Lyndon LaRouche U.S. presidential campaigns explained

Committee:Lyndon LaRouche for President
Campaign:1976 United States presidential election
1980 Democratic Party presidential primaries
1984 Democratic Party presidential primaries
1988 Democratic Party presidential primaries
1992 Democratic Party presidential primaries
1996 Democratic Party presidential primaries
2000 Democratic Party presidential primaries
2004 Democratic Party presidential primaries
2016 United States presidential election
Candidate:Lyndon LaRouche
Founder of the LaRouche movement
R. Wayne Evans (1976)
Billy Davis (1984)
Debra Hanania Freeman (1988)
James Bevel (1992)
Alexander Hamilton † (2016)
1st United States Secretary of the Treasury
Affiliation:U.S. Labor Party (1976)
Democratic Party (1980, 1984, 1988, 1992, 1996, 2000, 2004)
Independent Democratic (1984)
National Economic Recovery (1988)
Democrats for Economic Recovery (1992)
Write-in (2016)

Lyndon LaRouche's United States presidential campaigns were a controversial staple of American politics between 1976 and 2004. LaRouche ran for president on eight consecutive occasions, a record for any candidate, and tied Harold Stassen's record as a perennial candidate. LaRouche ran for the Democratic nomination for President of the United States seven times, beginning in 1980.

Campaigns

1976

In 1971 LaRouche founded the U.S. Labor Party as a vehicle for electoral politics. In 1976 he ran for President of the United States as the U.S. Labor Party candidate, polling 40,043 votes (0.05%). According to LaRouche supporters, the major accomplishment of the campaign was the broadcast of a paid half-hour television address, which gave LaRouche the opportunity to air his views before a national audience. This was to become a regular feature of later campaigns during the 1980s and 1990s.

His platform included a reference to Vice President Nelson Rockefeller: "Impeach Rocky to prevent imminent nuclear war".[1]

1980

Since the autumn of 1979, LaRouche resigned from the U.S. Labor Party and founded the National Democratic Policy Committee (NDPC), a political action committee whose name drew complaints from the Democratic National Committee, who saw these efforts as infiltration.[2] [3]

LaRouche budgeted $150,000 for the first primary state, New Hampshire. That included air time on TV stations in overlapping markets such as Maine and Vermont, along with 1,928 radio advertisements on New Hampshire radio. LaRouche reportedly spent $4,000 on a half-hour broadcast on WBZ, and a total of $24,200 on all TV spots in the state.[4]

The Democratic National Committee asserted that LaRouche is not a Democrat, but the U.S. electoral system made it impossible for the party to prevent LaRouche followers entering Democratic primaries. LaRouche himself polled negligible vote totals, but continued to promote himself as a serious political candidate, a claim which was sometimes accepted by elements of the media and some political figures.

In the end, LaRouche got 177,784 (0.91%) votes in the primaries.

1984

LaRouche's 1984 campaign was his most successful, garnering over 76,000 votes. Independent Democrats for LaRouche, a committee formed for the 1984 election, was found guilty in 1988 of soliciting loans in violation of Minnesota securities law, and was ordered to stop selling unregistered Securities.[5]

1988

In 1988 LaRouche and running mate Debra Hanania Freeman received 25,082 votes, or 0.03% of the vote.[6]

1992

In 1992, LaRouche became the third person in U.S. history (after Joseph Smith and Eugene Debs) to run for president from a prison cell. Classical violinist Norbert Brainin performed a benefit concert on his behalf in Washington, D.C.; the Washington Post reviewer praised his musicianship while condemning his political message. LaRouche's running mate, who did the active campaigning, was the American Civil Rights Movement leader, Reverend James Bevel.

1996

Prior to the primaries the Chair of the Democratic National Committee, Don Fowler, ruled that LaRouche "is not to be considered a qualified candidate for nomination of the Democratic Party for President" on account of LaRouche's "expressed political beliefs, including beliefs which are explicitly racist and anti-Semitic, and otherwise utterly contrary to the fundamental beliefs ... of the Democratic Party and ... on his past activities including exploitation of and defrauding contributors and voters."[7] In subsequent primaries LaRouche received enough votes in Louisiana and Virginia to get one delegate from each state. When the state parties refused to award the delegates LaRouche sued in federal court, claiming a violation of the Voting Rights Act. After losing in the district court the case was appealed to the First District Court of Appeals, which sustained the lower court.[8]

In 1999, however, a court ruled that the Democratic National Committee had the right to keep LaRouche from electing delegates to the Democratic National Convention, based on a party requirement that a Democratic nominee must be a registered voter. LaRouche, as a convicted felon, was not eligible to be a registered voter in the state of Virginia, where he lived. (see United States v. LaRouche)

2000

A routine FEC audit of the 2000 "LaRouche's Committee for a New Bretton Woods" campaign found that vendors whose sole client was Lyndon LaRouche had added unqualified "mark-up charges" to the bill submitted for matching funds. The vendors were American System Publications, Inc., Eastern States Distributors, Inc., EIR News Services, Inc., Hamilton Systems Distributors, Inc., Mid-West Circulation Corp., Southeast Literature Sales, Inc., and Southwest Literature Distributors, Inc. They had overbilled by $241,519 and the campaign was ordered to repay $222,034. The FEC decision was affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.[9] [10]

LaRouche qualified to win six delegates in the Arkansas Democratic primary.[11] A minimum of 15% vote was required and LaRouche took 22%. However, the Democratic Party refused to grant him delegates because he was ineligible to vote.

2004

He waged a campaign, begun in October 2002,[12] to have Dick Cheney dumped from the Republican ticket.

Again, LaRouche gained negligible electoral support. However, according to Federal Election Commission statistics, LaRouche had more individual contributors to his 2004 presidential campaign than any other candidate, until the final quarter of the primary season, when John Kerry surpassed him. As of the April 15 filing, LaRouche had 7834 individual contributions, of those who have given cumulatively, $200 or more, as compared to 6257 for John Kerry, 5582 for John Edwards, 4090 for Howard Dean, and 2744 for Dick Gephardt.[13]

He ran even though his home state of Virginia is one of a handful of states which still has lifetime denial of the vote to felons, which can be overturned only on appeal to the governor. (Neither the Constitution nor federal statute law requires presidents to be registered voters.) The Democratic Party did not consider his candidacy to be legitimate and ruled him ineligible to win delegates. He gained negligible electoral support. He was endorsed by two Democratic state representatives, Erik Fleming of Mississippi and Harold James of Pennsylvania, though Fleming later called the endorsement "the worst mistake of all."[14] LaRouche was not one of the major candidates invited to the primary-season debates, although he did participate in some alternative forums for minor candidates.

LaRouche was present in Boston during the 2004 Democratic National Convention but did not attend the convention itself. His followers sang songs insulting Democratic nominee John Kerry.[15] Later in the campaign his followers heckled Kerry and disrupted his rallies.[16] [17]

He held a media conference in which he declared his support for John Kerry and pledged to mobilize his organization to help defeat George W. Bush in the November presidential election.

2016

On October 17, 2016, LaRouchePAC advised readers to write in Lyndon LaRouche and Alexander Hamilton in the 2016 Presidential elections. In the article "What We Need in 2016: — Alexander Hamilton's Principles, LaRouche's Four Laws", the PAC wrote "American citizens should write in LaRouche's name at the presidential ballot box to stand for the re-adoption of Alexander Hamilton's economic principles, as LaRouche has reclarified them. "I'm writing in LaRouche and Alexander Hamilton, let's get the nation to elect the right principles" will cut through the dread with which Americans are questioning each other about the approach of Election Day."[18]

This exhortation was disseminated by PAC members through social media. No verifiable statistics have been assembled concerning vote totals.

Campaign statistics

Lyndon LaRouche political statistics (amounts in USD)(* off year campaign activity)
YearPartyRunning mateTotal funds raisedMatching fundsCampaign debtPrimary votesSources
1976LaborRonald Wayne Evans
1980Dem$526,253177,784http://www.fec.gov/members/thomas/thomasarticle08.pdf
1984Dem Billy Davis$494,146 http://www.fec.gov/members/thomas/thomasarticle08.pdf
1988Dem Debra Freeman$825,577 http://www.fec.gov/members/thomas/thomasarticle08.pdf
1992Dem $2,709,531 ineligible$2,223,985 https://web.archive.org/web/20060606131724/http://www.fecinfo.com/cgi-win/x_candpg.exe?DoFn=P60000452*1992http://www.fec.gov/members/thomas/thomasarticle08.pdf
1994*$1,154,623 $2,124,099 http://www.fecinfo.com
1996Dem $4,304,184 $624,692 $2,079,927 496,423 https://web.archive.org/web/20060606131248/http://www.fecinfo.com/cgi-win/x_candpg.exe?DoFn=P60000452*1996http://www.fec.gov/members/thomas/thomasarticle08.pdf
1998*$138,424 $2,051,489 https://web.archive.org/web/20060606131505/http://www.fecinfo.com/cgi-win/x_candpg1.exe?DoFn=&CandID=P60000452
2000Dem $4,898,362 $1,448,389 $2,471,918 327,928 http://www.fecinfo.comhttp://www.fec.gov/members/thomas/thomasarticle08.pdf
2002*$3,080,601 $2,360,261 https://web.archive.org/web/20060606131505/http://www.fecinfo.com/cgi-win/x_candpg1.exe?DoFn=&CandID=P60000452
2004Dem $10,255,464 $1,456,019 $3,217,890https://web.archive.org/web/20041210085220/http://www.opensecrets.org/presidential/summary.asp?ID=N00002047
Total since 1990$23,814,604 $2,899,889 $18,881,195 https://web.archive.org/web/20070930115222/http://www.opensecrets.org/presidential/summary.asp?ID=N00002047&Cycle=All

Campaign committees

Unknown years

FEC cases

FEC chronology 1979–1992

(Adapted from material at the FEC website.http://www.fec.gov/info/appone.htm)

Other FEC cases

In 2004, the FEC dismissed a complaint filed by LaRouche associate Barbara M. Boyd against LaRouche Watch, an online forum, and Red Letter Press, a publishing house affiliated with the Freedom Socialist Party. The Commission found "no reason to believe" that the forum was a political action committee, or that it was subsidized by Red Letter Press, as alleged by Boyd.[19]

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. News: Fascism Wrapped in an American Flag. Chip. Berlet. Chip Berlet. Joel Bellman. March 10, 1989. Political Research Associates. August 31, 2009. August 31, 2009. https://web.archive.org/web/20090831042037/http://www.publiceye.org/larouche/nclc1.html. live.
  2. News: 3-time fringe presidential hopeful LaRouche remains an enigma. Robert . Estill. The San Diego Union. San Diego, Calif.. March 23, 1986. A.15.
  3. "Spannaus to run against Sen. Warner, again", Joe Borda, Loudon County Times, April 30, 2002 http://www.loudountimes.com/news/2002/apr/30/spannaus-to-run-against-sen-warner-again/ Party insiders and political observers say that they believe the LaRouche organization is trying to use the Democratic Party to legitimize and restart its once-successful fund-raising operation. Former Democratic Party chair Rollie Winter confirmed that for much of the past decade county Democrats have fought to keep LaRouche and his followers from taking over the local Democratic Party. Mary Broz, communications director for the Democratic Party of Virginia, said there is no such thing as a LaRouche Democrat. "That just doesn't exist." Added Alan Moore, former director of the state Democratic Party, "Followers of Lyndon LaRouche are not Democrats."
  4. News: Television Hard Sell Begins. Stay Tuned. . Chris . Black . The Boston Globe . January 16, 1980 . 1.
  5. "U.S. Supreme Court;All-white jury acceptable in murder suit, court says" USA Today [McLean, Va.] 10 Jan. 1989, 06a.
  6. https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=940DEEDB103AF93AA15751C1A96E948260 "1988 Vote: the Final Word"
  7. LaRouche v. Fowler, 152 F. 3d 974, 975–76 (D.C. Cir. 1998), quoted in Extremism in the Electoral Arena: Challenging the Myth of American Exceptionalism. Gur. Bligh. Brigham Young University Law Review. Provo, Utah. 2008. 5. 1367.
  8. Web site: http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/common/opinions/199808/96-7191a.txt . https://web.archive.org/web/20060928001959/http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/common/opinions/199808/96-7191a.txt . 2006-09-28.
  9. Web site: Larouche . 2006-05-09 . https://web.archive.org/web/20060509003558/http://www.fec.gov/press/press2006/20060303litigation.html . 2006-05-09 . dead .
  10. Web site: http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/docs/common/opinions/200603/04-1311a.pdf . https://web.archive.org/web/20060927121111/http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/docs/common/opinions/200603/04-1311a.pdf . 2006-09-27.
  11. Web site: Ballot Access News -- June 1, 2000. February 1, 2008. March 16, 2008. https://web.archive.org/web/20080316152753/http://www.ballot-access.org/2000/0601.html. live.
  12. Web site: Iraq is a Fuse, but Cheney Built the Bomb, by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. 2004-09-28. 2004-08-03. https://web.archive.org/web/20040803220303/http://www.larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2002/020922_cheney_must_resign.html. live.
  13. Web site: FEC Report: Presidential Candidate LaRouche Has the Broadest Support. 2008-02-01. 2008-02-01. https://web.archive.org/web/20080201011729/http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2003/3017_larouche_leads.html. live.
  14. https://web.archive.org/web/20060329121947/http://kydem.blogspot.com/2005/04/friday-roundup.html Friday roundup
  15. News: Convention Notebook. Steve . Terrell . The Santa Fe New Mexican. July 30, 2004. A.7.
  16. News: You know it's almost election time when a particular voting. Concord Monitor. Concord, N.H.. October 5, 2004. A.01.
  17. News: Few tough questions in campaign town halls. ANNE . GEARAN. Associated Press. Columbian. Vancouver, Wash.. October 5, 2004. A.2.
  18. Web site: What We Need in 2016: — Alexander Hamilton's Principles, LaRouche's Four Laws. 2016-12-07. 2016-12-20. https://web.archive.org/web/20161220174557/https://larouchepac.com/20161017/what-we-need-2016-alexander-hamiltons-principles-larouches-four-laws. live.
  19. http://www.fec.gov/press/press2004/20041104mur.html MUR 5400