Lorentz space explained

In mathematical analysis, Lorentz spaces, introduced by George G. Lorentz in the 1950s,[1] [2] are generalisations of the more familiar

Lp

spaces.

The Lorentz spaces are denoted by

Lp,q

. Like the

Lp

spaces, they are characterized by a norm (technically a quasinorm) that encodes information about the "size" of a function, just as the

Lp

norm does. The two basic qualitative notions of "size" of a function are: how tall is the graph of the function, and how spread out is it. The Lorentz norms provide tighter control over both qualities than the

Lp

norms, by exponentially rescaling the measure in both the range (

p

) and the domain (

q

). The Lorentz norms, like the

Lp

norms, are invariant under arbitrary rearrangements of the values of a function.

Definition

(X,\mu)

is the space of complex-valued measurable functions

f

on X such that the following quasinorm is finite
\|f\|
Lp,q(X,\mu)

=

1
q
p

\left\|t\mu\{|f|\ge

1
p
t\}

\right

\|
q
L\left(R+,
dt
t
\right)

where

0<p<infty

and

0<q\leqinfty

. Thus, when

q<infty

,
\|f\|
Lp,q(X,\mu)
1
q
=p
infty
\left(\int
0

tq\mu\left\{x:|f(x)|\ge

q
p
t\right\}
dt
t
1
q
\right)

=

infty
\left(\int
0

l(\tau\mu\left\{x:|f(x)|p\ge\tau

q
p
\right\}r)
d\tau
\tau
1
q
\right)

.

and, when

q=infty

,
p
\|f\|
Lp,infty(X,\mu)

=\supt>0\left(tp\mu\left\{x:|f(x)|>t\right\}\right).

It is also conventional to set

Linfty,infty(X,\mu)=Linfty(X,\mu)

.

Decreasing rearrangements

The quasinorm is invariant under rearranging the values of the function

f

, essentially by definition. In particular, given a complex-valued measurable function

f

defined on a measure space,

(X,\mu)

, its decreasing rearrangement function,

f\ast:[0,infty)\to[0,infty]

can be defined as

f\ast(t)=inf\{\alpha\inR+:df(\alpha)\leqt\}

where

df

is the so-called distribution function of

f

, given by

df(\alpha)=\mu(\{x\inX:|f(x)|>\alpha\}).

Here, for notational convenience,

inf\varnothing

is defined to be

infty

.

The two functions

|f|

and

f\ast

are equimeasurable, meaning that

λl(\{x\inX:|f(x)|>\alpha\}r)=λl(\{t>0:f\ast(t)>\alpha\}r),\alpha>0,

where

λ

is the Lebesgue measure on the real line. The related symmetric decreasing rearrangement function, which is also equimeasurable with

f

, would be defined on the real line by

R\nit\mapsto\tfrac{1}{2}f\ast(|t|).

Given these definitions, for

0<p<infty

and

0<q\leqinfty

, the Lorentz quasinorms are given by

\|f

\|
Lp,

=\begin{cases}\left(\displaystyle

infty
\int
0

\left

1
p
(t

f\ast(t)\right)q

dt
t
1
q
\right)

&q\in(0,infty),\\ \sup\limitst

1
p
t

f\ast(t)&q=infty. \end{cases}

Lorentz sequence spaces

When

(X,\mu)=(N,\#)

(the counting measure on

N

), the resulting Lorentz space is a sequence space. However, in this case it is convenient to use different notation.

Definition.

For

(an)

infty\inR
n=1

N

(or

CN

in the complex case), let \left\|(a_n)_^\infty\right\|_p = \left(\sum_^\infty|a_n|^p\right)^ denote the p-norm for

1\leqp<infty

and \left\|(a_n)_^\infty\right\|_\infty = \sup_|a_n| the ∞-norm. Denote by

\ellp

the Banach space of all sequences with finite p-norm. Let

c0

the Banach space of all sequences satisfying

\limn\toinftyan=0

, endowed with the ∞-norm. Denote by

c00

the normed space of all sequences with only finitely many nonzero entries. These spaces all play a role in the definition of the Lorentz sequence spaces

d(w,p)

below.

Let

w=(wn)

infty\in
n=1

c0\setminus\ell1

be a sequence of positive real numbers satisfying

1=w1\geqw2\geqw3\geq

, and define the norm \left\|(a_n)_^\infty\right\|_ = \sup_\left\|(a_w_n^)_^\infty\right\|_p. The Lorentz sequence space

d(w,p)

is defined as the Banach space of all sequences where this norm is finite. Equivalently, we can define

d(w,p)

as the completion of

c00

under

\|\|d(w,p)

.

Properties

The Lorentz spaces are genuinely generalisations of the

Lp

spaces in the sense that, for any

p

,

Lp,p=Lp

, which follows from Cavalieri's principle. Further,

Lp,

coincides with weak

Lp

. They are quasi-Banach spaces (that is, quasi-normed spaces which are also complete) and are normable for

1<p<infty

and

1\leqq\leqinfty

. When

p=1

,

L1,=L1

is equipped with a norm, but it is not possible to define a norm equivalent to the quasinorm of

L1,infty

, the weak

L1

space. As a concrete example that the triangle inequality fails in

L1,infty

, consider

f(x)=\tfrac{1}{x}\chi(0,1)(x)andg(x)=\tfrac{1}{1-x}\chi(0,1)(x),

whose

L1,infty

quasi-norm equals one, whereas the quasi-norm of their sum

f+g

equals four.

The space

Lp,q

is contained in

Lp,

whenever

q<r

. The Lorentz spaces are real interpolation spaces between

L1

and

Linfty

.

Hölder's inequality

\|fg\|
Lp,q

\le

A
p1,p2,q1,q2
\|f\|
p1,q1
L
\|g\|
p2,q2
L
where

0<p,p1,p2<infty

,

0<q,q1,q2\leinfty

,

1/p=1/p1+1/p2

, and

1/q=1/q1+1/q2

.

Dual space

If

(X,\mu)

is a nonatomic σ-finite measure space, then
(i)

(Lp,q)*=\{0\}

for

0<p<1

, or

1=p<q<infty

;
(ii)

(Lp,q)*=Lp',q'

for

1<p<infty,0<q\leinfty

, or

0<q\lep=1

;
(iii)

(Lp,infty)*\ne\{0\}

for

1\lep\leinfty

. Here

p'=p/(p-1)

for

1<p<infty

,

p'=infty

for

0<p\le1

, and

infty'=1

.

Atomic decomposition

The following are equivalent for

0<p\leinfty,1\leq\leinfty

.
(i)
\|f\|
Lp,q

\leAp,qC

.
(ii)

f=style\sumn\inZfn

where

fn

has disjoint support, with measure

\le2n

, on which

0<Hn+1\le|fn|\leHn

almost everywhere, and
n/p
\|H
n2
\|
\ellq(Z)

\leAp,qC

.
(iii)

|f|\lestyle\sumn\inZHn\chi

En
almost everywhere, where

\mu(En)\leAp,q'2n

and
n/p
\|H
n2
\|
\ellq(Z)

\leAp,qC

.
(iv)

f=style\sumn\inZfn

where

fn

has disjoint support

En

, with nonzero measure, on which
n\le|f
B
n|\le
n
B
12
almost everywhere,

B0,B1

are positive constants, and
1/p
\|2
n)
\|
\ellq(Z)

\leAp,qC

.
(v)

|f|\lestyle\sumn\inZ

n\chi
2
En
almost everywhere, where
1/p
\|2
n)
\|
\ellq(Z)

\leAp,qC

.

See also

References

Notes and References

  1. G. Lorentz, "Some new function spaces", Annals of Mathematics 51 (1950), pp. 37-55.
  2. G. Lorentz, "On the theory of spaces Λ", Pacific Journal of Mathematics 1 (1951), pp. 411-429.