Carnac stones explained

The Carnac stones (Breton: Steudadoù Karnag) are an exceptionally dense collection of megalithic sites near the south coast of Brittany in northwestern France, consisting of stone alignments (rows), dolmens (stone tombs), tumuli (burial mounds) and single menhirs (standing stones). More than 3,000 prehistoric standing stones were hewn from local granite and erected by the pre-Celtic people of Brittany and form the largest such collection in the world.[1] Most of the stones are within the Breton municipality of Carnac, but some to the east are within neighboring La Trinité-sur-Mer. The stones were erected at some stage during the Neolithic period, probably around 3300 BC, but some may date to as early as 4500 BC.[2]

Although the stones date from 4500–3300 BC, modern beliefs associated them with 1st century AD Roman and later Christian occupations. A Christian legend associated with the stones held that they were pagan soldiers in pursuit of Pope Cornelius when he turned them to stone.[3] [4] [5] Brittany has its own local versions of the Arthurian cycle. Local tradition similarly claims that the reason they stand in such perfectly straight lines is that they are a Roman legion turned to stone by Merlin.

In recent centuries, many of the sites have been neglected, with reports of dolmens being used as sheep shelters, chicken sheds or even ovens.[6] Even more commonly, stones have been removed to make way for roads, or as building materials. The continuing management of the sites remains a controversial topic.[1] [7]

According to Neil Oliver's BBC documentary A History of Ancient Britain,[8] the alignments would have been built by hunter-gatherer people ("These weren't erected by Neolithic farmers, but by Mesolithic hunters"). That would place them in a different category from Stonehenge in England, which has been claimed to be the work of Early European Farmers.[9] The question of which people Carnac stones are to be attributed to is still debated.[10]

Alignments

There are three major groups of stone rowsMénec, Kermario and Kerlescan. They may have once formed a single group but have been split up as stones were removed for other purposes.

The standing stones are made of weathered granite from local outcroppings that once extensively covered the area.[11]

Ménec alignments

Eleven converging rows of menhirs stretching for 1165by. There are what Alexander Thom considered to be the remains of stone circles at either end. According to the tourist office there is a "cromlech containing 71 stone blocks" at the western end and a very ruined cromlech at the eastern end. The largest stones, around 4m (13feet) high, are at the wider, western end; the stones then become as small as 0.6lk=outNaNlk=out high along the length of the alignment before growing in height again toward the extreme eastern end.

Kermario alignment

This fan-like layout recurs a little further along to the east in the Kermario (House of the Dead)[12] alignment. It consists of 1029 stones[13] in ten columns, about 1300m (4,300feet) in length. A stone circle to the east end, where the stones are shorter, was revealed by aerial photography.[14]

Kerlescan alignments

A smaller group of 555 stones, further to the east of the other two sites. It is composed of 13 lines with a total length of about 800m (2,600feet), ranging in height from 80lk=onNaNlk=on to 4NaN. At the extreme west, where the stones are tallest, there is a stone circle which has 39 stones. There may also be another stone circle to the north.

Petit-Ménec alignments

A much smaller group, further east again of Kerlescan, falling within the commune of La Trinité-sur-Mer. These are now set in woods, and most are covered with moss and ivy.[15]

Tumuli

There are several tumuli, mounds of earth built up over a grave. In this area, they generally feature a passage leading to a central chamber which once held neolithic artifacts.

Three exceptionally large burial mounds are known from the Carnac and Morbihan area, dating from the mid-5th millennium BC and known collectively as 'Carnacéen tumuli': Saint-Michel, Tumiac and Mané-er-Hroëk.[16] Each of these tumuli contained a megalithic burial chamber, containing the burial of only one individual, along with numerous large polished stone axeheads, stone arm-rings, and jewellery made from callaïs (variscite and turqouise).[17] Scientific analyses have shown that many of the axeheads are made of jade from the Italian Alps, whilst the callaïs was imported from south-western Iberia.[18] [19] Archaeological evidence indicates that the callaïs was brought from Iberia by boat, across the Bay of Biscay, rather than along the coast or overland.[18] Some of the Carnacéen jade axeheads are up to 46 cm in length and may have taken over a thousand hours to produce, on top of the time required to quarry the material and transport it to Carnac.[20] The extraordinary nature of these burials, the scale of the tumuli, the distant exchange networks and effort involved, all indicate that these were the burials of extremely important elite individuals, that some researchers have described as "divine kings".[21] [22] [23] The large-scale effort and organisation involved in the construction of megalithic monuments, such as the 20.6 metre-tall Grand Menhir of Er Grah, further suggests the existence of rulers or kings in the Carnac and Morbihan region.[24] [25] [26] A similar situation has been described for the later megalithic culture in Ireland, which shows some close similarities to the megalithic culture in Brittany.[27] Based on archaeological, DNA and ethnographic evidence it has been suggested that an elite male buried in the Newgrange passage grave, c. 3200 BC, may have been a "god-king" and part of a "dynastic elite".[28] Similarities have also been noted with the Michelsberg culture in northeastern France and Germany (c. 4200 BC), which featured large tumulus burials within fortified settlements and the use of Alpine jade axes, all associated with the emergence of "high-ranking elites".[29] [30] Engravings on megalithic monuments in Carnac also feature numerous depictions of objects interpreted as symbols of authority and power, such as curved throwing weapons, axes and sceptres.[31] [32]

The Carnacéen tumuli were contemporary with the rich burials of the Varna culture in Bulgaria (c. 4500 BC), which contained more gold than all excavated sites from the rest of the world combined in the 5th millennium BC.[33] The Varna burials attest to the existence of powerful elites in southeastern Europe at the same time as they appear in Carnac.[34] Grave 43 of the Varna necropolis, which contained a single male buried with a sceptre and numerous gold ornaments, also contained an Alpine jade axehead.[35] [36]

Saint-Michel

See main article: article and Saint-Michel tumulus.

The tumulus of Saint-Michel was constructed between 5000 BCE and 3400 BCE. At its base it is 125by, and is 12m (39feet) high. It required 35000m2 of stone and earth. Its function was a tomb for the members of the ruling class. It contained various funerary objects, such as 15 stone chests, large jade axes, pottery, and callaïs jewellery, most of which are currently held by the Museum of Prehistory of Carnac.[37] It was excavated in 1862 by René Galles with a series of vertical pits, digging down 8m (26feet). Le Rouzic also excavated it between 1900 and 1907, discovering the tomb and the stone chests.[38]

A chapel was built on top in 1663 and was rebuilt in 1813, before being destroyed in 1923. The current building is an identical reconstruction of the 1663 chapel, built in 1926.

Tumiac

See main article: article. The tumulus of Tumiac is located in Arzon, in the Rhuys peninsula, south of the Gulf of Morbihan. It is also known as 'Caesar's mound' because, according to local legend, it served as an observatory for Julius Caesar during his war against the Veneti in 56 BC.

The site was excavated in 1853. The crater visible at the top of the tumulus corresponds to the vertical hole made at the time for its exploration. It was the subject of new excavations and work in 1934, which brought to light several secondary burials.

The tumulus, circular/elliptical in shape, is made up of layers of clay. It measures 50m in diameter and 15m in height. It contains a central rectangular burial chamber 4.40m long, 2.40m wide and 1.75m high. This chamber is made up of three monolithic supports and is covered with a quartz slab 4.80m long. It had a wooden floor and two engraved side slabs. The funerary chamber contained rich furniture consisting of 11 jadeite axes, 26 fibrolite axes and 249 callaïs beads. These objects are kept in the Archaeological Museum of Vannes. According to carbon-14 dating, the tumulus of Tumiac was erected between 4790 and 4530 BC.

The tumulus of Tumiac has been classified as a historical monument since 1923.

Mané-er-Hroëk

See main article: article.

The Tumulus of Mané-er-Hroëk (also known as the Tumulus du Ruyk) is located in Locmariaquer, Morbihan, immediately west of the hamlet of Er-Hroueg and about 1 km northeast of the Pierres Plates dolmen.

The tumulus comprises a rectangular burial vault of about 5m by 3m, covered with two roofing slabs, supporting a mound about 100m long and 60m wide. The tumulus rises to approximately 15m above sea level, or almost 8m above the natural ground. The current entrance, with a staircase, is a modern addition. An engraved stele, found broken into three pieces, stands next to the entrance.

The tumulus was excavated in 1863 by the Polymathic Society of Morbihan. These excavations led to the discovery of the vault and stele and brought to light 106 precious stone axes (the largest of which measures 46cm), 49 callaïs beads and 9 callaïs pendants. These objects were subsequently deposited in the Archeological Museum of Vannes. The tumulus has been classified as a historical monument since 1889.

Moustoir

47.6119°N -3.0608°W[39] Also known as Er Mané, it is a chamber tomb 85m (279feet) long, 35m (115feet) wide, and 5m (16feet) high. It has a dolmen at the west end, and two tombs at the east end.[37] A small menhir, approximately 30NaN0 high, is nearby.

Dolmens

There are several dolmens scattered around the area. These dolmens are generally considered to have been tombs; however, the acidic soil of Brittany has eroded away the bones. They were constructed with several large stones supporting a capstone, then buried under a mound of earth. In many cases, the mound is no longer present, sometimes due to archeological excavation, and only the large stones remain, in various states of ruin.

Er-Roc'h-Feutet

North, near the Chapelle de La Madeleine. Has a completely covered roof.

La Madeleine

47.6208°N -3.0482°W[40] A large dolmen measuring 12by, with a 5m (16feet) long broken capstone.[6] It is named after the nearby Chapelle de La Madeleine, which is still used.

Kercado

A rare dolmen still covered by its original cairn. South of the Kermario alignments, it is 25mto(-)30mm (82feetto(-)100feetm) wide, 5m (16feet) high, and has a small menhir on top. Previously surrounded by a circle of small menhirs 4m (13feet) out,[38] the main passage is 6.5m (21.3feet) long and leads to a large chamber where numerous artifacts were found, including axes, arrowheads, some animal and human teeth, some pearls and sherds, and 26 beads of a unique bluish Nephrite gem. It has some Megalithic art carved on its inner surfaces in the form of serpentines and a human-sized double-axe symbol carved in the underside of its main roof slab. In ancient cultures, the axe and more precisely the bi-pennis used to represent the lightning powers of divinity. It was constructed around 4600 BC and used for approximately 3,000 years.[38]

Kerlescan

A roughly rectangular mound, with only one capstone remaining. It is aligned east-to-west, with a passage entrance to the south.[41]

Kermarquer

On a small hill, has two separate chambers.

Mané-Kerioned

(Pixies' mound or Grotte de Grionnec[38]):A group of three dolmens with layout unique in Brittany,[38] once covered by a tumulus. Whereas most groups of dolmens are parallel, these are arranged in a horseshoe. The largest of the three is at the east, 11m (36feet).[37]

Crucuno

A "classic" dolmen, with a 40lk=onNaNlk=on, 7.6m (24.9feet) tablestone resting on pillars roughly 1.8m (05.9feet) high. Prior to 1900, it was connected by a passage making it 24m (79feet) long.[38]

Crucuno stone rectangle

47.625°N -3.122°W

A classic 3, 4, 5 rectangle of 21 menhirs varying in height from 0.91m (02.99feet) to 2.4m (07.9feet) that is aligned along its diagonal to the midsummer sunrise. Alexander Thom suggested it measured forty by thirty of his megalithic yards.[42]

Other formations

There are some individual menhirs and at least one other formation which do not fit into the above categories.

Manio quadrilateral

An arrangement of stones to form the perimeter of a large rectangle. Originally a "tertre tumulus" with a central mound, it is 37m (121feet) long, and aligned to east of northeast. The quadrilateral is 10m (30feet) wide to the east, but only 7m (23feet) wide at the west.[43]

Manio giant

47.603°N -3.056°W[44] Near the quadrilateral is a single massive menhir, now known as the "Giant". Over 6.5m (21.3feet) tall, it was re-erected around 1900 by Zacharie Le Rouzic,[38] and overlooks the nearby Kerlescan alignment.[45]

Excavation and analysis

From the 1720s increasing interest was shown in these features.[46] In 1796, for example, La Tour d'Auvergne attributed them to druidic gatherings.[38] In 1805, A. Maudet de Penhoët claimed they represented stars in the sky.[38]

Englishmen Francis Ronalds and Alexander Blair made a detailed survey of the stones in 1834.[47] Ronalds created the first accurate drawings of many of them with his patented perspective tracing instrument, which were printed in a book Sketches at Carnac (Brittany) in 1834.[48]

Miln and Le Rouzic

The first extensive excavation was performed in the 1860s by Scottish antiquary James Miln (1819–1881), who reported that by then fewer than 700 of the 3,000 stones were still standing.[49] Towards 1875, Miln engaged a local boy, (1864–1939), as his assistant, and Zacharie learnt archaeology on the job. After Miln's death, he left the results of his excavations to the town of Carnac, and the James Miln Museum was established there by his brother Robert to house the artifacts. Zacharie became the director of the Museum and, although self-taught, became an internationally recognised expert on megaliths in the region. He too left the results of his work to the town, and the museum is now named Le Musée de Préhistoire James Miln – Zacharie le Rouzic.[50] [51]

Other theories

In 1887, H. de Cleuziou argued for a connection between the rows of stones and the directions of sunsets at the solstices.[38]

Among more recent studies, Alexander Thom worked with his son Archie from 1970 to 1974 to carry out a detailed survey of the Carnac alignments, and produced a series of papers on the astronomical alignments of the stones as well as statistical analysis supporting his concept of the megalithic yard.[50] [52] Thom's megalithic yard has been challenged.[53] [54]

There are also general theories on the use of the stones as astronomical observatories, as has been claimed for Stonehenge. According to one such theory, the massive menhir at nearby Locmariaquer was linked to the alignments for such a purpose.[55]

Management

The Musée de Préhistoire James Miln – Zacharie le Rouzic is at the centre of conserving and displaying the artefacts from the area.[51] It also contains the "world's largest collection [of] prehistoric[al] exhibits"[37] with over 6,600 prehistoric objects from 136 different sites.

The monuments themselves were listed and purchased by the State at the start of the 20th century to protect them against quarrymen, and while this was successful at the time, in the middle of the century, redevelopment, changes to agricultural practices and increasing tourism bringing visitors to the stones led to rapid deterioration. The (Heritage Ministry) re-examined the issue starting in 1984, and subsequently set up the 'Mission Carnac' in 1991 with the aim of rehabilitating and developing the alignments. This involved restricting public access, launching a series of scientific and technical studies, and producing a plan for conservation and development in the area.[56]

As with the megalithic structure of Stonehenge in England, management of the stones can be controversial. Since 1991, the main groups of stone rows have been protected from the public by fences "to help vegetation growth",[37] preventing visits except by organised tours. They are open during winter, however.[57] When James Miln studied the stones in the 1860s, he reported that fewer than 700 of the 3,000 stones were still standing, and subsequent work during the 1930s and 1980s (using bulldozers) rearranged the stones, re-erecting some, to make way for roads or other structures. In 2002, protesters invaded the site, opening the padlocks and allowing tourists free entry.[49] In particular, the group Collectif Holl a gevred (French and Breton for "the everyone-together collective") occupied the visitor centre for the Kermario alignment, demanding an immediate stop to current management plans and local input into further plans.[58]

In recent years, management of the site has also experimented with allowing sheep to graze among the stones, in order to keep gorse and other weeds under control.[59]

In June 2023, 39 menhirs still outside the UNESCO protected site were destroyed to construct a DIY store of the Mr. Bricolage franchise, which obtained a building permit from the local town hall in August 2022. The affected stones are located in the town of Montaubin, separate from the primary tourist locations of Ménec and Kermario, which are situated a little over 1.5km (1 mile) away.The town's mayor, Olivier Lepick, told AFP that he had "followed the law" and pointed to the "low archaeological value" of objects found during checks before the construction process began. He also admitted to being unaware that the site was listed on the Heritage Atlas, despite reportedly presiding over the group that applied for UNESCO status for the prehistoric sites. While Lepick blamed the region's complex zoning situation, the researcher Christian Obeltz claimed that "elected officials in the area and the department are in a hurry to build up anything because once it is classified with UNESCO, it won't be possible anymore". The local Koun Breizh association has decided to lodge a complaint with the public prosecutor of Vannes for willful destruction of sites that relate to archaeological heritage.[60] [61] [62] [63]

See also

References

General references

External links

Online maps

47.5965°N -3.066°W

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Megaliths of Carnac: Introduction . menhirs.tripod.com . 2010-01-07 .
  2. Web site: Carnac Stones, Brittany. Sacred Destinations Travel Guide. 2006-05-17.
  3. Web site: Marvelling at Carnac's stones . News.therecord.com . 2008-03-08 . 2009-05-05 . https://web.archive.org/web/20120415042932/http://www.therecord.com/Life/Travel/article/320293 . 2012-04-15 . dead .
  4. Web site: France Holidays, Brittany . Franceholidays.co.uk . 2009-05-05 . https://web.archive.org/web/20111003153629/http://www.franceholidays.co.uk/france_holidays/brittany.php . 2011-10-03 . dead .
  5. Web site: Why are Carnac Stones Called Megaliths? . 15 December 2008 . Big Site of Amazing Facts . 2010-01-07 .
  6. Web site: La Madeleine dolmen Burial Chamber (Dolmen). The Megalithic Portal and Megalith Map. TheCaptain. 3 January 2005. 2006-05-17. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20120204060250/http://www.megalithic.co.uk/article.php?sid=9178. 4 February 2012.
  7. Web site: Megaliths of Carnac: Standing Stones / Menhirs . megaliths.sherwoodonline.de . 2010-01-07 .
  8. Web site: A History of Ancient Britain, Series 1, Age of Ancestors. 2020-11-09. www.bbc.co.uk (BBC Two).
  9. Web site: 2019-04-16. Stonehenge built by descendants of early immigrants, study finds. 2020-11-09. The Independent. en.
  10. Book: Laporte. Luc. Bâtisseurs du Néolithique. Roux. Charles-Tanguy Le. 2005. Maison des Roches. fr.
  11. Mens . Emmanuel . Refitting megaliths in western France . Antiquity . 2015 . 82 . 315 . 25–36 . 10.1017/S0003598X00096411 . 163056484 . .
  12. Web site: Mané Kermario. 2006-05-17. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20060923052428/http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/celynog/Brittany/mane_kermario.htm. 2006-09-23.
  13. Web site: Holidays in Brittany. https://web.archive.org/web/20051027065115/http://www.pvf.dircon.co.uk/BCH-4B%28Carnac%29.html. dead. October 27, 2005.
  14. Web site: Kermario . Myweb.tiscali.co.uk . 2009-05-05 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20071024184337/http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/celynog/Brittany/kermario.htm . 2007-10-24 .
  15. Web site: Petit Ménec . Myweb.tiscali.co.uk . 2009-05-05 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20120929192843/http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/celynog/Brittany/petit_menec.htm . 2012-09-29 .
  16. Web site: Paysages de Megalithes de Carnac et du Sud Morbihan. www.megalithes-morbihan.fr.
  17. Real and ideal European maritime transfers along the Atlantic coast during the Neolithic. Documenta Praehistorica. 46. 2019. Cassen. Serge. Rodríguez-Rellán. Carlos. Fábregas Valcarce. Ramon. Grimaud. Valentin. Pailler. Yvan. Schulz Paulsson. Bettina. 308–325. 10.4312/dp.46.19. 210130249 . There are, in the Morbihan region of western France (Brittany), more than one hundred earthen mounds (circular or elongated) containing individual or multiple burials dug into pits or arranged in stone or wood cists. … Among such monuments, three stand out for their isolation in the landscape, gigantic proportions and for the quantity and quality of the objects made of jade and callaïs they contained. These funerary spaces have no structured access and preserved the remains of only one individual. The volumes of their tumuli are extraordinary: Saint-Michel in Carnac (35,000m3), Tumiac in Arzon (16,000m3) and Mané er Hroëck in Locmariaquer (14,600m3); while their maximum height rises between 10 and 15m above the ground. The current state of knowledge suggests Mané er Hroëck was the oldest of the three, followed by Tumiac and – finally – Saint-Michel. The last two have radiocarbon dates available (about 4500 cal BC), obtained from diverse samples and by different researchers.. free.
  18. Real and ideal European maritime transfers along the Atlantic coast during the Neolithic. Documenta Praehistorica. 46. 2019. Cassen. Serge. Rodríguez-Rellán. Carlos. Fábregas Valcarce. Ramon. Grimaud. Valentin. Pailler. Yvan. Schulz Paulsson. Bettina. 308–325. 10.4312/dp.46.19. 210130249 . free.
  19. Book: La parure en callaïs du Néolithique européen. 2019. The time of callaïs: radiocarbon dates and Bayesian chronological modelling. Paulsson. Bettina. Archaeopress. 978-1-78969-280-8. 479–507.
  20. Book: Economic archaeology: from structure to performance in European archaeology. 2013. Kerig. T. Zimmermann. A. The value of things : the production and circulation of alpine jade axes during the 5th – 4th millenia [sic] in a European perspective. Petrequin. Pierre. Cassen. Serge. Errera. Michel. Klassen. Lutz. Pétrequin. Anne−Marie. Sheridan. Alison. Habelt. 65−82. the longest Alpine jade axehead from one of the massive Carnac mounds at Mané er Hroëck at Locmariaquer (Morbihan, France) measures no less than 46.6 cm in length … hundreds of hours of supplementary polishing would have been required to produce the ‘Carnac−style’ axeheads, with their perfect regularity of form, their extreme thinness and sometimes with a perforation through their butt. … For certain examples, a figure of 1000 hours is far from being unreasonable..
  21. Book: Petrequin. Pierre. Cassen. Serge. Errera. Michel. Klassen. Lutz. Sheridan. Alison. 29: Sacred things… the idealised functions of Alpine jade objects in western Europe. 2012. JADE – Grandes Haches Alpines du Néolithique Européen, Ve et IVe Millénaires av. J.C.. 978-2848674124. 1356–1357. Presses universitaires de Franche-Comté . The status of the individuals who were interred in the massive mounds in the Carnac area of the Gulf of Morbihan, accompanied by numerous large Alpine axeheads and by other objects imported over long distances, is therefore all the more exceptional and demands to be explained. ... The evidence encourages us to regard this society – which produced the earliest megalithic architecture in Europe around the middle of the 5th millennium, together with a whole repertoire of symbolic imagery engraved on extraordinary standing stones, as one which was markedly inegalitarian, with some men having acquired an intermediary status between the elite and the supernatural powers. Such individuals would have been theocrats, ‘divine kings’..
  22. Book: The World of Stonehenge . June 2022 . 145–147 . British Museum Press . 9780714123493 . Garrow. Duncan . Wilkin. Neil . From around 6,800 years ago, Brittany saw the construction of massive monuments, including burial mounds and the famous multi-stone alignments at Carnac as well as the erection of enormous menhirs (standing stones). Remarkable objects made from imported materials have been found in these tombs … One of the most impressive monuments is Tumulus Saint-Michel, a burial mound 125 metres long, 60 metres wide and 10 metres high, so large it now has a medieval chapel on top. Excavations there in the nineteenth century revealed thirty-nine polished stone axes, eleven of which were made of Alpine jadeitite (jade), along with several pendants and over a hundred beads made of Iberian variscite stone. It is likely that these objects were buried with a single person who was incredibly important to the community of mourners..
  23. Book: Economic archaeology: from structure to performance in European archaeology. 2013. Kerig. T. Zimmermann. A. The value of things: the production and circulation of alpine jade axes during the 5th – 4th millenia [sic] in a European perspective. Petrequin. Pierre. Cassen. Serge. Errera. Michel. Klassen. Lutz. Pétrequin. Anne−Marie. Sheridan. Alison. Habelt. 65−82. The ‘Powerful Ones’ who were interred under the massive mounds of Tumiac at Arzon, Saint−Michel at Carnac and Mané er Hroëck at Locmariaquer would have been supreme sovereigns in a system of royalty based on religious concepts, where the ‘King’ is an intermediary between people and supernatural Powers..
  24. Book: Kadrow, Slawomir. Paradigm Found: Archaeological Theory Present, Past And Future. 2015. Kristiansen. Kristian. Šmejda. Ladislav. Turek. Jan. The Idea of the Eneolithic. Oxbow Books. 978-1-78297-770-4. 248–262. Some researchers argue that the large tombs with richly furnished graves and the cult centres in the form of stone rows at Carnac indicate the possible existence of ‘kingdoms’ at that time, ruled by priests..
  25. Book: Cunliffe, Barry. On the Ocean. 2017. Oxford University Press. 978-0-19-875789-4. 124. The Grand Menhir Brisé was once a single stone standing to a height of seventeen metres (with a further three metres below ground). It marked the termination of a row of menhirs at Locmariaquer in Morbihan on the south coast of Brittany. The stone was brought from a source more than ten kilometres away. Its transport and erection were a triumph of the coercive power at work within the Early Neolithic community..
  26. Book: Jeunesse, Christian. The Neolithic of Europe. 2017. Bickle. Penny. Cummings. Vicki. Hofman. Daniela. Pollard. Joshua. From Neolithic kings to the Staffordshire hoard. Hoards and aristocratic graves in the European Neolithic: the birth of a ‘Barbarian’ Europe?. 175–186. Oxbow Books. 978-1-78570-654-7. the builders of the Carnac graves are very likely the same people who also solved the technical problems linked to the quarrying, the haulage over at least 10km and the erection of the Er Grah ‘grand menhir’. … one could say that the existence of a king explains the invention of the lost wax technique in Varna culture and the processes that led to the erection of the Er Grah broken menhir at Locmariaquer..
  27. Gavrinis and Newgrange: Two connected passage graves?. Archaeology Ireland. 31. 3. 2017. Harbison. Peter. 17–19. 90014377 .
  28. Nature. 582. 2020. A dynastic elite in monumental Neolithic society. Cassidy. Lara. 7812 . 384–388. 10.1038/s41586-020-2378-6. 32555485 . 7116870 . 2020Natur.582..384C .
  29. Web site: Tumulus and stone axes. Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum. 5 July 2022.
  30. Gronenborn. Detlef. A later fifth-millennium cal BC tumulus at Hofheim-Kapellenberg, Germany . 2020. Antiquity. 94. 375. 10.15184/aqy.2020.79 . 219743862 . free.
  31. Book: Petrequin. Pierre. Cassen. Serge. Errera. Michel. Klassen. Lutz. Tsonev. Tsoni. Dimitrov. Kalin. Mitkova. Rositsa. 26: Axeheads of «Alpine jades» in Bulgaria. 2012. JADE – Grandes Haches Alpines du Néolithique Européen, Ve et IVe Millénaires av. J.C.. 1231–1279. It has long been recognised that, in Neolithic and Chalcolithic Europe, there existed a kind of ‘mirror image’ between Carnac and the Gulf of Morbihan (Brittany, France) in the west and Varna (Bulgaria) in the east. Around the middle of the fifth millennium BC, these two areas display a remarkable wealth in their funerary assemblages (with jade and variscite being used in the west and gold and copper in the east), and they also shared some social concepts, featuring a marked degree of social inequality, expressed through symbols of violence and of power, curved throwing weapons, sceptres and axes. … Mont Viso and the Beigua massif (in the Italian Alps) occupied a central position in the diffusion of Alpine axeheads (through repeated contacts) across a vast swathe of Europe, from Carnac to Varna..
  32. Cassen. Serge. La crosse, point d'interrogation? Poursuite de l'analyse d'un signe néolithique, notamment à Locmariaquer (Morbihan) . 2012. L'Anthropologie. 116. 2. 171–216 . 10.1016/j.anthro.2012.03.006 .
  33. Book: The Lost World of Old Europe: The Danube Valley, 5000-3500 BC. The Varna Eneolithic Cemetery in the Context of the Late Copper Age in the East Balkans. 2010. 9780691143880. Slavchev. Vladimir. Anthony. David. Chi. Jennifer. New York University, Institute for the Study of the Ancient World. 192–211. The weight and the number of gold finds in the Varna cemetery exceeds by several times the combined weight and number of all of the gold artifacts found in all excavated sites of the same millennium, 5000-4000 BC, from all over the world, including Mesopotamia and Egypt. … Three graves contained gold objects that together accounted for more than half of the total weight of all gold grave goods yielded by the cemetery. A scepter, symbol of a supreme secular or religious authority, was discovered in each of these three graves..
  34. Book: Petrequin. Pierre. Cassen. Serge. Errera. Michel. Klassen. Lutz. Tsonev. Tsoni. Dimitrov. Kalin. Mitkova. Rositsa. 26: Axeheads of «Alpine jades» in Bulgaria. 2012. JADE – Grandes Haches Alpines du Néolithique Européen, Ve et IVe Millénaires av. J.C.. 1231–1279. It has long been recognised that, in Neolithic and Chalcolithic Europe, there existed a kind of ‘mirror image’ between Carnac and the Gulf of Morbihan (Brittany, France) in the west and Varna (Bulgaria) in the east. Around the middle of the fifth millennium BC, these two areas display a remarkable wealth in their funerary assemblages (with jade and variscite being used in the west and gold and copper in the east), and they also shared some social concepts, featuring a marked degree of social inequality, expressed through symbols of violence and of power, curved throwing weapons, sceptres and axes. … Mont Viso and the Beigua massif (in the Italian Alps) occupied a central position in the diffusion of Alpine axeheads (through repeated contacts) across a vast swathe of Europe, from Carnac to Varna..
  35. Book: Economic archaeology: from structure to performance in European archaeology. 2013. Kerig. T. Zimmermann. A. The value of things : the production and circulation of alpine jade axes during the 5th – 4th millenia [sic] in a European perspective. Petrequin. Pierre. Cassen. Serge. Errera. Michel. Klassen. Lutz. Pétrequin. Anne−Marie. Sheridan. Alison. Habelt. 65−82. At the pan−European scale, large jade axeheads are very rare in tombs. … Two regions of Europe offer an exception to this general situation. Firstly, on the shores of the Black Sea, tomb 43 in the cemetery of Varna I, one of the richest graves, with the most gold objects, contained an axehead made of jade from Mont Beigua that had been placed between the legs of a man. This had clearly been a personal possession of a particularly rich individual. The second and most important exception is to be found on the southern coast of Brittany, in the gigantic Carnac mounds close to the Gulf of Morbihan..
  36. Rings and axeheads of Alpine jades: imports to and exports from the Gulf of Morbihan during the 5th millennium and the beginning of the 4th millennium . Archaeopress . Petrequin . Pierre. 2019 . Within the sphere of long-distance links based on the functioning of inegalitarian societies, the role of the gulf of Morbihan during the 5th millennium is becoming increasingly clear, as an epicentre of a ‘Europe of jade’, symmetrical to Varna as an epicentre in the ‘Europe of copper’. In both cases, the strategic location of these centres of power (between the sea and the continent), the role of salt in the exchanges and the power of religious beliefs could have been some of the primary conditions for the success of these societies with their unequally-distributed riches..
  37. Web site: Office de Tourisme de Carnac . 2006-07-03 . 2009-07-25 . https://web.archive.org/web/20060703063525/http://www.ot-carnac.fr/version_anglaise/histoire_alignement.php . 2006-07-03.
  38. Web site: Annick Jacq . Carnac . Bretagne-celtic.com . 2009-05-05 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20120204191614/http://www.bretagne-celtic.com/carte_carnac.htm . 2012-02-04 .
  39. Web site: The Megalithic Portal and Megalith Map: Moustoir tumulus Moustoir Er Mané – Chambered Tomb. Megalithic.co.uk . 2009-06-23.
  40. Web site: The Megalithic Portal and Megalith Map: La Madeleine (Carnac) Burial Chamber (Dolmen) . Megalithic.co.uk . 2009-05-05 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20120204060250/http://www.megalithic.co.uk/article.php?sid=9178 . 2012-02-04 .
  41. Web site: Kerlescan . Myweb.tiscali.co.uk . 2009-05-05 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20120929191807/http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/celynog/Brittany/kerlescan.htm . 2012-09-29 .
  42. Book: Alexander Thom. Archibald Stevenson Thom. Megalithic remains in Britain and Brittany. 30 April 2011. 1978. Oxford University Press US. 978-0-19-858156-7.
  43. Web site: Manio Quadrilateral . Myweb.tiscali.co.uk . 2009-05-05 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20120205043709/http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/celynog/Brittany/manio_quadrilateral.htm . 2012-02-05 .
  44. Web site: The Megalithic Portal and Megalith Map: Geant du Manio Le Manio (Standing Stone (Menhir)) . Megalithic.co.uk . 2009-06-23.
  45. Web site: Géant de Manio . Myweb.tiscali.co.uk . 2009-05-05 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20071024131838/http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/celynog/Brittany/geant_de_manio.htm . 2007-10-24 .
  46. Web site: Megalithism in Morbihan - Carnac - Astonishing heaps of stones. www2.culture.gouv.fr.
  47. Book: Ronalds, B.F.. Sir Francis Ronalds: Father of the Electric Telegraph. Imperial College Press. 2016. 978-1-78326-917-4. London.
  48. Web site: Sketches at Carnac (Brittany) in 1834. Blair and Ronalds. 1836. Google Books. 22 June 2016.
  49. Web site: Bretons fight for Carnac to stay in the Stone Age : The Megalithic Portal and Megalith Map . https://web.archive.org/web/20120204060153/http://www.megalithic.co.uk/article.php?sid=2146410728 . 2012-02-04 .
  50. Web site: Carnac - a megalithic wonderland - M E g A L i T h i A. www.megalithia.com.
  51. Web site: Le Musée de Préhistoire à Carnac . https://web.archive.org/web/20060517075032/http://www.museedecarnac.com/musee_carnac.htm . 2006-05-17 .
  52. Book: Wood, John Edwin . 1978 . Sun, Moon and Standing Stones . registration . paperback 1980 . Oxford University Press . Oxford . 0-19-285089-X .
  53. Book: Heggie, Douglas C.. Megalithic Science: Ancient Mathematics and Astronomy in North-west Europe. 1981. Thames and Hudson. 0-500-05036-8. 58.
  54. Book: Ruggles, Clive. Astronomy in Prehistoric Britain and Ireland. 1999. Yale University Press. 978-0-300-07814-5. 83.
  55. Web site: Dolmen. Tumulus. Menhir . En Images. Dinosoria. www.dinosoria.com.
  56. Web site: Reality and fantasy - The Carnac project. www2.culture.gouv.fr.
  57. Web site: Carnac . Myweb.tiscali.co.uk . 2009-05-05 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20120205043735/http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/celynog/Brittany/carnac.htm . 2012-02-05 .
  58. Web site: No Pasaran - Carnac : Occupation holl a gevred . 2006-05-11 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20081227231719/http://nopasaran.samizdat.net/article.php3?id_article=662 . 2008-12-27 . fr.
  59. Web site: Menec West . Myweb.tiscali.co.uk . 2009-05-05 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20120205043812/http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/celynog/Brittany/menec_west.htm . 2012-02-05 .
  60. News: Anger as pre-historic stones destroyed for French DIY store . Le Monde.fr . 8 June 2023 .
  61. Web site: À Carnac, 39 menhirs détruits pour construire un magasin de bricolage : Que s'est-il passé ? . 6 June 2023 .
  62. Web site: France: Ancient standing stones bulldozed for massive DIY chain store . .
  63. Web site: Prehistoric standing stones in western France destroyed during construction of DIY store – The Local.

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Carnac stones".

Except where otherwise indicated, Everything.Explained.Today is © Copyright 2009-2024, A B Cryer, All Rights Reserved. Cookie policy.