The following is a list of statewide initiatives and referendums modifying state law and proposing state constitutional amendments in Michigan, sorted by election.
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Constitutional Question | A question as to whether to adopt the 1850 Constitution of Michigan | 36,169 (79.31%) | 9,433 (20.69%) | ||
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to equal suffrage for African-Americans | 12,840 (28.62%) | 32,026 (71.38%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to the regulation of banking corporations | 59,954 (79.48%) | 15,477 (20.52%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to sessions of the Michigan Legislature | 53,152 (74.44%) | 18,246 (25.56%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment relating to eminent domain | 62,936 (88.65%) | 8,054 (11.35%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to the removal of public officials from office | 3,180 (71.41%) | 1,273 (28.59%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to the regulation of banks | 5,067 (75.50%) | 1,644 (24.50%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment relating to the selection of university regents | 4,363 (69.65%) | 1,901 (30.35%) | ||
Proposal 4 | A constitutional amendment relating to the administration of elections in the Upper Peninsula | 5,193 (78.29%) | 1,440 (21.71%) | ||
Proposal 5 | A constitutional amendment relating to future constitutional amendments | 4,375 (70.78%) | 1,806 (29.22%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to the ability of soldiers to vote | 86,354 (86.83%) | 13,094 (13.17%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A proposal calling for a constitutional convention | 79,505 (73.53%) | 28,623 (26.47%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to sessions of the Michigan Legislature | 24,482 (19.62%) | 100,314 (80.38%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to alcohol prohibition | 72,462 (45.69%) | 86,143 (54.31%) | ||
Constitutional Question | A question as to whether to adopt the 1868 Constitution of Michigan | 71,733 (39.35%) | 110,582 (60.65%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to the power of county boards of supervisors | 39,180 (38.76%) | 61,904 (61.24%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to the salaries of state government officials | 36,109 (34.38%) | 68,912 (65.62%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment relating to equal suffrage for African-Americans | 54,105 (51.67%) | 50,598 (48.33%) | ||
Proposal 4 | A constitutional amendment relating to railroad rates | 78,602 (60.46%) | 51,397 (39.54%) | ||
Proposal 5 | A constitutional amendment relating to rail monopolies | 76,912 (60.04%) | 51,194 (39.96%) | ||
Proposal 6 | A constitutional amendment relating to government aid for railroads in the form of bonds | 50,078 (38.96%) | 78,453 (61.04%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to government aid for railroads in the form of bonds | 44,684 (38.66%) | 70,893 (61.34%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to the structure of the circuit courts in Michigan | 47,972 (42.15%) | 65,848 (57.85%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment relating to salaries for circuit court judges | 57,326 (49.29%) | 58,987 (50.71%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to equal suffrage for women | 40,077 (22.77%) | 135,957 (77.23%) | ||
Constitutional Question | A question as to whether to adopt the 1874 Constitution of Michigan | 39,285 (24.05%) | 124,034 (75.95%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to liquor licenses | 60,639 (53.57%) | 52,561 (46.43%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to salaries for circuit court judges | 65,371 (49.77%) | 65,966 (50.23%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment modifying the timeframe to submit constitutional amendments | 52,306 (70.41%) | 21,984 (29.59%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment modifying the position of Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court | 30,313 (46.62%) | 34,712 (53.38%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to corporation stockholder's liability | 24,770 (37.06%) | 42,064 (62.94%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 (April) | A constitutional amendment relating to the salary of the Governor of Michigan | 49,035 (34.83%) | 91,753 (65.17%) | ||
Proposal 2 (November) | A constitutional amendment relating to the construction of a river crossing in Detroit | 37,340 (39.15%) | 58,040 (60.85%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to fines for libraries and schools | 51,475 (86.01%) | 8,370 (13.99%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to the position of court clerk | 62,593 (90.41%) | 6,640 (9.59%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment relating to the circuit court system | 53,840 (89.04%) | 6,628 (10.96%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to salaries for circuit court judges | 85,705 (60.64%) | 55,638 (39.36%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to boards of county auditors | 23,814 (38.48%) | 38,073 (61.52%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A proposal calling for a constitutional convention | 20,937 (37.35%) | 35,123 (62.65%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to salaries for circuit court judges | 35,345 (55.24%) | 28,642 (44.76%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to salaries for state legislators | 31,693 (37.55%) | 52,707 (62.45%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to the Wayne County board of auditors | 15,020 (41.98%) | 20,755 (58.02%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to salaries for public officials | 40,445 (40.18%) | 60,220 (59.82%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to the sale of alcohol | 178,636 (49.22%) | 184,281 (50.78%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to salaries for public officials | 72,718 (36.81%) | 124,838 (63.19%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to circuit courts | 21,221 (52.26%) | 19,382 (47.74%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A question relating to banking regulation | 48,531 (70.51%) | 20,300 (29.49%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to circuit courts | 49,478 (58.38%) | 35,269 (41.62%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to corporations | 35,269 (54.92%) | 28,950 (45.08%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment relating to the salary of the Governor of Michigan | 111,854 (60.68%) | 72,494 (39.32%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to the salaries of public officials | 59,317 (45.60%) | 70,772 (54.40%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to internal government improvements | 72,745 (58.09%) | 52,476 (41.91%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment relating to the jurisdiction of circuit courts | 62,023 (55.97%) | 48,797 (44.03%) | ||
Proposal 4 | A constitutional amendment relating to highway commissioners | 69,050 (53.54%) | 59,922 (46.46%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to voting rights | 127,758 (81.19%) | 29,607 (18.81%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to minimum qualifications for electors | 117,088 (78.78%) | 31,537 (21.22%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to the salaries of public officials | 50,065 (26.47%) | 139,039 (73.53%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to circuit courts | 60,567 (39.63%) | 92,278 (60.37%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to the salary of the Michigan Attorney General | 70,138 (43.53%) | 90,973 (56.47%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to the Kent County board of auditors | 53,201 (47.93%) | 57,793 (52.07%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to highway improvements | 130,416 (58.26%) | 93,442 (41.74%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment adding additional circuit court judges | 108,197 (50.78%) | 104,884 (49.22%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment relating to intermediate courts | 99,391 (49.29%) | 102,269 (50.71%) | ||
Proposal 4 | A constitutional amendment relating to the state printing office | 105,711 (49.39%) | 108,317 (50.61%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to the salaries of state legislators | 112,883 (37.57%) | 187,615 (62.43%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment adding additional circuit court judges | 110,855 (46.00%) | 130,108 (54.00%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to the publication of new laws | 155,837 (59.69%) | 105,241 (40.31%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to "indeterminate sentence" | 146,265 (65.12%) | 78,338 (34.88%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to the salaries of circuit court judges | 105,618 (55.98%) | 83,048 (44.02%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to boards of county auditors | 108,889 (56.27%) | 84,636 (43.73%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A proposal calling for a constitutional convention | 165,123 (57.91%) | 120,018 (42.09%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to the introduction of bills | 180,157 (64.62%) | 98,657 (35.38%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to public wagon roads | 205,750 (76.41%) | 63,506 (23.59%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to the Genesee County board of auditors | 94,860 (59.40%) | 64,825 (40.60%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment relating to the salaries of circuit court judges | 91,994 (59.13%) | 63,590 (40.87%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to the salaries of circuit court judges | 94,585 (60.58%) | 61,550 (39.42%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to boards of county auditors | 98,259 (61.31%) | 62,008 (38.69%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment relating to teaching convicts certain trades | 167,163 (66.34%) | 84,831 (33.66%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to corporate taxes | 227,899 (62.37%) | 137,500 (37.63%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A question as to whether to adopt the 1908 Constitution of Michigan | 244,705 (65.17%) | 130,783 (34.83%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to equal suffrage for women | 247,375 (49.92%) | 248,135 (50.08%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to the modification of city charters | 285,373 (67.41%) | 137,972 (32.59%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to equal suffrage for women | 168,738 (38.91%) | 264,882 (61.09%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to citizen-led ballot measures for constitutional matters | 204,796 (55.77%) | 162,392 (44.23%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment relating to citizen-led ballot measures for legislative matters | 219,057 (58.97%) | 152,388 (41.03%) | ||
Proposal 4 | A constitutional amendment relating to firefighter's benefits | 179,948 (46.60%) | 206,204 (53.40%) | ||
Proposal 5 | A constitutional amendment relating to the recall process for state officials | 237,743 (62.05%) | 145,412 (37.95%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to state-issued bonds for the purpose of constructing and improving wagon roads | 164,333 (44.85%) | 202,087 (55.15%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to state-issued bonds for the purpose of constructing drains and developing agricultural lands | 165,290 (45.26%) | 199,873 (54.74%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment relating to absentee voting | 190,510 (51.99%) | 175,948 (48.01%) | ||
Proposal 4 | A constitutional amendment relating to the regulation of fraternal beneficiary societies | 92,392 (24.05%) | 291,776 (75.95%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to alcohol prohibition | 353,378 (55.38%) | 284,754 (44.62%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to the local option | 256,272 (40.35%) | 378,871 (59.65%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment relating to the right of repeal | 283,823 (50.73%) | 275,701 (49.27%) | ||
Proposal 4 | A constitutional amendment relating to the regulation of fraternal beneficiary societies | 225,220 (39.17%) | 349,810 (60.83%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment authorizing drainage districts to issue bonds | 198,918 (58.86%) | 139,027 (41.14%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to "the elective franchise" | 216,270 (65.37%) | 114,594 (34.63%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment authorizing the state to acquire railroad properties | 242,969 (70.69%) | 100,722 (29.31%) | ||
Proposal 4 | A constitutional amendment relating to the salary of public officials | 148,625 (43.49%) | 193,119 (56.51%) | ||
Proposal 5 | A constitutional amendment relating to highway construction | 209,559 (62.29%) | 126,871 (37.71%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment requiring that all ballot measures be printed on the same ballot | 317,070 (77.75%) | 90,744 (22.25%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment extending the right to vote to women | 229,790 (54.06%) | 195,284 (45.94%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment authorizing the state to issue bonds for the purpose of constructing highways | 558,572 (71.26%) | 225,239 (28.74%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to salary changes for state officials | 313,539 (42.81%) | 418,778 (57.19%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment relating to the manufacturing of alcoholic beverages | 322,603 (37.83%) | 530,123 (62.17%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to the salaries of some state officials | 348,311 (42.88%) | 463,959 (57.12%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to minimum qualifications for electors | 415,780 (53.61%) | 359,749 (46.39%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment relating to compulsory school attendance | 353,817 (36.68%) | 610,699 (63.32%) | ||
Proposal 4 | A constitutional amendment relating to property condemnation | 360,668 (45.08%) | 439,373 (54.92%) | ||
Proposal 5 | A constitutional amendment relating to working hours for men | 420,085 (50.40%) | 413,362 (49.60%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to a state income tax | 180,176 (36.00%) | 320,269 (64.00%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to ports and port districts | 221,543 (49.06%) | 230,060 (50.94%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment relating to property condemnation | 204,564 (42.54%) | 276,304 (57.46%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to compulsory school attendance | 421,472 (35.66%) | 760,571 (64.34%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to a state income tax | 216,437 (19.15%) | 913,833 (80.85%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment relating to state legislative districts | 231,718 (22.87%) | 781,351 (77.13%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to salaries for state legislators | 189,739 (40.46%) | 279,241 (59.54%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to term limits for sheriffs | 278,329 (56.25%) | 216,463 (43.75%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment relating to the creation of metropolitan districts | 207,993 (47.56%) | 229,314 (52.44%) | ||
Proposal 4 | A constitutional amendment relating to property condemnation | 204,859 (46.93%) | 231,672 (53.07%) | ||
Proposal 5 | A constitutional amendment generally revising the constitution | 119,491 (29.52%) | 285,252 (70.48%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to salaries for state legislators | 441,114 (51.38%) | 417,419 (48.62%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to property condemnation | 490,032 (54.27%) | 412,928 (45.73%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment modifying legislative districts | 523,127 (57.50%) | 386,673 (42.50%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to township officers elections | 275,781 (42.71%) | 369,906 (57.29%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to river improvement projects | 300,990 (45.62%) | 358,734 (54.38%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment increasing the homestead exemption | 298,909 (45.58%) | 356,938 (54.42%) | ||
Proposal 4 | A constitutional amendment relating to legislative districts | 292,659 (41.59%) | 411,043 (58.41%) | ||
Proposal 5 | A referendum to uphold a law taxing cigarettes | 198,515 (30.50%) | 452,375 (69.50%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A referendum to uphold a law relating to capital punishment | 269,538 (43.32%) | 352,594 (56.68%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to landing fields improvements | 263,508 (41.21%) | 375,935 (58.79%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment relating to state debt | 262,394 (41.18%) | 374,754 (58.82%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment establishing the Michigan Liquor Control Commission | 1,022,508 (68.27%) | 475,265 (31.73%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment limiting property taxes | 671,124 (51.11%) | 641,962 (48.89%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment relating to terms of office for state legislators | 520,740 (43.89%) | 665,766 (56.11%) | ||
Proposal 4 | A constitutional amendment relating to homestead tax exemptions | 445,141 (36.84%) | 763,311 (63.16%) | ||
Proposal 5 | A constitutional amendment changing residency requirements for electors | 662,588 (58.15%) | 476,849 (41.85%) | ||
Proposal 6 | A constitutional amendment relating to criminal pardons | 590,260 (48.91%) | 616,583 (51.09%) | ||
Proposal 7 | A constitutional amendment restricting the vote on bond issues to impacted property owners | 642,142 (52.86%) | 572,625 (47.14%) | ||
Proposal 8 | A referendum to uphold a law regulating the sale of oleomargarine | 432,966 (36.47%) | 754,372 (63.53%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment limiting some gasoline taxes | 280,765 (25.63%) | 814,616 (74.37%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment abolishing uniform taxation | 245,648 (23.53%) | 798,193 (76.47%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment limiting vehicle registration fees | 292,760 (28.85%) | 722,132 (71.15%) | ||
Proposal 4 | A constitutional amendment making the position of judge nonpartisan | 501,580 (47.26%) | 559,851 (52.74%) | ||
Proposal 5 | A constitutional amendment allowing counties to adopt home rule | 399,135 (38.87%) | 627,595 (61.13%) | ||
Proposal 6 | A constitutional amendment relating to justices of the peace | 154,326 (15.96%) | 812,856 (84.04%) | ||
Proposal 7 | A referendum upholding a law allowing the state to contract debt for the purpose of construction projects | 51,378 (16.40%) | 261,844 (83.60%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to the use of firearms as evidence in criminal proceedings | 815,221 (58.67%) | 574,324 (41.33%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment permitting counties to incorporate | 583,057 (43.63%) | 753,315 (56.37%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment relating to exempting some types of food from sales tax | 581,485 (38.10%) | 944,573 (61.90%) | ||
Proposal 4 | A constitutional amendment creating a state income tax | 382,262 (27.02%) | 1,032,384 (72.98%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment increasing county office terms from two years to four years | 414,832 (32.24%) | 872,057 (67.76%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment making Michigan Supreme Court justices be appointed and nonpartisan | 504,904 (40.39%) | 745,312 (59.61%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment requiring that gas taxes be used only to fund highway and road improvements | 813,289 (60.55%) | 529,859 (39.45%) | ||
Proposal 4 | A referendum to uphold a social security law | 497,569 (46.49%) | 572,756 (53.51%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment making the position of judge a nonpartisan one | 376,246 (60.93%) | 241,252 (39.07%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment granting circuit court commissioners additional powers | 205,711 (36.89%) | 351,961 (63.11%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment exempting school districts from some tax limitations | 602,952 (41.69%) | 843,159 (58.31%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment establishing a system of civil service | 766,764 (51.93%) | 709,894 (48.07%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A referendum upholding a law which modified vehicle permitting requirements | 640,051 (40.76%) | 930,227 (59.24%) | ||
Proposal 4 | A referendum upholding a law further regulating the practice of dentistry and dental surgery | 735,053 (58.73%) | 516,597 (41.27%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to the circulation of constitutional amendment petitions[3] | 386,859 (56.73%) | 295,083 (43.27%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to the circulation of initiative and referendum petitions | 372,796 (57.70%) | 273,275 (42.30%) |
Proposal name | Description[4] | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A proposal calling for a constitutional convention | 408,188 (46.56%) | 468,506 (53.44%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment allowing Wayne County to adopt a charter | 432,164 (48.70%) | 455,320 (51.30%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A referendum upholding a law creating a Milk Marketing Board | 318,899 (35.27%) | 585,380 (64.73%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment setting township officer terms at two years | 215,957 (62.14%) | 131,554 (37.86%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to homestead mortgages | 169,736 (57.36%) | 126,164 (42.64%) |
Proposal name | Description[5] | Status[6] | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment modifying water furnishing limits | 860,219 (60.23%) | 568,090 (39.77%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment modifying the eligibility of state legislators to run for other offices | 676,142 (48.23%) | 725,858 (51.77%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment relating to the salaries of state legislators | 614,300 (43.34%) | 803,104 (56.66%) | ||
Proposal 4 | A constitutional amendment allowing Wayne County to adopt a charter | 638,876 (42.85%) | 851,926 (57.15%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment modifying taxation | 115,463 (33.25%) | 231,742 (66.75%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment authorizing the state to control rivers and other waterways | 189,313 (57.74%) | 138,558 (42.26%) |
Proposal name | Description[7] | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment limiting state control over some things | 921,144 (68.36%) | 426,430 (31.64%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment returning a portion of sales tax revenues to some municipalities | 864,530 (59.65%) | 584,689 (40.35%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment relating to payments for soldiers in World War II | 871,296 (61.34%) | 549,242 (38.66%) |
Proposal name | Description[8] [9] | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to the order of succession | 1,055,632 (68.07%) | 495,214 (31.93%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to the distribution of state sales tax and annual school grants | 343,217 (19.18%) | 1,446,016 (80.82%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment relating to the salaries of state officials | 935,441 (63.75%) | 531,950 (36.25%) | ||
Proposal 4 | A constitutional amendment relating to the salaries of state legislators | 911,473 (60.80%) | 587,691 (39.20%) | ||
Proposal 5 | A constitutional amendment modifying the property tax system | 962,800 (56.79%) | 732,677 (43.21%) | ||
Proposal 6 | A referendum upholding a law relating to foreign agencies | 890,435 (60.33%) | 585,469 (39.67%) | ||
Proposal 7 | A proposal relating to a general revision of the constitution | 855,451 (51.70%) | 799,198 (48.30%) |
Proposal name | Description[10] | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to voting rights | 907,312 (68.48%) | 417,652 (31.52%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment authorizing the state to issue some form of bond | 1,224,249 (79.81%) | 309,657 (20.19%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment relating to the definition of subversion | 823,938 (61.29%) | 520,412 (38.71%) | ||
Proposal 4 | An initiative permitting the sale of oleomargarine | 1,090,000 (65.98%) | 562,034 (34.02%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to meetings of the state legislature | 405,570 (69.63%) | 176,873 (30.37%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment authorizing the payment of a death benefit bonus | 401,117 (64.11%) | 224,564 (35.89%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment relating to the salaries of Supreme Court justices | 276,632 (46.75%) | 315,140 (53.25%) |
Proposal name | Description[11] | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to police authority over narcotic drugs investigations | 1,910,728 (83.33%) | 382,285 (16.67%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment providing for reapportionment every ten years | 924,242 (39.50%) | 1,415,355 (60.50%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment providing for reapportionment every ten years | 1,269,807 (56.55%) | 975,518 (43.45%) |
Proposal name | Description[12] | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to the elective franchise | 1,202,811 (72.10%) | 465,556 (27.90%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to sales taxes | 1,182,412 (72.74%) | 443,079 (27.26%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment authorizing bonus payments for veterans of the Korean War | 1,166,564 (68.26%) | 542,541 (31.74%) | ||
Proposal 4 | A constitutional amendment permitting the Michigan State Legislature to authorize charitable lotteries | 903,303 (48.89%) | 944,388 (51.11%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to nonpartisan judicial elections | 559,279 (70.27%) | 236,620 (29.73%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to minimum judge qualifications | 596,145 (72.12%) | 230,489 (27.88%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment authorizing the state to borrow up to for loans to school districts | 455,868 (54.40%) | 382,093 (45.60%) | ||
Proposal 4 | A constitutional amendment providing for a bipartisan board of state canvassers | 456,986 (60.59%) | 297,250 (39.41%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment establishing government continuity procedures | 702,183 (74.76%) | 237,071 (25.24%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment changing the name of Michigan State University's governing body | 595,333 (65.38%) | 315,223 (34.62%) |
Proposal name | Description[15] | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A constitutional amendment relating to school bonds and state loans to school districts | 1,416,188 (59.99%) | 944,536 (40.01%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment increasing the sales tax limitation | 1,250,264 (50.41%) | 1,230,001 (49.59%) | ||
Proposal 3 | A constitutional amendment changing the process for calling a constitutional convention | 1,312,215 (57.76%) | 959,527 (42.24%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 | A proposal calling for a constitutional convention | 596,433 (51.00%) | 573,012 (49.00%) | ||
Proposal 2 | A constitutional amendment relating to state aid for industrial development | 541,826 (48.80%) | 568,476 (51.20%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 1 (August) | A constitutional amendment establishing a judicial tenure commission and providing for its membership and duties[19] | 553,182 (70.75%) | 228,738 (29.25%) | ||
Proposal 2 (August) | A constitutional amendment providing for a state officer's compensation commission and providing for its membership, duties, and limitations | 417,393 (54.62%) | 346,839 (45.38%) | ||
Proposal 3 (August) | A constitutional amendment providing that the Governor of Michigan fill judicial vacancies and extending existing constitutional provisions to appointed judges | 494,512 (64.98%) | 266,561 (35.02%) | ||
Proposal 1 (November) | A constitutional amendment permitting the state to impose a graduated income tax | 614,826 (23.29%) | 2,025,052 (76.71%) | ||
Proposal 2 (November) | A referendum upholding a law permitting the establishment of daylight saving time | 1,402,562 (49.99%) | 1,403,052 (50.01%) | ||
Proposal 3 (November) | An initiative authorizing the state to issue bonds for the purpose of constructing water pollution prevention facilities | 1,906,385 (70.54%) | 796,079 (29.46%) | ||
Proposal 4 | An initiative authorizing the state to issue bonds for the purpose of constructing public recreational facilities | 1,384,254 (52.84%) | 1,235,681 (47.16%) | ||
Proposal 5 | A constitutional amendment permitting the election of members of the legislature to other state offices | 778,388 (30.39%) | 1,783,186 (69.61%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal A | An initiative authorizing the state to issue bonds for urban redevelopment | 921,482 (39.89%) | 1,388,737 (60.11%) | ||
Proposal B | A constitutional amendment lowering the voting age from 21 years to 18 years | 924,981 (39.00%) | 1,446,884 (61.00%) | ||
Proposal C | A constitutional amendment prohibiting public aid to nonpublic schools and students | 1,416,838 (56.77%) | 1,078,740 (43.23%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal A (May) | A constitutional amendment allowing the legislature to authorize lotteries and the sale of lottery tickets[20] | 1,352,768 (72.75%) | 506,778 (27.25%) | ||
Proposal B (May) | A constitutional amendment permitting members of the Michigan State Legislature to resign and accept another office to which they have been elected or appointed | 866,593 (48.63%) | 915,312 (51.37%) | ||
Proposal A (August) | A constitutional amendment allowing trial by jury of less than 12 jurors in all prosecutions in all courts for misdemeanors punishable by imprisonment for not more than 1 year | 696,570 (66.10%) | 357,186 (33.90%) | ||
Proposal A (November) | An initiative establishing daylight saving time in Michigan | 1,754,887 (54.57%) | 1,460,724 (45.43%) | ||
Proposal B (November) | An initiative allowing physicians to perform abortions prior to 20 weeks | 1,270,416 (39.35%) | 1,958,265 (60.65%) | ||
Proposal C | A constitutional amendment limiting property taxes for the purpose of funding schools and establishing a state fund for the support of schools | 1,324,702 (42.19%) | 1,815,126 (57.81%) | ||
Proposal D | A constitutional amendment allowing the legislature to impose an income tax and allowing municipalities to impose income taxes | 959,286 (31.33%) | 2,102,744 (68.67%) | ||
Proposal E | An initiative authorizing the state to issue bonds for the purpose of providing benefits to veterans | 1,490,968 (48.19%) | 1,603,203 (51.81%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal A | A constitutional amendment limiting the use of the motor fuel tax fund | 1,091,938 (48.79%) | 1,146,109 (51.21%) | ||
Proposal B | An initiative authorizing the state to issue bonds for the purpose of providing benefits to veterans | 1,668,641 (70.45%) | 700,041 (29.55%) | ||
Proposal C | A constitutional amendment eliminating the sales and use tax on food and prescription drugs | 1,337,609 (55.53%) | 1,071,253 (44.47%) | ||
Proposal D | An initiative authorizing the state to issue bonds for the purpose of funding transportation systems | 963,576 (42.20%) | 1,319,586 (57.80%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal A | An initiative creating a bottle buyback program | 2,160,398 (63.77%) | 1,227,254 (36.23%) | ||
Proposal B | A constitutional amendment lowering the age of eligibility for state legislators from 21 years to 18 years | 698,993 (21.31%) | 2,580,945 (78.69%) | ||
Proposal C | A constitutional amendment placing a limit on a state income tax to 8.3% | 1,407,438 (42.99%) | 1,866,620 (57.01%) | ||
Proposal D | A constitutional amendment removing the ban on a graduated income tax | 897,780 (27.79%) | 2,332,513 (72.21%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal A | A proposal calling for a constitutional convention | 640,286 (23.26%) | 2,112,549 (76.74%) | ||
Proposal B | An initiative to revise standards for parole | 2,075,599 (74.48%) | 711,262 (25.52%) | ||
Proposal C | A constitutional amendment allowing the state to deposit funds in savings and loan associations, credit unions, and banks | 1,819,847 (66.11%) | 933,101 (33.89%) | ||
Proposal D | A constitutional amendment raising the drinking age to 21 years | 1,609,589 (57.12%) | 1,208,497 (42.88%) | ||
Proposal E | A constitutional amendment establishing limits on taxes imposed by the legislature and locla governments | 1,450,150 (52.46%) | 1,313,984 (47.54%) | ||
Proposal G | A constitutional amendment allowing for Michigan State Police to engage in collective bargaining | 1,535,023 (56.04%) | 1,203,930 (43.96%) | ||
Proposal H | A constitutional amendment prohibiting the use of property taxes for school operating expenses and establishing a voucher system | 718,440 (25.71%) | 2,075,583 (74.29%) | ||
Proposal J | A constitutional amendment modifying the property and school tax system | 1,032,343 (37.28%) | 1,737,133 (62.72%) | ||
Proposal K | A constitutional amendment allowing courts to deny bail for violent crimes and providing for the commencement of trials within 90 days | 2,307,038 (83.43%) | 458,357 (16.57%) | ||
Proposal M | A constitutional amendment modifying the percentage of gas tax revenues used for road improvements | 1,478,316 (54.52%) | 1,233,196 (45.48%) | ||
Proposal R | A constitutional amendment requiring the state to create a railroad redevelopment authority | 1,257,606 (47.05%) | 1,415,441 (52.95%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal A | A constitutional amendment modifying the powers of local school boards | 746,027 (21,22%) | 2,769,497 (78.78%) | ||
Proposal B | A constitutional amendment lowering the drinking age to 19 years | 1,403,935 (38.41%) | 2,250,873 (61.59%) | ||
Proposal C | A constitutional amendment providing property tax relief | 894,441 (25.72%) | 2,583,253 (74.28%) | ||
Proposal D | A constitutional amendment substantially modifying the property tax system | 1,622,301 (44.16%) | 2,051,008 (55.84%) | ||
Proposal E | An initiative increasing the state income tax for the purpose of funding corrections programs | 1,288,999 (36.92%) | 2,202,042 (63.08%) | ||
Proposal G | A constitutional amendment allowing the legislature to modify rules relating to legislative immunity | 1,287,172 (37.62%) | 2,134,546 (62.38%) | ||
Proposal H | A constitutional amendment modifying the authority of the Lieutenant Governor of Michigan | 1,410,912 (42.27%) | 1,927,001 (57.73%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal A | A constitutional amendment allowing the legislature to pass laws relating to legislative immunity | 1,804,728 (63.67%) | 1,029,743 (36.33%) | ||
Proposal B | A constitutional amendment creating a Michigan Department of State Police | 720,915 (25.45%) | 2,111,802 (74.55%) | ||
Proposal C | An initiative prohibiting lenders from using a "due on sale" clause in foreclosure proceedings | 1,344,463 (48.18%) | 1,445,897 (51.82%) | ||
Proposal D | An initiative prohibiting utility rate increases unless a notice period and hearing has taken place | 1,472,442 (50.70%) | 1,431,884 (49.30%) | ||
Proposal E | An initiative calling for a nuclear weapons freeze between the USSR and the USA | 1,585,809 (56.60%) | 1,216,172 (43.40%) | ||
Proposal G | A constitutional amendment establishing an elected Public Service Commission | 1,026,160 (36.68%) | 1,771,098 (63.32%) | ||
Proposal H | A constitutional amendment prohibiting some utility rate adjustments | 1,670,381 (59.61%) | 1,131,990 (40.39%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal A | A constitutional amendment allowing the state legislature to overturn administrative rules | 1,280,948 (41.21%) | 1,827,677 (58.79%) | ||
Proposal B | A constitutional amendment establishing a natural resources trust fund | 2,066,554 (64.84%) | 1,120,794 (35.16%) | ||
Proposal C | A constitutional amendment modifying tax rates | 1,376,141 (40.33%) | 2,035,867 (59.67%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal A | A constitutional amendment establishing a state library within the legislative branch | 908,627 (49.24%) | 936,643 (50.76%) | ||
Proposal B | A constitutional amendment allowing the state legislature to overturn administrative rules | 648,116 (36.31%) | 1,136,721 (63.69%) | ||
Proposal C | A constitutional amendment allowing the state officials compensation commission to set salaries for the Michigan Attorney General and Michigan Secretary of State | 905,767 (49.88%) | 910,297 (50.12%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal A | A referendum upholding a law which prohibited the use of public funds for abortions if the recipient was on welfare | 1,959,727 (56.87%) | 1,486,371 (43.13%) | ||
Proposal B | A constitutional amendment providing for victim's rights | 2,662,796 (80.37%) | 650,515 (19.63%) | ||
Proposal C | An initiative authorizing the state to issue bonds for the purpose of funding environmental protection programs | 2,528,109 (76.55%) | 774,451 (23.45%) | ||
Proposal D | An initiative authorizing the state to issue bonds for the purpose of funding public recreation projects | 2,055,290 (63.01%) | 1,206,465 (36.99%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal A | A constitutional amendment increasing the sales tax and dedicating increased revenue to public schools | 514,407 (27.72%) | 1,341,292 (72.28%) | ||
Proposal B | A constitutional amendment increasing the sales tax, dedicating increased revenue to public schools, and requiring voter renewal of property taxes | 436,958 (23.89%) | 1,392,053 (76.11%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal A | A constitutional amendment limiting property tax increases | 1,433,354 (37.54%) | 2,384,777 (62.46%) | ||
Proposal B | A constitutional amendment limiting the number of times a person can be elected to public office | 2,295,904 (58.73%) | 1,613,404 (41.27%) | ||
Proposal C | A constitutional amendment relating to property taxes and school funding | 1,552,119 (40.54%) | 2,276,360 (59.46%) | ||
Proposal D | An initiative to uphold changes to auto insurance laws | 1,482,577 (37.41%) | 2,480,032 (62.59%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal A (March) | A constitutional amendment increasing sales tax rates and decreasing the annual property tax increase | 1,684,541 (69.17%) | 750,952 (30.83%) | ||
Proposal A (November) | A measure calling for a constitutional convention | 777,779 (27.92%) | 2,008,070 (72.08%) | ||
Proposal B | A constitutional amendment limiting criminal appeals | 2,118,734 (73.55%) | 761,784 (26.45%) | ||
Proposal C | A referendum to uphold a law reducing auto insurance rates | 1,165,732 (39.14%) | 1,812,526 (60.86%) | ||
Proposal P | A constitutional amendment establishing an endowment fund for Michigan state parks | 2,007,097 (71.33%) | 806,888 (28.67%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal A | A referendum upholding some changes to the Michigan Bingo Act | 1,511,063 (43.83%) | 1,936,198 (56.17%) | ||
Proposal B | A constitutional amendment requiring that all judges have practiced law at least five years before becoming judges | 2,806,833 (81.68%) | 629,402 (18.32%) | ||
Proposal C | A constitutional amendment establishing a trust fund for veterans | 2,447,905 (74.24%) | 849,525 (25.76%) | ||
Proposal D | An initiative limiting bear hunting season and the use of bait and dogs while hunting bear | 1,379,340 (38.26%) | 2,225,675 (61.74%) | ||
Proposal E | An initiative permitting Detroit to host three casinos | 1,878,542 (51.51%) | 1,768,156 (48.49%) | ||
Proposal G | An initiative granting the Natural Resources Commission full authority over wildlife management | 2,413,730 (68.71%) | 1,099,262 (31.29%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal A | A constitutional amendment changing the word "handicapped" to "disabled" in the Michigan State Constitution | [21] | 1,708,873 (59.13%) | 1,181,138 (40.87%) | |
Proposal B | An initiative legalizing physician-assisted suicide | 859,381 (28.88%) | 2,116,154 (71.12%) | ||
Proposal C | An initiative authorizing the state to issue bonds for the purpose of funding environmental and natural resources protection programs | 1,821,006 (62.73%) | 1,081,988 (37.27%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 00-1 | A constitutional amendment allowing students to use tuition vouchers at private schools and requiring teacher tests | [22] | 1,235,533 (30.87%) | 2,767,320 (69.13%) | |
Proposal 00-2 | A constitutional amendment requiring all laws impacting local governments receive a supermajority vote | 1,242,516 (32.77%) | 2,548,995 (67.23%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 02-1 (August) | A constitutional amendment modifying the pay structure for state officials | [23] | 1,057,503 (72.32%) | 404,682 (27.68%) | |
Proposal 02-2 (August) | A constitutional amendment allowing some state funds to be invested in parks and outdoor recreation | 925,475 (62.05%) | 565,971 (37.95%) | ||
Proposal 02-1 (November) | A referendum to uphold legislation substantially modifying the election process | [24] | 1,199,236 (40.32%) | 1,775,043 (59.68%) | |
Proposal 02-2 (November) | An initiative authorizing the state to issue bonds for the purpose of funding sewage, stormwater, and water pollution projects | 1,774,053 (60.21%) | 1,172,612 (39.79%) | ||
Proposal 02-3 | A constitutional amendment affirming state employee's right to engage in collective bargaining | 1,336,249 (45.64%) | 1,591,756 (54.36%) | ||
Proposal 02-4 | A constitutional amendment reallocating money received from tobacco settlements | 1,018,644 (33.62%) | 2,011,105 (66.38%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 04-1 | A constitutional amendment requiring voter approval for new gambling forms and facilities | [25] | 2,689,448 (58.26%) | 1,926,721 (41.74%) | |
Proposal 04-2 | A constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage | 2,698,077 (58.62%) | 1,904,319 (41.38%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 06-1 | A constitutional amendment creating a Conservation and Recreation Legacy Fund | [26] | 2,915,106 (81.07%) | 680,859 (18.93%) | |
Proposal 06-2 | A constitutional amendment banning affirmative action programs | 2,141,010 (57.92%) | 1,555,691 (42.08%) | ||
Proposal 06-3 | A referendum to uphold the legalization of mourning dove hunting | 1,137,379 (30.97%) | 2,534,680 (69.03%) | ||
Proposal 06-4 | A constitutional amendment restricting the use of eminent domain | 2,914,214 (80.09%) | 724,573 (19.91%) | ||
Proposal 06-5 | An initiative to set mandatory school funding levels | 1,366,355 (37.69%) | 2,259,247 (62.31%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 08-1 | An initiative legalizing the use of medical marijuana[27] | [28] | 3,006,820 (62.67%) | 1,790,889 (37.33%) | |
Proposal 08-2 | A constitutional amendment allowing stem cell research to be conducted on embryos[29] | 2,521,026 (52.61%) | 2,271,083 (47.39%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 10-1 | A measure calling for a constitutional convention[30] | [31] | 983,019 (33.40%) | 1,960,573 (66.60%) | |
Proposal 10-2 | A constitutional amendment banning felons who were convicted of fraud from holding public office for 20 years[32] | 2,270,657 (74.91%) | 760,586 (25.09%) |
See main article: article and Michigan ballot proposals, 2012.
Proposal name | Description[33] | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 12-1 | A referendum to uphold a law substantially modifying the emergency manager system | [34] | 2,130,354 (47.33%) | 2,370,601 (52.67%) | |
Proposal 12-2 | A constitutional amendment to guarantee the right to collective bargaining | 1,949,513 (42.60%) | 2,626,731 (57.40%) | ||
Proposal 12-3 | A constitutional amendment to mandate at least 25% of state electricity come from renewable resources | 1,721,279 (37.72%) | 2,842,000 (62.28%) | ||
Proposal 12-4 | A constitutional amendment overhauling the home healthcare system | 1,985,595 (43.77%) | 2,550,420 (56.23%) | ||
Proposal 12-5 | A constitutional amendment requiring that tax increases be passed by either a supermajority vote in the state legislature or by a statewide vote | 1,410,944 (31.24%) | 3,105,649 (68.76%) | ||
Proposal 12-6 | A constitutional amendment requiring voters to approve any new bridge or tunnel to Canada | 1,853,127 (40.70%) | 2,699,558 (59.30%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 14-1 (August) | An initiative to exempt commercial and industrial property from the personal property tax[35] | [36] | 863,459 (69.29%) | 382,770 (30.71%) | |
Proposal 14-1 (November) | A referendum to uphold the legalization of wolf hunting[37] | [38] | 1,318,080 (45.07%) | 1,606,328 (54.93%) | |
Proposal 14-2 | A referendum to uphold a law allowing the Michigan Natural Resources Commission to classify game animals and hunting seasons | 1,051,426 (36.16%) | 1,856,603 (63.84%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 18-1 | An initiative to legalize marijuana possession, production, and sale[41] | [42] | 2,356,422 (55.89%) | 1,859,675 (44.11%) | |
Proposal 18-2 | A constitutional amendment to create an independent redistricting commission | 2,522,355 (61.28%) | 1,593,556 (38.72%) | ||
Proposal 18-3 | A constitutional amendment making substantial changes to state voting procedures | 2,777,998 (66.91%) | 1,373,636 (33.09%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 20-1 | A constitutional amendment making changes to the way park-related revenue can be spent[43] | [44] | 4,154,745 (84.29%) | 774,509 (15.71%) | |
Proposal 20-2 | A constitutional amendment requiring the police to obtain a search warrant before accessing a person's electronic data[45] | 4,472,671 (88.75%) | 567,130 (11.25%) |
Proposal name | Description | Status | Yes votes | No votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal 22-1 | A constitutional amendment changing state legislator's term limits to a flat 12 years, regardless of position.[46] | [47] | 2,838,540 (66.45%) | 1,433,154 (33.55%) | |
Proposal 22-2 | A constitutional amendment implementing significant changes to the voting system, including requiring photo identification, an early-voting period, and the creation of an absentee ballot system.[48] | 2,586,269 (59.99%) | 1,725,130 (40.01%) | ||
Proposal 22-3 | A constitutional amendment establishing a right to reproductive freedom in Michigan.[49] | 2,482,497 (56.66%) | 1,898,914 (43.34%) |