238/239[30]
A new large-scale invasion by the Sasanian armies occurred later that year, which laid siege to the fortress-city of Dura Europos, a Roman outpost on the Euphrates River.[31] [32] [33] [34]
240
In the course of that year, it appears that Ardashir I finally succeeded in the feat of occupying and destroying the important Roman-allied city-stronghold of Hatra,[35] then occupying much of Roman Mesopotamia (including the legionary fortresses of Rhesaina and Singara as well as the auxiliary fort of Zagurae, today's Ain Sinu[36]), perhaps even going so far as to besiege and occupy Antioch itself,[37] as seems to be suggested by the fact that its mint stopped minting coinage for the years 240 and 241.
The death of the young emperor at the hands of one of his generals, Maximinus the Thracian (in 235), and the subsequent military anarchy into which the Roman Empire poured for about fifty years, determined considerable advantages in favor of the nascent Sasanian Empire, which did not miss the opportunity for surprising revenge, even going so far as to occupy Antioch itself in 252 and 260.
Ancient sources
Modern historiographical sources