In mathematics, the Littlewood subordination theorem, proved by J. E. Littlewood in 1925, is a theorem in operator theory and complex analysis. It states that any holomorphic univalent self-mapping of the unit disk in the complex numbers that fixes 0 induces a contractive composition operator on various function spaces of holomorphic functions on the disk. These spaces include the Hardy spaces, the Bergman spaces and Dirichlet space.
Let h be a holomorphic univalent mapping of the unit disk D into itself such that h(0) = 0. Then the composition operator Ch defined on holomorphic functions f on D by
Ch(f)=f\circh
defines a linear operator with operator norm less than 1 on the Hardy spaces
Hp(D)
Ap(D)
l{D}(D)
The norms on these spaces are defined by:
p | |
\|f\| | |
Hp |
=\supr{1\over
2\pi | |
2\pi}\int | |
0 |
|f(rei\theta)|pd\theta
p | |
\|f\| | |
Ap |
={1\over\pi}\iintD|f(z)|pdxdy
2 | |
\|f\| | |
lD |
={1\over\pi}\iintD|f\prime(z)|2dxdy={1\over4\pi}\iintD|\partialxf|2+|\partialyf|2dxdy
Let f be a holomorphic function on the unit disk D and let h be a holomorphic univalent mapping of D into itself with h(0) = 0. Thenif 0 < r < 1 and 1 ≤ p < ∞
2\pi | |
\int | |
0 |
|f(h(rei\theta))|pd\theta\le
2\pi | |
\int | |
0 |
|f(rei\theta)|pd\theta.
This inequality also holds for 0 < p < 1, although in this case there is no operator interpretation.
To prove the result for H2 it suffices to show that for f a polynomial
\displaystyle{\|Chf\|2\le\|f\|2,}
Let U be the unilateral shift defined by
\displaystyle{Uf(z)=zf(z)}.
This has adjoint U* given by
U*f(z)={f(z)-f(0)\overz}.
Since f(0) = a0, this gives
f=a0+zU*f
and hence
Chf=a0+h
*f. | |
C | |
hU |
Thus
\|Chf\|2=
2 | |
|a | |
0| |
+
*f\| | |
\|hC | |
hU |
2\le
2|+ | |
|a | |
0 |
\|ChU*f\|2.
Since U*f has degree less than f, it follows by induction that
\|ChU*f\|2\le\|U*f\|2=\|f\|2-
2, | |
|a | |
0| |
and hence
\|Chf\|2\le\|f\|2.
The same method of proof works for A2 and
lD.
If f is in Hardy space Hp, then it has a factorization
f(z)=fi(z)fo(z)
with fi an inner function and fo an outer function.
Then
\|Ch
f\| | |
Hp |
\le\|(Chfi)(Chfo)\|
Hp |
\le\|Chfo\|
Hp |
\le\|Ch
p/2 | |
f | |
o |
2/p | |
\| | |
H2 |
\le
\|f\| | |
Hp |
.
Taking 0 < r < 1, Littlewood's inequalities follow by applying the Hardy space inequalities to the function
fr(z)=f(rz).
The inequalities can also be deduced, following, using subharmonic functions. The inequaties in turn immediately imply the subordination theorem for general Bergman spaces.