Lithium–sulfur battery explained

Etow:	450 [Wh/kg]^[1]
Etos:	550 [Wh/L]
Ctode:	C/5 nominal
Nomv:	cell voltage varies nonlinearly in the range 2.5–1.7V during discharge; batteries often packaged for 3V
Cd:	disputed

The lithium–sulfur battery (Li–S battery) is a type of rechargeable battery. It is notable for its high specific energy.^[2] The low atomic weight of lithium and moderate atomic weight of sulfur means that Li–S batteries are relatively light (about the density of water). They were used on the longest and highest-altitude unmanned solar-powered aeroplane flight (at the time) by Zephyr 6 in August 2008.^[3]

Lithium–sulfur batteries may displace lithium-ion cells because of their higher energy density and reduced cost. This is due to two factors. First the use of sulfur instead of a less energy dense and more expensive substances such as cobalt and/or iron compounds found in lithium-ion batteries.^[4] Secondly, the use of metallic lithium instead of intercalating lithium ions allows for much higher energy density, as less substances are needed to hold "lithium" and lithium is directly oxidized. Li–S batteries offer specific energies on the order of 550Wh/kg,^[1] while lithium-ion batteries are in the range of 150260Wh/kg.^[5]

Li–S batteries with up to 1,500 charge and discharge cycles were demonstrated in 2017,^[6] but cycle life tests at commercial scale and with lean electrolyte have not been completed. As of early 2021, none were commercially available.

Issues that have slowed acceptance include the polysulfide "shuttle" effect that is responsible for the progressive leakage of active material from the cathode, resulting in too few recharge cycles.^[7] Also, sulfur cathodes have low conductivity, requiring extra mass for a conducting agent in order to exploit the contribution of active mass to the capacity.^[8] Volume expansion of the sulfur cathode during S to LiS conversion and the large amount of electrolyte needed are also issues. In the early 2000s, however, scientists began to make progress creating high-stability sulfurized-carbon cathodes^[9] and by 2020, scientists at Rice University had demonstrated batteries based on sulfurized carbon cathodes that retained >70% of their capacity after 1000 cycles.^[10] By 2023, Zeta Energy a Texas-based startup announced that multiple national laboratories had independently verified that its lithium-sulfur batteries based on sulfurized-carbon cathodes were polysulfide shuttle free.^[11]

The competitive advantages of sulfurized-carbon cathodes (e.g., sulfurized polyacrylonitrile, also known as SPAN) were highlighted by a quantitative analysis performed by researchers at University of Maryland, College Park and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in 2024.^[12] Their polysulfide shuttle free feature facilitates proper operation under lean electrolyte conditions (< 3 g (Ah)⁻¹), which was proved to be extremely crucial to attain the full potential of Li-S batteries. The researchers proposed and analyzed unconventional perspectives on how to further improve both energy density and cycle life, highlighting the importance of a proper electrolyte (i.e., stable, lightweight, and highly Li⁺-conductive).

History

LiS batteries were invented in the 1960s, when Herbert and Ulam patented a primary battery employing lithium or lithium alloys as anodic material, sulfur as cathodic material and an electrolyte composed of aliphatic saturated amines.^{[13] [14]} A few years later the technology was improved by the introduction of organic solvents as PC, DMSO and DMF yielding a 2.35–2.5 V battery.^[15] By the end of the 1980s a rechargeable LiS battery was demonstrated employing ethers, in particular DOL, as the electrolyte solvent.^{[16] [17]}

In 2020 Manthiram identified the critical parameters needed for achieving commercial acceptance.^{[18] [19]} Specifically, Li–S batteries need to achieve a sulfur loading of >5 mg cm⁻², a carbon content of <5%, electrolyte-to-sulfur ratio of <5 μL mg⁻¹, electrolyte-to-capacity ratio of <5 μL (mA h)⁻¹, and negative-to-positive capacity ratio of <5 in pouch-type cells.

In 2021, researchers announced the use of a sugar-based anode additive that prevented the release of polysulfide chains from the cathodes that pollute the anode. A prototype cell demonstrated 1,000 charge cycles with a capacity of 700 mAh/g.^[20]

In 2022, an interlayer was introduced that claimed to reduce polysulfide movement (protecting the anode) and facilitate lithium ion transfer to reduce charge/discharge times.^[21] Also that year, researchers employed aramid nanofibers (nanoscale Kevlar fibers), fashioned into cell membrane-like networks. This prevented dendrite formation. It addressed polysulfide shuttle by using ion selectivity, by integrating tiny channels into the network and adding an electrical charge.^[22]

Also in 2022, Researchers at Drexel University produced a prototype lithium-sulfur battery that did not degrade over 4000 charge cycles. Analysis has shown that the battery contained monoclinic gamma-phase sulfur, which has been thought to be unstable below 95 degrees Celsius, and only a few studies have shown this type of sulfur to be stable longer than 20 to 30 minutes.^[23]

In 2024, researchers at UC San Diego announced the discovery of a novel sulfur–iodine crystalline material that can drastically increase the electrical conductivity of a lithium–sulfur battery’s cathode by 11 orders of magnitude, making it 100 billion times more conductive than crystals made of sulfur alone. Moreover, the new material has self-healing properties which make it possible to repair the damage caused from recharge cycling by heating the new material.^[24]

Chemistry

Chemical processes in the Li–S cell include lithium dissolution from the anode surface (and incorporation into alkali metal polysulfide salts) during discharge, and reverse lithium plating to the anode while charging.^[25]

Anode

At the anodic surface, dissolution of the metallic lithium occurs, with the production of electrons and lithium ions during the discharge and electrodeposition during the charge. The half-reaction is expressed as:^[26]

Li <=> Li+ + e-

In analogy with lithium batteries, the dissolution / electrodeposition reaction causes over time problems of unstable growth of the solid-electrolyte interface (SEI), generating active sites for the nucleation and dendritic growth of lithium. Dendritic growth is responsible for the internal short circuit in lithium batteries and leads to the death of the battery itself.^[27]

Cathode

In Li–S batteries, energy is stored in the sulfur cathode (S₈). During discharge, the lithium ions in the electrolyte migrate to the cathode where the sulfur is reduced to lithium sulphide (Li₂S). The sulfur is reoxidized to S₈ during the recharge phase. The semi-reaction is therefore expressed as:

S + 2Li+ + 2e- <=> Li2S (E ° ≈ 2.15 V vs Li / Li⁺)

Actually the sulfur reduction reaction to lithium sulphide is much more complex and involves the formation of lithium polysulphides (Li₂S_x, 2 ≤ x ≤ 8) at decreasing chain length according to:^[28]

S8 \ + \ 2 Li -> Li2S8

Li2S8 \ + \ 2 Li \ -> \ Li2S6 \ + \ Li2S2

...Over all:

S8 \ + \ 8 Li \ -> 4 Li2S2And the final step:

Li2S2 \ + \ 2 Li \ -> \ 2 Li2SThe final product is actually a mixture of Li₂S₂ and Li₂S rather than pure Li₂S, due to the slow reduction kinetics at Li₂S.^[29] This contrasts with conventional lithium-ion cells, where the lithium ions are intercalated in the anode and cathodes. Each sulfur atom can host two lithium ions. Typically, lithium-ion batteries accommodate only 0.5–0.7 lithium ions per host atom.^[30] Consequently, LiS allows for a much higher lithium storage density. Polysulfides are reduced on the cathode surface in sequence while the cell is discharging:

→ → → → Across a porous diffusion separator, sulfur polymers form at the cathode as the cell charges:

These reactions are analogous to those in the sodium–sulfur battery.

The main challenges of LiS batteries is the low conductivity of sulfur and its considerable volume change upon discharging and finding a suitable cathode is the first step for commercialization of LiS batteries.^[31] Therefore, most researchers use a carbon/sulfur cathode and a lithium anode.^[32] Sulfur is very cheap, but has practically no electroconductivity, 5S⋅cm⁻¹ at 25°C.^[33] A carbon coating provides the missing electroconductivity. Carbon nanofibers provide an effective electron conduction path and structural integrity, at the disadvantage of higher cost.^[34] In 2024, researchers announced the discovery of a sulfur–iodine material that can dramatically increase the electrical conductivity of a lithium–sulfur battery’s cathode by 11 orders of magnitude, making it 100 billion times more conductive than crystals made of sulfur alone.^[24]

One problem with the lithium–sulfur design is that when the sulfur in the cathode absorbs lithium, volume expansion of the Li_xS compositions occurs, and predicted volume expansion of Li₂S is nearly 80% of the volume of the original sulfur.^[35] This causes large mechanical stresses on the cathode, which is a major cause of rapid degradation. This process reduces the contact between the carbon and the sulfur, and prevents the flow of lithium ions to the carbon surface.^[36]

Mechanical properties of the lithiated sulfur compounds are strongly contingent on the lithium content, and with increasing lithium content, the strength of lithiated sulfur compounds improves, although this increment is not linear with lithiation.^[37]

One of the primary shortfalls of most Li–S cells is unwanted reactions with the electrolytes. While S and are relatively insoluble in most electrolytes, many intermediate polysulfides are not. Dissolving into electrolytes causes irreversible loss of active sulfur.^[38] Use of highly reactive lithium as a negative electrode causes dissociation of most of the commonly used other type electrolytes. Use of a protective layer in the anode surface has been studied to improve cell safety, i.e., using Teflon coating showed improvement in the electrolyte stability,^[39] LIPON, Li₃N also exhibited promising performance.

Polysulfide "shuttle"

Historically, the "shuttle" effect is the main cause of degradation in a LiS battery.^[40] The lithium polysulfide Li₂S_x (6≤x≤8) is highly soluble^[41] in the common electrolytes used for LiS batteries. They are formed and leaked from the cathode and they diffuse to the anode, where they are reduced to short-chain polysulfides and diffuse back to the cathode where long-chain polysulfides are formed again. This process results in the continuous leakage of active material from the cathode, lithium corrosion, low coulombic efficiency and low battery life.^[42] Moreover, the "shuttle" effect is responsible for the characteristic self-discharge of LiS batteries, because of slow dissolution of polysulfide, which occurs also in rest state. The "shuttle" effect in a LiS battery can be quantified by a factor f_c (0c<1), evaluated by the extension of the charge voltage plateau. The factor f_c is given by the expression:^[43]

fc = (k _{sq} _{up[S} _{tot]})/(I _{c})

where k_s, q_up, [S_tot] and I_c are respectively the kinetic constant, specific capacity contributing to the anodic plateau, the total sulfur concentration and charge current.

In 2022,^[44] researchers reported the use of a cathode made from carbon nanofibers. Elemental sulfur was deposited onto the carbon substrate (cf. physical vapor deposition), which formed the rare and usually metastable monoclinic γ-Sulfur allotrope. This allotrope reversibly reacts to without the formation of intermediate polysulfides . Therefore, carbonate electrolytes, which commonly react with those polysulfides, can be used instead of the rather dangerous ether based electrolytes (low flash and boiling points).^[45]

Its initial capacity was 800 Ah/kg (classical LiCoO2/graphite batteries have a cell capacity of 100 Ah/kg). It decayed only very slowly, on average 0.04% each cycle, and retained 658 Ah/kg after 4000 cycles (82%).^[44]

Electrolyte

Conventionally, LiS batteries employ a liquid organic electrolyte, contained in the pores of PP separator. The electrolyte plays a key role in LiS batteries, acting both on "shuttle" effect by the polysulfide dissolution and the SEI stabilization at anode surface. It has been demonstrated that the electrolytes based on organic carbonates commonly employed in Li-ion batteries (i.e. PC, EC, DEC and mixtures of them) are not compatible with the chemistry of LiS batteries.^[46] Long-chain polysulfides undergo nucleophilic attack on electrophilic sites of carbonates, resulting in the irreversible formation of by-products as ethanol, methanol, ethylene glycol and thiocarbonates. In LiS batteries are conventionally employed cyclic ethers (as DOL) or short-chain ethers (as DME) as well as the family of glycol ethers, including DEGDME and TEGDME.^[47] One common electrolyte is 1M LiTFSI in DOL:DME 1:1 vol. with 1%w/w di LiNO₃ as additive for lithium surface passivation.

Safety

Because of the high potential energy density and the nonlinear discharge and charging response of the cell, a microcontroller and other safety circuitry is sometimes used along with voltage regulators to manage cell operation and prevent rapid discharge.^[48]

Lifespan

Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries have a shorter lifespan compared to traditional Li-ion batteries.^[49] Recent advancements in materials and electrolyte formulations have shown potential to extend its cycle life to over 1,000 cycles. One of the primary factors limiting the lifespan of Li-S batteries is the dissolution of polysulfides in the electrolyte, which leads to the shuttle effect and results in capacity loss over time.^[50] The operating temperature and cycling rate also play significant roles in determining the lifespan of Li-S batteries.^[51]

Research

Research! Anode !! Cathode !! Date !! Source !! Specific Capacity after cycling !! Notes

Lithium metal	Polyethylene glycol coated, pitted mesoporous carbon	17 May 2009	University of Waterloo^[52]	1,110mA⋅h/g after 20 cycles at a current of 168mA⋅g	Minimal degradation during charge cycling. To retain polysulfides in the cathode, the surface was functionalized to repel (hydrophobic) polysulfides. In a test using a glyme solvent, a traditional sulfur cathode lost 96% of its sulfur over 30 cycles, while the experimental cathode lost only 25%.
Lithium metal	Sulfur-coated, disordered carbon hollow carbon nanofibers	2011	Stanford University^[53] ^[54]	730mA⋅h/g after 150 cycles (at 0.5C)	An electrolyte additive boosted the faraday efficiency from 85% to over 99%.
Silicon nanowire/carbon	Sulfur-coated, disordered carbon nanotubes made from carbohydrates	2013	CGS^[55] ^[56]	1,300mA⋅h/g after 400 cycles (at 1C)	Microwave processing of materials and laser-printing of electrodes.
Silicon carbon	Sulfur	2013	Fraunhofer Institute for Material and Beam Technology IWS^[57]	? after 1,400 cycles
	Copolymerized sulfur	2013	University of Arizona^[58] ^[59]	823mA⋅h/g at 100 cycles	Uses "inverse vulcanization" on mostly sulfur with a small amount of 1,3-diisopropenylbenzene (DIB) additive
	Porous -encapsulated sulfur nanoparticles	2013	Stanford University^[60] ^[61]	721mA⋅h/g at 1,000 cycles (0.5C)	shell protects the sulfur-lithium intermediate from electrolyte solvent. Each cathode particle is 800 nanometers in diameter. Faraday efficiency of 98.4%.
	Sulfur	June 2013		1200mA·h/g at 300 cycles at 60°C (0.1C) 800mA·h/g at 300 cycles at 60°C (1C)^[62]	Solid lithium polysulfidophosphate electrolyte. Half the voltage of typical LIBs. Remaining issues include low electrolyte ionic conductivity and brittleness in the ceramic structure.^[63] ^[64]
Lithium	Sulfur-graphene oxide nanocomposite with styrene-butadiene-carboxymethyl cellulose copolymer binder	2013	Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory^[65]	700mA·h/g at 1,500 cycles (0.05C discharge) 400mA·h/g at 1,500 cycles (0.5C charge / 1C discharge)	Voltage between about 1.7 and 2.5 volts, depending on charge state. Lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide) dissolved in a mixture of nmethyl-(n-butyl) pyrrolidinium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)-imide (PYR14TFSI), 1,3-dioxolane (DOL), dimethoxyethane (DME) with 1 M lithium bis-(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI), and lithium nitrate . High porosity polypropylene separator. Specific energy is 500W⋅h/kg (initial) and 250W⋅h/kg at 1,500 cycles (C=1.0)
Lithiated graphite	Sulfur	February 2014		400 cycles	Coating prevents polysulfides from destroying the anode.^[66]
Lithiated graphene	Sulfur/Lithium-sulfide passivation layer	2014	OXIS Energy^[67] ^[68]	240mA·h/g (1000 cycles)25A·h/cell	Passivation layer prevents sulfur loss
Lithiated hard-carbon	Sulfur-copolymer (poly(S-co-DVB))	2019		400 mAh/g for 500 cycles at 3C	The SEI of hard-carbon prevents polysulphides deposition at anode and enables high-rate performance.^[69]
Lithium sulfur batteries	Carbon nanotube/Sulfur	2014	Tsinghua University^[70]	15.1mA·h⋅cm^−2 at a sulfur loading of 17.3mgS⋅cm^−2	A free-standing CNT–S paper electrode with a high areal sulfur-loading was fabricated, in which short MWCNTs served as the short-range electrical conductive network and super-long CNTs acted as both the long-range conductive network and intercrossed binders.
	Glass-coated sulfur with mildly reduced graphene oxide for structural support	2015	University of California, Riverside^[71]	700mA⋅h⋅g^−1 (50 cycles)^[72]	Glass coating prevents lithium polysulfides from permanently migrating to an electrode
Lithium	Sulfur	2016	LEITAT	500W⋅h/kg	ALISE H2020 project developing a LiS battery for cars with new components and optimized regarding anode, cathode, electrolyte and separator
Lithium metal	Sulfurized graphene	2021	CATRIN, Palacký University https://www.catrin.com/	644mA⋅h⋅g^−1 (250 cycles)	An efficient and straightforward approach to prepare a covalently sulfurized graphene cathode for LiS batteries with high sulfur content and high cycling stability.^[73]
	Sulfur-loaded carbon nanotubes	2022	Korea Electrotechnology Research Institute^[74]	850mA⋅h⋅g^−1 (100 cycles)	Uses a phosphorus-doped activated carbon separator layer to minimize the polysulfide shuttle effect, while creating a foldable battery.
Lithium metal	Lithium thiophosphate catholyte	2023	Dartmouth College,Stanford University^[75]	1271 mA⋅h⋅g^−1 (200 cycles)	Adding phosphorus pentasulfide to a Li–S catholyte leads to the formation of complexes that accommodate the discharge product (Li2S) and allow high cyclability and low temperature performance.

Commercialization

As of 2021 few companies had been able to commercialize the technology on an industrial scale. Companies such as Sion Power have partnered with Airbus Defence and Space to test their lithium sulfur battery technology. Airbus Defense and Space successfully launched their prototype High Altitude Pseudo-Satellite (HAPS) aircraft powered by solar energy during the day and by lithium sulfur batteries at night in real life conditions during an 11-day flight. The batteries used in the test flight utilized Sion Power's LiS cells that provide 350 W⋅h/kg.^[76] Sion originally claimed to be in the process of volume manufacturing with availability by end of 2017; however more recently it can be seen that they have dropped work on their lithium sulfur battery in favor of a lithium-metal battery.^{[77] [78]}

British firm OXIS Energy developed prototype lithium sulfur batteries.^{[79] [80]} Together with Imperial College London and Cranfield University, they published equivalent-circuit-network models for its cells.^[81] With Lithium Balance of Denmark they built a prototype scooter battery system primarily for the Chinese market, which had a capacity of 1.2kWh using 10Ah Long Life cells, and weighed 60% less than lead acid batteries with a significant increase in range.^[82] They also built a 3U, 3,000W⋅h Rack-Mounted Battery that weighed only 25kg and was said to be fully scalable.^[83] They claimed their Lithium-Sulfur batteries would cost about $200/kWh in mass production.^[84] However, the firm entered bankruptcy (insolvency) status in May 2021.^[85]

Sony, which also commercialized the first lithium-ion battery, planned to introduce lithium–sulfur batteries to the market in 2020, but has provided no updates since the initial announcement in 2015.^[86]

Monash University's Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in Melbourne, Australia developed an ultra-high capacity Li–S battery that has been manufactured by partners at the Fraunhofer Institute for Material and Beam Technology in Germany. It is claimed the battery can provide power to a smartphone for five days.^[87]

In 2022, the German company Theion claimed to introduce lithium–sulfur batteries for mobile devices in 2023 and for vehicles by 2024.^[88]

In January 2023, Houston, Texas company Zeta Energy was awarded $4 million by the United States Department of Energy ARPA-E program to advance its lithium-sulfur batteries based on a sulfurized-carbon cathode and a vertically-aligned carbon nanontube anode.^[89]

In June 2023, San Jose, California company Lyten started up a pilot production line making about 100 batteries a day.^[90]

See also

• List of battery types

External links

• Web site: PolyPlus Lithium Sulfur . Polyplus.com . 2013-04-06 . https://web.archive.org/web/20130420054932/http://polyplus.com/lisulfur.html . 2013-04-20 .
• Web site: Sion Power . Sion Power . 2013-04-06.
• Web site: Winston Battery Limited . En.winston-battery.com . https://web.archive.org/web/20140325161004/http://en.winston-battery.com/index.php/products/power-battery/category/lsp-battery . 2013-04-06. 2014-03-25 .
• "EEMB Battery". EEMB Battery. Retrieved 2018-04-13.

Notes and References

1. Web site: OXIS ENERGY SET TO MAKE SOLID-STATE LITHIUM-SULFUR CELL TECHNOLOGY A REALITY . 20 April 2021. 7 June 2021 . pdf.
2. Zhang . Sheng S . 2013 . Liquid electrolyte lithium/sulfur battery: Fundamental chemistry, problems, and solutions . Journal of Power Sources . 231 . 153–162 . 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.12.102 .
3. Amos, J. (24 August 2008) "Solar plane makes record flight" BBC News
4. Manthiram . Arumugam . Fu . Yongzhu . Su . Yu-Sheng . 2013 . Challenges and Prospects of Lithium–Sulfur Batteries . https://web.archive.org/web/20200103201726/http://pdf-s3.xuebalib.com:1262/3p53gUMPTEVW.pdf . 2020-01-03 . Acc. Chem. Res. . 46 . 5 . 1125–1134 . 10.1021/ar300179v . 23095063 .
5. Automotive Li-Ion Batteries: Current Status and Future Perspectives. 2019-01-01. 15 March 2021. 26. U.S. Department Of Energy.
6. Web site: OXIS Energy's Lithium-Sulfur Battery Technology. live. https://web.archive.org/web/20170628172832/https://oxisenergy.com/technology/. 28 June 2017 . In 2017: "can be cycled approximately 1500 times ... In the next 2 years, we expect this to reach 2500 cycles". In 2021: "Within the next two years we aim to double the current cycle life to achieve upwards of 500 cycles"
7. Diao. Yan. Xie. Kai. Xiong. Shizhao. Hong. Xiaobin. August 2013. Shuttle phenomenon – The irreversible oxidation mechanism of sulfur active material in Li–S battery. Journal of Power Sources. en. 235. 181–186. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.132.
8. Eftekhari . Ali . 2017 . The rise of lithium–selenium batteries . Sustainable Energy & Fuels . 1 . 14–29 . 10.1039/C6SE00094K .
9. Wang . J . Yang, J . Xie, J . Xu, N . A novel conductive polymer–sulfur composite cathode material for rechargeable lithium batteries . Advanced Materials . 2002 . 14 . 13–14 . 963–965 . 10.1002/1521-4095(20020705)14:13/14<963::AID-ADMA963>3.0.CO;2-P.
10. Book: Salvatierra . Rodrigo V . James, Dustin K . Tour, James M . Gupta . Ram K . Lithium-Sulfur Batteries: Materials, Challenges and Applications . 2022 . Elsevier . Amsterdam . 978-0-323-91934-0 . 241–270.
11. News: Zeta Energy Receives Third-Party Verification that its Lithium-Sulfur Battery is Polysulfide Free . September 3, 2023 . PR Newswire . May 1, 2023.
12. Phan . An L. . Le . Phung M.L. . Wang . Chunsheng . May 2024 . Realizing high-energy and long-life Li/SPAN batteries . Joule . 8 . 6 . 1601–1618 . 10.1016/j.joule.2024.04.003 . 2542-4351.
13. US . 3043896 . patent . 1962-07-10 . 1958-11-24 . 1957-11-26 . Danuta, Herbert . Juliusz, Ulam . Electric dry cells and storage batteries . Electric Tech Corp .
14. US . 3532543 . patent . 1970-10-06 . 1968-02-21 . 1968-02-21 . Nole, Dominick A. . Moss, Vladimir . Battery employing lithium – sulphur electrodes with non-aqueous electrolyte . Aerojet Rocketdyne Inc .
15. US . 3413154 . patent . 1968-11-26 . 1966-03-23 . 1966-03-23 . Mlarur, Rao . Bhaskara, Lakshmanar . Organic electrolyte cells . Duracell Inc USA .
16. Peled. E.. Gorenshtein. A.. Segal. M.. Sternberg. Y.. May 1989. Rechargeable lithium–sulfur battery (extended abstract). Journal of Power Sources. en. 26. 3–4. 269–271. 10.1016/0378-7753(89)80133-8. 1989JPS....26..269P.
17. Peled. E.. 1989. Lithium-Sulfur Battery: Evaluation of Dioxolane-Based Electrolytes. Journal of the Electrochemical Society. en. 136. 6. 1621–1625. 10.1149/1.2096981. 1989JElS..136.1621P.
18. Bhargav . Amruth . Jiarui . He . 10.1016/j.joule.2020.01.001 . Lithium-Sulfur Batteries: Attaining the Critical Metrics . Joule . 4 . 285–291 . 2020 . 2 . free .
19. Manthiram . Arumugam . Fu . Yongzhu . Chung . Sheng-Heng . Zu . Chenxi . Su . Yu-Sheng. 10.1021/cr500062v . Rechargeable Lithium–Sulfur Batteries . Chemical Reviews . 114 . 11751–11787 . 2014 . 23 . 25026475 .
20. Web site: Lavars. Nick. 2021-09-13. Sugar-doped lithium sulfur battery promises up to 5 times the capacity. 2021-09-20. New Atlas. en-US.
21. Web site: Lavars . Nick . 2022-02-28 . Porous battery layer pulls once-a-week EV charging a step closer . 2022-03-01 . New Atlas . en-US.
22. Web site: Lavars . Nick . 2022-01-17 . Kevlar fibers fortify lithium-sulfur battery with 5x capacity of Li-ion . 2022-04-07 . New Atlas . en-US.
23. Stabilization of gamma sulfur at room temperature to enable the use of carbonate electrolyte in Li-S batteries . Communications Chemistry . Pai . Rahul . 2022-02-10 . 5 . 1 . 17 . 10.1038/s42004-022-00626-2. 36697747 . 9814344 . 246704531 . free .
24. News: Healable Cathode Could Unlock Potential of Solid-state Lithium-sulfur Batteries . 20 April 2024 . US San Diego Today . 6 March 2024.
25. Tudron, F.B., Akridge, J.R., and Puglisi, V.J. (2004) "Lithium-Sulfur Rechargeable Batteries: Characteristics, State of Development, and Applicability to Powering Portable Electronics" (Tucson, AZ: Sion Power)
26. Rudra. Kumar. 2018. Recent research trends in Li–S batteries. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 6. 25. en. 2019-07-04. 10.1039/C8TA01483C. Jie. Liu. Jang-Yeon. Hwang. 11582–11605.
27. Teyeb. Ould Ely. 2018-05-29. Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: State of the Art and Future Directions. ACS Applied Energy Materials. 1. 5. en. 10.1021/acsaem.7b00153. Dana. Kamzabek. Dhritiman. Chakraborty. 1783–1814.
28. Zhan. Lin. 2015. Lithium–sulfur batteries: from liquid to solid cells. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 3. 3. en. 2019-07-04. 10.1039/C4TA04727C. Chengdu. Liang. 18. 1185628.
29. Min-Kyu. Song. 2013. Lithium/sulfur batteries with high specific energy: old challenges and new opportunities. Nanoscale. 5. 6. en. 2019-07-04. 10.1039/c2nr33044j. Elton J.. Cairns. Yuegang. Zhang. 2186–204. 23397572. 2013Nanos...5.2186S.
30. Revisiting Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. Kevin. Bullis. Technology Review. May 22, 2009. August 12, 2016. April 15, 2012. https://web.archive.org/web/20120415013749/http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/22689/.
31. Cathode Materials for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: A Practical Perspective . Eftekhari . A. . 2017 . 17734–17776 . 10.1039/C7TA00799J . Journal of Materials Chemistry A . 5. 34 .
32. Improvement of cycle property of sulfur electrode for lithium/sulfur battery . Choi . Y.J. . Kim, K.W. . 2008 . 313–316 . 10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.02.098 . Journal of Alloys and Compounds . 449. 1–2 .
33. Book: Lange's Handbook of Chemistry . registration . third . McGraw-Hill . New York . 1985 . 3–5 . 978-0-07-016192-4 . J.A. Dean.
34. Effects of carbon coating on the electrochemical properties of sulfur cathode for lithium/sulfur cell . Choi . Y. J. . Chung, Y. D. . Baek, C. Y. . Kim, K. W. . Ahn, J. H. . J. Power Sources . 548–552 . March 4, 2008 . 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.02.053 . 184. 2 . 2008JPS...184..548C .
35. ReaxFF molecular dynamics simulations on lithiated sulfur cathode materials. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.. 3383–3393. 17. 5. 10.1039/c4cp04532g. 25529209. en. Md Mahbubul. Islam. Alireza. Ostadhossein. Oleg. Borodin. A. Todd. Yeates. William W.. Tipton. Richard G.. Hennig. Nitin. Kumar. Adri C. T. van. Duin. 2015PCCP...17.3383I. 2015-01-21.
36. Brian Dodson, "New lithium/sulfur battery doubles energy density of lithium-ion", NewAtlas, 1 December 2013
37. Islam . etal . 2015 . ReaxFF molecular dynamics simulations on lithiated sulfur cathode materials . Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. . 17 . 5. 3383–3393 . 10.1039/C4CP04532G . 25529209. 2015PCCP...17.3383I .
38. Jeong . S. S. . Lim . Y. . Choi . Y. T.. Kim . K. W.. Ahn . H. J.. Cho . K. K.. 2006 . Electrochemical properties of lithium sulfur cells using PEO polymer electrolytes prepared under three different mixing conditions . 745–750 . 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.06.108 . J. Power Sources . 174. 2. 2007JPS...174..745J.
39. Islam . Md Mahbubul . Bryantsev . Vyacheslav S. . van Duin . Adri CT . 2014 . ReaxFF Reactive Force Field Simulations on the Influence of Teflon on Electrolyte Decomposition during Li/SWCNT Anode Discharge in Lithium-Sulfur Batteries . Journal of the Electrochemical Society . 161 . 8. E3009–E3014 . 10.1149/2.005408jes . 52235837 . https://web.archive.org/web/20190221002727/http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2a78/5bfba40f0395e971d0e1a16b215b6c44d564.pdf . 2019-02-21 .
40. Manthiram. Arumugam. Fu. Yongzhu. Chung. Sheng-Heng. Zu. Chenxi. Su. Yu-Sheng. 2014-12-10. Rechargeable Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Chemical Reviews. 114. 23. 11751–11787. 10.1021/cr500062v. 25026475. 0009-2665.
41. Book: Chemically Derived Graphene: Functionalization, Properties and Applications . illustrated . Kintao . Zhang . Royal Society of Chemistry . 2018 . 978-1-78801-080-1 . 224 . Extract of page 224
42. Song. Min-Kyu. Cairns. Elton J.. Zhang. Yuegang. 2013. Lithium/sulfur batteries with high specific energy: old challenges and new opportunities. Nanoscale. en. 5. 6. 2186–204. 10.1039/c2nr33044j. 23397572. 2040-3364. 2013Nanos...5.2186S.
43. Mikhaylik. Yuriy V.. Akridge. James R.. 2004 . Polysulfide Shuttle Study in the Li/S Battery System. Journal of the Electrochemical Society. en. 151. 11. A1969. 10.1149/1.1806394. 2004JElS..151A1969M. free.
44. Pai . Rahul . Singh . Arvinder . Tang . Maureen H. . Kalra . Vibha . Stabilization of gamma sulfur at room temperature to enable the use of carbonate electrolyte in Li-S batteries . Communications Chemistry . 10 February 2022 . 5 . 1 . 17 . 10.1038/s42004-022-00626-2 . 36697747 . 9814344 . 246704531 . en . 2399-3669. free .
45. Tao . Xinyong . Liu . Yayuan . Liu . Wei . Zhou . Guangmin . Zhao . Jie . Lin . Dingchang . Zu . Chenxi . Sheng . Ouwei . Zhang . Wenkui . Lee . Hyun-Wook . Cui . Yi . Solid-State Lithium–Sulfur Batteries Operated at 37 °C with Composites of Nanostructured Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 /Carbon Foam and Polymer . Nano Letters . 10 May 2017 . 17 . 5 . 2967–2972 . 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00221 . 28388080 . 2017NanoL..17.2967T . en . 1530-6984.
46. Yim. Taeeun. Park. Min-Sik. Yu. Ji-Sang. Kim. Ki Jae. Im. Keun Yung. Kim. Jae-Hun. Jeong. Goojin. Jo. Yong Nam. Woo. Sang-Gil. September 2013. Effect of chemical reactivity of polysulfide toward carbonate-based electrolyte on the electrochemical performance of Li–S batteries. Electrochimica Acta. en. 107. 454–460. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.06.039.
47. Scheers. Johan. Fantini. Sébastien. Johansson. Patrik. June 2014. A review of electrolytes for lithium–sulphur batteries. Journal of Power Sources. en. 255. 204–218. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.01.023. 2014JPS...255..204S.
48. Akridge, J.R. (October 2001) "Lithium Sulfur Rechargeable Battery Safety" Battery Power Products & Technology
49. Web site: Lithium-Sulfur Batteries vs. Lithium-Ion Batteries: A Comparative Analysis . Trento . Chin . Stanford Advanced Materials . Dec 27, 2023 . July 11, 2024.
50. Yu . Linghui . Ong . Samuel . 2021 . The importance of the dissolution of polysulfides in lithium-sulfur batteries and a perspective on high-energy electrolyte/cathode design . Electrochimica Acta . 392 . 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.139013. 10356/155660 . free .
51. Liu . Y . Wang . T . 2023 . Challenges and Solutions for Low-Temperature Lithium-Sulfur Batteries: A Review . Materials . 16 . 12 . 4359 . 10.3390/ma16124359. free . 37374546 . 10302741 .
52. Xiulei Ji, Kyu Tae Lee, and Linda F. Nazar. (17 May 2009)"A highly ordered nanostructured carbon-sulphur cathode for lithium-sulphur batteries." Nature Materials
53. Guangyuan. Zheng. Yuan Yang . Judy J. Cha . Judy Cha. Seung Sae Hong . Yi Cui . Hollow Carbon Nanofiber-Encapsulated Sulfur Cathodes for High Specific Capacity Rechargeable Lithium Batteries . 14 September 2011. Nano Letters. 4462–4467. 10.1021/nl2027684. 2011NanoL..11.4462Z . 11 . 10. 21916442.
54. News: Sarah Jane . Keller. Sulfur in hollow nanofibers overcomes challenges of lithium-ion battery design . Stanford News . October 4, 2011 . Stanford University . February 18, 2012.
55. Rosenberg. Sarah. Hintennach . Laser-printed lithium-sulphur micro-electrodes for Li/S batteries . 1 April 2014. Russian Journal of Electrochemistry. 50. 4. 327–335 . 10.1134/S1023193514040065. 97154966.
56. Vandenberg. Aurelius. Hintennach . A novel design approach for lithium-sulphur batteries . 1 April 2014. Russian Journal of Electrochemistry. 50. 4. 317–326 . 10.1134/S102319351306013X. 96826100.
57. Web site: Researchers increase lifespan of lithium-sulfur batteries . 4 April 2013 . Gizmag.com . 2013-12-04.
58. Chung . W. J. . Griebel . J. J. . Kim . E. T. . Yoon . H. . Simmonds . A. G. . Ji . H. J. . Dirlam . P. T. . Glass . R. S. . Wie . J. J. . Nguyen . N. A. . Guralnick . B. W. . Park . J. . Somogyi . Á. D. . Theato . P. . MacKay . M. E. . Sung . Y. E. . Char . K.. Jeffrey Pyun. Pyun . J. . The use of elemental sulfur as an alternative feedstock for polymeric materials . 10.1038/nchem.1624 . Nature Chemistry . 5 . 6 . 518–524 . 2013 . 23695634. 2013NatCh...5..518C .
59. Web site: Radical approach to turn sulfur into polymers. 2013-04-16. Caryl Richards.
60. Web site: SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (6 Posts) . World-Record Battery Performance Achieved With Egg-Like Nanostructures . CleanTechnica . 2013-01-08 . 2013-06-11.
61. Wei Seh . Z. . Li . W. . Cha . J. J. . Zheng . G. . Yang . Y. . McDowell . M. T. . Hsu . P. C. . Cui . Y. . 10.1038/ncomms2327 . Sulphur–TiO2 yolk–shell nanoarchitecture with internal void space for long-cycle lithium–sulphur batteries . Nature Communications . 4 . 1331 . 2013 . 23299881. 2013NatCo...4.1331W . free .
62. Lithium Polysulfidophosphates: A Family of Lithium-Conducting Sulfur-Rich Compounds for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries . 10.1002/anie.201300680 . 52. 29. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 7460–7463. 23737078 . Lin . Z . Liu . Z . Fu . W . Dudney . NJ . Nancy Dudney . Liang . C. 2013. 37368147 . https://web.archive.org/web/20160910063005/http://diyhpl.us/~bryan/papers2/paperbot/1efd1920760b882bd4ca5e3b544f3ed3.pdf . 2016-09-10 .
63. Lin . Z. . Liu . Z. . Fu . W. . Dudney . N. J. . Nancy Dudney. Liang . C. . Lithium Polysulfidophosphates: A Family of Lithium-Conducting Sulfur-Rich Compounds for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries . 10.1002/anie.201300680 . Angewandte Chemie International Edition . 7460–7463. 2013 . 23737078. 52. 29 . 37368147 . https://web.archive.org/web/20160910063005/http://diyhpl.us/~bryan/papers2/paperbot/1efd1920760b882bd4ca5e3b544f3ed3.pdf . 2016-09-10 .
64. Web site: All-solid lithium-sulfur battery stores four times the energy of lithium-ions . 7 June 2013 . NewAtlas.com . 2013-06-13.
65. Web site: New lithium/sulfur battery doubles energy density of lithium-ion . 2 December 2013 . NewAtlas.com . 2013-12-04.
66. Web site: Hybrid anode quadruples the lifespan of lithium-sulfur batteries . Nick . Lavars . February 20, 2014 . August 22, 2016.
67. News: A whiff of brimstone. January 3, 2015. Economist. August 22, 2016.
68. Web site: LiS battery company OXIS Energy reports 300 W⋅h/kg and 25 A⋅h cell, predicting 33 A⋅h by mid-2015, 500 W⋅h/kg by end of 2018. November 12, 2014. Green Car Congress. August 22, 2016 .
69. Nguyen . D.-T. . Hoefling . A. . Yee . M. . Nguyen . T. H. G. . Theato . P. . Lee . Y. J. . Song . S.-W.. Enabling high-rate and safe lithium ion-sulfur battery by effective combination of sulfur-copolymer cathode and hard-carbon anode . 10.1002/cssc.201802430. 30479038 . ChemSusChem . 12. 2 . 480–486 . 2019 . 53771189 .
70. Hierarchical Free-Standing Carbon-Nanotube Paper Electrodes with Ultrahigh Sulfur-Loading for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Advanced Functional Materials. 2014-10-01. 1616-3028. 6105–6112. 24. 39. 10.1002/adfm.201401501. en. Zhe. Yuan. Hong-Jie. Peng. Jia-Qi. Huang. Xin-Yan. Liu. Dai-Wei. Wang. Xin-Bing. Cheng. Qiang. Zhang. 97124341 . https://web.archive.org/web/20200103232206/http://www.qianggroup.com/wp/pdf/AFM-2014-Hierarchical%20Free-Standing%20Carbon-Nanotube%20Paper%20Electrodes%20with%20Ultrahigh%20Sulfur-Loading%20for%20Lithium%E2%80%93Sulfur%20Batteries.pdf. 2020-01-03.
71. News: Glass coating for improved battery performance. Nealon. Sean. 2015-03-03. R&D. https://web.archive.org/web/20150307171420/http://www.rdmag.com/news/2015/03/glass-coating-improved-battery-performance. August 22, 2016. 2015-03-07.
72. News: Glass coating improves battery performance. Nealon. Sean. March 2, 2015. phys.org. August 22, 2016.
73. Tantis . Iosif . Bakandritsos . Aristides . Zaoralová . Dagmar . Medveď . Miroslav . Jakubec . Petr . Havláková . Jana . Zbořil . Radek . Otyepka . Michal . Covalently Interlinked Graphene Sheets with Sulfur-Chains Enable Superior Lithium–Sulfur Battery Cathodes at Full-Mass Level . Advanced Functional Materials . 2021 . 31 . 30 . 2101326 . 10.1002/adfm.202101326 . 234870475 . en . 1616-3028. free .
74. Jo . Seong-Chan . Hong . Jeong-Won . Choi . Ik-Hyeon . Kim . Min-Ju . Kim . Byung Gon . Lee . You-Jin . Choi . Hye Young . Kim . Doohun . Kim . TaeYoung . Baeg . Kang-Jun . Park . Jun-Woo . May 2022 . Multimodal Capturing of Polysulfides by Phosphorus-Doped Carbon Composites for Flexible High-Energy-Density Lithium–Sulfur Batteries . Small . en . 18 . 21 . 2200326 . 10.1002/smll.202200326 . 35285157 . 247437352 . 1613-6810.
75. Wang . Peiyu . Kateris . Nikolaos . Li . Baiheng . Zhang . Yiwen . Luo . Jianmin . Wang . Chuanlong . Zhang . Yue . Jayaraman . Amitesh S. . Hu . Xiaofei . Wang . Hai . Li . Weiyang . 2023-08-17 . High-Performance Lithium–Sulfur Batteries via Molecular Complexation . Journal of the American Chemical Society . 145 . 34 . 18865–18876 . en . 10.1021/jacs.3c05209 . 37589666 . 0002-7863.
76. Kopera, J (September 2014) "Sion Power's Lithium-Sulfur Batteries Power High Altitude Pseudo-Satellite Flight" Sion Power Company Press Release
77. Web site: Sion Power Delivers Next Generation Battery Performance Through Patented Licerion® Technology. 4 October 2016. 2016-10-03.
78. Web site: Sion Power Announces Launch of its Groundbreaking Licerion Rechargeable Lithium Battery, Sion Power. sionpower.com.
79. Web site: July 14, 2015 . Anesco and OXIS to Release Lithium Sulfur Battery Storage by 2016 . press release. OXIS Energy . August 22, 2016 .
80. Web site: February 22, 2015 . OXIS battery powers driverless vehicle for the UK Government's Smart City Gateway programme . press release . OXIS Energy . https://web.archive.org/web/20160429232744/http://oxisenergy.com/blog/oxis-technology-powers-driverless-vehicle-for-the-uk-governments-smart-city/ . August 22, 2016 . 2016-04-29 .
81. Propp . K. . Marinescu . M. . Auger . D. J. . O'Neill . L. . Fotouhi . A. . Somasundaram . K. . Offer . G. J. . Minton . G. . Longo . S. . Wild . M. . Knap . V. . 3 . August 12, 2016 . Multi-temperature state-dependent equivalent circuit discharge model for lithium-sulfur batteries . J. Power Sources . 328 . 289–299 . 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.090 . 2016JPS...328..289P . free . 10044/1/39221 . free .
82. Web site: Lithium Sulfur batteries will be first commercialized by 2018 in electric bikes where energy density will be improved for eventual use in electric cars. nextbigfuture.com. 2017-02-02. 2016-06-10.
83. Web site: OXIS Rack-Mounted Battery . OXIS Energy . May 20, 2017 . August 26, 2018 . https://web.archive.org/web/20180826152407/http://oxisenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/OXIS-Rack-Mounted-Battery.pdf .
84. Web site: OXIS Energy Lithium-Sulfur Battery Technology Presentation . OXIS Energy . May 20, 2017 . 2016-11-03 .
85. News: Oxis Energy files for bankruptcy . . Scott . Alex . 2021-06-26 . 2022-08-15 .
86. Web site: Sony battery to offer 40% longer phone life . December 17, 2015 . August 22, 2016 . Nikkei Asian Review.
87. Web site: 'World's most efficient lithium-sulphur battery' set for launch . January 6, 2020 . January 9, 2020 . The Engineer.
88. Web site: Morris . James . Sulfur Battery Technology Could Make Electric Cars Go Three Times Further By 2024 . 2022-08-28 . Forbes . en.
89. News: Zeta Energy: Enabling Fast Charging Batteries with 3D Lithium Metal Architectures and Sulfurized Carbon Cathodes . September 28, 2023 . United States Department of Energy . January 13, 2023.
90. News: Lyten launches San Jose pilot production for cutting-edge batteries – Company hopes lithium-sulfur batteries can revolutionize sector . Avalos . George . . 2023-06-14 .