| Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board | |
| Seal: | LTFRB Seal.svg |
| Jurisdiction: | Republic of the Philippines |
| Headquarters: | East Avenue, Diliman, Quezon City |
| Chief1 Name: | Atty. Teofilo E. Guadiz III, CESO V |
| Chief1 Position: | Chairman |
| Chief2 Position: | Enge. Riza Marie T. Paches, MNSA |
| Chief3 Name: | Board Member |
| Chief3 Position: | Atty. Mercy Jane Paras-Leynes, LLM |
| Chief4 Name: | Board Member |
| Chief4 Position: | Atty. Robert D. Peig, CESO V |
| Chief5 Name: | Executive Director |
| Chief5 Position: | Pircelyn B. Pialago |
| Chief6 Name: | Spokesperson |
| Parent Department: | Department of Transportation |
| Website: | http://ltfrb.gov.ph |
The Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board (Abbreviation: LTFRB; Filipino: Lupon sa Pagpaprangkisa at Regulasyon ng Transportasyong-Lupa) is an agency of the Republic of the Philippines under the Department of Transportation (DOTr). The LTFRB was established on June 19, 1987, during the former president Corazon Aquino’s administration.
The LTFRB is responsible for promulgating, administering, enforcing, and monitoring compliance of policies, laws, and regulations of public land transportation services. The agency is in charge of granting franchises or accreditations and regulating public vehicles such as Public Utility Buses (PUBs), Mini-buses, Public Utility Jeepneys (PUJs), Utility Vehicle (UV) Express Services, Filcab service, school services, taxies, Transportation Network Vehicle Services (TNVS), Tourist Transport Services, and For Hire Cargo vehicles except tricycles, pedicabs, and habal-habals.
The regulatory land transportation dates back to the early 1900s. The LTFRB therefore, is a product of a series of transformations. The evolutionary progression runs as thus:
The first iteration of the LTFRB was established on November 17, 1902, through the passing of Act No. 520.[1] The commission is in charge of classifying vessels, merchandise, and passengers in with reference to transportation under the coastwise trade, and fixing the maximum rates to be imposed on the vessels and merchandise of different classes, and people that are being moved from one point to another across the country.
On December 19, 1913, through Act No. 1507, the Supervising Railway Expert was created.[2] The following year would see the creation of the Board of Rate Regulation before these three would be subsumed into the Board of Public Utility Commissioners. The Board of Public Utility Commissioners was patterned after the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities and regulated utilities such as electricity and water in addition to land and coastal transportation.
In 1926, with the implementation of the Public Service Act, the Board was replaced by the Public Service Commission.[3] The commission was given jurisdiction over many forms of public utility and services, which was defined in the Act as any person for hire, any mode of transport, or anything else that fit into the remaining categories listed in the Act.
In September 1972, then President Ferdinand Marcos implemented the Integrated Reorganization Plan through Presidential Decree No. 1. In the implementation of this plan, the Public Service Commission was abolished and its responsibilities distributed among multiple regulatory boards that each focused on a part of the PSC's regulatory function.[4]
The Land Transportation Commission was formed in 1964,[5] but it would be renamed in 1979 by former president, Ferdinand Marcos, to the Bureau of Land Transportation.[6] In 1985, the Bureau was combined with the Board of Transportation because it was determined that a number of their functions were similar to the other's. The Board of Transportation was formed as a part of the Integrated Reorganization Plan. The Bureau worked closely with the Board by enforcing the regulations established by it.
From its inception, the Land Transportation Commission held the duty of classifying, registering, and regulating all forms of land-based vehicles. In addition to this, it issued licenses and enforced traffic rules.[7]
In 1987, then President Corazon Aquino abolished the LTC, and created two offices to replace it. The Land Transportation Office took on the functions of the Bureau of Land Transportation, and the Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board took on the functions of the Board of Transportation.
The Office of the Chairman and its board members has the capability perform the powers and functions as mandated in Executive Order 202 and Public Service Act.[8] [9] The Board shall have the following powers and functions:
The Office of the Executive Director assists the Chairman or the Board Members in the execution and implementation of all laws and policies pertaining to the regulations of land transportation public utilities.
They provide advisement services relative to the economical, efficient, and effective administration of personnel and other resources of the LTFRB.
LTFRB key officials as of December 19, 2022
| CHAIRPERSON, BOARD MEMBERS AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR | ||
|---|---|---|
| Name | Function | |
| Teofilo E. Guadiz III, CESO V | Chairperson | |
| Mercy Jane P. Leynes, LLM | Board Member | |
| Riza Marie T. Paches, EnP, MNSA | Board Member | |
| Robert D. Peig, CESO V | Executive Director | |
| DIVISIONS HEADS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Function | Division | |
| Nida P. Quibic | Chief | Information Systems Management Division | |
| Frederick L. Valero | Chief | Legal Division | |
| Roweena B. Dirain | Chief | Administrative Division | |
| Ma. Angelina Goldamier M. Tamayo | Officer-in-Charge | Financial and Management Division | |
| Carl Sha Jemimah F. Marbell | Officer-in-Charge | Technical Division | |
| Joanne E. Elmedolan | Officer-in-Charge | Franchise Planning and Monitoring Division | |
The LTFRB is in charge of regulating fares of public vehicles.
In 2003, LTFRB granted fare discounts to senior citizens, persons with disabilities (PWD) and students.[10] The discount is equivalent to 20% of the regular or normal fare. According to the memorandum they issued, this is to give their needs the utmost priority.[11]
The word colorum was first used in an official capacity in 1973 to refer to unauthorized public utility vehicles, when then-president Ferdinand Marcos issued Presidential Decree No. 101,[12] which modified the definitions of public utility vehicles and prescribed the manner in which these should be operated.
The colorum violation was established and prescribed by the Department of Transportation and Communications under the Violations in Connection with Franchise of the Joint Administrative Order No. 2014–01 in 1992.[13] This penalizes motor vehicles operating as colorum, and they are considered as such under the following circumstances:
This practice is outlawed on the bases that it unfairly puts up competition to legal public utility vehicles and therefore costs the government fees and taxes. Working against colorum, the LTFRB is authorized to arrest drivers of colorum vehicles and seize their vehicles.[14] The board also has the capacity to shut down the operations of Transport Network Vehicle Services such as Uber,[15] bus operators,[16] and taxis.[17]
In March 2018, the Task Force Kamao,[18] an inter-agency task force, was launched to combat colorum vehicles in the country. Headed by the Transportation Undersecretary and the LTFRB chairman, the campaign aims to conduct anti-colorum operations more effectively by increasing the presence of intelligence in communities.[19] The public may engage in the efforts by reporting colorum vehicles on the Inter-Agency Council for Traffic Facebook page.
The LTFRB organized the Public Utility Drivers Academy Program which is a free seminar that aims to inform drivers of basic road safety, driving courtesy, and traffic regulations and regulations.[20] The seminar is composed of four core modules namely anger management, road courtesy, traffic rules, and terms and conditions of a franchise.[21] The program was designed by the LTFRB, LTO, University of the Philippines, and De La Salle University.
In October 2014, LTFRB launched a sting operation against Uber for operating as a public vehicle with the lack of a franchise.[22] A few days later, DOTr, then DOTC, urged LTFRB to meet with Uber Executives to discuss terms as they see potential in Uber as a service.[23]
In May 2015, the Philippines became the first country to have regulations on ride sharing.[24]
DOTr gave the duty of regulating fares of TNVS to LTFRB. The TNCS and TNVS are subject to the full regulation and supervision by LTFRB, including but not limited to application and approval/denial of franchise, setting of fares, routes, operating conditions, and imposition of fines, suspension and cancellation of franchise.[25] Uber and Grab was accredited as TNCS in July and August 2015 respectively. The TNCs must screen and accredit their drivers and register them with the LTFRB. Meanwhile, the agency is responsible for the issuance of permits to TNVS drivers - namely the provisional authority (PA), or a temporary permit valid for 45 days, and the Certificate of Public Convenience (CPC) franchise, which is valid for a year.[26]
In July 2016, LTFRB suspended accepting and processing applications of the TNVS of the companies Uber and Grab. This was done in light of the increasing number of applications and after the review done by the agency of the fare scheme being implemented. Both companies continued to accept applications for partner drivers despite the memorandum.[27]
A year later, LTFRB also ordered that the two companies should deactivate drivers who registered in their systems after June 30, 2017 and to also provide them a masterlist of all the drivers that are with them as of the said date.[28] Despite this, Grab and Uber allowed their drivers to operate that still have no licenses or with expired permits. Both companies revealed that they accepted driver's applications to meet the consumer demand. They also said that around 80% of their drivers to not have the required documents that LTFRB insisted on having. This led to LTFRB fining them a penalty of Php 5 million.[29] Grab complied to the order but Uber did not, leading to a suspension of its operation for a month as a penalty. Uber was able to resume its operations after it paid a fine of PHP 190M in exchange of the penalty.[30]
As of July 2018, the TNCs that are given accreditation are Grab, Hirna Mobility Solutions, Hype Transport Systems, Go Lag Incorporated, Micab Systems Corporation, and iPARA Technologies, and Solutions, Inc (the owner of Owto).[31]
In June 2017, the Department of Transportation (DOTr) issued the Public Utility Vehicle Modernization Program (PUVMP) or Omnibus Guidelines on the Planning and Identification of Public Road Transportation Services and Franchise Insurance under the Department Order No. 2017-011.[32] The PUVMP is a hallmark program under President Rodrigo Duterte's administration. It aims to restructure, modernize, and employ a well-managed and environmentally sustainable transport sector while ensuring that drivers and operators have stable and sufficient livelihood and that commuters get to commute swiftly, safely, and comfortably.
The basic policy states that the DOTr shall lessen the reliance on the use of private vehicles and transition toward the promotion of mobility solutions and high-quality transportation systems that are environmentally sound. This program shall prioritize the movement of people and goods over vehicles. The department is tasked to disseminate, administer, and oversee the compliance of public land transportation policies, laws, and regulations which promote the basic human need for mobility. LTFRB is assigned to implement this Department Order, to support and reinforce the operators and establish a bigger and coordinate fleet of PUVs. The LTFRB has also the power to incentivize or prioritize the operators with larger fleets of PUVs with higher passenger capacity.
A special loan program with coordination with Land Bank and the Development Bank of the Philippines (DBP) is being proposed to help soften the impact and accommodate the small operators who will be affected by the PUVMP. Various training and social programs shall be given under this program.
A pilot implementation will be conducted by the DOTr, LTFRB, LTO, OTC, and other concerned agencies to review and assess the efficacy and effects of the program's intended outcomes. The program is considered to be revolutionary in terms of road-based public land transportation and that it will steer the country to have an improved riding experience that will be benefited by generations of Filipino passengers.
House Bill No. 6776 known as Land Transport Act of 2017 was passed to the Congress that proposes the merging of two major transport regulators, namely LTFRB and LTO, into one agency that is the Land Transport Authority.[33] The former was created through E.O. 202 which is meant for regulating public transport vehicles while the latter was created through E.O. 125 and 226 is meant for licensing of drivers and registration of all motor vehicles.
This was passed by House Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez, Cesar V. Sarmiento, Juan Pablo P. Bondoc, Bayani F. Fernando, Anna Katrina M. Enverga, Renato Unico, Winston Castelo, Emi Calixto Rubiano, and Alfred D. Vargas. The reason for this proposal is “create a central agency that will consolidate the functions of the LTO and LTFRB in order to avoid confusion as to which agency is tasked to maintain land transportation law and order in the Philippines.” The proposal of the LTO also seeks to address the need for a more comprehensive transportation policy that considers the “varied and complex areas in the land transportation industry”. Moreover, the explanatory notes states that some existing policies are inadequate, ineffective and already obsolete.
The board of directors of the proposed LTA are composed of the following: