Mansi languages explained

Mansi
Also Known As:Mansic
Region:Khanty–Mansi, Sverdlovsk
Familycolor:Uralic
Fam1:Uralic
Fam2:(Finno-Ugric)
Fam3:(Ugric)
Fam4:(Ob-Ugric)
Map:6-Ob Ugric-languages.png
Mapcaption:Khanty and Mansi languages at the beginning of the 20th century[1] [2]
Iso3:mns
Glotto:mans1269
Glottorefname:Mansic
Notice:IPA
Date:2021
Ethnicity:Mansi people
Child1:Southern
Child2:Eastern
Child3:Northern
Child4:Western

The Mansi languages are spoken by the Mansi people in Russia along the Ob River and its tributaries, in the Khanty–Mansi Autonomous Okrug, and Sverdlovsk Oblast. Traditionally considered a single language, they constitute a branch of the Uralic languages, often considered most closely related to neighbouring Khanty and then to Hungarian.

The base dialect of the Mansi literary language is the Sosva dialect, a representative of the northern language. Fixed word order is typical in Mansi. Adverbials and participles play an important role in sentence construction.

In the 2020–2021 census, 2229 people claimed to speak Mansi natively.[3] All current speakers use Northern Mansi, as the other variants have become extinct.

Mansi is subdivided into four main dialect groups which are to a large degree mutually unintelligible, and therefore best considered four languages. A primary split can be set up between the Southern variety and the remainder. Several features are also shared between the Western and Eastern varieties, while certain later sound changes have diffused between Eastern and Northern (and are also found in some neighboring dialects of Northern Khanty to the east).

Individual dialects are known according to the rivers their speakers live(d) on:[4]

The sub-dialects given above are those which were still spoken in the late 19th and early 20th century and have been documented in linguistic sources on Mansi. Pre-scientific records from the 18th and early 19th centuries exist also of other varieties of Western and Southern Mansi, spoken further west: the Tagil, Tura and Chusovaya dialects of Southern[5] and the Vishera dialect of Western.[6]

The two dialects last mentioned were hence spoken on the western slopes of the Urals, where also several early Russian sources document Mansi settlements. Placename evidence has been used to suggest Mansi presence reaching still much further west in earlier times,[7] though this has been criticized as poorly substantiated.[8]

Northern Mansi has strong Russian, Komi, Nenets, and Northern Khanty influence, and it forms the base of the literary Mansi language. There is no accusative case; that is, both the nominative and accusative roles are unmarked on the noun. pronounced as /

/ and pronounced as / / have been backed to pronounced as /[a]/ and pronounced as /[aː]/.

Western Mansi was described as "probably extinct" already in 1988. Although the last speaker is not known, it is considered certain that none were left at the end of the 20th century.[9] It had strong Russian and Komi influences; dialect differences were also considerable.[10] Long vowels were diphthongized.

Eastern Mansi became extinct in 2018, when its last speaker Maksim Šivtorov (Максим Семенович Шивторов) died.[9] It has Khanty and Siberian Tatar influence. There is vowel harmony, and for pronounced as /

/ it has pronounced as /link/, frequently diphthongized.

Southern (Tavda) Mansi was recorded from area isolated from the other Mansi varieties. Around 1900 a couple hundred speakers existed; in the 1960s it was spoken only by a few elderly speakers, and it has since then become extinct. It had strong Tatar influence and displayed several archaisms such as vowel harmony, retention of pronounced as //y// (elsewhere merged with pronounced as /

/), pronounced as //tsʲ// (elsewhere deaffricated to pronounced as //sʲ//), pronounced as //æː// (elsewhere fronted to pronounced as //aː// or diphthongized) and pronounced as //ɑː// (elsewhere raised to pronounced as //oː//).

Phonology

Consonants

Mansi consonants
LabialAlveolar(Alveolo-)
Palatal
Velar
Nasalpronounced as //m//pronounced as //n//pronounced as //nʲ//pronounced as //ŋ//pronounced as //ŋʷ//
Stoppronounced as //p//pronounced as //t//pronounced as //tʲ//pronounced as //k//pronounced as //kʷ//
Affricatepronounced as //ɕ//1
~
pronounced as //sʲ//
Fricativepronounced as //s//pronounced as //x//2 pronounced as //ɣ//pronounced as //xʷ//3 pronounced as /
  • ɣʷ
/4
Semivowelpronounced as //j//pronounced as //w//
Lateralpronounced as //l//pronounced as //lʲ//
Trillpronounced as //r//
The inventory presented here is a maximal collection of segments found across the Mansi varieties. Some remarks:
  1. /ɕ/ is an allophone of /sʲ/.[11]
  2. The voiceless velar fricatives /x/, /xʷ/ are only found in the Northern group and the Lower Konda dialect of the Eastern group, resulting from spirantization of *k, *kʷ adjacent to original back vowels.
  3. According to Honti, a contrast between *w and *ɣʷ can be reconstructed, but this does not surface in any of the attested varieties.
  4. The labialization contrast among the velars dates back to Proto-Mansi, but was in several varieties strengthened by labialization of velars adjacent to rounded vowels. In particular, Proto-Mansi *yK → Core Mansi *æKʷ (a form of transphonologization).

Vowels

The vowel systems across Mansi show great variety. As typical across the Uralic languages, many more vowel distinctions were possible in the initial, stressed syllable than in unstressed ones. Up to 18–19 stressed vowel contrasts may be found in the Western and Eastern dialects, while Northern Mansi has a much reduced, largely symmetric system of 8 vowels, though lacking short **pronounced as //e// and having a very rare long pronounced as /[iː]/:

References

  1. Rantanen . Timo . Tolvanen . Harri . Roose . Meeli . Ylikoski . Jussi . Vesakoski . Outi . 2022-06-08 . Best practices for spatial language data harmonization, sharing and map creation—A case study of Uralic . PLOS ONE . en . 17 . 6 . e0269648 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0269648. free . 35675367 . 9176854 . 2022PLoSO..1769648R .
  2. Rantanen, Timo, Vesakoski, Outi, Ylikoski, Jussi, & Tolvanen, Harri. (2021). Geographical database of the Uralic languages (v1.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4784188
  3. Web site: . Росстат — Итоги ВПН-2020. Том 5 Национальный состав и владение языками. Таблица 6. Население по родному языку. . 2024-02-04 . ru.
  4. Book: Honti, László . The Uralic Languages . 1998 . 0-415-08198-X . Abondolo . Daniel . ObUgrian. Taylor & Francis . 327–328.
  5. Janos. Gulya. 1958. Egy 1736-ból származó manysi nyelvemlék. Nyelvtudományi Közlemények. 60. 41–45.
  6. Artturi. Kannisto. 1918. Ein Wörterverzeichnis eines ausgestorbenen wogulischen Dialektes in den Papieren M. A. Castréns. Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran Aikakauskira. 30/8.
  7. Artturi. Kannisto. 1927. Über die früheren Wohngebiete der Wogulen. Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen. XVIII. 57–89.
  8. Vladimir V.. Napolskikh. 2002. "Ugro-Samoyeds" in Eastern Europe?. Finnisch-Ugrische Mitteilungen. 24/25. 127–148.
  9. Book: Salminen, Tapani . Demography, endangerment, and revitalization . The Uralic languages . 2023 . Routledge . 978-1-138-65084-8 . Abondolo . Daniel Mario . 2nd . Routledge Language Family . London New York . Valijärvi . Riitta-Liisa. 101-102.
  10. Book: Kálmán, Béla . Vogul Chrestomathy . Mouton . 1965 . Indiana University Publications. Uralic and Altaic Series . 46 . The Hague . 4–5.
  11. Book: Rombandeeva . E. I. . Sovremennyĭ mansiĭskiĭ i︠a︡zyk : leksika, fonetika, grafika, orfografii︠a︡, morfologii︠a︡, slovoobrazovanie . Ромбандеева . Е. И. . 2017 . Obsko-ugorskiĭ institut prikladnykh issledovaniĭ i razrabotok, Обско-угорский институт прикладных исследований и разработок . 978-5-6040210-8-8 . Ti︠u︡menʹ . 29 . 1062352461.