List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 169 explained

Location:Washington, D.C.
Type:Presidential nomination with Senate confirmation
Authority:Constitution of the United States, Art. III, §1
Terms:life tenure, subject to impeachment and removal
Positions:9 (by statute)

This is a list of cases reported in volume 169 of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1898.

Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of volume 169 U.S.

See also: List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States.

See also: List of United States Supreme Court justices by time in office.

See also: List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States by court composition.

The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).[1] Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices (always including one chief justice).

When the cases in volume 169 were decided the Court comprised the following nine members:

PortraitJusticeOfficeHome StateSucceededDate confirmed by the Senate
(Vote)
Tenure on Supreme Court
Melville FullerChief JusticeIllinoisMorrison Waite
(41–20)


July 4, 1910
(Died)
John Marshall HarlanAssociate JusticeKentuckyDavid Davis
(Acclamation)


October 14, 1911
(Died)
Horace GrayAssociate JusticeMassachusettsNathan Clifford
(51–5)


September 15, 1902
(Died)
David Josiah BrewerAssociate JusticeKansasStanley Matthews
(53–11)


March 28, 1910
(Died)
Henry Billings BrownAssociate JusticeMichiganSamuel Freeman Miller
(Acclamation)


May 28, 1906
(Retired)
George Shiras Jr.Associate JusticePennsylvaniaJoseph P. Bradley
(Acclamation)


February 23, 1903
(Retired)
Edward Douglass WhiteAssociate JusticeLouisianaSamuel Blatchford
(Acclamation)


December 18, 1910
(Continued as chief justice)
Rufus W. PeckhamAssociate JusticeNew YorkHowell Edmunds Jackson
(Acclamation)


October 24, 1909
(Died)
Joseph McKennaAssociate JusticeCaliforniaStephen Johnson Field
(Acclamation)


January 5, 1925
(Retired)

Notable Cases in 169 U.S.

Holden v. Hardy

In Holden v. Hardy, 169 U.S. 366 (1898), the Supreme Court held that a limitation on working time for miners and smelters was constitutional. The decision stated that the Utah law was a legitimate exercise of the state's police power; that such a law is legitimate if there is indeed a rational basis, supported by facts, for the legislature to believe particular work conditions are dangerous.

United States v. Wong Kim Ark

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), is a landmark decision in which the Supreme Court held that "a child born in the United States, of parents of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicil and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China", is a U.S. citizen. This is due to the first clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution, 'All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.'" This decision established an important precedent in the interpretation of the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.[2]

Citation style

See also: United States district court.

See also: United States circuit court.

See also: United States court of appeals.

See also: United States federal courts. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction (i.e., in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.

The Judiciary Act of 1891 created the United States Courts of Appeals and reassigned the jurisdiction of most routine appeals from the district and circuit courts to these appellate courts. The Act created nine new courts that were originally known as the "United States Circuit Courts of Appeals." The new courts had jurisdiction over most appeals of lower court decisions. The Supreme Court could review either legal issues that a court of appeals certified or decisions of court of appeals by writ of certiorari.

Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.

List of cases in volume 169 U.S.

See also: Fuller Court.

Case NamePage & yearOpinion of the CourtConcurring opinion(s)Dissenting opinion(s)Lower CourtDisposition
Stuart v. Hayden 1 (1898) Harlan none none 8th Cir.affirmed
United States v. Passavant 16 (1898) Fuller none Brown 2d Cir.certification
Hetzel v. Baltimore & O.R.R. Co. 26 (1898) Harlannone none D.C. Cir.reversed
In re Boardman ex rel. Durrant 39 (1898) Fuller none none 9th Cir.habeas corpus denied
Building & Loan Ass'n v. Price 45 (1898) Peckham none none reversed
Williams v. Paine 55 (1898) Peckham none none D.C. Cir.affirmed
Holder v. Aultman M. & Co. 81 (1898) Gray none none affirmed
Powers v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. 92 (1898) Gray none none affirmed
Union M.L. Ins. Co. v. Kirchoff 103 (1898) Fuller none none dismissed
Wetmore v. Rymer 115 (1898) Shiras none none reversed
Richardson v. Louisville & N.R.R. Co. 128 (1898) Fuller none none affirmed
Chicago et al. Ry. Co. v. Solan 133 (1898) Gray none none Iowaaffirmed
Ritter v. Mutual L. Ins. Co. 139 (1898) Harlan none none 3d Cir.affirmed
Benjamin v. City of New Orleans 161 (1898) Fuller none none 5th Cir.dismissed
Cessna v. United States 165 (1898) Brewer none none affirmed
Baker v. Cummings 189 (1898) Whitenone none D.C. Cir.reversed
United States v. Klumpp 209 (1898) Fuller none none 2d Cir.reversed
Barrett v. United States I 218 (1898) Fuller none none affirmed
Barrett v. United States II 231 (1898) Fuller none none affirmed
Levis v. Kengla 234 (1898) Gray none none D.C. Cir.affirmed
Wetzel v. Minnesota et al. Co. 237 (1898) Brown none none 8th Cir.affirmed
Dull v. Blackman 243 (1898) Brewer none none affirmed
United States v. City of Louisville 249 (1898) Peckham none none affirmed
Logan County v. United States 255 (1898) Peckham none none affirmed
Thomas v. Gay 264 (1898) Shiras none none reversed
Baker v. Grice 284 (1898) Peckham none none reversed
Willis v. Eastern T. & B. Co. 295 (1898) Gray none none D.C. Cir.reversed
Richmond & A.R.R. Co. v. R.A. Patterson T. Co. 311 (1898) Whitenone none affirmed
United States v. Garlinger 316 (1898) Shiras none none reversed
Payne v. Robertson 323 (1898) Whitenone none affirmed
United States v. Eaton 331 (1898) Whitenone none affirmed
Beley v. Naphtaly 353 (1898) Peckham none none 9th Cir.affirmed
Smith v. Naphtaly 365 (1898) Peckham none none 9th Cir.affirmed
Holden v. Hardy 366 (1898) Brown none none Utahaffirmed
Smithsonian Inst. v. Meech 398 (1898) Brewer none none D.C. Cir.reversed
Brown v. Marion Nat'l Bank 416 (1898) Harlan none none reversed
Savings & L. Soc'y v. Multnomah Cnty. 421 (1898) Gray none none affirmed
Central Nat'l Bank v. Stevens 432 (1898) Shiras none none N.Y.reversed
Smyth v. Ames 466 (1898) Harlan none none C.C.D. Neb.affirmed
Merritt v. Bowdoin Coll. 551 (1898) Harlan none none dismissed
Backus v. Fort St. U.D. Co. 557 (1898) Brewer none Harlan affirmed
Wilson v. North Carolina 586 (1898) Peckham none none dismissed
United States ex rel. Bernardin v. Butterworth 600 (1898) Shiras none none D.C. Cir.reversed
McCormick H.M. Co. v. Aultman Co. 606 (1898) Brown none none 6th Cir.certification
Missouri et al. Ry. Co. v. Haber 613 (1898) Harlan none Brewer affirmed
Louisville & N.R.R. Co. v. Behlmer 644 (1898) Fuller none none 4th Cir.vacation denied
United States v. Wong Kim Ark 649 (1898) Gray none Fuller affirmed

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Supreme Court Research Guide . 7 April 2021 . Georgetown Law Library.
  2. News: Donald Trump meet Wong Kim Ark, the Chinese American Cook who is the father of 'birthright citizenship' . . August 31, 2015.