Martin William Francis Stone Explained

Martin William Francis Stone (born 1965) is an Irish philosopher who served as a professor of philosophy at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. In 2010 he was found guilty of plagiarizing texts in more than 40 publications and subsequently dismissed from his university post.[1]

Biography

Martin Stone was a professor at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven's Institute of Philosophy. He also served for a time on the faculty of King's College in London. While employed by these universities, his research centred on the philosophy of the Late Middle Ages and the Renaissance.

Stone's credentials made him appear highly qualified. He had received his bachelor's degree in classics and philosophy from King's College, University of London, and a master's in philosophy from the University of Paris. Further study took him to the University of Cambridge, yet for the degrees of Master of Philosophy (MPhil) and Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), he returned to London University's Birkbeck College.[2] His doctoral thesis was titled "Casuistry and moral conflict: a philosophical and historical examination of the practical resolution of moral conflicts by casuistical reasoning" and was submitted in 1994.[3] He has held post-doctoral fellowships at the prestigious Warburg Institute in London, as well as shorter appointments at the London School of Economics, Oxford University, and was hired to teach courses on the philosophy of religion at his alma mater, King's College London.

Plagiarism

In 2010, first reports of plagiarism were made public by several scholars. Among them, Ilkka Kantola, a Member of Parliament in Finland, said that Stone had copied extensively from Kantola’s 1994 book Probability and Moral Uncertainty in Late Medieval and Early Modern Times: "tens of pages were identical or nearly identical, although my name was not mentioned at all", Kantola said in a 2010 interview.[4] The investigators Dougherty, Harsting, and Friedman have documented 40 instances of plagiarism in an academic journal.[5] [6]

In January 2010, the Commission on Scientific Integrity at Katholieke Universiteit Leuven sent notifications to editors who had published Stone’s works, stating that "the conduct of Martin Stone is highly questionable in terms of scientific integrity" and that the university "formally retracts its affiliation" with the publications by Stone which appeared when he was a professor there.[7]

Despite the discovery of plagiarism and the retraction of many of these works, a 2023 study found that they continued to be cited by other philosophers.[8]

See also

Notes and References

  1. Newman, Melanie. "Plagiarism probe sees UK scholar quit Belgian post." Times Higher Education 11 (2010): 03-10.
  2. https://web.archive.org/web/20160330090728/http://www.mediaevum.unifr.ch/vitia/teilnehmer/stone.htm Academic Biography retrieved 30 March 2016.
  3. Stone . Martin William Francis . Casuistry and moral conflict: a philosophical and historical examination of the practical resolution of moral conflicts by casuistical reasoning . E-Thesis Online Service . The British Library Board . 8 July 2023 . 1994. Ph.D .
  4. https://web.archive.org/web/20100927053024/http:/thevoiceleuven.be/news/education/188-interview-with-a-victim-of-plagiarism Ielse Broeksteeg, "Interview With a Victim of Plagiarism"
  5. Dougherty . Michael V. . Harsting . Pernille . Friedman . Russell L. . 2009 . 40 Cases of Plagiarism . Bulletin de Philosophie médiévale . 51 . 350–391. 10.1484/J.BPM.3.615 . 2020-05-21.
  6. Pattaro . Enrico . Miller . Fred Jr.. Biondi . Carrie-Ann . 2010 . Announcement. Plagiarism: The Case of Martin Stone. Ratio Juris . 23 . 3 . 435–6 . 10.1111/j.1467-9337.2010.00463.x . 2020-05-21.
  7. https://www.brepolsonline.net/doi/pdf/10.5555/J.QUAESTIO.6.78018881010204000008030507080778 Statement issued by Prof. Peter Marynen, Vice Chancellor for Research
  8. Dougherty. M. V.. October 2023. 10.1163/15685349-06103001. 3-4. Vivarium. 245–287. After "40 Cases": The downstream citation of plagiarizing articles in medieval and early modern philosophy research. 61.