List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 80 explained

Location:Washington, D.C.
Type:Presidential nomination with Senate confirmation
Authority:Constitution of the United States, Art. III, §1
Terms:life tenure, subject to impeachment and removal
Positions:9 (by statute)

This is a list of cases reported in volume 80 (13 Wall.) of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1872.[1]

Nominative reports

In 1874, the U.S. government created the United States Reports, and retroactively numbered older privately-published case reports as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of U.S. Reports have dual citation forms; one for the volume number of U.S. Reports, and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called "nominative reports").

John William Wallace

Starting with the 66th volume of U.S. Reports, the Reporter of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States was John William Wallace. Wallace was Reporter of Decisions from 1863 to 1874, covering volumes 68 through 90 of United States Reports which correspond to volumes 1 through 23 of his Wallace's Reports. As such, the dual form of citation to, for example, Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co. is 80 U.S. (13 Wall.) 166 (1872).

Wallace's Reports were the final nominative reports for the US Supreme Court; starting with volume 91, cases were identified simply as "(volume #) U.S. (page #) (year)".

Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of 80 U.S. (13 Wall.)

See also: List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States.

See also: List of United States Supreme Court justices by time in office.

See also: List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States by court composition.

The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).[2] Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices (always including one chief justice).

When the cases in 80 U.S. (13 Wall.) were decided the Court comprised these nine members:

Portrait Justice Office Home State Succeeded Date confirmed by the Senate
(Vote)
Tenure on Supreme Court
Salmon P. ChaseChief JusticeOhioRoger B. Taney
(Acclamation)


May 7, 1873
(Died)
Smith Thompson
(Acclamation)


November 28, 1872
(Retired)
Nathan CliffordAssociate JusticeMaineBenjamin Robbins Curtis
(26–23)


July 25, 1881
(Died)
Noah Haynes SwayneAssociate JusticeOhioJohn McLean
(38–1)


January 24, 1881
(Retired)
Samuel Freeman MillerAssociate JusticeIowaPeter Vivian Daniel
(Acclamation)


October 13, 1890
(Died)
David DavisAssociate JusticeIllinoisJohn Archibald Campbell
(Acclamation)


March 4, 1877
(Resigned)
Stephen Johnson FieldAssociate JusticeCalifornianewly created seat
(Acclamation)


December 1, 1897
(Retired)
William StrongAssociate JusticePennsylvaniaRobert Cooper Grier
(No vote recorded)


December 14, 1880
(Retired)
Joseph P. BradleyAssociate JusticeNew Jerseynewly created seat
(46–9)


January 22, 1892
(Died)

Notable Cases in 80 U.S. (13 Wall.)

United States v. Klein

The Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Klein, 80 U.S. (13 Wall.) 128 (1872) stands for the proposition that the legislative branch cannot impair the exclusive powers of another branch; it recognizes and supports the fundamental value of separation of powers defined by the Constitution. Specifically, Klein means that Congress may not direct the outcome of a case by prescribing the rule of decision, nor may Congress impair the power and effect of a Presidential pardon.

Tarble's Case

In Tarble's Case, 80 U.S. (13 Wall.) 397 (1872), the Supreme Court held that a state judge has no jurisdiction to issue a writ of habeas corpus, or to continue proceedings under the writ once issued, for the discharge of a person held by the authority of the United States by an officer of the federal government.

Watson v. Jones

Watson v. Jones, 80 U.S. (13 Wall.) 679 (1872), was based upon a dispute regarding the Walnut Street Presbyterian Church in Kentucky. The Court held that in adjudications of church property disputes: (1) courts cannot rule on the truth or falsity of a religious teaching; (2) if a previous ecclesiastical authority structure existed before the dispute, then courts should defer to the decision of that structure; and (3) in the absence of such an internal authority structure, courts should defer to the wishes of a majority of the congregation.

Citation style

See also: United States district court.

See also: United States circuit court.

See also: United States federal courts. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction (i.e., in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.

Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.

List of cases in 80 U.S. (13 Wall.)

See also: Chase Court.

Case NamePage and yearOpinion of the CourtConcurring opinion(s)Dissenting opinion(s)Lower courtDisposition
Bethell v. Mathews1 (1872)ChasenonenoneC.C.D. La.affirmed
Norwich Transportation Company v. Flint3 (1872)BradleynonenoneC.C.D. Conn.affirmed
Yeager v. Farwell6 (1872)DavisnonenoneC.C.D. Mo.affirmed
Webb v. Sharp14 (1872)BradleynonenoneSup. Ct. D.C.affirmed
Boyden v. United States17 (1872)StrongnonenoneC.C.D. Wis.affirmed
United States v. Wormer25 (1872)BradleynonenoneCt. Cl.reversed
Low v. Austin29 (1872)FieldnonenoneCal.reversed
United States v. Clyde35 (1872)BradleynonenoneCt. Cl.reversed
Clyde v. United States38 (1872)BradleynonenoneCt. Cl.reversed
Toof v. Martin40 (1872)FieldnonenoneC.C.D. Ark.affirmed
Wheeler v. Harris51 (1872)ChasenonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.dismissed
Bevans v. United States56 (1872)StrongnoneChaseC.C.E.D. Ark.affirmed
Halliburton v. United States63 (1872)StrongnoneChaseC.C.E.D. Ark.affirmed
Rice v. Houston66 (1872)DavisnonenoneC.C.M.D. Tenn.affirmed
Curtis v. Whitney68 (1872)MillernonenoneWis.affirmed
Johnson v. Towsley72 (1872)MillernoneCliffordNeb.affirmed
Samson v. Smiley91 (1872)MillernonenoneNeb.affirmed
Gibson v. Chouteau92 (1872)FieldnonenoneMo.reversed
Norwich Company v. Wright104 (1872)BradleynonenoneC.C.D. Conn.affirmed
United States v. Klein128 (1872)ChasenoneMillerCt. Cl.affirmed
Carroll v. United States151 (1872)ChasenonenoneCt. Cl.reversed
Armstrong v. United States154 (1872)ChasenonenoneCt. Cl.reversed
Pargoud v. United States156 (1872)ChasenonenoneCt. Cl.reversed
Semmes v. Hartford Insurance Company158 (1872)MillernonenoneC.C.D. Conn.reversed
Reiche v. Smythe162 (1872)DavisnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.reversed
Pumpelly v. Green Bay and Mississippi Canal Company166 (1872)MillernonenoneC.C.D. Wis.reversed
Steinbach v. Insurance Company183 (1872)ChasenonenoneC.C.D. Md.affirmed
Philip v. Nock185 (1872)ChasenonenoneSup. Ct. D.C.dismissal denied
Hampton v. Rouse187 (1872)ChasenonenoneC.C.S.D. Miss.dismissed
Wells v. McGregor188 (1872)ChasenonenoneMont.dismissed
Pennsylvania College Cases190 (1872)CliffordnonenonePa.affirmed (both cases)
Union Mutual Insurance Company v. Wilkinson222 (1872)MillernonenoneC.C.D. Iowaaffirmed
Ex parte McNiel236 (1872)SwaynenonenoneE.D.N.Y.prohibition denied
Bath County v. Amy244 (1872)StrongnonenoneC.C.D. Ky.reversed
United States v. Avery251 (1872)ChasenonenoneC.C.D.S.C.certification
United States v. Wilder254 (1872)DavisnonenoneCt. Cl.reversed
Klinger v. Missouri257 (1872)BradleynonenoneMo.dismissed
Wilmington and Weldon Railroad Company v. Reid264 (1872)DavisnonenoneN.C.reversed
Raleigh and Gaston Railroad Company v. Reid269 (1872)DavisnonenoneN.C.reversed
Chicago and Northwestern Railway Company v. Whitton's Administrator270 (1872)FieldnonenoneC.C.E.D. Wis.affirmed
Myers v. Croft291 (1872)DavisnonenoneC.C.D. Neb.affirmed
Pendleton County v. Amy297 (1872)StrongnonenoneC.C.D. Ky.reversed
Williams v. Kirtland306 (1872)FieldnonenoneC.C.D. Minn.reversed
Delaware and Hudson Canal Company v. Clark311 (1872)StrongnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
The Patapsco329 (1872)DavisnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
Bradley v. Fisher335 (1872)FieldnonenoneSup. Ct. D.C.affirmed
Gay's Gold358 (1872)MillernonenoneC.C.D. La.affirmed
Robinson v. United States363 (1872)DavisnonenoneC.C.D. Cal.affirmed
Hall and Long v. Nashville and Chattanooga Railroad Company367 (1872)StrongnonenoneC.C.M.D. Tenn.reversed
East Saginaw Salt Manufacturing Company v. City of East Saginaw373 (1872)BradleynonenoneMich.affirmed
Slaughter's Administrator v. Gerson379 (1872)FieldnonenoneC.C.D. Md.affirmed
Alexander v. Roulet386 (1872)DavisnonenoneC.C.D. Cal.affirmed
The Siren389 (1872)SwaynenonenoneD. Mass.affirmed
Tarble's Case397 (1872)FieldnoneChaseWis.reversed
Kitchen v. Bedford413 (1872)BradleynonenoneC.C.D. Kan.reversed
Davenport v. Lamb418 (1872)FieldnonenoneC.C.D. Ore.affirmed
West Tennessee Bank v. Citizens' Bank432 (1872)SwaynenonenoneLa.dismissed
Clinton v. Englebrecht434 (1872)ChasenonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Utahreversed
United States v. Vigil449 (1872)DavisnonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. N.M.reversed
Tucker v. Spalding453 (1872)MillernonenoneC.C.D. Cal.reversed
Butler v. Watkins456 (1872)StrongnonenoneC.C.D. La.reversed
Caujolle v. Ferri465 (1872)DavisnonenoneC.C.D.N.Y.affirmed
The Ariadne475 (1872)SwaynenonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.reversed
Carpentier v. Montgomery480 (1872)BradleynonenoneC.C.D. Cal.affirmed
Chew v. Brumagen497 (1872)StrongnonenoneN.J.reversed
French v. Edwards506 (1872)FieldnoneMillerC.C.D. Cal.reversed
Milwaukee and St. Paul Railway Company v. Soutter517 (1872)BradleynoneFieldC.C.D. Wis.affirmed
Kentucky v. Boutwell526 (1872)Davisnonenoneoriginalmandamus denied
Stockwell v. United States531 (1872)StrongnoneField, MillerC.C.D. Me.affirmed
Twenty Per Cent Cases568 (1872)CliffordnonenoneCt. Cl.affirmed (all cases)
Blyew v. United States581 (1872)StrongnoneBradleyC.C.D. Ky.reversed
Mason v. Rollins602 (1872)ChasenonenoneC.C.N.D. Ill.affirmed
Insurance Company v. Barton603 (1872)SwaynenonenoneC.C.D. Mo.affirmed
Dooley v. Smith604 (1872)MillernoneFieldKy.reversed
Paige v. Banks608 (1872)DavisnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Bailey616 (1872)CliffordnonenoneSup. Ct. D.C.affirmed
United States v. Russell623 (1872)CliffordnonenoneCt. Cl.affirmed
Pugh v. United States633 (1872)ChasenonenoneCt. Cl.affirmed
United States v. Kimbal636 (1872)SwaynenonenoneCt. Cl.reversed
White v. Hart646 (1872)SwaynenonenoneGa.reversed
Osborn v. Nicholson654 (1872)SwaynenoneChaseC.C.D. Ark.reversed
Ex parte Russell664 (1872)BradleynoneChaseCt. Cl.mandamus denied
Great Western Insurance Company v. Thwing672 (1872)BradleynoneCliffordC.C.D. Mass.reversed
Watson v. Jones679 (1872)MillernoneCliffordC.C.D. Ky.affirmed
The Mabey738 (1872)CliffordnonenoneC.C.D.N.Y.commission denied

See also

certificate of division

External links

Notes and References

  1. Anne Ashmore, DATES OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS AND ARGUMENTS, Library, Supreme Court of the United States, 26 December 2018.
  2. Web site: Supreme Court Research Guide . 7 April 2021 . Georgetown Law Library.