Magnetic resonance elastography explained

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is a form of elastography that specifically leverages MRI to quantify and subsequently map the mechanical properties (elasticity or stiffness) of soft tissue. First developed and described at Mayo Clinic by Muthupillai et al. in 1995, MRE has emerged as a powerful, non-invasive diagnostic tool, namely as an alternative to biopsy and serum tests for staging liver fibrosis.[1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

Diseased tissue (e.g. a breast tumor) is often stiffer than the surrounding normal (fibroglandular) tissue,[6] providing motivation to assess tissue stiffness. This principle of operation is the basis for the longstanding practice of palpation, which, however, is limited (except at surgery) to superficial organs and pathologies, and by its subjective, qualitative nature, depending on the skill and touch sensitivity of the practitioner. Conventional imaging techniques of CT, MRI, US, and nuclear medicine are unable to offer any insight on the elastic modulus of soft tissue. MRE, as a quantitative method of assessing tissue stiffness, provides reliable insight to visualize a variety of disease processes which affect tissue stiffness in the liver, brain, heart, pancreas, kidney, spleen, breast, uterus, prostate, and skeletal muscle.[7]

MRE is conducted in three steps: first, a mechanical vibrator is used on the surface of the patient's body to generate shear waves that travel into the patient's deeper tissues; second, an MRI acquisition sequence measures the propagation and velocity of the waves; and finally this information is processed by an inversion algorithm to quantitatively infer and map tissue stiffness in 3-D. This stiffness map is called an elastogram, and is the final output of MRE, along with conventional 3-D MRI images as shown on the right.

Mechanics of soft tissue

MRE quantitatively determines the stiffness of biological tissues by measuring its mechanical response to an external stress. Specifically, MRE calculates the shear modulus of a tissue from its shear-wave displacement measurements.[8] The elastic modulus quantifies the stiffness of a material, or how well it resists elastic deformation as a force is applied. For elastic materials, strain is directly proportional to stress within an elastic region. The elastic modulus is seen as the proportionality constant between stress and strain within this region. Unlike purely elastic materials, biological tissues are viscoelastic, meaning that it has characteristics of both elastic solids and viscous liquids. Their mechanical responses depend on the magnitude of the applied stress as well as the strain rate. The stress-strain curve for a viscoelastic material exhibits hysteresis. The area of the hysteresis loop represents the amount of energy lost as heat when a viscoelastic material undergoes an applied stress and is distorted. For these materials, the elastic modulus is complex and can be separated into two components: a storage modulus and a loss modulus. The storage modulus expresses the contribution from elastic solid behavior while the loss modulus expresses the contribution from viscous liquid behavior. Conversely, elastic materials exhibit a pure solid response. When a force is applied, these materials elastically store and release energy, which does not result in energy loss in the form of heat.[9]

Yet, MRE and other elastography imaging techniques typically utilize a mechanical parameter estimation that assumes biological tissues to be linearly elastic and isotropic for simplicity purposes.[10] The effective shear modulus

\mu

can be expressed with the following equation:

\mu=E/[2(1+\nu)]

where

E

is the elastic modulus of the material and

\nu

is the Poisson's ratio.

The Poisson's ratio for soft tissues is approximated to equal 0.5, resulting in the ratio between the elastic modulus and shear modulus to equal 3.[11] This relationship can be used to estimate the stiffness of biological tissues based on the calculated shear modulus from shear-wave propagation measurements. A driver system produces and transmits acoustic waves set at a specific frequency (50–500 Hz) to the tissue sample. At these frequencies, the velocity of shear waves can be about 1–10 m/s.[12] [13] The effective shear modulus can be calculated from the shear wave velocity with the following:[14]

2
\mu=\rho{v
s}

where

\rho

is the tissue density and

vs

is the shear wave velocity.

Recent studies have been focused on incorporating mechanical parameter estimations into post-processing inverse algorithms that account for the complex viscoelastic behavior of soft tissues. Creating new parameters could potentially increase the specificity of MRE measurements and diagnostic testing.[15]

Applications

Liver

Liver fibrosis is a common condition arising in many liver diseases. Progression of fibrosis can lead to cirrhosis and end-stage liver disease. MRE-based measurement of liver stiffness has emerged as the most accurate non-invasive technique for detecting and staging liver fibrosis. MRE provides quantitative maps of tissue stiffness over large regions of the liver. Abnormally increased liver stiffness is a direct consequence of liver fibrosis. The diagnostic performance of MRE in assessing liver fibrosis has been established in multiple studies.[16] [17] [18] [19]

Liver MRE examinations are performed in MRI systems that have been equipped for the technique.   Patients should fast for  3 to 4 hours prior to their MRE exam to allow for the most accurate measurement of liver stiffness.[20] [21] [22] Patients lie supine in the MRI scanner for the examination.  A special device is placed on the right side of the chest wall over the liver to apply gentle vibration which generates propagating shear waves in the liver.   Imaging is for MRE is very quick, with data acquired in a series of  1-4 periods of breath-holding, each lasting 15–20 seconds.   

A standardized approach for performing and analyzing liver MRE exams has been documented by the RSNA Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance.[23] The technical success rate of Liver MRE is very high (95-100%)[24] [25] [26]

Brain

Magnetic resonance elastography
Purpose:measures the mechanical properties of soft tissues

MRE of the brain [27] was first presented in the early 2000s.[28] [29] Elastogram measures have been correlated with memory tasks,[30] fitness measures,[31] and progression of various neurodegenerative conditions. For example, regional and global decreases in brain viscoelasticity have been observed in Alzheimer's disease[32] [33] and multiple sclerosis.[34] [35] It has been found that as the brain ages, it loses its viscoelastic integrity due to degeneration of neurons and oligodendrocytes.[36] [37] A recent study looked into both the isotropic and anisotropic stiffness in brain and found a correlation between the two and with age, particularly in gray matter.[38]

MRE may also have applications for understanding the adolescent brain. Recently, it was found that adolescents have regional differences in brain viscoelasticity relative to adults.[39] [40]

MRE has also been applied to functional neuroimaging. Whereas functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) infers brain activity by detecting relatively slow changes in blood flow, functional MRE is capable of detecting neuromechanical changes in the brain related to neuronal activity occurring on the 100-millisecond scale.[41]

Kidney

MRE has also been applied to investigate the biomechanical properties of the kidney. The feasibility of clinical renal MRE was first reported in 2011 for healthy volunteers [42] and in 2012 for renal transplant patients.[43] Renal MRE is more challenging than MRE of larger organs such as the brain or liver due to fine mechanical features in the renal cortex and medulla as well as the acoustically shielded position of the kidneys within the abdominal cavity. To overcome these challenges, researchers have been looking at different passive drivers and imaging techniques to best deliver shear waves to the kidneys.[44] [45] [46] [47] [48] Studies investigating renal diseases such as renal allograft dysfunction,[49] [50] [51] [52] lupus nephritis,[53] immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN),[54] diabetic nephrology,[55] renal tumors[56] and chronic kidney disease[57] demonstrate that kidney stiffness is sensitive to kidney function[58] [59] and renal perfusion.[58] [60]

Prostate

The prostate can also be examined by MRE, in particular for the detection and diagnosis of prostate cancer.[61] To ensure good shear wave penetration in the prostate gland, different actuator systems were designed and evaluated.[62] [63] Preliminary results in patients with prostate cancer showed that changes in stiffness allowed differentiation of cancerous tissue from normal tissue.[64] Magnetic Resonance Elastography has been successfully used in patients with prostate cancer showing high specificity and sensitivity in differentiating prostate cancer from benign prostatic diseases [65] [66] (see figure on right (b)). Even higher specificity of 95% for prostate cancer was achieved when Magnetic Resonance Elastography was combined with systematic image interpretation using PI-RADS (version 2.1).[67]

Pancreas

The pancreas is one of the softest tissues in the abdomen. Given that pancreatic diseases including pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer significantly increase stiffness, MRE is a promising tool for diagnosing benign and malignant conditions of the pancreas. Abnormally high pancreatic stiffness was detected by MRE in patients with both acute and chronic pancreatitis.[68] Pancreatic stiffness was also used to distinguish pancreatic malignancy from benign masses [69] and to predict the occurrence of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoenteric anastomosis.[70] Quantification of the volume of pancreatic tumors based on tomoelastographic measurement of stiffness was found to be excellently correlated with tumor volumes estimated by contrast-enhanced computed tomography.[71] In patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma stiffness was found to be elevated in the tumor as well as in pancreatic parenchyma distal to the tumor, suggesting heterogeneous pancreatic involvement [72] (figure on right (c)).

See also

Notes and References

  1. Book: Magnetic Resonance Elastography | Wiley Online Books . 2016 . 10.1002/9783527696017 . Hirsch . Sebastian . Braun . Jürgen . Sack . Ingolf . 9783527696017 .
  2. Mariappan YK, Glaser KJ, Ehman RL. 2010. Magnetic resonance elastography: a review. Clin Anat. 23. 5. 497–511. 10.1002/ca.21006. 3066083. 20544947.
  3. Glaser KJ, Manduca A, Ehman RL. 14 September 2012. Review of MR elastography applications and recent developments. J Magn Reson Imaging. 36. 4. 757–74. 10.1002/jmri.23597. 3462370. 22987755.
  4. Chen J, Yin M, Glaser KJ, Talwalkar JA, Ehman RL. 2013. MR Elastography of Liver Disease: State of the Art. Appl Radiol. 42. 4. 5–12. 10.37549/AR1982 . 4564016. 26366024.
  5. Ingolf Sack: Magnetic resonance elastography from fundamental soft-tissue mechanics to diagnostic imaging. In: Nature Reviews Physics. 5, 2023, S. 25, .
  6. Pepin KM, Ehman RL, McGee KP. 2015. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in cancer: Technique, analysis, and applications.. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 90-91. 32–48. 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2015.06.001. 4660259. 26592944.
  7. Wang. Jin. Deng. Ying. Jondal. Danielle. Woodrum. David M.. Shi. Yu. Yin. Meng. Venkatesh. Sudhakar K.. 2018. New and Emerging Applications of Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Other Abdominal Organs. Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging . 27. 5. 335–352. 10.1097/RMR.0000000000000182. 0899-3459. 7042709. 30289829.
  8. Muthupillai R, Lomas DJ, Rossman PJ, Greenleaf JF, Manduca A, Ehman RL. September 1995. Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves. Science. 269. 5232. 1854–7. 10.1126/science.7569924. 7569924. 1995Sci...269.1854M.
  9. Wineman A . 2009 . Nonlinear Viscoelastic Solids—A Review. Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids. en. 14. 3. 300–366. 10.1177/1081286509103660. 121161691. 1081-2865.
  10. Mariappan YK, Glaser KJ, Ehman RL. July 2010. Magnetic resonance elastography: a review. Clinical Anatomy. 23. 5. 497–511. 10.1002/ca.21006. 3066083. 20544947.
  11. Low G, Kruse SA, Lomas DJ . January 2016 . General review of magnetic resonance elastography . World Journal of Radiology . 8 . 1 . 59–72 . 10.4329/wjr.v8.i1.59 . 4731349 . 26834944 . free .
  12. Book: 6 . Sarvazyan AP, Skovoroda AR, Emelianov SY, Fowlkes JB, Pipe JG, Adler RS, Buxton RB, Carson PL . Acoustical Imaging . Biophysical Bases of Elasticity Imaging . 1995 . Springer US . 21 . 223–240 . 10.1007/978-1-4615-1943-0_23 . 978-1-4613-5797-1.
  13. Cameron. John . vanc . 1991. Physical Properties of Tissue. A Comprehensive Reference Book, edited by Francis A. Duck . Medical Physics. 18. 4. 834. 10.1118/1.596734 . 1991MedPh..18..834C . free.
  14. Wells PN, Liang HD . November 2011 . Medical ultrasound: imaging of soft tissue strain and elasticity . Journal of the Royal Society, Interface . 8 . 64 . 1521–49 . 10.1016/S1361-8415(00)00039-6 . 3177611 . 21680780.
  15. Sinkus R, Tanter M, Catheline S, Lorenzen J, Kuhl C, Sondermann E, Fink M . February 2005 . Imaging anisotropic and viscous properties of breast tissue by magnetic resonance-elastography . Magnetic Resonance in Medicine . 53 . 2 . 372–87 . 10.1002/mrm.20355 . 15678538 . free.
  16. 6 . Yin M, Talwalkar JA, Glaser KJ, Manduca A, Grimm RC, Rossman PJ, Fidler JL, Ehman RL . October 2007 . Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography . Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology . 5 . 10 . 1207–1213.e2 . 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.06.012 . 2276978 . 17916548.
  17. 6 . Huwart L, Sempoux C, Vicaut E, Salameh N, Annet L, Danse E, Peeters F, ter Beek LC, Rahier J, Sinkus R, Horsmans Y, Van Beers BE . July 2008 . Magnetic resonance elastography for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis . Gastroenterology . 135 . 1 . 32–40 . 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.03.076 . 18471441. free .
  18. 6 . Asbach P, Klatt D, Schlosser B, Biermer M, Muche M, Rieger A, Loddenkemper C, Somasundaram R, Berg T, Hamm B, Braun J, Sack I . October 2010 . Viscoelasticity-based staging of hepatic fibrosis with multifrequency MR elastography . Radiology . 257 . 1 . 80–6 . 10.1148/radiol.10092489 . 20679447 .
  19. Venkatesh SK, Yin M, Ehman RL . March 2013 . Magnetic resonance elastography of liver: technique, analysis, and clinical applications . Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging . 37 . 3 . 544–55 . 10.1002/jmri.23731 . 3579218 . 23423795.
  20. Jajamovich . Guido H. . Dyvorne . Hadrien . Donnerhack . Claudia . Taouli . Bachir . 2014-05-19 . Quantitative Liver MRI Combining Phase Contrast Imaging, Elastography, and DWI: Assessment of Reproducibility and Postprandial Effect at 3.0 T . PLOS ONE . 9 . 5 . e97355 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0097355 . 1932-6203 . 4026225 . 24840288. 2014PLoSO...997355J . free .
  21. Obrzut . Marzanna . Atamaniuk . Vitaliy . Chen . Jun . Obrzut . Bogdan . Ehman . Richard L. . Cholewa . Marian . Palusińska . Agnieszka . Gutkowski . Krzysztof . 2021-10-05 . Postprandial hepatic stiffness changes on magnetic resonance elastography in healthy volunteers . Scientific Reports . 11 . 1 . 19786 . 10.1038/s41598-021-99243-7 . 2045-2322 . 8492759 . 34611231. 2021NatSR..1119786O .
  22. Yin . Meng . Talwalkar . Jayant A. . Glaser . Kevin J. . Venkatesh . Sudhakar K. . Chen . Jun . Manduca . Armando . Ehman . Richard L. . July 2011 . Dynamic Postprandial Hepatic Stiffness Augmentation Assessed With MR Elastography in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease . AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology . 197 . 1 . 64–70 . 10.2214/AJR.10.5989 . 0361-803X . 3151663 . 21701012.
  23. Web site: Profiles - QIBA Wiki . 2023-02-21 . qibawiki.rsna.org.
  24. Singh . Siddharth . Venkatesh . Sudhakar K. . Wang . Zhen . Miller . Frank H. . Motosugi . Utaroh . Low . Russell N. . Hassanein . Tarek . Asbach . Patrick . Godfrey . Edmund M. . Yin . Meng . Chen . Jun . Keaveny . Andrew P. . Bridges . Mellena . Bohte . Anneloes . Murad . Mohammad Hassan . March 2015 . Diagnostic Performance of Magnetic Resonance Elastography in Staging Liver Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data . Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 13 . 3 . 440–451.e6 . 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.09.046 . 1542-3565 . 4333001 . 25305349.
  25. Kennedy . Paul . Wagner . Mathilde . Castéra . Laurent . Hong . Cheng William . Johnson . Curtis L. . Sirlin . Claude B. . Taouli . Bachir . March 2018 . Quantitative Elastography Methods in Liver Disease: Current Evidence and Future Directions . Radiology . 286 . 3 . 738–763 . 10.1148/radiol.2018170601 . 0033-8419 . 5831316 . 29461949.
  26. Joshi . Madalsa . Dillman . Jonathan R. . Towbin . Alexander J. . Serai . Suraj D. . Trout . Andrew T. . June 2017 . MR elastography: high rate of technical success in pediatric and young adult patients . Pediatric Radiology . 47 . 7 . 838–843 . 10.1007/s00247-017-3831-z . 1432-1998 . 28367603. 24875956 .
  27. Hiscox LV, Johnson CL, Barnhill E, McGarry MD, Huston J, van Beek EJ, Starr JM, Roberts N . Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) of the human brain: technique, findings and clinical applications . Phys Med Biol . 61 . 24 . R401–R437 . December 2016 . 27845941 . 10.1088/0031-9155/61/24/R401 . 2016PMB....61R.401H . 1194782 .
  28. Van Houten EE, Paulsen KD, Miga MI, Kennedy FE, Weaver JB . October 1999 . An overlapping subzone technique for MR-based elastic property reconstruction . Magnetic Resonance in Medicine . 42 . 4 . 779–86 . 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199910)42:4<779::AID-MRM21>3.0.CO;2-Z . 10502768 . 13244029.
  29. Van Houten EE, Miga MI, Weaver JB, Kennedy FE, Paulsen KD . May 2001 . Three-dimensional subzone-based reconstruction algorithm for MR elastography . Magnetic Resonance in Medicine . 45 . 5 . 827–37 . 10.1002/mrm.1111 . 11323809 . free.
  30. Schwarb H, Johnson CL, McGarry MD, Cohen NJ . May 2016 . Medial temporal lobe viscoelasticity and relational memory performance . NeuroImage . 132 . 534–541 . 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.059 . 4970644 . 26931816.
  31. Schwarb H, Johnson CL, Daugherty AM, Hillman CH, Kramer AF, Cohen NJ, Barbey AK . June 2017 . Aerobic fitness, hippocampal viscoelasticity, and relational memory performance . NeuroImage . 153 . 179–188 . 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.061 . 5637732 . 28366763.
  32. Murphy MC, Huston J, Jack CR, Glaser KJ, Manduca A, Felmlee JP, Ehman RL . September 2011 . Decreased brain stiffness in Alzheimer's disease determined by magnetic resonance elastography . Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging . 34 . 3 . 494–8 . 10.1002/jmri.22707 . 3217096 . 21751286.
  33. 6 . Murphy MC, Jones DT, Jack CR, Glaser KJ, Senjem ML, Manduca A, Felmlee JP, Carter RE, Ehman RL, Huston J . 2016 . Regional brain stiffness changes across the Alzheimer's disease spectrum . NeuroImage. Clinical . 10 . 283–90 . 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.12.007 . 4724025 . 26900568.
  34. Streitberger KJ, Sack I, Krefting D, Pfüller C, Braun J, Paul F, Wuerfel J . 2012 . Brain viscoelasticity alteration in chronic-progressive multiple sclerosis . PLOS ONE . 7 . 1 . e29888 . 2012PLoSO...729888S . 10.1371/journal.pone.0029888 . 3262797 . 22276134 . free.
  35. Sandroff BM, Johnson CL, Motl RW . January 2017 . Exercise training effects on memory and hippocampal viscoelasticity in multiple sclerosis: a novel application of magnetic resonance elastography . Neuroradiology . 59 . 1 . 61–67 . 10.1007/s00234-016-1767-x . 27889837 . 9100607.
  36. 6 . Sack I, Beierbach B, Wuerfel J, Klatt D, Hamhaber U, Papazoglou S, Martus P, Braun J . July 2009 . The impact of aging and gender on brain viscoelasticity . NeuroImage . 46 . 3 . 652–7 . 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.02.040 . 19281851 . 4843107.
  37. Sack I, Streitberger KJ, Krefting D, Paul F, Braun J . 2011 . The influence of physiological aging and atrophy on brain viscoelastic properties in humans . PLOS ONE . 6 . 9 . e23451 . 2011PLoSO...623451S . 10.1371/journal.pone.0023451 . 3171401 . 21931599 . free.
  38. Kalra P, Raterman B, Mo X, Kolipaka A . August 2019 . Magnetic resonance elastography of brain: Comparison between anisotropic and isotropic stiffness and its correlation to age . Magnetic Resonance in Medicine . 82 . 2 . 671–679 . 10.1002/mrm.27757 . 6510588 . 30957304.
  39. Johnson CL, Telzer EH . October 2018 . Magnetic resonance elastography for examining developmental changes in the mechanical properties of the brain . Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience . 33 . 176–181 . 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.08.010 . 5832528 . 29239832.
  40. McIlvain G, Schwarb H, Cohen NJ, Telzer EH, Johnson CL . Mechanical properties of the in vivo adolescent human brain . Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience . 34 . 27–33 . November 2018 . 29906788 . 6289278 . 10.1016/j.dcn.2018.06.001 .
  41. News: Bridger. Haley . vanc . 17 April 2019. Seeing brain activity in 'almost real time'. Harvard Gazette. 2019-04-20.
  42. Rouvière O, Souchon R, Pagnoux G, Ménager JM, Chapelon JY . Magnetic resonance elastography of the kidneys: feasibility and reproducibility in young healthy adults . J Magn Reson Imaging . 34 . 4 . 880–6 . October 2011 . 21769970 . 3176985 . 10.1002/jmri.22670 .
  43. Lee CU, Glockner JF, Glaser KJ, Yin M, Chen J, Kawashima A, Kim B, Kremers WK, Ehman RL, Gloor JM . MR elastography in renal transplant patients and correlation with renal allograft biopsy: a feasibility study . Acad Radiol . 19 . 7 . 834–41 . July 2012 . 22503893 . 3377786 . 10.1016/j.acra.2012.03.003 .
  44. Bensamoun . Sabine F. . Robert . Ludovic . Leclerc . Gwladys E. . Debernard . Laëtitia . Charleux . Fabrice . July 2011 . Stiffness imaging of the kidney and adjacent abdominal tissues measured simultaneously using magnetic resonance elastography . Clinical Imaging . 35 . 4 . 284–287 . 10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.07.009 . 1873-4499 . 21724121.
  45. Low . Gavin . Owen . Nicola E. . Joubert . Ilse . Patterson . Andrew J. . Graves . Martin J. . Alexander . Graeme J. M. . Lomas . David J. . October 2015 . Magnetic resonance elastography in the detection of hepatorenal syndrome in patients with cirrhosis and ascites . European Radiology . 25 . 10 . 2851–2858 . 10.1007/s00330-015-3723-2 . 1432-1084 . 25903705. 1606666 .
  46. Zhang . Jiong . Yu . Yuanmeng . Liu . Xiaoshuang . Tang . Xiong . Xu . Feng . Zhang . Mingchao . Xie . Guotong . Zhang . Longjiang . Li . Xiang . Liu . Zhi-Hong . March 2021 . Evaluation of Renal Fibrosis by Mapping Histology and Magnetic Resonance Imaging . Kidney Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) . 7 . 2 . 131–142 . 10.1159/000513332 . 2296-9381 . 8010230 . 33824869.
  47. Gandhi . Deep . Kalra . Prateek . Raterman . Brian . Mo . Xiaokui . Dong . Huiming . Kolipaka . Arunark . November 2019 . Magnetic Resonance Elastography of kidneys: SE-EPI MRE reproducibility and its comparison to GRE MRE . NMR in Biomedicine . 32 . 11 . e4141 . 10.1002/nbm.4141 . 1099-1492 . 6817380 . 31329347.
  48. Low . Gavin . Owen . Nicola E. . Joubert . Ilse . Patterson . Andrew J. . Graves . Martin J. . Glaser . Kevin J. . Alexander . Graeme J. M. . Lomas . David J. . September 2015 . Reliability of magnetic resonance elastography using multislice two-dimensional spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) and three-dimensional inversion reconstruction for assessing renal stiffness . Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging . 42 . 3 . 844–850 . 10.1002/jmri.24826 . 1522-2586 . 4560097 . 25537823.
  49. Marticorena Garcia . Stephan Rodrigo . Fischer . Thomas . Dürr . Michael . Gültekin . Emin . Braun . Jürgen . Sack . Ingolf . Guo . Jing . September 2016 . Multifrequency Magnetic Resonance Elastography for the Assessment of Renal Allograft Function . Investigative Radiology . 51 . 9 . 591–595 . 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000271 . 1536-0210 . 27504796. 34327744 .
  50. Kim . J. K. . Yuen . D. A. . Leung . G. . Jothy . S. . Zaltzman . J. . Ramesh Prasad . G. V. . Prabhudesai . V. . Mnatzakanian . G. . Kirpalani . A. . September 2017 . Role of Magnetic Resonance Elastography as a Noninvasive Measurement Tool of Fibrosis in a Renal Allograft: A Case Report . Transplantation Proceedings . 49 . 7 . 1555–1559 . 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.04.002 . 1873-2623 . 28838439.
  51. Kirpalani . Anish . Hashim . Eyesha . Leung . General . Kim . Jin K. . Krizova . Adriana . Jothy . Serge . Deeb . Maya . Jiang . Nan N. . Glick . Lauren . Mnatzakanian . Gevork . Yuen . Darren A. . 2017-10-06 . Magnetic Resonance Elastography to Assess Fibrosis in Kidney Allografts . Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology . 12 . 10 . 1671–1679 . 10.2215/CJN.01830217 . 1555-905X . 5628708 . 28855238.
  52. Marticorena Garcia . Stephan R. . Althoff . Christian E. . Dürr . Michael . Halleck . Fabian . Budde . Klemens . Grittner . Ulrike . Burkhardt . Christian . Jöhrens . Korinna . Braun . Jürgen . Fischer . Thomas . Hamm . Bernd . 2021-02-01 . Tomoelastography for Longitudinal Monitoring of Viscoelasticity Changes in the Liver and in Renal Allografts after Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment in 15 Kidney Transplant Recipients with Chronic HCV Infection . Journal of Clinical Medicine . 10 . 3 . 510 . 10.3390/jcm10030510 . 2077-0383 . 7867050 . 33535495. free .
  53. Marticorena Garcia . Stephan Rodrigo . Grossmann . Markus . Bruns . Anne . Dürr . Michael . Tzschätzsch . Heiko . Hamm . Bernd . Braun . Jürgen . Sack . Ingolf . Guo . Jing . February 2019 . Tomoelastography Paired With T2* Magnetic Resonance Imaging Detects Lupus Nephritis With Normal Renal Function . Investigative Radiology . 54 . 2 . 89–97 . 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000511 . 1536-0210 . 30222647. 52286012 .
  54. Lang . Sophia Theresa . Guo . Jing . Bruns . Anne . Dürr . Michael . Braun . Jürgen . Hamm . Bernd . Sack . Ingolf . Marticorena Garcia . Stephan Rodrigo . October 2019 . Multiparametric Quantitative MRI for the Detection of IgA Nephropathy Using Tomoelastography, DWI, and BOLD Imaging . Investigative Radiology . 54 . 10 . 669–674 . 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000585 . 1536-0210 . 31261295. 195772720 .
  55. Brown . Robert S. . Sun . Maryellen R. M. . Stillman . Isaac E. . Russell . Teresa L. . Rosas . Sylvia E. . Wei . Jesse L. . 2020-06-01 . The utility of magnetic resonance imaging for noninvasive evaluation of diabetic nephropathy . Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation. 35 . 6 . 970–978 . 10.1093/ndt/gfz066 . 1460-2385 . 7282829 . 31329940.
  56. Prezzi . Davide . Neji . Radhouene . Kelly-Morland . Christian . Verma . Hema . OʼBrien . Tim . Challacombe . Ben . Fernando . Archana . Chandra . Ashish . Sinkus . Ralph . Goh . Vicky . June 2018 . Characterization of Small Renal Tumors With Magnetic Resonance Elastography: A Feasibility Study . Investigative Radiology . 53 . 6 . 344–351 . 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000449 . 1536-0210 . 29462024. 3435686 .
  57. Han . Jun Hee . Ahn . Jhii-Hyun . Kim . Jae-Seok . December 2020 . Magnetic resonance elastography for evaluation of renal parenchyma in chronic kidney disease: a pilot study . La Radiologia Medica . 125 . 12 . 1209–1215 . 10.1007/s11547-020-01210-1 . 1826-6983 . 32367323. 218495236 .
  58. Güven . Alper Tuna . Idilman . Ilkay S. . Cebrayilov . Cebrayil . Önal . Ceren . Kibar . Müge Üzerk . Sağlam . Arzu . Yıldırım . Tolga . Yılmaz . Rahmi . Altun . Bülent . Erdem . Yunus . Karçaaltıncaba . Muşturay . January 2022 . Evaluation of renal fibrosis in various causes of glomerulonephritis by MR elastography: a clinicopathologic comparative analysis . Abdominal Radiology . 47 . 1 . 288–296 . 10.1007/s00261-021-03296-1 . 2366-0058 . 34633496. 238534093 .
  59. Dittmann . Florian . Tzschätzsch . Heiko . Hirsch . Sebastian . Barnhill . Eric . Braun . Jürgen . Sack . Ingolf . Guo . Jing . September 2017 . Tomoelastography of the abdomen: Tissue mechanical properties of the liver, spleen, kidney, and pancreas from single MR elastography scans at different hydration states . Magnetic Resonance in Medicine . 78 . 3 . 976–983 . 10.1002/mrm.26484 . 1522-2594 . 27699875. 33374176 . free .
  60. Marticorena Garcia . Stephan Rodrigo . Grossmann . Markus . Lang . Sophia Theresa . Tzschätzsch . Heiko . Dittmann . Florian . Hamm . Bernd . Braun . Jürgen . Guo . Jing . Sack . Ingolf . April 2018 . Tomoelastography of the native kidney: Regional variation and physiological effects on in vivo renal stiffness . Magnetic Resonance in Medicine . 79 . 4 . 2126–2134 . 10.1002/mrm.26892 . 1522-2594 . 28856718. 25438749 .
  61. Kemper J, Sinkus R, Lorenzen J, Nolte-Ernsting C, Stork A, Adam G . MR elastography of the prostate: initial in-vivo application . RöFo . 176 . 8 . 1094–9 . August 2004 . 15346284 . 10.1055/s-2004-813279 . 260312137 .
  62. Sahebjavaher RS, Frew S, Bylinskii A, ter Beek L, Garteiser P, Honarvar M, Sinkus R, Salcudean S . Prostate MR elastography with transperineal electromagnetic actuation and a fast fractionally encoded steady-state gradient echo sequence . NMR Biomed . 27 . 7 . 784–94 . July 2014 . 24764278 . 10.1002/nbm.3118 . 10640155 .
  63. Arani A, Da Rosa M, Ramsay E, Plewes DB, Haider MA, Chopra R . Incorporating endorectal MR elastography into multi-parametric MRI for prostate cancer imaging: Initial feasibility in volunteers . J Magn Reson Imaging . 38 . 5 . 1251–60 . November 2013 . 23408516 . 10.1002/jmri.24028 . free .
  64. Sahebjavaher RS, Nir G, Honarvar M, Gagnon LO, Ischia J, Jones EC, Chang SD, Fazli L, Goldenberg SL, Rohling R, Kozlowski P, Sinkus R, Salcudean SE . MR elastography of prostate cancer: quantitative comparison with histopathology and repeatability of methods . NMR Biomed . 28 . 1 . 124–39 . January 2015 . 25395244 . 10.1002/nbm.3218 . 206307554 .
  65. Asbach P, Ro SR, Aldoj N, Snellings J, Reiter R, Lenk J, Köhlitz T, Haas M, Guo J, Hamm B, Braun J, Sack I . In Vivo Quantification of Water Diffusion, Stiffness, and Tissue Fluidity in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Prostate Cancer . Invest Radiol . 55 . 8 . 524–530 . August 2020 . 32496317 . 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000685 . 219315386 .
  66. Li M, Guo J, Hu P, Jiang H, Chen J, Hu J, Asbach P, Sack I, Li W . Tomoelastography Based on Multifrequency MR Elastography for Prostate Cancer Detection: Comparison with Multiparametric MRI . Radiology . 2021 . 299. 2. 362–370 . 33687285. 10.1148/radiol.2021201852 . 232161536 .
  67. Hectors SJ, Lewis S . Tomoelastography of the Prostate: Use of Tissue Stiffness for Improved Cancer Detection . Radiology . 299. 2. 371–373 . March 2021 . 33689473 . 10.1148/radiol.2021210292 . 232195893 .
  68. (Serai SD, Abu-El-Haija M, Trout AT . 3D MR elastography of the pancreas in children . Abdom Radiol (NY) . 44 . 5 . 1834–1840 . May 2019 . 30683979 . 10.1007/s00261-019-01903-w . 8579322 . 59259395 .
  69. Shi Y, Gao F, Li Y, Tao S, Yu B, Liu Z, Liu Y, Glaser KJ, Ehman RL, Guo Q . Differentiation of benign and malignant solid pancreatic masses using magnetic resonance elastography with spin-echo echo planar imaging and three-dimensional inversion reconstruction: a prospective study . Eur Radiol . 28 . 3 . 936–945 . March 2018 . 28986646 . 5812826 . 10.1007/s00330-017-5062-y .
  70. Shi Y, Liu Y, Gao F, Liu Y, Tao S, Li Y, Glaser KJ, Ehman RL, Guo Q . Pancreatic Stiffness Quantified with MR Elastography: Relationship to Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreaticoenteric Anastomosis . Radiology . 288 . 2 . 476–484 . August 2018 . 29664337 . 6067817 . 10.1148/radiol.2018170450 .
  71. Marticorena Garcia SR, Zhu L, Gültekin E, Schmuck R, Burkhardt C, Bahra M, Geisel D, Shahryari M, Braun J, Hamm B, Jin ZY, Sack I, Guo J . Tomoelastography for Measurement of Tumor Volume Related to Tissue Stiffness in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinomas . Invest Radiol . 55 . 12 . 769–774 . December 2020 . 32796197 . 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000704 . 221133340 .
  72. Zhu L, Guo J, Jin Z, Xue H, Dai M, Zhang W, Sun Z, Xu J, Marticorena Garcia SR, Asbach P, Hamm B, Sack I . Distinguishing pancreatic cancer and autoimmune pancreatitis with in vivo tomoelastography . Eur Radiol . 31. 5. 3366–3374. October 2020 . 33125553 . 10.1007/s00330-020-07420-5 . 225994738 .

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Magnetic resonance elastography".

Except where otherwise indicated, Everything.Explained.Today is © Copyright 2009-2024, A B Cryer, All Rights Reserved. Cookie policy.