Mathisson–Papapetrou–Dixon equations explained

In physics, specifically general relativity, the Mathisson–Papapetrou–Dixon equations describe the motion of a massive spinning body moving in a gravitational field. Other equations with similar names and mathematical forms are the Mathisson–Papapetrou equations and Papapetrou–Dixon equations. All three sets of equations describe the same physics.

They are named for M. Mathisson,[1] W. G. Dixon,[2] and A. Papapetrou.[3]

Throughout, this article uses the natural units c = G = 1, and tensor index notation.

Mathisson–Papapetrou–Dixon equations

The Mathisson–Papapetrou–Dixon (MPD) equations for a mass

m

spinning body are

\begin{align}

Dk\nu
D\tau

+

12
S

λ\muRλV\rho&=0,\\

DSλ\mu
D\tau

+Vλk\mu-V\mukλ&=0. \end{align}

Here

\tau

is the proper time along the trajectory,

k\nu

is the body's four-momentum

k\nu=\intt=const

0}
{T
\nu

\sqrt{g}d3x,

the vector

V\mu

is the four-velocity of some reference point

X\mu

in the body, and the skew-symmetric tensor

S\mu\nu

is the angular momentum

S\mu\nu=\intt=const\left\{\left(x\mu-X\mu\right)T0\nu-\left(x\nu-X\nu\right)T0\mu\right\}\sqrt{g}d3x

of the body about this point. In the time-slice integrals we are assuming that the body is compact enough that we can use flat coordinates within the body where the energy-momentum tensor

T\mu\nu

is non-zero.

As they stand, there are only ten equations to determine thirteen quantities. These quantities are the six components of

Sλ\mu

, the four components of

k\nu

and the three independent components of

V\mu

. The equations must therefore be supplemented by three additional constraints which serve to determine which point in the body has velocity

V\mu

. Mathison and Pirani originally chose to impose the condition

V\muS\mu\nu=0

which, although involving four components, contains only three constraints because

V\muS\mu\nuV\nu

is identically zero. This condition, however, does not lead to a unique solution and can give rise to the mysterious "helical motions".[4] The Tulczyjew–Dixon condition

k\muS\mu\nu=0

does lead to a unique solution as it selects the reference point

X\mu

to be the body's center of mass in the frame in which its momentum is

(k0,k1,k2,k3)=(m,0,0,0)

.

Accepting the Tulczyjew–Dixon condition

k\muS\mu\nu=0

, we can manipulate the second of the MPD equations into the form
DSλ\mu
D\tau

+

1{m
2}\left(S

λ\rhok\mu

Dk\rho
D\tau

+S\rhokλ

Dk\rho
D\tau

\right)=0,

This is a form of Fermi–Walker transport of the spin tensor along the trajectory – but one preserving orthogonality to the momentum vector

k\mu

rather than to the tangent vector

V\mu=dX\mu/d\tau

. Dixon calls this M-transport.

See also

References

Selected papers

Notes and References

  1. News: M. Mathisson. Neue Mechanik materieller Systeme . Acta Physica Polonica . 6 . 1937 . 163–209 .
  2. Dynamics of Extended Bodies in General Relativity. I. Momentum and Angular Momentum . W. G. Dixon . 1970 . 10.1098/rspa.1970.0020 . Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A . 314 . 1519 . 1970RSPSA.314..499D . 499–527. 119632715 .
  3. A. Papapetrou . Spinning Test-Particles in General Relativity. I . 1951 . 10.1098/rspa.1951.0200 . Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A . 209 . 1097 . 1951RSPSA.209..248P . 248–258. 121464697 .
  4. Mathisson's helical motions demystified. AIP Conf. Proc.. 1458 . 367–370 . L. F. O. Costa . J. Natário . M. Zilhão . 2012. 1206.7093. 10.1063/1.4734436. AIP Conference Proceedings . 2012AIPC.1458..367C. 119306409.