In mathematics, the Loewner differential equation, or Loewner equation, is an ordinary differential equation discovered by Charles Loewner in 1923 in complex analysis and geometric function theory. Originally introduced for studying slit mappings (conformal mappings of the open disk onto the complex plane with a curve joining 0 to ∞ removed), Loewner's method was later developed in 1943 by the Russian mathematician Pavel Parfenevich Kufarev (1909–1968). Any family of domains in the complex plane that expands continuously in the sense of Carathéodory to the whole plane leads to a one parameter family of conformal mappings, called a Loewner chain, as well as a two parameter family of holomorphic univalent self-mappings of the unit disk, called a Loewner semigroup. This semigroup corresponds to a time dependent holomorphic vector field on the disk given by a one parameter family of holomorphic functions on the disk with positive real part. The Loewner semigroup generalizes the notion of a univalent semigroup.
The Loewner differential equation has led to inequalities for univalent functions that played an important role in the solution of the Bieberbach conjecture by Louis de Branges in 1985. Loewner himself used his techniques in 1923 for proving the conjecture for the third coefficient. The Schramm–Loewner equation, a stochastic generalization of the Loewner differential equation discovered by Oded Schramm in the late 1990s, has been extensively developed in probability theory and conformal field theory.
Let
f
g
D
|z|<1
f(0)=0=g(0)
f
g
\varphi
D
0
\displaystyle{f(z)=g(\varphi(z))}
for
|z|<1
A necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of such a mapping
\varphi
f(D)\subseteqg(D).
Necessity is immediate.
Conversely
\varphi
\displaystyle{\varphi(z)=g-1(f(z)).}
By definition φ is a univalent holomorphic self-mapping of
D
\varphi(0)=0
Since such a map satisfies
0<|\varphi'(0)|\leq1
Dr
|z|<r
0<r<1
\displaystyle{|f\prime(0)|\le|g\prime(0)|}
and
\displaystyle{f(Dr)\subseteqg(Dr).}
For
0\leqt\leqinfty
U(t)
C
0
U(s)\subsetneqU(t)
if
s<t
U(t)=cups<tU(s)
and
U(infty)=C.
Thus if
sn\uparrowt
U(sn) → U(t)
in the sense of the Carathéodory kernel theorem.
If
D
C
ft(z)
ft(D)=U(t),ft(0)=0,\partialzft(0)=1
given by the Riemann mapping theorem are uniformly continuous on compact subsetsof
[0,infty) x D
Moreover, the function
\prime | |
a(t)=f | |
t(0) |
By a reparametrization it can be assumed that
t. | |
f | |
t(0)=e |
Hence
tz | |
f | |
t(z)=e |
+a2(t)z2+ …
The univalent mappings
ft(z)
The Koebe distortion theorem shows that knowledge of the chain is equivalent to the properties of the open sets
U(t)
If
ft(z)
\displaystyle{fs(D)\subsetneqft(D)}
for
s<t
\varphis,t(z)
0
\displaystyle{fs(z)=ft(\varphis,t(z)).}
By uniqueness the mappings
\varphis,t
\displaystyle{\varphit,r\circ\varphis,t=\varphis,r
for
s\leqt\leqr
They constitute a Loewner semigroup.
The self-mappings depend continuously on
s
t
\displaystyle{\varphit,t(z)=z.}
The Loewner differential equation can be derived either for the Loewner semigroup or equivalently for the Loewner chain.
For the semigroup, let
\displaystyle{ws(z)=\partialt\varphis,t(z)|t=s
then
\displaystyle{ws(z)=-zps(z)}
with
\displaystyle{\Reps(z)>0}
for
|z|<1
Then
w(t)=\varphis,t(z)
\displaystyle{{dw\overdt}=-wpt(w)}
with initial condition
w(s)=z
To obtain the differential equation satisfied by the Loewner chain
ft(z)
\displaystyle{ft(z)=fs(\varphis,t(z))}
ft(z)
\displaystyle{\partialtft(z)=zpt(z)\partialzft(z)}
with initial condition
\displaystyle{ft(z)|t=0=f0(z).}
The Picard–Lindelöf theorem for ordinary differential equations guarantees that theseequations can be solved and that the solutions are holomorphic in
z
The Loewner chain can be recovered from the Loewner semigroup by passing to the limit:
\displaystyle{fs(z)=\limt → et\phis,t(z).}
Finally given any univalent self-mapping
\psi(z)
D
0
\varphis,t(z)
\displaystyle{\varphi0,1(z)=\psi(z).}
Similarly given a univalent function
g
D
g(0)=0
g(D)
ft(z)
\displaystyle{f0(z)=z,f1(z)=g(z).}
Results of this type are immediate if
\psi
g
\partialD
f(z)
f(rz)/r
Holomorphic functions
p(z)
D
p(0)=1
\displaystyle{p(z)
2\pi | |
=\int | |
0 |
{1+e-i\thetaz\over1-e-i\thetaz}d\mu(\theta),}
where
\mu
\displaystyle{pt(z)={1+\kappa(t)z\over1-\kappa(t)z}}
with
|\kappa(t)|=1
Inequalities for univalent functions on the unit disk can be proved by using the density for uniform convergence on compact subsets of slit mappings. These are conformal maps of the unit disk onto the complex plane with a Jordan arc connecting a finite point to ∞ omitted. Density follows by applying the Carathéodory kernel theorem. In fact any univalent function
f(z)
\displaystyle{g(z)=f(rz)/r}
which take the unit circle onto an analytic curve. A point on that curve can be connected to infinity by a Jordan arc. The regions obtained by omitting a small segment of the analytic curve to one side of the chosen point converge to
g(D)
D
g
To apply the Loewner differential equation to a slit function
f
c(t)
infty
[0,infty)
ft
D
C
c([t,infty))
\displaystyle{
2 | |
f | |
2(t)z |
+b3(t)z3+ … )}
with
bn
\displaystyle{f0(z)=f(z).}
For
s\leqt
\displaystyle{\varphis,t(z)=
-1 | |
f | |
t |
\circfs(z)=es-t
2 | |
(z+a | |
2(s,t)z |
+a3(s,t)z3+ … )}
with
an
This gives a Loewner chain and Loewner semigroup with
\displaystyle{pt(z)={1+\kappa(t)z\over1-\kappa(t)z}}
where
\kappa
[0,infty)
To determine
\kappa
\varphis,t
s
λ(t)
[0,infty)
\kappa(t)
λ(t)
\displaystyle{\kappa(t)=λ(t)-1.}
ft
λ(t)
\displaystyle{ft(λ(t))=c(t).}
Not every continuous function
\kappa
\kappa
used his differential equation for slit mappings to prove the Bieberbach conjecture
\displaystyle{|a3|\le3}
for the third coefficient of a univalent function
\displaystyle{f(z)=z+a2z2+
3 | |
a | |
3z |
+ … }
In this case, rotating if necessary, it can be assumed that
a3
Then
\displaystyle{\varphi0,t(z)=e-t
2 | |
(z+a | |
2(t)z |
+a3(t)z3+ … )}
with
an
\displaystyle{an(0)=0,an(infty)=an.}
If
\displaystyle{\alpha(t)=e-t\kappa(t),}
the Loewner differential equation implies
\displaystyle{a |
2=-2\alpha}
and
\displaystyle{a |
3=-2\alpha2-4\alphaa2.}
So
\displaystyle{a2
infty | |
=-2\int | |
0 |
\alpha(t)dt}
which immediately implies Bieberbach's inequality
\displaystyle{|a2|\le2.}
Similarly
\displaystyle{a3=-2\int
infty | |
0 |
\alpha(t)2dt
infty | |
+4\left(\int | |
0 |
\alpha(t)dt\right)2}
Since
a3
|\kappa(t)|=1
\displaystyle{|a3|=2\int
infty | |
0 |
|\Re\alpha(t)2|dt
infty | |
+4\left(\int | |
0 |
\Re\alpha(t)dt\right)2} \le
infty | |
2\int | |
0 |
|\Re\alpha(t)2|dt
infty | |
+4\left(\int | |
0 |
e-t
infty | |
dt\right)\left(\int | |
0 |
et(\Re\alpha(t))2dt\right)=1
infty | |
+4\int | |
0 |
(e-t-e-2t)(\Re\kappa(t))2dt\le3,
using the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality.