List of NBA G League yearly standings explained

These are regular season standings and playoff results for the NBA G League. The NBA G League is the official minor league basketball organization owned and run by the National Basketball Association (NBA). The league was formed in 2001 as the National Basketball Development League (NBDL). The league was renamed to NBA Development League (NBA D-League) in 2005 to reflect its close affiliation with the NBA. In 2017, it was renamed NBA G League, as part of a sponsorship deal with Gatorade.

2001–02

See main article: article and 2001–02 National Basketball Development League season.

Team	W	L	Win %	GB
	36	20	.643	—
	36	20	.643	—
	31	25	.554	5
	30	26	.536	6
	26	30	.464	10
	26	30	.464	10
	21	35	.375	15
	18	38	.321	18

Finals^[1]

• April 8: Greenville 81, North Charleston 63
• April 10: Greenville 76, North Charleston 68

Finals

2002–03

See main article: article and 2002–03 National Basketball Development League season.

Team	W	L	Win %	GB
	32	18	.640	—
	26	24	.520	6
	26	24	.520	6
	26	24	.520	6
	23	27	.460	9
	23	27	.460	9
	22	28	.440	10
	22	28	.440	10

Finals

• April 4: Mobile 92, Fayetteville 82
• April 9: Fayetteville 77, Mobile 71
• April 11: Mobile 75, Fayetteville 72

Finals

2003–04

See main article: article.

Team	W	L	Win %	GB
	align=center	28	align=center	18	align=center	.609	align=center	—
	align=center	27	align=center	19	align=center	.587	align=center	1
	align=center	24	align=center	22	align=center	.522	align=center	4
	align=center	21	align=center	25	align=center	.457	align=center	7
	align=center	20	align=center	26	align=center	.435	align=center	8
	align=center	18	align=center	28	align=center	.391	align=center	10

Finals boxscore

2004–05

See main article: article.

Team	W	L	Win %	GB
	align=center	30	align=center	18	align=center	.625	align=center	—
	align=center	27	align=center	21	align=center	.563	align=center	3
	align=center	27	align=center	21	align=center	.563	align=center	3
	align=center	26	align=center	22	align=center	.542	align=center	4
	align=center	17	align=center	31	align=center	.354	align=center	13
	align=center	17	align=center	31	align=center	.354	align=center	13

Finals boxscore

2005–06

See main article: article.

Team	W	L	Win %	GB
	align=center	28	align=center	20	align=center	.583	align=center	—
	align=center	26	align=center	22	align=center	.542	align=center	2
	align=center	25	align=center	23	align=center	.521	align=center	3
	align=center	25	align=center	23	align=center	.521	align=center	3
	align=center	24	align=center	24	align=center	.500	align=center	4
	align=center	24	align=center	24	align=center	.500	align=center	4
	align=center	24	align=center	24	align=center	.500	align=center	4
	align=center	16	align=center	32	align=center	.333	align=center	12

Finals boxscore

2006–07

See main article: article.

Regular season

Eastern Division

Team
x-Dakota Wizards (1)	33	17		–	19–6	14–11
x-Sioux Falls Skyforce (2)	30	20		3	17–8	13–12
x-Fort Worth Flyers (3)	29	21		4	18–7	11–14
	21	29		12	12–13	9–14
	21	29		12	11–14	10–15
	16	34		17	11–14	5–20

Western Division

Team
x-Idaho Stampede (1)	33	17		–	16–9	17–8
x-Colorado 14ers (2)	28	22		5	16–9	12–13
x-Albuquerque Thunderbirds (3)	24	26		9	14–11	10–15
	23	27		10	13–12	10–15
	23	27		10	11–14	12–13
	19	31		14	12–13	7–18

Notes

• x indicates a team that had qualified for the playoffs
• Number in parentheses indicates the team's seeding for the playoffs.

Playoffs

Three teams with the best regular season records in each division qualified for playoffs. The playoffs consist of three rounds with single elimination format. Teams with the better regular season record holds home-court advantage in the first and second rounds, while teams with higher seed holds home-court advantage in the Finals. The division winners received a bye from the first round. The remaining teams faced each other in the first round.

Notes

• The numbers to the left of each team indicate the team's seeding.
• An asterisk (*) denotes overtime period(s).
• Teams in bold advanced to the next round.
• Teams in italics have home-court advantage in that round.

Finals

2007–08

See main article: article.

Regular season

Central Division

Team
x-Dakota Wizards (3)	29	21		–	18–7	11–14
x-Sioux Falls Skyforce (6)	28	22		1	19–6	9–16
	22	28		7	13–12	9–16
	17	33		12	12–13	5–20

Southwest Division

Team
x-Austin Toros (2)	30	20		–	19–6	11–14
x-Colorado 14ers (5)	29	21		1	17–8	12–13
	26	24		4	14–11	12–13
	22	28		8	14–11	8–17
	21	29		9	16–9	5–20

Western Division

Team
x-Idaho Stampede (1)	36	14		–	21–4	15–10
x-Los Angeles D-Fenders (4)	32	18		4	19–6	13–12
	24	26		12	14–11	10–15
	23	27		13	14–11	9–16
	11	39		25	9–16	2–23

Notes

• x indicates a team that had qualified for the playoffs
• Number in parentheses indicates the team's seeding for the playoffs.

Playoffs

The three division winners, along with the next three teams with the best regular season records regardless of division, qualified for the playoffs. The playoffs consist of three rounds with single elimination format for the first two rounds and best-of-three format for the finals. Teams with the better regular season record holds home-court advantage in every rounds. The three division winners were seeded from 1 to 3 based on their regular season records, while the remaining teams were seeded from 4 to 6 based on their regular season records. The two division winners with the best regular season records received a bye from the first round. The remaining division winners faced the lowest seeded teams, while the two remaining teams faced each other.

Notes

• The numbers to the left of each team indicate the team's seeding.
• The numbers to the right indicate the number of games the team won in that round.
• The division winners are marked by an asterisk (*).
• Teams in bold advanced to the next round.
• Teams in italics have home-court advantage in that round.

Finals

2008–09

See main article: article.

Regular season

Complete rosters for each of the 16 2008–09 NBA D-League teams will consist of the ten players drafted November 7 along with seven returning, allocation, and local tryout players. Rosters will be reduced to 12 players on November 20 and opening-day 10-man rosters must be set by November 26 in anticipation of the November 28 tip off of the NBA D-League's eighth season. Each team will play one preseason game between November 19 and 25.

Central Division

Team
x-Iowa Energy (3)	28	22		–	17–8	11–14
x-Dakota Wizards (6)	27	23		1	16–9	11–14
x-Erie BayHawks (7)	27	23		1	16–9	11–14
	25	25		3	13–12	12–13
	19	31		9	11–14	8–17

Southwest Division

Team
x-Colorado 14ers (1)	34	16		–	20–5	14–11
x-Austin Toros (4)	32	18		2	17–8	15–10
	24	26		10	15–10	9–16
	21	29		13	12–13	9–16
	15	35		19	8–17	7–18

Western Division

Team
x-Utah Flash (2)	32	18		–	17–8	15–10
x-Idaho Stampede (5)	31	19		1	20–5	11–14
x-Bakersfield Jam (8)	26	24		6	16–9	10–15
	25	25		7	18–7	7–18
	19	31		13	11–14	8–17
	15	35		17	9–16	6–19

Notes

• x indicates a team that had qualified for the playoffs
• Number in parentheses indicates the team's seeding for the playoffs.

Playoffs

The three division winners, along with the next five teams with the best regular season records regardless of division, qualified for the playoffs. The playoffs consist of three rounds with single elimination format for the first two rounds and best-of-three format for the finals. Teams with the better regular season record holds home-court advantage in every rounds. The three division winners were seeded from 1 to 3 based on their regular season records, while the remaining teams were seeded from 4 to 8 based on their regular season records. The three division winners had to choose their opponents in the first round from among the four lowest seeded teams. The fourth seeded team would be paired with the remaining team that is not chosen as an opponent by the three division winners. For the first time in the best-of-three era, a team completed a perfect postseason record, with the 14ers going a perfect 4–0 to win the championship.

Notes

• The numbers to the left of each team indicate the team's seeding.
• The numbers to the right indicate the number of games the team won in that round.
• The division winners are marked by an asterisk (*).
• Teams in bold advanced to the next round.
• Teams in italics have home-court advantage in that round.

Finals

2009–10

See main article: article.

Regular season

Eastern Conference

Team
x-Iowa Energy (1)	37	13		–	19–6	18–7
x-Sioux Falls Skyforce (4)	32	18		5	20–5	12–13
x-Dakota Wizards (5)	29	21		8	21–4	8–17
	27	23		10	16–9	11–14
	22	28		15	13–12	9–16
	21	29		16	10–15	11–14
	7	43		30	7–18	0–25

Western Conference

Team
x-Rio Grande Valley Vipers (2)	34	16		–	21–4	13–12
x-Austin Toros (3)	32	18		2	18–7	14–11
x-Reno Bighorns (6)	28	22		6	15–10	13–12
x-Utah Flash (7)	28	22		6	14–11	14–11
x-Tulsa 66ers (8)	26	24		8	15–10	10–15
	25	25		9	15–10	11–14
	18	32		16	13–12	5–20
	17	33		17	10–15	7–18
	16	34		18	9–16	7–18

Notes

• x indicates a team that had qualified for the playoffs
• Number in parentheses indicates the team's seeding for the playoffs.

Playoffs

The Eastern and Western Conference winners, along with the next six teams with the best regular season records regardless of conference, qualified for the playoffs. The playoffs consist of three rounds with best-of-three format. Teams with the better regular season record holds home-court advantage in every rounds. The teams were seeded from 1 to 8 based on their regular season records. The top three seeds had to choose their opponents in the first round from among the four lowest seeded teams. The fourth seeded team would be paired with the remaining team that is not chosen as an opponent by the top three seeds.

This was the first Finals to feature teams with a single affiliation partnership, which featured the Rio Grande Valley Vipers (operated by the Houston Rockets) and the Tulsa 66ers (operated by the Oklahoma City Thunder). The Vipers won Game 1 and then finished Game 2 with a last-second shot by Craig Winder to win their first championship.^[2]

Notes

• The numbers to the left of each team indicate the team's seeding.
• The numbers to the right indicate the number of games the team won in that round.
• The conference champions are marked by an asterisk (*).
• Teams in bold advanced to the next round.
• Teams in italics have home-court advantage in that round.

Finals

2010–11

See main article: article and 2010–11 NBA Development League season.

Regular season

Eastern Conference

Team
x-Iowa Energy (1)	37	13		–	21–4	16–9
x-Erie BayHawks (5)	32	18		5	18–7	14–11
	24	26		13	16–9	8–17
	19	31		18	11–14	8–17
	18	32		19	14–11	4–21
	13	37		24	7–18	6–19
	10	40		27	6–19	4–21

Western Conference

Team
x-Reno Bighorns (2)	34	16		–	20–5	14–11
x-Rio Grande Valley Vipers (3)	33	17		1	17–8	16–9
x-Tulsa 66ers (4)	33	17		1	17–8	16–9
x-Bakersfield Jam (6)	29	21		5	17–8	12–13
x-Utah Flash (7)	28	22		6	16–9	12–13
x-Texas Legends (8)	24	26		10	15–10	9–16
	24	26		10	12–13	12–13
	22	28		12	13–12	9–16
	20	30		14	13–12	7–18

Notes

• x indicates a team that had qualified for the playoffs
• Number in parentheses indicates the team's seeding for the playoffs.

Playoffs

The Eastern and Western Conference winners, along with the next six teams with the best regular season records regardless of conference, qualified for the playoffs. The playoffs consist of three rounds with best-of-three format. Teams with the better regular season record holds home-court advantage in every rounds. The teams were seeded from 1 to 8 based on their regular season records. The top three seeds had to choose their opponents in the first round from among the four lowest seeded teams. The fourth seeded team would be paired with the remaining team that is not chosen as an opponent by the top three seeds.

Notes

• The numbers to the left of each team indicate the team's seeding.
• The numbers to the right indicate the number of games the team won in that round.
• The conference champions are marked by an asterisk (*).
• Teams in bold advanced to the next round.
• Teams in italics have home-court advantage in that round.

Finals

2011–12

See main article: article and 2011–12 NBA Development League season.

Regular season

Eastern Conference

Team
x-Springfield Armor (2)	29	21		–	19–6	10–15
x-Dakota Wizards (4)	29	21		–	17–8	12–13
x-Erie BayHawks (5)	28	22		1	16–9	12–13
x-Canton Charge (7)	27	23		2	15–10	12–13
x-Iowa Energy (8)	25	25		4	17–8	8–17
	21	29		8	11–14	10–15
	15	35		14	10–15	5–20
	14	36		15	7–18	7–18

Western Conference

Team
x-Los Angeles D-Fenders (1)	38	12		–	21–4	17–8
x-Austin Toros (3)	33	17		5	19–6	14–11
x-Bakersfield Jam (6)	28	22		10	17–8	11–14
	24	26		14	15–10	9–16
	24	26		14	14–14	13–12
	23	27		15	13–12	10–15
	21	29		17	12–13	9–16
	21	29		17	13–12	8–17

Notes

• x indicates teams that have qualified for the playoff.

Playoffs

The Eastern and Western Conference winners, along with the next six teams with the best regular season records regardless of conference, qualified for the playoffs. The playoffs consist of three rounds with best-of-three format. Teams with the better regular season record holds home-court advantage in every rounds. The teams were seeded from 1 to 8 based on their regular season records. The top three seeds had to choose their opponents in the first round from among the four lowest seeded teams. The fourth seeded team would be paired with the remaining team that is not chosen as an opponent by the top three seeds.

Notes

• The numbers to the left of each team indicate the team's seeding.
• The numbers to the right indicate the number of games the team won in that round.
• The conference champions are marked by an asterisk (*).
• Teams in bold advanced to the next round.
• Teams in italics have home-court advantage in that round.

Finals

2012–13

Regular season

Eastern Conference

Team
x-Canton Charge (4)	30	20		–	16–9	14–11
x-Fort Wayne Mad Ants (5)	27	23		3	16–9	11–14
x- Maine Red Claws (8)	26	24		4	14–11	12–13
	26	24		4	12–13	12–13
	18	32		12	12–13	6–19

Central Conference

Team
x-Rio Grande Valley Vipers (2)	35	15		–	20–5	15–10
x-Austin Toros (6)	27	23		8	15–10	12–13
x-Tulsa 66ers (7)	27	23		8	16–9	11–14
	25	25		10	13–12	12–13
	21	29		14	13–12	8–17
	14	36		21	10–15	4–21

Western Conference

Team
x-Bakersfield Jam (1)	36	14		–	21–4	17–8
x-Santa Cruz Warriors (3)	32	18		4	19–6	13–12
	21	29		17	13–12	8–17
	19	31		17	10–15	9–16
	16	34		20	11–14	5–20

Notes

• x indicates teams that have qualified for the playoff
• Maine qualified over Erie due to a better head-to-head record (5–4).^[3]

Playoffs

The three conference winners, along with the next five teams with the best regular season records regardless of conference, qualified for the playoffs. The playoffs consist of three rounds with best-of-three format. Teams with the better regular season record holds home-court advantage in every rounds. The teams were seeded from 1 to 8 based on their regular season records. The top three seeds had to choose their opponents in the first round from among the four lowest seeded teams. The fourth seeded team would be paired with the remaining team that is not chosen as an opponent by the top three seeds. For the second time in league history, a team went undefeated in postseason play to win the championship, with the Rio Grande Valley Vipers going 6–0 becoming the second team in league history to win two titles.

Notes

• The numbers to the left of each team indicate the team's seeding.
• The numbers to the right indicate the number of games the team won in that round.
• The conference champions are marked by an asterisk (*).
• Teams in bold advanced to the next round.
• Teams in italics have home-court advantage in that round.

Finals

2013–14

Regular season

East Division

Team
x-Fort Wayne Mad Ants (1)	34	16		–	19–6	15–10
x-Canton Charge (7)	28	22		6	17–8	11–14
	22	28		12	11–14	11–14
	19	31		15	13–12	6–19
	16	34		18	8–17	8–17
	12	38		22q	8–17	4–21

Central Division

Team
x-Iowa Energy (3)	31	19		–	18–7	13–12
x-Sioux Falls Skyforce (4)	31	19		–	19–6	12–13
x-Rio Grande Valley Vipers (5)	30	20		1	15–10	15–10
	24	26		7	14–11	10–15
	24	26		7	13–12	11–14
	19	31		12	10–15	9–16

• In addition to finishing tied with each other, Iowa and Sioux Falls also finished tied with Los Angeles. The tie among the three teams was broken with a multiple-team tiebreaker by comparing the teams' records in games against one another. Los Angeles was 3–2 (.600), Iowa was 4–3 (.571), and Sioux Falls was 4–6 (.400). This gave Los Angeles the #2 seed, Iowa the #3 seed and the Central Division championship and left Sioux Falls with the #4 seed.
• Texas and Tulsa split their regular-season series, 3–3. Texas was 8–11 (.421) against opponents with records of .500 or better compared with Tulsa's record of 12–17 (.414) in such games.

West Division

Team
x-Los Angeles D-Fenders (2)	31	19		–	17–8	14–11
x-Santa Cruz Warriors (6)	29	21		2	16–9	13–12
x-Reno Bighorns (8)	27	23		4	15–10	12–13
	24	26		7	13–12	11–14
	24	26		7	13–12	11–14

• Idaho won the season series against Bakersfield, 3–2.

Notes

• x indicates teams that have qualified for the playoffs with seeding in (parentheses).
• If Los Angeles had not been involved in a three-way tie with Iowa and Sioux Falls, Iowa still would have won the Central Division championship. Iowa and Sioux Falls split their regular-season series, 3–3. Iowa was 13–14 (.481) against opponents with records of .500 or better compared with Sioux Falls's record of 12–13 (.480) in such games. If Sioux Falls had not been involved in a three-way tie with Iowa and Los Angeles, or if the league broke ties within divisions before interdivisional ties, Iowa would have been the #2 seed based on head-to-head record against Los Angeles, since Iowa won the only game the teams played.
• If the league broke ties for non-playoff teams in the same way as it does to determine playoff seeding, the tie among Texas, Tulsa, Idaho and Bakersfield would have been broken using a multiple-team tiebreaker by considering the teams' records in games they played against one another. Tulsa was 5–4 (.556), Bakersfield was 6–5 (.545), Idaho was 5–5 (.500) and Texas was 6–8 (.429) in such games. This would have given Tulsa fourth place in the Central Division, Bakersfield fourth place in the West Division, Idaho last place in the West Division and Texas fifth place in the Central Division.

Playoffs

The three division winners, along with the next five teams with the best regular-season records regardless of division qualified for the playoffs. The playoffs consist of three rounds with a best-of-three format. Teams with the better regular-season record hold home-court advantage in each round but play Game 1 on the road and Games 2 and 3 (if necessary) at home. The teams were seeded from 1 to 8 based on their regular-season records. Division winners were not given any special consideration in the seeding and could be the #8 seed. The three division winners, which may or may not be the three top seeds, had to choose their opponents in the first round from among the four lowest seeded wild-card teams. The top-seeded wild-card team was paired with the remaining team that was not chosen as an opponent by the three division winners. The two division winners which are not the top seed were placed in the lower half of the bracket which meant they would meet in the semifinals should they both advance. This would also result in the top two seeds meeting in the semifinals if they were from the same division and both advanced. For the third time, a team went 6–0 in postseason play, which saw the Fort Wayne Mad Ants become champions for the first time ever, while the Santa Cruz Warriors became the first D League team to ever lose back-to-back Finals (a feat not matched as of 2022).

Notes

• The numbers to the left of each team indicate the team's seeding.
• The numbers to the right indicate the number of games the team won in that round.
• The division champions are marked by an asterisk (*).
• Teams in bold advanced to the next round.
• Teams in italics have home-court advantage in that round.

Finals

2014–15

See main article: article and 2014–15 NBA Development League season.

Regular season

Eastern Conference

Team!style="width:30px"

x- Maine Red Claws (1)	35	15		–	20–6	15–9
x- Canton Charge (3)	31	19		4	14–10	17–9
	24	26		11	15–10	9–16
	20	30		15	11–14	9–16
	10	40		25	9–16	1–24

Team!style="width:30px"

x- Sioux Falls Skyforce (2)	29	21		–	14–10	15–11
x- Fort Wayne Mad Ants (4)	28	22		1	14–11	14–11
	26	24		3	13–12	13–12
	23	27		6	15–9	8–18

Western Conference

Team!style="width:30px"

x- Austin Spurs (2)	32	18		–	18–8	14–10
x- Oklahoma City Blue (4)	28	22		4	16–9	12–13
	27	23		5	14–11	13–12
	22	28		10	8–17	14–11

Team!style="width:30px"

x- Santa Cruz Warriors (1)	35	15		–	19–7	16–8
x- Bakersfield Jam (3)	34	16		1	17–8	17–8
	20	30		15	14–11	6–19
	17	33		18	12–13	5–20
	9	41		26	6–19	3–22

Finals

2015–16

See main article: article and 2015–16 NBA Development League season.

Regular season

Eastern Conference

Team!style="width:30px"

	31	19		–	15–10	16–9
	28	22		3	13–12	15–10
	23	27		8	10–15	13–12
	21	29		10	13–11	8–18
	12	38		19	9–16	3–22

Team!style="width:30px"

	40	10		–	22–3	18–7
	31	19		9	18–7	13–12
	26	24		14	15–11	12–13
	21	29		19	14–11	7–18
	20	30		20	13–12	7–18

Western Conference

Team!style="width:30px"

	33	17		–	20–5	13–12
	27	23		6	17–8	10–15
	22	28		11	13–12	9–16
	20	30		13	13–12	7–18
	19	31		14	12–13	7–18

Team!style="width:30px"

	30	20		–	15–10	15–10
	29	21		1	18–7	11–14
	23	27		7	13–12	10–15
	19	31		11	10–15	9–16

Finals boxscore

2016–17

See main article: article and 2016–17 NBA Development League season. Final standings.^[4]

Eastern Conference

Atlantic Division

Team (affiliate)
y – Maine Red Claws (BOS)	29	21		0	15–10	14–11
Delaware 87ers (PHI)	26	24		3	15–10	11–14
Westchester Knicks (NYK)	19	31		10	12–13	7–18
Greensboro Swarm (CHA)	19	31		10	13–12	6–19
Long Island Nets (BKN)	17	33		12	10–15	7–18
Erie BayHawks (ORL)	14	36		15	9–16	5–20

Central Division

Team (affiliate)
z – Raptors 905 (TOR)	39	11		0	18–7	21–4
x – Fort Wayne Mad Ants (IND)	30	20		9	16–9	14–11
x – Canton Charge (CLE)	29	21		10	17–8	12–13
Grand Rapids Drive (DET)	26	24		13	15–10	11–14
Windy City Bulls (CHI)	23	27		16	15–10	8–17

Western Conference

Southwest Division

Team (affiliate)
y – Oklahoma City Blue (OKC)	34	16		0	19–6	15–10
	32	18		2	19–6	13–12
Sioux Falls Skyforce (MIA)	29	21		5	16–9	13–12
Austin Spurs (SAS)	25	25		9	13–12	12–13
Texas Legends (DAL)	25	25		9	14–11	11–14
Iowa Energy (MEM)	12	38		22	6–19	6–19

Pacific Division

Team (affiliate)
	34	16		0	16–9	18–7
x – Santa Cruz Warriors (GSW)	31	19		3	18–7	13–12
Northern Arizona Suns (PHX)	22	28		12	14–11	8–17
Reno Bighorns (SAC)	21	29		13	12–13	9–16
Salt Lake City Stars (UTA)	14	36		20	7–18	7–18

Finals boxscore

2017–18

See main article: article and 2017–18 NBA G League season. Finals standings.^[5]

x – qualified for playoffs; y – Division champion; z – Conference champion

Eastern Conference

Atlantic Division

Team (affiliate)
	32	18		0	13–12	19–6
x – Raptors 905 (TOR)	31	19		1	18–7	13–12
Long Island Nets (BKN)	27	23		5	14–11	13–12
Maine Red Claws (BOS)	17	33		15	14–11	3–22

Central Division

Team (affiliate)
	29	21		0	19–6	10–15
x – Grand Rapids Drive (DET)	29	21		0	16–9	13–12
Windy City Bulls (CHI)	24	26		5	13–12	11–14
Canton Charge (CLE)	22	28		7	9–16	13–12
Wisconsin Herd (MIL)	21	29		8	8–17	13–12

Southeast Division

Team (affiliate)
y – Erie BayHawks (ATL)	28	22		0	15–10	13–12
x – Lakeland Magic (ORL)	28	22		0	15–10	13–12
Greensboro Swarm (CHA)	16	34		12	9–16	7–18
Delaware 87ers (PHI)	16	34		12	6–19	10–15

Western Conference

Midwest Division

Team (affiliate)
	28	22		0	15–10	13–12
Sioux Falls Skyforce (MIA)	25	25		3	13–12	12–13
Iowa Wolves (MIN)	24	26		4	14–11	10–15
Memphis Hustle (MEM)	21	29		7	10–15	11–14

Pacific Division

Team (affiliate)
y – Reno Bighorns (SAC)	29	21		0	14–11	15–10
	28	22		1	16–9	12–13
Santa Cruz Warriors (GSW)	23	27		6	13–12	10–15
	23	27		6	13–12	10–15
	23	27		6	14–11	9–16

Southwest Division

Team (affiliate)
z – Austin Spurs (SAS)	32	18		0	17–8	15–10
	29	21		3	14–11	15–10
x – Texas Legends (DAL)	29	21		3	16–9	13–12
Salt Lake City Stars (UTA)	16	34		16	11–14	5–20

Finals boxscore

2018–19

See main article: article and 2018–19 NBA G League season. Regular SeasonFinal standings:^[6]

x – qualified for playoffs; y – Division champion; z – Conference champion

Eastern Conference

Atlantic Division

Team (affiliate)
z – Long Island Nets (BKN)	34	16		0	19–6	15–10
	29	21		5	16–9	13–12
x – Raptors 905 (TOR)	29	21		5	13–12	16–9
	21	29		13	13–12	8–17
Maine Red Claws (BOS)	19	31		15	11–14	8–17

Central Division

Team (affiliate)
	28	22		0	14–11	14–11
x – Windy City Bulls (CHI)	27	23		1	15–10	12–13
	23	27		5	14–11	9–16
Canton Charge (CLE)	22	28		6	10–15	12–13
Wisconsin Herd (MIL)	12	38		16	8–17	4–21

Southeast Division

Team (affiliate)
	32	18		0	18–7	14–11
Capital City Go-Go (WAS)	25	25		7	14–11	11–14
Greensboro Swarm (CHA)	24	26		8	10–15	14–11
Erie BayHawks (ATL)	24	26		8	17–8	7–18

Western Conference

Midwest Division

Team (affiliate)
	34	16		0	17–8	17–8
x – Memphis Hustle (MEM)	28	22		6	16–9	12–13
Sioux Falls Skyforce (MIA)	24	26		10	13–12	11–14
Iowa Wolves (MIN)	20	30		14	13–12	7–18

Pacific Division

Team (affiliate)
	34	16		0	20–5	14–11
x – Stockton Kings (SAC)	30	20		4	18–7	12–13
	26	24		8	14–11	12–13
	21	29		13	13–12	8–17
	12	38		22	7–18	5–20

Southwest Division

Team (affiliate)
	34	16		0	18–7	16–9
x – Salt Lake City Stars (UTA)	27	23		7	15–10	12–13
Austin Spurs (SAS)	20	30		14	13–12	7–18
Texas Legends (DAL)	16	34		18	14–11	2–23

Finals boxscore

2019–20

See main article: article and 2019–20 NBA G League season. Final standings when the season was curtailed on March 12, 2020:^[7]

x – qualified for playoffs; y – Division champion; z – Conference champion

Eastern Conference

Atlantic Division

Team (affiliate)
Maine Red Claws (BOS)	28	14		0	14–6	14–8
	22	21		6.5	10–12	12–9
Raptors 905 (TOR)	22	21		6.5	12–8	10–13
Long Island Nets (BKN)	19	23		9	10–14	9–9
	17	24		10.5	7–13	10–11

Central Division

Team (affiliate)
	33	10		0	16–7	17–3
	29	14		4	20–4	9–10
	25	18		8	12–7	13–11
	21	22		12	16–8	5–14
Windy City Bulls (CHI)	17	26		16	7–13	10–13

Southeast Division

Team (affiliate)
	25	17		0	11–11	14–6
Capital City Go-Go (WAS)	22	21		3.5	14–7	8–14
	20	23		5.5	9–10	11–13
Erie BayHawks (NO)	13	30		12.5	8–12	5–18
Greensboro Swarm (CHA)	9	34		16.5	4–17	5–17

Western Conference

Midwest Division

Team (affiliate)
Memphis Hustle (MEM)	26	15		0	14–7	12–8
Sioux Falls Skyforce (MIA)	22	20		4.5	15–7	7–13
	20	22		6.5	12–10	8–12
Iowa Wolves (MIN)	19	24		8	10–13	9–11

Pacific Division

Team (affiliate)
Stockton Kings (SAC)	24	19		0	12–8	12–11
	21	21		2.5	8–12	13–9
	22	22		2.5	12–10	10–12
	19	25		5.5	13–6	6–19
	8	34		15.5	3–18	5–16

Southwest Division

Team (affiliate)
	30	12		0	17–6	13–6
Austin Spurs (SAS)	24	18		6	13–9	11–9
Texas Legends (DAL)	24	19		6.5	12–11	12–8
	15	27		15	6–13	9–14

2020–21

See main article: article and 2020–21 NBA G League season.

Playoffs

For the first time since the 2006–07 NBA Development League season, the playoffs were held entirely as a single-elimination bracket (the league held this type of format from 2003 to 2007, albeit with four teams for the first three seasons and six for the last season).

Championship boxscore

2021–22

See main article: article and 2021–22 NBA G League season.

Finals boxscore

2022–23

See main article: article and 2022–23 NBA G League season.

Finals boxscore

2023–24

See main article: article and 2023–24 NBA G League season.

Finals boxscore

References

General

• Web site: History of the National Basketball Developmental League. The Association for Professional Basketball Research. May 5, 2011.
• Web site: 2007 NBA Development League Championship Set. April 13, 2007. NBA.com/Dleague. Turner Sports Interactive, Inc. May 5, 2011.
• Web site: D-League Playoffs 101. April 13, 2007. NBA.com/Dleague. Turner Sports Interactive, Inc. May 5, 2011. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20121110225735/http://www.nba.com/dleague/playoffs_070404.html. November 10, 2012.
• Web site: 2008 NBA Development League Playoff Schedule. April 13, 2008. NBA.com/Dleague. Turner Sports Interactive, Inc. May 5, 2011.
• Web site: D-League Playoffs 101: Format And Current Bracket. NBA.com/Dleague. Turner Sports Interactive, Inc. May 5, 2011.
• Web site: NBA D-League Announces Innovative Playoff Format. March 9, 2009. NBA.com/Dleague. Turner Sports Interactive, Inc. May 5, 2011.
• Web site: 2009 NBA D-League Playoffs 101. NBA.com/Dleague. Turner Sports Interactive, Inc. May 5, 2011.
• Web site: NBA D-League Announces 2010 Playoff Format. November 11, 2009. NBA.com/Dleague. Turner Sports Interactive, Inc. May 5, 2011. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20111125054743/http://www.nba.com/dleague/news/playoff_format_2010.html. November 25, 2011.
• Web site: 2010 NBA D-League Playoffs 101. NBA.com/Dleague. Turner Sports Interactive, Inc. May 5, 2011. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20101202104646/http://www.nba.com/dleague/news/playoffs_2010.html. December 2, 2010.
• Web site: 2011 NBA D-League Playoffs 101. NBA.com/Dleague. Turner Sports Interactive, Inc. May 5, 2011. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20110410033948/http://www.nba.com/dleague/news/playoffs_101_2011.html. April 10, 2011.
• Web site: 2013 NBA D-League Playoffs Hub. NBA.com/Dleague. Turner Sports Interactive, Inc. May 5, 2011.

External links

• Official site
• D-League at Basketball-Reference.com

Notes and References

1. Web site: History of the National Basketball Developmental League .
2. Web site: 2010 NBA D-League Finals - an All-Access look inside. YouTube.
3. http://www.nba.com/dleague/erie/_look_back_201213_bayhawks__2013_04_17.html A Look Back: 2012-13 BayHawks Season
4. Web site: NBA D-League Standings . NBA D-League . January 15, 2017.
5. Web site: NBA G League Standings . NBA G League . November 5, 2017.
6. Web site: NBA G League Standings . NBA G League . March 23, 2019.
7. Web site: NBA G League Standings . NBA G League . February 24, 2020.