Virgo Supercluster Explained

Virgo Supercluster
Epoch:J2000
Parent:Laniakea Supercluster
Redshift:Doppler shift
Mass:~1.48 × 1015
Luminosity Specify:3 (total)
Other Names:Local Supercluster, LSC, LS

The Virgo Supercluster (Virgo SC) or the Local Supercluster (LSC or LS) is a defined supercluster containing the Virgo Cluster and Local Group, which itself contains the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies, as well as others. At least 100 galaxy groups and clusters are located within its diameter of 33 megaparsecs (110 million light-years). The Virgo SC is one of about 10 million superclusters in the observable universe and is in the Pisces–Cetus Supercluster Complex, a galaxy filament.

A 2014 study indicates that the Virgo Supercluster is only a part of an even greater supercluster, Laniakea, a larger, competing referent of the term Local Supercluster centered on the Great Attractor,[1] thus subsuming the former Virgo Supercluster under Laniakea.

Background

Beginning with the first large sample of nebulae published by William and John Herschel in 1863, it was known that there is a marked excess of nebular fields in the constellation Virgo, near the north galactic pole. In the 1950s, French–American astronomer Gérard de Vaucouleurs was the first to argue that this excess represented a large-scale galaxy-like structure, coining the term "Local Supergalaxy" in 1953, which he changed to "Local Supercluster" (LSC[2]) in 1958. Harlow Shapley, in his 1959 book Of Stars and Men, suggested the term Metagalaxy.[3]

Debate went on during the 1960s and 1970s as to whether the Local Supercluster (LS) was actually a structure or a chance alignment of galaxies.[4] The issue was resolved with the large redshift surveys of the late 1970s and early 1980s, which convincingly showed the flattened concentration of galaxies along the supergalactic plane.[5]

Structure

In a comprehensive 1982 paper, R. Brent Tully presented the conclusions of his research concerning the basic structure of the LS. It consists of two components: an appreciably flattened disk containing two thirds of the supercluster's luminous galaxies, and a roughly spherical halo containing the remaining third.[6] The disk itself is a thin (~1 Mpc) ellipsoid with a long axis / short axis ratio of at least 6 to 1, and possibly as high as 9 to 1.[7] Data released in June 2003 from the 5-year Two-degree-Field Galaxy Redshift Survey (2dF) has allowed astronomers to compare the LS to other superclusters. The LS represents a typical poor (that is, lacking a high density core) supercluster of rather small size. It has one rich galaxy cluster in the center, surrounded by filaments of galaxies and poor groups.[8]

The Local Group is located on the outskirts of the LS in a small filament extending from the Fornax Cluster to the Virgo Cluster. The Virgo Supercluster's volume is roughly 7,000 times that of the Local Group, or 100 billion times that of the Milky Way.

Galaxy distribution

The number density of galaxies in the LS falls off with the square of the distance from its center near the Virgo Cluster, suggesting that this cluster is not randomly located. Overall, the vast majority of the luminous galaxies (less than absolute magnitude −13) are concentrated in a small number of clouds (groups of galaxy clusters). Ninety-eight percent can be found in the following 11 clouds, given in decreasing order of number of luminous galaxies: Canes Venatici, Virgo Cluster, Virgo II (southern extension), Leo II, Virgo III, Crater (NGC 3672), Leo I, Leo Minor (NGC 2841), Draco (NGC 5907), Antlia (NGC 2997), and NGC 5643.

Of the luminous galaxies located in the disk, one third are in the Virgo Cluster. The remainder are found in the Canes Venatici Cloud and Virgo II Cloud, plus the somewhat insignificant NGC 5643 Group.

The luminous galaxies in the halo are concentrated in a small number of clouds (94% in 7 clouds). This distribution indicates that "most of the volume of the supergalactic plane is a great void." A helpful analogy that matches the observed distribution is that of soap bubbles. Flattish clusters and superclusters are found at the intersection of bubbles, which are large, roughly spherical (on the order of 20–60 Mpc in diameter) voids in space.[9] Long filamentary structures seem to predominate. An example of this is the Hydra–Centaurus Supercluster, the nearest supercluster to the Virgo Supercluster, which starts at a distance of roughly 30 Mpc and extends to 60 Mpc.[10]

Cosmology

Large-scale dynamics

Since the late 1980s it has been apparent that not only the Local Group, but all matter out to a distance of at least 50 Mpc is experiencing a bulk flow on the order of 600 km/s in the direction of the Norma Cluster (Abell 3627).[11] Lynden-Bell et al. (1988) dubbed the cause of this the "Great Attractor". The Great Attractor is now understood to be the center of mass of an even larger structure of galaxy clusters, dubbed "Laniakea", which includes the Virgo Supercluster (including the Local Group) as well as the Hydra-Centaurus Supercluster, the Pavo-Indus Supercluster, and the Fornax Group.

The Great Attractor, together with the entire supercluster, is found to be moving toward Shapley Supercluster, with center of Shapley Attractor.[12]

Dark matter

The LS has a total mass M ≈ 1015 and a total optical luminosity L ≈ 3 . This yields a mass-to-light ratio of about 300 times that of the solar ratio (/ = 1), a figure that is consistent with results obtained for other superclusters.[13] [14] By comparison, the mass-to-light ratio for the Milky Way is 63.8 assuming a solar absolute magnitude of 4.83,[15] a Milky Way absolute magnitude of −20.9,[16] and a Milky Way mass of . These ratios are one of the main arguments in favor of the presence of large amounts of dark matter in the universe; if dark matter did not exist, much smaller mass-to-light ratios would be expected.

Maps

File:Virgosupercluster atlasoftheuniverse.gif|frame|center|Map of the nearby universe within 100 million light-years from Earth, including a portion of the Southern Supercluster at the bottom left and the Virgo Supercluster on the right in supergalactic coordinates (click on feature names for more information)circle 473 220 33 Virgo Clustercircle 339 230 16 Centaurus A/M83 Groupcircle 349 252 15 M81 groupcircle 326 264 15 Maffei Groupcircle 289 292 20 NGC 1023 Groupcircle 370 236 13 M101 groupcircle 347 299 20 NGC 2997 Groupcircle 405 238 20 Canes Venatici I Groupcircle 426 203 19 NGC 5033 grouprect 445 247 508 276 Ursa Major Clustercircle 391 270 18 Leo I Groupcircle 277 197 25 NGC 6744 Groupcircle 236 314 22 Dorado Groupcircle 518 87 40 Virgo III Groupscircle 526 225 20 NGC 4697circle 546 331 34 Leo II Groupscircle 165 194 27 NGC 7582poly 180 356 178 325 252 345 242 378 Fornax Clusterpoly 176 357 239 379 214 413 162 381 Eridanus Clusterrect 295 213 324 239 Local Grouprect 252 235 304 257 Sculptor Groupdesc bottom-left

File:Nearest Groups of Galaxies atlasoftheuniverse.gif|frame|center|The nearest galaxy groups projected onto the supergalactic plane (click on feature names for more information)circle 333 283 20 NGC 55rect 399 299 419 325 Milky Waycircle 385 294 14 Large Magellanic Cloudcircle 429 267 20 NGC 3109circle 395 338 16 Messier 31circle 365 335 15 Messier 33circle 278 311 20 NGC 247circle 388 119 28 Circinus Galaxycircle 456 124 17 NGC 5128circle 494 161 20 NGC 5253poly 475 149 500 133 483 113 463 137 NGC 5102circle 440 165 28 NGC 5128 Groupcircle 368 206 27 IC 4662circle 520 105 20 Messier 83rect 699 183 774 265 Virgo Clustercircle 433 65 22 ESO 274-01circle 266 177 22 NGC 1313circle 214 255 20 NGC 625circle 235 282 16 NGC 7793rect 435 80 472 107 NGC 4945circle 184 301 20 NGC 45circle 217 311 17 NGC 253circle 265 260 22 Sculptor Grouprect 368 268 412 284 Local Groupcircle 409 379 25 NGC 1569circle 296 280 17 NGC 300circle 424 418 20 IC 342rect 383 429 415 451 Maffei Groupcircle 325 442 20 NGC 404circle 272 508 20 NGC 784circle 397 510 20 Maffei Irect 353 456 413 478 Maffei IIrect 371 526 434 553 Dwingeloo 1circle 444 481 22 NGC 1560rect 510 417 537 434 Messier 81rect 527 433 578 443 IC 2574rect 500 434 515 450 Messier 82poly 516 434 521 456 554 456 552 447 533 445 523 435 NGC 3077circle 549 476 18 NGC 2976circle 604 440 22 NGC 4605circle 513 479 19 NGC 6503circle 583 410 13 NGC 5204circle 559 389 16 NGC 3738circle 512 401 14 NGC 4236rect 452 442 485 461 NGC 2366rect 451 420 484 440 NGC 2403rect 485 433 502 465 NGC 4305circle 659 382 20 NGC 5023rect 634 344 658 364 Messier 94circle 618 355 15 NGC 4244circle 594 337 13 NGC 4214circle 577 361 19 NGC 4449circle 615 319 17 NGC 4395rect 591 280 640 304 Canes I Grouppoly 528 393 542 392 558 411 525 414 M81 Groupdesc bottom-left

See also

Further reading

External links

Notes and References

  1. The Laniakea supercluster of galaxies . R. Brent Tully . Hélène Courtois. Hélène Courtois. Yehuda Hoffman. Daniel Pomarède . 2 September 2014 . 4 September 2014 . Nature . 513 . 7516 . 71–73 . 2014Natur.513...71T . 1409.0880 . 10.1038/nature13674 . 25186900. 205240232 .
  2. cfa.harvard.edu, The Geometry of the Local Supercluster, John P. Huchra,2007(accessed 12-12-2008)
  3. [Harlow Shapley|Shapley, Harlow]
  4. de Vaucouleurs, G. . The Local Supercluster of Galaxies . Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India . March 1981 . 9 . 6 (see note) . 1981BASI....9....1D .
  5. Klypin, Anatoly . etal . Constrained Simulations of the Real Universe: The Local Supercluster . The Astrophysical Journal . October 2003 . 596 . 1 . 19–33 . 2003ApJ...596...19K . 10.1086/377574 . astro-ph/0107104. 1830859 .
  6. Hu, F. X. . etal . Orientation of Galaxies in the Local Supercluster: A Review . Astrophysics and Space Science . April 2006 . 302 . 1–4 . 43–59 . 2006Ap&SS.302...43H . 10.1007/s10509-005-9006-7 . astro-ph/0508669. 18837475 .
  7. Tully, R. B. . The Local Supercluster . Astrophysical Journal . 15 Jun 1982 . 257 . 1 . 389–422 . 1982ApJ...257..389T . 10.1086/159999. free .
  8. Einasto, M. . etal . The richest superclusters. I. Morphology . Astronomy and Astrophysics . December 2007 . 476 . 2 . 697–711 . 2007A&A...476..697E . 10.1051/0004-6361:20078037. 0706.1122 . 15004251 .
  9. Book: Carroll, Bradley . Ostlie, Dale . An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics . . 1996 . New York . 1136 . 0-201-54730-9.
  10. Fairall . A. P. . Vettolani . G. . Chincarini . G. . A wide angle redshift survey of the Hydra-Centaurus region . Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series . May 1989 . 78 . 2 . 270 . 1989A&AS...78..269F . 0365-0138.
  11. Plionis, Manolis . Valdarnini, Riccardo . Evidence for large-scale structure on scales about 300/h MPC . Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society . March 1991 . 249 . 46–61 . 1991MNRAS.249...46P . 10.1093/mnras/249.1.46 . free .
  12. Web site: What is the Great Attractor?. 14 July 2014.
  13. Small, Todd A. . etal . The Norris Survey of the Corona Borealis Supercluster. III. Structure and Mass of the Supercluster . Astrophysical Journal . Jan 1998 . 492 . 1. 45–56 . 1998ApJ...492...45S . 10.1086/305037 . astro-ph/9708153. 119451873 .
  14. Heymans, Catherine . etal . The dark matter environment of the A901 abell A901/902 supercluster: a weak lensing analysis of the HST STAGES survey . . April 2008 . 385 . 3 . 1431–1442 . 2008MNRAS.385.1431H . 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.12919.x. free . 0801.1156 . 59057342 .
  15. Web site: Williams . D. R. . 2004 . Sun Fact Sheet . . 2012-03-17.
  16. Web site: Absolute Magnitude . Jerry Coffey . 2010-04-09.