Maris Piper Explained

Maris Piper
Species:Solanum tuberosum
Genus:Solanum
Cultivar:'Maris Piper'
Origin:Plant Breeding Institute, Trumpington, Cambridgeshire, Britain 1956

Maris Piper is the most widely grown potato variety in the United Kingdom accounting for 16% of the planted area in 2014. Introduced in 1966 it was one of the first potato varieties bred to be resistant to a form of potato cyst nematode, a major pest of potato production in the UK. It has been the most widely grown variety in the UK since 1980 and is suitable for a range of uses including chips, roast potatoes and mashed potatoes.

Breeding

Attempts to find resistance to the potato cyst nematode Globodera rostochiensis in wild potatoes began in 1941, when Conrad Ellenby started testing over 60 species held in the Commonwealth Potato Collection, finding that few were resistant or suitable to breed with cultivated potatoes. In a letter to Nature in 1952, Ellenby reported that by 1948 he had found four types that were resistant and could be crossed with contemporary varieties.[1] All four were the species Solanum tuberosum andigena, and one of these, CPC 1673, was the source of nematode resistance in Maris Piper. Although resistant to PCN, the wild potato produced very small tubers in the UK climate.[2]

Led by H. W. Howard, workers at the Plant Breeding Institute in Cambridge crossed the wild potato with contemporary varieties to produce a high-yielding, resistant variety.[2] CPC 1673 was backcrossed, crossed with Ulster Knight, and then crossed with a cross of Arran Cairn and Herald.[3] Arran Cairn was bred by Donald Mackelvie, the leading Scottish potato breeder in the early 20th century,[4] and Ulster Knight was bred by John Clarke, an eminent potato breeder from Antrim.[5] [6] The final cross was made in 1956,[7] but it took another ten years for the variety to be tested and multiplied before it was recommended by the National Institute of Agricultural Botany in 1966.[8] The PBI and Howard were awarded the Queen's Award for Technology in 1982 for breeding Maris Piper.[9] [10]

The first part of the variety's name came from Maris Lane in Trumpington where the Plant Breeding Institute was located.[11] By convention, the breeder got to choose the second name, with Piper chosen arbitrarily by Howard's son, although earlier, he had proposed calling it Maris Pard.[12] [13] It should not be confused with Maris Peer, another variety of potato.

Usage

The variety was the most popular in the UK by 1980, accounting for 24 % of the British potato crop in 1982,[2] 20 % in 2005[14] and 16 % in 2014.[15] It became popular due to both its resistance to nematodes and its pleasing taste for consumers.[16]

Maris Piper has a fluffy texture and is considered an "all-rounder" potato.[17] Itis widely used to make chips (French fries)[11] due to it having high dry matter[18] and low reducing sugars.[19] As well as being sold fresh, the variety is also suitable for processing into frozen or dehydrated products.[2]

It has been recommended by chefs Heston Blumenthal and Tom Kerridge for making triple cooked chips.[20] [21] In his book Perfection, Blumenthal stated they were "in a league of their own" for making roast potatoes[22] and he also considers them the best variety for mashed potatoes.[23]

Traits

Maris Piper is one of the most susceptible potato varieties to being eaten by slugs,[24] and also the bacterial disease common scab, which causes corky lesions to form on the skin. Common scab is controlled by irrigating crops just as the potatoes begin to form, requiring "perfect timing and perfect irrigation".[25]

Maris Piper was one of the first varieties with resistance to G. rostochiensis, with the H1 gene giving complete resistance to UK strains.[26] The widespread growth of Maris Piper led to the closely related G. pallida (to which Maris Piper has no resistance) becoming the main potato cyst nematode in the UK.[27] When nematodes feed on the roots, the H1 gene results in the potato roots dying, preventing the nematodes from feeding and making it likely they die or turn into males.[28] H1 is thought to encode a protein that specifically detects the product of one nematode gene during feeding, a so-called gene-for-gene relationship.[29]

Notes and References

  1. Ellenby. C.. Resistance to the Potato Root Eelworm, Heterodera rostochiensis Wollenweber. Nature. 170. 4337. 1952. 1016. 0028-0836. 10.1038/1701016a0. 13013294 . 1952Natur.170.1016E . free.
  2. News: Cambridge applies itself to a potato pest. 1982-04-30. Elaine Williams. The Financial Times.
  3. Web site: Maris Piper . AHDB Potatoes . 2017-02-15.
  4. Web site: Donald McKelvie . John Marshall . Arran Civic Trust . 2017-02-15.
  5. Web site: Potato Breeding in Ireland . Pádraic Óg Gallagher . 2017-02-15.
  6. Web site: Spud Sunday: A Potato By Any Other Name . The Daily Spud . 2013-06-02 . 2017-02-15.
  7. Web site: Breeding Maris Piper . Maris Piper Fifty . 30 January 2016. 2017-02-15.
  8. Book: Norbert U. Haase. A. J. Haverkort. Potato Developments in a Changing Europe. 2006. Wageningen Academic Pub. 978-90-8686-011-1. 36–.
  9. Book: Joan Green. The Plant Breeding Institute, 75 Years: 1912-1987. 1987. The Institute. 978-0-7084-0459-1.
  10. Book: Plant Breeding Institute (Cambridge, England). Annual Report - Plant Breeding Institute. 1980. Plant Breeding Institute..
  11. Book: John Ayto. The Diner's Dictionary: Word Origins of Food and Drink. 18 October 2012. OUP Oxford. 978-0-19-964024-9. 221–.
  12. Book: Angus Stevenson. Maurice Waite. Concise Oxford English Dictionary: Luxury Edition. 18 August 2011. OUP Oxford. 978-0-19-960111-0. 874.
  13. Web site: How Maris Piper got its name . Maris Piper Fifty . 21 March 2016. 2017-02-15.
  14. Book: Dick Vreugdenhil. John Bradshaw. Christiane Gebhardt. Francine Govers. Mark A. Taylor. Donald K.L. MacKerron. Heather A. Ross. Potato Biology and Biotechnology: Advances and Perspectives: Advances and Perspectives. 31 August 2011. Elsevier. 978-0-08-052505-1. 6.
  15. Web site: David Jones . Maris Piper makes a rebound in potato plantings - . Farmers Weekly . 2014-09-02 . 2017-02-15.
  16. Book: John M. Webster. K. Bengt Eriksson. David G. McNamara. An Anecdotal History of Nematology. 1 January 2008. Pensoft Publishers. 978-954-642-324-5. 111.
  17. Web site: Maris Piper Potatoes Information . Love Potatoes . 2017-02-15.
  18. Book: Heston Blumenthal. Perfection. 2006. A&C Black. 978-0-7475-8409-4. 212–214.
  19. Book: M. Brown. Chilled Foods: A Comprehensive Guide. 24 September 2008. Elsevier. 978-1-84569-488-3. 32–.
  20. Web site: Heston Blumenthal . Triple-cooked chips . https://web.archive.org/web/20150318235852/http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/Magazine/article1337494.ece . dead . March 18, 2015 . The Sunday Times . 2013-11-17 . 2017-02-15.
  21. Web site: Xanthe Clay . National chip week: Three steps to a hip chip . Telegraph . 2011-02-11 . 2017-02-15.
  22. Book: Heston Blumenthal. Perfection. 2006. A&C Black. 978-0-7475-8409-4. 51.
  23. News: Claire Wrathall. Top of the crops. The Financial Times. 1995-08-17.
  24. Book: A. South. Terrestrial Slugs: Biology, ecology and control. 6 December 2012. Springer Science & Business Media. 978-94-011-2380-8. 182.
  25. Web site: Heather Briggs . Optimising irrigation for potato scab control . FG Insight . 2015-06-01 . 2017-02-15.
  26. Investigation of potato cyst nematode control. Brian Kerry . Andy Barker . Ken Evans . DEFRA. 12.
  27. News: Getting to the root of a wormy problem. The Financial Times. 1995-08-17.
  28. Bakker. Erin. Achenbach. Ute. Bakker. Jeroen. van Vliet. Joke. Peleman. Johan. Segers. Bart. van der Heijden. Stefan. van der Linde. Piet. Graveland. Robert. Hutten. Ronald. van Eck. Herman. Coppoolse. Eric. van der Vossen. Edwin. Bakker. Jaap. Goverse. Aska. A high-resolution map of the H1 locus harbouring resistance to the potato cyst nematode Globodera rostochiensis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 109. 1. 2004. 146–152. 0040-5752. 10.1007/s00122-004-1606-z. 14985978 . 20896516 .
  29. Jasmer. Douglas P.. Goverse. Aska. Smant. Geert. Parasitic nematode interactions with mammals and plants. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 41. 1. 2003. 245–270. 0066-4286. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.052102.104023. 14527330 .