| Memoirs of a Survivor | |
| Director: | David Gladwell |
| Producer: | Penny Clark Michael Medwin |
| Based On: | The Memoirs of a Survivor by Doris Lessing |
| Starring: | Julie Christie |
| Cinematography: | Walter Lassally |
| Editing: | Bill Shapter |
| Distributor: | Columbia-Warner Distributors[1] |
| Budget: | £800,000[2] [3] |
| Runtime: | 115 minutes |
| Country: | United Kingdom |
| Language: | English |
Memoirs of a Survivor is a 1981 British science fiction film directed by David Gladwell, with some scenes filmed at the location of Argyle Street, Norwich. It was screened in the Un Certain Regard section at the 1981 Cannes Film Festival.[4] It is based on the 1974 novel of the same name by Doris Lessing.
After a near future economic collapse, England lies in ruins. Middle aged D (Julie Christie) struggles to survive in the failing city, where electricity is infrequent, water delivery scarce and trash pick up non-existent. As she rarely leaves her apartment, D is required to take in teenager Emily, allowing her to share D's apartment, in exchange for the girl's help.
Emily soon begins to fall for Gerald (Christopher Guard) and leaves D to move in with Gerald. Gerald operates a makeshift refugee camp for the orphan and homeless children of the city. D is able to see Gerald's failing whereas Emily can not.
In addition. D's grasp on reality is questioned as she can also travel back in time and observe a Victorian age family that resided in the same apartment. D may be witnessing the distorted history of the young woman currently in her care, as the child in the Victorian age is also named Emily, although whether these trips to the past are actually occurring or they are a fantasy in D's mind is a question left unanswered.[5]
Variety praised the performance of Christie, but stated that the low budget hampered the portrayal of the degenerating city.[6] Christie won a Fantasporto International Fantasy Film Award for Best Actress for her performance. The website Experiential Conversations states that the movie "takes an impressionistic approach" to the material of the novel, while mentioning that Christie is able to carry this curious and haunting film; however, they state that the viewer must abandon trying to comprehend the literal meaning of the Victorian sequences, and instead accept the film on the whole as an immensely atmospheric mood piece.[7] Moria Reviews states that the films is "what one might kindly call a flawed film", although it also praised the visuals of the film, as well as the ending and a brooding scene.[5]