In probability theory, Luce's choice axiom, formulated by R. Duncan Luce (1959),[1] states that the relative odds of selecting one item over another from a pool of many items is not affected by the presence or absence of other items in the pool. Selection of this kind is said to have "independence from irrelevant alternatives" (IIA).[2]
Consider a set
X
P
a\inA\subsetX
A
a
A
P(a\midA)
Luce proposed two choice axioms. The second one is usually meant by "Luce's choice axiom", as the first one is usually called "independence from irrelevant alternatives" (IIA).[3]
Luce's choice axiom 1 (IIA): if
P(a\midA)=0,P(b\midA)>0
a,b\inB\subsetA
P(a\midB)=0
Luce's choice axiom 2 ("path independence"): for any
a\inB\subsetA
Luce's choice axiom 1 is implied by choice axiom 2.
See also: Matching law.
Define the matching law selection rule
P(a\midA)=
u(a) | |
\suma'\inu(a') |
u:A\to(0,infty)
Theorem: Any matching law selection rule satisfies Luce's choice axiom. Conversely, if
P(a\midA)>0
a\inA\subsetX
In economics, it can be used to model a consumer's tendency to choose one brand of product over another.
In behavioral psychology, it is used to model response behavior in the form of matching law.
In cognitive science, it is used to model approximately rational decision processes.