In mathematics, an LF-space, also written (LF)-space, is a topological vector space (TVS) X that is a locally convex inductive limit of a countable inductive system
(Xn,inm)
(Xn,inm)
Xn
If each of the bonding maps
inm
See main article: Final topology.
See also: Category (mathematics).
Throughout, it is assumed that
l{C}
l{C}
l{C}
If it exists, then the final topology on in
l{C}
l{C}
l{C}
l{C}
In the category of topological spaces, the final topology always exists and moreover, a subset is open (resp. closed) in if and only if is open (resp. closed) in for every index .
However, the final topology may not exist in the category of Hausdorff topological spaces due to the requirement that belong to the original category (i.e. belong to the category of Hausdorff topological spaces).
See main article: Direct limit.
Suppose that is a directed set and that for all indices there are (continuous) morphisms in
l{C}
such that if then is the identity map on and if then the following compatibility condition is satisfied:
where this means that the composition
If the above conditions are satisfied then the triple formed by the collections of these objects, morphisms, and the indexing set
is known as a direct system in the category
l{C}
If the indexing set is understood then is often omitted from the above tuple (i.e. not written); the same is true for the bonding maps if they are understood. Consequently, one often sees written " is a direct system" where "" actually represents a triple with the bonding maps and indexing set either defined elsewhere (e.g. canonical bonding maps, such as natural inclusions) or else the bonding maps are merely assumed to exist but there is no need to assign symbols to them (e.g. the bonding maps are not needed to state a theorem).
For the construction of a direct limit of a general inductive system, please see the article: direct limit.
Direct limits of injective systems
If each of the bonding maps
j | |
f | |
i |
If the 's have an algebraic structure, say addition for example, then for any, we pick any index such that and then define their sum using by using the addition operator of . That is, where is the addition operator of . This sum is independent of the index that is chosen.
In the category of locally convex topological vector spaces, the topology on the direct limit of an injective directed inductive limit of locally convex spaces can be described by specifying that an absolutely convex subset of is a neighborhood of if and only if is an absolutely convex neighborhood of in for every index .
Direct limits in Top
Direct limits of directed direct systems always exist in the categories of sets, topological spaces, groups, and locally convex TVSs. In the category of topological spaces, if every bonding map is/is a injective (resp. surjective, bijective, homeomorphism, topological embedding, quotient map) then so is every .
Direct limits in the categories of topological spaces, topological vector spaces (TVSs), and Hausdorff locally convex TVSs are "poorly behaved". For instance, the direct limit of a sequence (i.e. indexed by the natural numbers) of locally convex nuclear Fréchet spaces may to be Hausdorff (in which case the direct limit does not exist in the category of Hausdorff TVSs). For this reason, only certain "well-behaved" direct systems are usually studied in functional analysis. Such systems include LF-spaces. However, non-Hausdorff locally convex inductive limits do occur in natural questions of analysis.
If each of the bonding maps
j | |
f | |
i |
N
In the category of locally convex topological vector spaces, the topology on a strict inductive limit of Fréchet spaces can be described by specifying that an absolutely convex subset is a neighborhood of if and only if is an absolutely convex neighborhood of in for every .
An inductive limit in the category of locally convex TVSs of a family of bornological (resp. barrelled, quasi-barrelled) spaces has this same property.
Every LF-space is a meager subset of itself.The strict inductive limit of a sequence of complete locally convex spaces (such as Fréchet spaces) is necessarily complete. In particular, every LF-space is complete. Every LF-space is barrelled and bornological, which together with completeness implies that every LF-space is ultrabornological. An LF-space that is the inductive limit of a countable sequence of separable spaces is separable. LF spaces are distinguished and their strong duals are bornological and barrelled (a result due to Alexander Grothendieck).
If is the strict inductive limit of an increasing sequence of Fréchet space then a subset of is bounded in if and only if there exists some such that is a bounded subset of .
A linear map from an LF-space into another TVS is continuous if and only if it is sequentially continuous. A linear map from an LF-space into a Fréchet space is continuous if and only if its graph is closed in .Every bounded linear operator from an LF-space into another TVS is continuous.
If is an LF-space defined by a sequence
\left(Xi
infty | |
\right) | |
i=1 |
\prime | |
X | |
b |
See main article: Distribution (mathematics).
A typical example of an LF-space is,
n) | |
C | |
c(R |
Rn
K1\subsetK2\subset\ldots\subsetKi\subset\ldots\subsetRn
cupiKi=Rn
Ki
Ki+1
infty(K | |
C | |
i) |
Rn
Ki
n) | |
C | |
c(R |
Ki
With this LF-space structure,
n) | |
C | |
c(R |
Suppose that for every positive integer, and for, consider Xm as a vector subspace of via the canonical embedding defined by . Denote the resulting LF-space by . Since any TVS topology on makes continuous the inclusions of the Xm's into, the latter space has the maximum among all TVS topologies on an
R
X\prime
RN
X\prime
X\prime
\prime | |
X | |
\sigma |
=
\prime | |
X | |
b |
X\prime