Limpet Explained

Limpets are a group of aquatic snails with a conical shell shape (patelliform) and a strong, muscular foot. This general category of conical shell is known as "patelliform" (dish-shaped).[1] Existing within the class Gastropoda, limpets are a polyphyletic group (its members descending from different immediate ancestors).

All species of Patellogastropoda are limpets, with the Patellidae family in particular often referred to as "true limpets". Examples of other clades commonly referred to as limpets include the Vetigastropoda family Fissurellidae ("keyhole limpet"), which use a siphon to pump water over their gills, and the Siphonariidae ("false limpets"), which have a pneumostome for breathing air like the majority of terrestrial Gastropoda.

Description

The basic anatomy of a limpet consists of the usual molluscan organs and systems:

The two kidneys are very different in size and location. This is a result of torsion. The left kidney is diminutive and in most limpets is barely functional. The right kidney, however, has taken over the majority of blood filtration and often extends over and around the entire mantle of the animal in a thin, almost-invisible layer.[2]

True limpets in the family Patellidae live on hard surfaces in the intertidal zone. Unlike barnacles (which are not molluscs but may resemble limpets in appearance) and mussels (which are bivalve molluscs that cement themselves to a substrate for their entire adult lives), limpets are capable of locomotion instead of being permanently attached to a single spot. However, when they need to resist strong wave action or other disturbances, limpets cling extremely firmly to the surfaces on which they live, using their muscular foot to apply suction combined with the effect of adhesive mucus. It often is very difficult to remove a true limpet from a rock without injuring or killing it.

All "true" limpets are marine. The most primitive group have one pair of gills, in others only a single gill remains, the lepetids do not have any gills at all, while the patellids have evolved secondary gills as they have lost the original pair.[3] However, because the adaptive feature of a simple conical shell has repeatedly arisen independently in gastropod evolution, limpets from many different evolutionary lineages occur in widely different environments. Some saltwater limpets such as Trimusculidae breathe air, and some freshwater limpets are descendants of air-breathing land snails (e.g. the genus Ancylus) whose ancestors had a pallial cavity serving as a lung. In these small freshwater limpets, that "lung" underwent secondary adaptation to allow the absorption of dissolved oxygen from water.

Teeth

Function and formation

In order to obtain food, limpets rely on an organ called the radula, which contains iron-mineralized teeth.[4] Although limpets contain over 100 rows of teeth, only the outermost 10 are used in feeding.[5] These teeth form via matrix-mediated biomineralization, a cyclic process involving the delivery of iron minerals to reinforce a polymeric chitin matrix.[6] Upon being fully mineralized, the teeth reposition themselves within the radula, allowing limpets to scrape off algae from rock surfaces. As limpet teeth wear out, they are subsequently degraded (occurring anywhere between 12 and 48 hours) and replaced with new teeth. Different limpet species exhibit different overall shapes of their teeth.[7]

Growth and development

Development of limpet teeth occurs in conveyor belt style, where teeth start growing at the back of the radula, and move toward the front of this structure as they mature.[8] The growth rate of the limpet's teeth is around 47 hours per row.[9] Fully mature teeth are located in the scraping zone, the very front of the radula. The scraping zone is in contact with the substrate that the limpet feeds off of. As a result, the fully mature teeth are subsequently worn down until they are discarded – at a rate equal to the growth rate. To counter this degradation, a new row of teeth begin to grow.

Biomineralization

The exact mechanism behind the biomineralization of limpet teeth is unknown. However, it is suggested that limpet teeth biomineralize using a dissolution-reprecipitation mechanism. Specifically, this mechanism is associated with the dissolution of iron stored in epithelial cells of the radula to create ferrihydrite ions. These ferrihydrite ions are transported through ion channels to the tooth surface. The build-up of enough ferrihydrite ions leads to nucleation, the rate of which can be altered via changing the pH at the site of nucleation. After one to two days, these ions are converted to goethite crystals.[10] The unmineralized matrix consists of relatively well-ordered, densely packed arrays of chitin fibers, with only a few nanometers between adjacent fibers.[11] The lack of space leads to the absence of pre-formed compartments within the matrix that control goethite crystal size and shape. Because of this, the main factor influencing goethite crystal growth is the chitin fibers of the matrix. Specifically, goethite crystals nucleate on these chitin fibers and push aside or engulf the chitin fibers as they grow, influencing their resulting orientation.

Strength

Looking into limpet teeth of Patella vulgata, Vickers hardness values are between 268 and 646 kg⋅m−1⋅s−2, while tensile strength values range between 3.0 and 6.5 GPa. As spider silk has a tensile strength only up to 4.5 GPa, limpet teeth outperforms spider silk to be the strongest biological material. These considerably high values exhibited by limpet teeth are due to the following factors:

The first factor is the nanometer length scale of goethite nanofibers in limpet teeth;[12] at this length scale, materials become insensitive to flaws that would otherwise decrease failure strength. As a result, goethite nanofibers are able to maintain substantial failure strength despite the presence of defects.

The second factor is the small critical fiber length of the goethite fibers in limpet teeth.[13] Critical fiber length is a parameter defining the fiber length that a material must be to transfer stresses from the matrix to the fibers themselves during external loading. Materials with a large critical fiber length (relative to the total fiber length) act as poor reinforcement fibers, meaning that most stresses are still loaded on the matrix. Materials with small critical fiber lengths (relative to the total fiber length) act as effective reinforcement fibers that are able to transfer stresses on the matrix to themselves. Goethite nanofibers express a critical fiber length of around 420 to 800 nm, which is several orders of magnitude away from their estimated fiber length of 3.1 μm. This suggests that the goethite nanofibers serve as effective reinforcement for the collagen matrix and significantly contribute to the load-bearing capabilities of limpet teeth. This is further supported by the large mineral volume fraction of elongated goethite nanofibers within limpet teeth, around 0.81.

Applications of limpet teeth involve structural designs requiring high strength and hardness, such as biomaterials used in next-generation dental restorations.

Role in distributing stress

The structure, composition, and morphological shape of the teeth of the limpet allow for an even distribution of stress throughout the tooth. The teeth have a self-sharpening mechanism which allows for the teeth to be more highly functional for longer periods of time. Stress wears preferentially on the front surface of the cusp of the teeth, allowing the back surface to stay sharp and more effective.

There is evidence that different regions of the limpet teeth show different mechanical strengths. Measurements taken from the tip of the anterior edge of the tooth show that the teeth can exhibit an elastic modulus of around 140 GPa. Traveling down the anterior edge toward the anterior cusp of the teeth however, the elastic modulus decreases ending around 50 GPa at the edge of the teeth. The orientation of the goethite fibers can be correlated to this decrease in elastic modulus, as towards the tip of the tooth the fibers are more aligned with each other, correlating to a high modulus and vice versa.

Critical length of the goethite fibers is the reason the structural chitin matrix has extreme support. The critical length of goethite fibers has been estimated to be around 420 to 800 nm and when compared with the actual length of the fibers found in the teeth, around 3.1 um, shows that the teeth have fibers much larger than the critical length. This paired with orientation of the fibers leads to effective stress distribution onto the goethite fibers and not onto the weaker chitin matrix in the limpet teeth.

Causes of structure degradation

The overall structure of the limpet teeth is relatively stable within most natural conditions given the limpet's ability to produce new teeth at a similar rate to the degradation. Individual teeth are subjected to shear stresses as the tooth is dragged along the rock. Goethite as a mineral is a relatively soft iron based material,[14] which increases the chance of physical damage to the structure. Limpet teeth and the radula have also been shown to experience greater levels of damage in CO2 acidified water.

Crystal structure

Goethite crystals form at the start of the tooth production cycle and remain as a fundamental part of the tooth with intercrystal space filled with amorphous silica. Existing in multiple morphologies, prisms with rhomb-shaped sections are the most frequent". The goethite crystals are stable and well formed for a biogenic crystal. The transport of the mineral to create the crystal structures has been suggested to be a dissolution-reprecipitation mechanism as of 2011. Limpet tooth structure is dependent upon the living depth of the specimen. While deep water limpets have been shown to have the same elemental composition as shallow water limpets, deep water limpets do not show crystalline phases of goethite.[15]

Crystallization process

The initial event that takes place when the limpet creates a new row of teeth is the creation of the main macromolecular α-chitin component. The resulting organic matrix serves as framework for the crystallization of the teeth themselves. The first mineral to be deposited is goethite (α-FeOOH), a soft iron oxide which forms crystals parallel to the chitin fibers.[16] The goethite, however, has varying crystal habits. The crystals arrange in various shapes and thicknesses throughout the chitin matrix. The varying formation of the chitin matrix has profound effects on the formation of the goethite crystals. The space in between the crystals and the chitin matrix is filled with amorphous hydrated silica (SiO2).

Characterizing composition

The most prominent metal by percent composition is iron in the form of goethite. Goethite has the chemical formula FeO(OH) and belongs to a group known as oxy-hydroxides. There exists amorphous silica between the goethite crystals; surrounding the goethite is a matrix of chitin.[17] Chitin has a chemical formula of C8H13O5N. Other metals have been shown to be present with the relative percent compositions varying on geographic locations. The goethite has been reported to have a volume fraction of approximately 80%.

Regional dependency

Limpets from different locations were shown to have different elemental ratios within their teeth. Iron is consistently most abundant however other metals such as sodium, potassium, calcium, and copper were all shown to be present to varying degrees.[18] The relative percentages of the elements have also been shown to differ from one geographic location to another. This demonstrates an environmental dependency of some kind; however the specific variables are currently undetermined.

Taxonomy

Gastropods that have limpet-like or patelliform shells are found in several different clades:

Other limpets

Marine

Freshwater

Some species of limpet live in fresh water,[19] [20] but these are the exception. Most marine limpets have gills, whereas all freshwater limpets and a few marine limpets have a mantle cavity adapted to breathe air and function as a lung (and in some cases again adapted to absorb oxygen from water). All these kinds of snail are only very distantly related.

Naming

The common name "limpet" also is applied to a number of not very closely related groups of sea snails and freshwater snails (aquatic gastropod mollusks). Thus the common name "limpet" has very little taxonomic significance in and of itself; the name is applied not only to true limpets (the Patellogastropoda), but also to all snails that have a simple, broadly conical shell, and either is not spirally coiled, or appears not to be coiled in the adult snail. In other words, the shell of all limpets is patelliform, which means the shell is shaped more or less like the shell of most true limpets. The term "false limpets" is used for some (but not all) of these other groups that have a conical shell.

Thus, the name limpet is used to describe various extremely diverse groups of gastropods that have independently evolved a shell of the same basic shape (see convergent evolution). And although the name "limpet" is given on the basis of a limpet-like or patelliform shell, the several groups of snails that have a shell of this type are not at all closely related to one another.

Ecology

Symbiosis

Limpets have a mutualistic relationship with several other beings. Clathromorphum, a type of algae, provides food to limpets, which clean the algae's surface and allow its persistence.

The rough keyhole limpet (Diodora aspera) is host to the scale worm copepod Anthessius nortoni, which bites predatory starfish to discourage them from eating the limpet.

Homescars

Limpets wander over the surface of the rocks during high tide and tend to return to their favourite spot by following a trail of mucus left whilst grazing. Over a period of time the edges of the limpet's shell wear a shallow hollow in the rock called a homescar. The homescar helps the limpet to stay attached to the rock and not to dry out during low tide periods.

Bio-erosion

Limpets are known to cause bio-erosion on sedimentary rocks by the formation of homescars and by ingesting tiny particles of rock through the action of feeding. C.Andrews & R.B.G. Williams [21] in their research paper titled Limpet erosion of chalk shore platforms in southeast England from Oct 2000 estimate from the amount of calcium carbonate deposits in faeces of captive limpets, that an adult limpet will ingest around 4.9 g of chalk per year. Suggesting that limpets are on average responsible for 12% of the chalk platform erosion in areas that they frequent, potentially rising to 35% + in areas where the limpet population has reached its maximum.

In culture

Many species of limpet have historically been used, or are still used, by pigs for food.[22]

Limpet mines are a type of naval mine attached to a target by magnets. They are named after the tenacious grip of the limpet.

The humorous author Edward Lear wrote "Cheer up, as the limpet said to the weeping willow" in one of his letters.[23] Simon Grindle wrote the 1964 illustrated children's book of nonsense poetry The Loving Limpet and Other Peculiarities, said to be "in the great tradition of Edward Lear and Lewis Carroll".[24]

In his book South, Sir Ernest Shackleton relates the stories of his twenty-two men left behind on Elephant Island harvesting limpets from the icy waters on the shore of the Southern Ocean. Near the end of their four-month stay on the island, as their stocks of seal and penguin meat dwindled, they derived a major portion of their sustenance from limpets.

The light-hearted comedy film The Incredible Mr. Limpet is about a patriotic but weak American who desperately clings to the idea of joining the U.S. military to serve his country; by the end of the film, having been transformed into a fish, he is able to use his new body to save U.S. naval vessels from disaster. Although he does not become a snail but a fish, his name limpet hints at his tenacity.

External links

Notes and References

  1. Book: Jaeger, Edmund Carroll . Edmund Jaeger. A Source-book of Biological Names and Terms . registration . Thomas . Springfield, IL . 1959 . 978-0398061791 .
  2. Book: James Richard Ainsworth Davis. Herbert John Fleure. Patella, the Common Limpet. 1903. Williams & Norgate.
  3. Book: Evolution. E. R.. Trueman. M. R.. Clarke. 22 October 2013. Academic Press. 9781483289366. Google Books.
  4. Shaw. Jeremy A.. Macey. David J.. Brooker. Lesley R.. Clode. Peta L.. 2010-04-01. Tooth use and wear in three iron-biomineralizing mollusc species. The Biological Bulletin. en. 218. 2. 132–44. 10.1086/bblv218n2p132. 20413790. 35442787.
  5. Faivre. Damien. Godec. Tina Ukmar. 2015-04-13. From Bacteria to Mollusks: The Principles Underlying the Biomineralization of Iron Oxide Materials. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. en. 54. 16. 4728–4747. 10.1002/anie.201408900. 25851816. 1521-3773.
  6. Barber. Asa H.. Lu. Dun. Pugno. Nicola M.. 2015-04-06. Extreme strength observed in limpet teeth. Journal of the Royal Society Interface. en. 12. 105. 20141326. 10.1098/rsif.2014.1326. 1742-5689. 4387522. 25694539.
  7. Valdovinos. Claudio. Rüth. Maximillian. 2005-09-01. Nacellidae limpets of the southern end of South America: taxonomy and distribution. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural. 78. 3. 497–517. 10.4067/S0716-078X2005000300011. 0716-078X. free.
  8. Ukmar-Godec. Tina. Kapun. Gregor. Zaslansky. Paul. Faivre. Damien. 2015-12-01. The giant keyhole limpet radular teeth: A naturally-grown harvest machine. Journal of Structural Biology. 192. 3. 392–402. 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.09.021. 4658332. 26433029.
  9. Sone. Eli D.. Weiner. Steve. Addadi. Lia. 2005-11-01. Morphology of Goethite Crystals in Developing Limpet Teeth: Assessing Biological Control over Mineral Formation. Crystal Growth & Design. 5. 6. 2131–2138. 10.1021/cg050171l. 1528-7483.
  10. Book: Biomineralization: From Nature to Application. Sigel. Astrid. Sigel. Helmut. Sigel. Roland K. O.. 2008. John Wiley & Sons. 978-0470986318. en.
  11. Sone. Eli D.. Weiner. Steve. Addadi. Lia. 2007-06-01. Biomineralization of limpet teeth: A cryo-TEM study of the organic matrix and the onset of mineral deposition. Journal of Structural Biology. 158. 3. 428–44. 10.1016/j.jsb.2007.01.001. 17306563.
  12. Gao. Huajian. Ji. Baohua. Jäger. Ingomar L.. Arzt. Eduard. Fratzl. Peter. 2003-05-13. Materials become insensitive to flaws at nanoscale: Lessons from nature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. en. 100. 10. 5597–5600. 10.1073/pnas.0631609100. 0027-8424. 156246. 12732735. free.
  13. Lu. Dun. Barber. Asa H.. 2012-06-07. Optimized nanoscale composite behaviour in limpet teeth. Journal of the Royal Society Interface. en. 9. 71. 1318–24. 10.1098/rsif.2011.0688. 1742-5689. 3350734. 22158842.
  14. Chicot. D.. Mendoza. J.. Zaoui. A.. Louis. G.. Lepingle. V.. Roudet. F.. Lesage. J.. Mechanical properties of magnetite (Fe3O4), hematite (α-Fe2O3) and goethite (α-FeO·OH) by instrumented indentation and molecular dynamics analysis. Materials Chemistry and Physics. October 2011. 129. 3. 862–70. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.05.056.
  15. Cruz. R.. Farina. M.. Mineralization of major lateral teeth in the radula of a deep-sea hydrothermal vent limpet (Gastropoda:Neolepetopsidae). Marine Biology. 4 March 2005. 147. 1. 163–68. 10.1007/s00227-004-1536-y. 84563618.
  16. Mann. S.. Perry. C. C.. Webb. J.. Luke. B.. Williams. R. J. P.. 1986-03-22. Structure, Morphology, Composition and Organization of Biogenic Minerals in Limpet Teeth. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. en. 227. 1247. 179–90. 10.1098/rspb.1986.0018. 1986RSPSB.227..179M. 89570130. 0962-8452.
  17. Addadi. Lia. 4 August 2011. Crystallization Pathways in Biomineralization. Annual Review of Materials Research. 41. 1. 21–40. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-062910-095803. Weiner. Steve. 2011AnRMS..41...21W.
  18. Davies. Mark S.. Proudlock. Donna J.. Mistry. A.. Metal Concentrations in the Radula of the Common Limpet, Patella vulgata L., from 10 Sites in the UK. Ecotoxicology. May 2005. 14. 4. 465–75. 10.1007/s10646-004-1351-8. 16385740. 25235604.
  19. Web site: Luminescent limpet . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20150221010501/http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/resources/identification/animals/freshwater-invertebrates/guide/no-jointed-legs2/molluscs/limpets/luminescent-limpet . 21 February 2015 . 21 February 2015 . Landcare Research . dmy.
  20. Web site: Identifying British freshwater snails: Ancylidae . 21 February 2015 . The Conchological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
  21. Andrews . C. . Williams . R. B. G. . 2000 . Limpet erosion of chalk shore platforms in southeast England . Earth Surface Processes and Landforms . 25 . 12 . 1371–1381 . 2000ESPL...25.1371A . 10.1002/1096-9837(200011)25:12<1371::AID-ESP144>3.0.CO;2-#.
  22. Web site: Gray . William . 18 September 2013 . Escape to the Isles of Scilly . Wanderlust .
  23. Book: Letters of Edward Lear . T. Fisher Unwin . Lear, Edward . 1907 . 165.
  24. Book: The Loving Limpet and Other Peculiarities . Oriel Press . Grindle, Simon . Illustrated by Alan Todd . 1964 . Newcastle .