Lieberkühn reflector explained

A Lieberkühn reflector(also known as Lieberkühn mirroror simply Lieberkühn) is an illumination device for incident light illumination (epi-illumination) in light microscopes.It encircles the objective, with the mirrored surface facing towards the specimen. This allows illuminating an opaque object from the side of the objective, with the light source positioned behind the specimen as in a transmission microscope.

The device is named after Johann Nathanael Lieberkühn (1711–1756) who used and popularized it but did not invent it. Similar mirrors were described and used by earlier microscopists.

Operation and Light Path

The principle is explained for a modern upright compound microscope, where the light source illuminates the specimen from below. The light passes the object of interest laterally upwards. When using the Lieberkühn reflector, the opening in the microscope stage is covered with a flat glass plate upon which the specimen is placed. Typically, a dark disc is placed under the object to avoid direct light entering the objective[1]

The Lieberkühn reflector completely surrounds the objective lens, featuring a central hole through which it is mounted onto the lens. The mirrored inner surface faces the specimen. A Lieberkühn reflector is typically a concave mirror (see illustrations), one descriptions uses a flat mirror at a 45-degree angle.[1] When used in a compound microscope, the light must be directed from below and parallel to the optical axis. Thus, the illumination is different from the conventional Köhler illumination setup, where a condenser forms a light cone with the specimen at its focus. Instead, light passing laterally past the specimen is reflected at the Lieberkühn reflector and now falls from above from all sides onto the specimen, resulting in minimal shadow formation. Hence, the microscopic image appears with relatively low contrast. Since light that is reflected at object surfaces perpendicular to the optical axis (parallel to the microscope stage) will not be collected by the objective, this arrangement qualifies as darkfield illumination.[1]

Variations

By using apertures that restrict illumination to a part of the original field of illumination, the specimen is no longer illuminated from all sides but from a single direction, creating a stronger relief impression.[1]

By omitting the dark disc beneath the specimen, mixed transmission brightfield and incident darkfield illumination can be achieved, which can be useful for certain specimens such as textiles.[1]

When matte white surfaces replace a reflective Lieberkühn mirror, the specimen is illuminated with scattered light. This can also be achieved by using a matte filter between the light source and the microscope stage. A matte white Lieberkühn reflector can be made from plaster of Paris by filling it into a round container and pressing a rubber ball into the still moist plaster. After solidification and drilling a hole for the objective, the resulting plaster bell can be placed on the microscope stage.[1]

Limitations

A Lieberkühn mirror is usable only if the specimen is small enough to allow sufficient light to pass laterally. Therefore, its applicability also depends on the size of the hole in the microscope stage. Objects of less than one centimeter in size are advantageous.[1]

The objective lens should not be too close to the specimen, as it will cast a shadow on the specimen, rendering it dark. Therefore, objectives with several millimeters of working distance are preferred.[1] These are typically low-magnification objectives without immersion.

History

René Descartes published his book Dioptrics in 1637, in which Chapter 9 dealt with glasses, telescopes, and microscopes. It also includes two drawings that sketch illuminations with a Lieberkühn mirror.[2] First for a simple microscope and a few pages later for a compound microscope. While the "compound microscopes" that are common today use an objective and an eyepiece for a "compound" magnification, simple microscopes have only a highly magnifying objective but no eyepiece. Until the 19th century, simple microscopes provided better resolution. Without the possibility of correcting chromatic aberration, the image errors of the objective and eyepiece in the compound microscope were multiplied, degrading image quality. It is believed that Descartes' drawings are drafts that were never built, as the technology during Descartes' time was considered to be not advanced enough.[3] [4]

Descriptions of a concave mirror for generating reflected light illumination can also be found in the works of Antoni van Leeuwenhoek,[5] as well as in the works of Athanasius Kircher ("Ars magna lucis et umbrae", 1646).[6]

Leeuwenhoek and Kircher used a "simple microscope" for their work. A special form of the simple microscope was the compass microscope, which was built from the end of the 17th century. Like a pair of compasses, it had two legs, the distance between which could be adjusted in fine steps. On one leg was the objective lens, and the specimen was mounted on the other. Focusing was performed by changing the distance between the legs.[7]

Such a compass microscope was also designed and used by Johann Nathanael Lieberkühn. He equipped it with a Lieberkühn mirror, examined, among other things, the intestines of dogs, and described the crypt of Lieberkühn. In 1739[8] or 1740,[9] he was able to present his development to the Royal Society in London.

In England, Lieberkühn was credited with the invention of this reflected light illumination, and corresponding devices were named after him.[7] The earliest documented use of the term was by Benjamin Martin (1704–1782) in a microscope description from 1776 as "concave speculum or lieberkuhn".[10] For the following 150 years, Lieberkühn reflectors were part of the standard accessories of microscopes.[9]

In German-language microscopy books from 1950[11] and 1957, the invention is also attributed to Lieberkühn. There are statements about reflected light illumination using a concave mirror, such as: "The first arrangement of this kind was the Lieberkühn mirror from 1738."[12] In contrast, a book from 1988 states: "J.N. Lieberkühn introduced the concave mirror named after him for reflected light illumination in 1738, as it was used in similar form by Descartes 100 years earlier."[13]

Lieberkühn mirrors were also used in compound microscopes over the centuries.[14] In the early 20th century, modified Lieberkühn mirrors were also used in early fluorescence microscopes for reflected light illumination of opaque specimens. New metallic mirror surfaces reflected UV light for excitation very well, resulting in bright fluorescences.[15]

Notes and References

  1. Book: Einführung in die mikroskopischen Untersuchungsmethoden . Heinz Appelt . 4 . Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Geest & Portig K.G. . Leipzig . 1959 . 136-140.
  2. Book: Geschichte der Mikroskopie . Dieter Gerlach . Verlag Harri Deutsch . Frankfurt am Main . 2009 . 978-3-8171-1781-9 . 30.
  3. Book: The Evolution of the Microscope . S. Bradbury . second impression 1968 . Pergamon Press . Oxford . 1967 . 9781483131900 . 18–21. Reprint by Amazon Distribution GmbH, Leipzig
  4. Book: Das Mikroskop. Von seinen Anfängen bis zur jetzigen Vervollkommnung für alle Freunde dieses Instruments . . Verlag von Richard Schoetz . Berlin . 1896 . 6-9.
  5. Book: Geschichte der Mikroskopie . Dieter Gerlach . Verlag Harri Deutsch . Frankfurt am Main . 2009 . 978-3-8171-1781-9 . 87.
  6. Book: Geschichte der Mikroskopie . Dieter Gerlach . Verlag Harri Deutsch . Frankfurt am Main . 2009 . 978-3-8171-1781-9 . 75.
  7. Book: Geschichte der Mikroskopie . Dieter Gerlach . Verlag Harri Deutsch . Frankfurt am Main . 2009 . 978-3-8171-1781-9 . 94-96, 107.
  8. Book: A practical treatise on the use of the microscope including the different methods of preparing and examining animal, vegetable, and mineral structures . . Hippolyte Bailliere, Publisher . London . 1848 . Library of illustrated standard scientific works . VI . 14-16.
  9. Book: Mikroskope. Gerard Turner (incorrectly listed as Gerald Turner) . Callwey Verlag . Munich . 1981 . 3-7667-0561-X . 28 . Dieter Gerlach, Erlangen.
  10. Book: Geschichte der Mikroskopie . Dieter Gerlach . Verlag Harri Deutsch . Frankfurt am Main . 2009 . 978-3-8171-1781-9 . 144–146.
  11. Book: Das Mikroskop und seine Nebenapparate im Dienst der Naturwissenschaften, Medizin und Technik . Viktor Patzelt . Verlag Georg Fromme & Co. . Vienna . 1950 . 107.
  12. „Die erste Anordnung dieser Art war der Lieberkühn-Spiegel von 1738.“ From: Book: Das Mikroskop und seine Nebenapparate im Dienst der naturwissenschaften, Medizin und Technik . Erich Menzel . Hugo Freund . Handbuch der Mikroskopie in der Technik. . 1 . Umschau Verlag . Frankfurt am Main . 1957 . 327.
  13. „J.N. Lieberkühn führte 1738 den nach ihm benannten Hohlspiegel für die Auflichtbeleuchtung ein, wie ihn in ähnlicher Form 100 Jahre vorher schon Descartes verwendet hatte.“ From: Book: Historischer Rückblick . Hermann Beyer . Horst Riesenberg . Handbuch der Mikroskopie . 3. VEB Verlag Technik . Berlin . 1988 . 3-341-00283-9 . 16.
  14. Book: Geschichte der Mikroskopie . Dieter Gerlach . Verlag Harri Deutsch . Frankfurt am Main . 2009 . 978-3-8171-1781-9 . 165 and 407.
  15. Book: Geschichte der Mikroskopie . Dieter Gerlach . Verlag Harri Deutsch . Frankfurt am Main . 2009 . 978-3-8171-1781-9 . 650–651.