Lèse-majesté in Japan was a special crime of defamation concerning the imperial family that was in effect between 1877 and 1947, mostly in militarized Japan.[1] It is an act of disrespect against the imperial family and affiliated sites like imperial shrines and mausoleums. It first appeared in 1877 in the draft of the Japanese Penal Code. Later, it was stipulated in Articles 74 and 76 as one of the elements of the current Penal Code, Part II, Chapter 1, "Crimes against the Imperial Family," which came into effect in 1908. Here, the scope of the crime was extremely wide and any actions considered the act to be disrespectful was enacted.[2] Therefore, this law forced Japanese people to support the Emperor, Shinto, and militaristic Japan during World War II.[3] However, after World War II, in accordance with the strong instructions of the Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers, MacArthur, and the spirit of the new constitution, which respects the equality of individuals, "crimes against the imperial family," including lèse-majesté, were abolished in the 1947 revision of the penal code. Therefore, there is no lèse-majesté in the current law in Japan. During the Meiji and Taisho periods, the number of people who were suspected of lèse-majesté averaged less than ten per year, but during World War II, the number increased dramatically, and from 1941 to 1943, the annual average number rose to nearly 160.[4] [5] [6] [7]
The Tokugawa family, which had been in power for many years since Tokugawa Ieyasu became the conqueror in 1603, returned power to the emperor in 1867 when the 15th shogun, Tokugawa Yoshinobu, submitted 'Taisei Hokan Johyo' to the emperor and the Edo shogunate closed.[8] With the return of power to the emperor, it became important to increase the people's reverence for the emperor. In order to enhance this idea of the Emperor, the state decided that “Shinto”, whose sacred text was the “Kojiki'', which stated that the descendants of the divine Amaterasu were the first emperors, was the nation's recognized religion. This later became "State Shinto".[9] Thereafter, in 1877, the "Draft of the Japanese Penal Code" was promulgated, in which lèse-majesté which was an act of disrespect against certain objects was introduced for the first time in Japan. The term "disrespect" referred to any act that expresses contempt for the objects and harms their dignity. The specifics ranged from actual defamation to questioning the divinity of the act. The objects of lèse-majesté in Japan were divided into the following five categories: 1. Emperor (Article 74, Paragraph 1) 2. Imperial family equivalent to the emperor (same article) 3. Jingu (Article 74, Paragraph 2) 4. Imperial mausoleum (same article) 5. ordinary imperial family (Article 76).[10] More specifically, 2. The imperial family included Grand Empress Dowager, Empress Dowager, Empress, Crown Prince, Grandson of Emperor. 3. The term "Jingu" was usually used to refer to Ise Jingu, but it was also understood to include shrines named "Jingu" such as Atsuta Jingu, Kashihara Jingu, and Katori Jingu. 4. The imperial mausoleum was understood to be the tomb of the successive emperors who once reigned as emperor.[11] In terms of Statutory Penalty for lèse-majesté in Japan, crimes against objects in 1 through 4 were punishable by "imprisonment for a term of not less than three months and not more than five years"; crimes against objects in 5 were punishable by "imprisonment for a term of not less than two months and not more than four years".[12] At that time, the publicity of the act of disrespect was a requirement. Later, in 1880, the "Penal Code" was promulgated, and the lèse-majesté was officially stipulated. Then, the content of the lèse-majesté was amended and the requirement of publicity was removed. This removal makes the act did not matter whether it was done publicly or privately, and thus made the scope of application extremely wide. For example, there was actually a case where a person who wrote in his diary about his opposition to militarism was considered as lèse-majesté and was arrested.[12] In 1889, Emperor Meiji promulgated the Constitution of the Empire of Japan, which became the backbone of the pre-war Japanese nation. Accordingly, the Emperor's sovereignty, in which the Emperor, with his unbroken imperial line and sacred inviolability, holds sway, was the principle, and the people were regarded as "subjects" to be ruled by the Emperor.[13] In addition, Shinto was increasingly treated as a state religion in a large part of the country, separate from general religions, and treated as a morality rather than a religion. In 1890, the Imperial Rescript on Education was issued, ordering students to be loyal to the emperor's state. Thus, in the latter half of the 19th century, when the lèse-majesté first appeared and was officially stipulated, Japan gradually increased the people's reverence for the emperor through all kinds of methods, including education, in accordance with the restoration of imperial rule.[14]
Subsequently, in the “Penal Code” revised in 1908, the lèse-majesté was stipulated in Articles 74 and 76 of Part II, Chapter 1, "Crimes against the Imperial Family". The content of the law was largely in keeping with the old Penal Code.[10] Then, with the Manchurian Incident of 1931, the Second Sino-Japanese War began. In 1940, on the occasion of the "2,600th anniversary of the Emperor's accession to the throne," the Bureau of Shrines was promoted to a Institute of Divinities, and with the intensification of the war, the doctrine of the national identity was inspired. Japan was regarded as a divine country of unparalleled power, ruled by an emperor of the unbroken imperial line and Hakko Ichiu, meaning world domination, became the slogan for the "Holy War”.[15] [16] In addition to this, the Law on Religious Organizations was enforced that year, accelerating the state's control over religion.[17] Afterward, in 1941, the Pacific War began with the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.
As a result, in 1945, with the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the entry of the Soviet Union into the war, Japan accepted the Potsdam Declaration and surrendered unconditionally, ending World War II. In December 1945, immediately after the defeat, the GHQ (Supreme Headquarters of the Allied Powers) issued a Shinto directive, ordering the abolition of State Shinto and the separation of politics and religion. In accordance with the strong instructions of the Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers, MacArthur, and the spirit of the new constitution, which respects the equality of individuals, Articles 73-76 of Chapter I of Part II of the Current Penal Code, "Crimes against the Imperial Family," including "lèse-majesté" were abolished in the "Law Partially Amending the Penal Code" (Law No. 124), which was promulgated on October 26, 1947 and came into effect on November 15, 1947.[18]
Chapter 1 "Crimes against the Imperial Family"
The old Penal Code had similar provisions. The difference is that it provided for fines and had a provision on surveillance.
Chapter 1 "Crimes against the Imperial Family"
On the occasion of Food MayDay in 1946, Shōtarō Matsushima, one of the demonstrators who gathered in the plaza in front of the Imperial Palace held a placard criticizing the Emperor and was arrested and charged with lèse-majesté.
In accordance with the orders of the Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers (Potsdam Declaration and Surrender Document), the government had released the perpetrators of lèse-majesté since October 5, 1945. In addition, the divinity of the Emperor, which was the basis of the lèse-majesté, had been denied in the so-called Emperor's Declaration of Humanity in January 1946. At the Food MayDay in May of the same year, placards were seen that read, "Hirohito, imperial edict, the national government has been protected. “Chin” (the emperor) is eating a lot. Nanji people, starve and die, “gyomei gyoji” (the emperor)". The Tokyo Public Prosecutor's Office prosecuted Matsushima Matsutaro, who was responsible for creating the placards, on the grounds that this was a lèse-majesté. In November of the same year, the first instance court ruled that the lèse-majesté did not exist and found him guilty of defamation. Then, he pleaded not guilty to both charges and appealed. In June of the same year, the second trial ruled that he was guilty of lèse-majesté, but that he was exonerated because the GHQ enacted "the act of grace for the lèse-majesté", which made the people who has been convicted in lèse-majesté lose the effect of the sentence.[19]