| Lobster | |
| Frequency: | Biannual |
| Format: | A5 (issues 1–9) A4 (issues 10–57) A4 PDF Online (issue 58+) |
| Firstdate: | 1983 |
| Founder: | Robin Ramsay Stephen Dorril |
| Editor: | Robin Ramsay |
| Headquarters: | Hull, United Kingdom --> |
| Circulation: | ≈1,200 (1993)[1] 1,300 (2007)[2] |
| Issn: | 0964-0436 |
| Publisher: | Lobster |
Lobster is a magazine that is interested primarily in the influence of intelligence and security services on politics and world trade, what it calls "deep politics" or "parapolitics". It combines the examination of conspiracy theories and contemporary history.[3] [4] Lobster is edited and published in the United Kingdom and has appeared twice a year for years, at first in 16-page A5 format, then as an A4 magazine. Operating on a shoestring, its contributors include academics and others. Since 2009 it is distributed as a free downloadable PDF document.
According to the Hull Daily Mail, Lobster 'investigates government conspiracies, state espionage and the secret service.'[5] In 1986 the magazine scooped mainstream media by uncovering the secret Clockwork Orange operation, implicated in trying to destabilise the British government. Colin Wallace,[6] [7] a former British Army Intelligence Corps officer in Northern Ireland, described how he had been instructed to smear leading UK politicians.[8] Questions were asked in the House of Commons and an extended scandal ensued.[9]
The current curator of the CIA Historical Intelligence Collection, Hayden B. Peake,[10] notes that the editors of Lobster see it as "member of the international brotherhood of parapolitics mags," the other members being Geheim (Cologne, Germany), Intelligence Newsletter (Paris, France),[11] and Covert Action Information Bulletin (US), and is "distinctive in its depth of coverage, its detailed documentation, and the absence of the rhetoric".[12]
In 1989, Lobster published names of 1,500 citizens said to be working in intelligence. The magazine was denounced in the House of Commons. The editors replied that all published details could be found in local libraries.[13] The magazine has also carried detailed analysis of fringe and pseudoscientific subjects such as UFOs and remote viewing.[14]
In 1982, an American newsletter about the Kennedy assassination, Echoes of Conspiracy,[15] put Robin Ramsay and Stephen Dorril in touch with each other because of their common interest in the JFK assassination story. A few months later, they decided to launch a magazine, and in September 1983, they published 150 copies of The Lobster priced at 50p.[16] Ramsay later described himself and his associate: "Dorril is a Freudo-anarchist, with Situationist tendencies; and Ramsay is a premature anti-Militant member of the soft old left of the Labour Party".[17]
The inaugural issue stated its aims as "a journal/newsletter about intelligence, parapolitics, state structures and so forth [..] there is no copyright on the material in The Lobster [..] we hope to break even at the present price of 50p, but we may not [..] should appear 6 times a year".[18] From Issue 5 onwards, the cover dropped the definite article and became just "Lobster".[19]
Publishing frequency Lobster dropped to four issues in 1984 and three issues in 1986 and 1987, before settling down as a bi-annual from 1988.[20] The Lobster logo (see illustration), first appeared in issue 20 in November 1990 and was designed by Clive Gringras.[21]
The first 8 issues of Lobster are A5 paper size (148 × 210mm) format, growing to A4 (210 × 297mm) from Issue 9 in September 1985.[22] The magazine was originally typewritten, reduced on a photocopier, pasted-up and printed on a Gestetner off-set litho duplicating machine. Around issue 17, the magazine was type-set on an Amstrad PCW using Wordstream and from Lobster 27, on an AppleMac with Claris Works.[23] Lobster Issue 57 (Summer 2009) was the last hard copy issue.[24] Issue 58 (Winter 2009/2010) was the first available without charge. The magazine is published from Ramsay's home in Hull.[25]
Lobster is published not-for-profit. The Independent on Sunday quoted Ramsay that the magazine ".. always broke even, as I would put the price up if it started losing money. The readers paid whatever I asked", which the newspaper commented "Sounds a fine business model".[24] Robert McCrum in The Guardian quotes Ramsay as boasting that Lobster is "the only left-wing journal to pay for itself".[16]
In March 1993, The Independent newspaper noted that the founders of Lobster had fallen out, and that "The break between the two men began in December when Ramsay told Dorril he was removing his name from the Lobster masthead and would run the twice-yearly magazine alone." The London Evening Standard reported that Ramsay had told his readers that Dorril also planned to produce a magazine called Lobster.[26] After producing Lobster Issue 25, they each produced their own version of Lobster Issue 26. Dorril recalls a different version of events.[27] Dorril's website indicates that his Lobster Issue 31 (October 1996) was the last published.[28] Alternative media expert[29] and Professor of Media and Culture at Edinburgh Napier University, Chris Atton,[30] notes that Dorril's Lobster concentrates on the activities of the British and US security services, while Robin Ramsay's Lobster casts its net wider to encompass histories of fascism, the JFK assassination, the Lockerbie bombing and the military's medical experiments on service personnel.[31]
The name of the magazine, "Lobster", has attracted multiple interpretations. Dorril recalls that "We wanted the magazine to sound not pompous, and as a teenager, he would invent names for punk rock groups. 'Lobster' was just one of his favourites."[16] Ramsay recalls that "The name "Lobster" was Steve Dorril's choice. I couldn't think of an alternative and I didn't think the name mattered. As far as I know it had no connotations for Dorril; indeed as I remembered it, the absence of connotations was part of its appeal."[23]
Lobster published the first account of the Colin Wallace affair,[32] [33] also known as Operation Clockwork Orange, about the plot by disaffected members of Britain's Security Service, MI5, to destabilise the Harold Wilson Labour Government,[34] and to smear politicians such as former Tory prime minister Edward Heath.[35] The editors of Lobster described the revelations as Britain's Watergate and the biggest story since World War Two. The revelations were subsequently confirmed by former MI5 officer Peter Wright in his book Spycatcher.[16]
In late 1986, questions were asked in the UK Parliament concerning the matters in Lobster. Then Labour Party Member of Parliament for Hull North, Kevin McNamara, brought up the issue in the House of Commons, asking the Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher, to refer the matter to the Security Commission,[36] and asking then Attorney-General and Conservative MP Michael Havers, to ask the Director of Public Prosecutions to investigate allegations published in Lobster and prosecute Colin Wallace for revealing details of secret service operations against Her Majesty's Government.[37] Both declined. Two weeks later, Labour MP Tam Dalyell asked the Prime Minister why she would not refer the matter to the Security Commission, but she said that she had nothing more to add.[38]
In 1989, British journalist Richard Norton-Taylor reported in The Guardian newspaper, that Lobster was planning to publish "a list of the names and brief biographical details of more than 1,500 past and present officials involved, according to the publishers, in covert activities".[13] A year later the article appeared in Lobster Issue 19,[39] and another appeared 18 months later.[40] [41] Although The Guardian noted that the Government was considering making the publication of such names a criminal offence, then Lobster co-editor Stephen Dorril noted that "All the names and details .. have been compiled by research in their local libraries or have already appeared in published books. 'No inside knowledge or breach of official secrets was needed'"[13] 10 years later, Ramsay was quoted in the Hull Daily Mail, that "At the time it was a way of sticking two fingers up at the Government".[42]
Subsequently, Lobster was denounced in the British Parliament.[14] Then Conservative Party Member of Parliament for Wycombe, Ray Whitney, criticised the publication of the names in the House of Commons on 21 December 1988 in a debate on a proposed Official Secrets Bill, when he commented that:
"A small obscure magazine published, I think, in Hull and called, would hon. Members believe, Lobster makes a practice of publishing names of gentlemen who are alleged to be members of the security services. That creates danger and I am sure that my right hon. Friend the Member for Old Bexley and Sidcup shares my deep apprehension about that sort of practice being allowed to continue."[43]
In his book, Politics and Paranoia, Ramsay criticised Whitney's role as the head of the Foreign Office's Information Research Department which Ramsay described as the "State's official, anti-left psy-war outfit", and had omitted to tell the Commons before denouncing him.[44]
In addition to co-founders Robin Ramsay and Stephen Dorril, contributors have included:
Lobster has published a couple of themed or special issues, including:[64]
| (April 1986) | Wilson, MI5 and the Rise of Thatcher: Covert Operations in British Politics 1974-1978 | |
| (1996) | The Clandestine Caucus. Anti socialist campaigns and operations in the British Labour Movement since the war |
A number of regular sections have appeared in Lobster over the years:
| When started | Section name | Section description |
|---|---|---|
| Parish notices | name checks, thanks, and updates on contributors |
| Re: | a round-up of news, mainly on 'fringe' issues |
| View from the Bridge | an editorial news section, by Ramsay |
| Historical notes | A 'long view' of events, by Scott Newton. |
| Tittle-tattle | the self-effacing title of John Burne's column |
| Reviews | mainly of books, sometimes other media, by various contributors |
| Letters | |
In 1998, the Hull Daily Mail described the magazine as "a tiny but influential fringe political journal".[65] In 2001, the magazine Red Pepper wrote that Lobster ".. succeeds on the quality of its writing... articles are well researched... human, passionate and honest...",[66] the Fortean Times (who also syndicated a regular Lobster column by Ramsay) wrote that it was "... immensely engrossing reading, ...an essential purchase for anyone interested in the machinations of the secret state",[67] Green Anarchist magazine wrote that Lobster is "... an invaluable resource, and deserves to be widely read and much studied",[68] and Direct Action magazine described it as "a good read ... very revealing and worth it, just for the pub talk".[69]
Journalist Robert McCrum in The Guardian describes Lobster as ".. a left-wing journal that offers succour to conspiracy theorists [..] a brave, bright beacon, a Quixotic piece of typically English amateurism that keeps the professionals on their toes". The Independent newspaper has described it as a "delightful and worthwhile publications, more footnote than story, that [..] delivers a comprehensive picture of a clandestine world which the Establishment would prefer remained secret".
Trade Magazine PRWeek describes Lobster as a "Hull-based intelligence magazine and conspiracy theorists' bible",[70] and the Conspiracy Encyclopedia described it as "the most influential publication in the parapolitical underground". Irish historical writer, Tim Pat Coogan, in discussing a TV programme about Captain Fred Holroyd in relation to the Collin Wallace affair, noted that "some of the best writing on the Holroyd case is contained in smaller journals published contemporaneously, notably Lobster, Private Eye, and, in particular [Duncan] Campbell's own series [..] in the Statesman".[71]
Professor of Media and Culture at Edinburgh Napier University, Chris Atton, notes that a reference at the end of an article in Lobster led to the founding of the activist librarians' group Information for Social Change.[72] CIA curator, Hayden B. Peake notes that a British journalist described "much of its content its impenetrable", but that it was also intriguing.