In mathematics, the Korteweg–De Vries (KdV) equation is a partial differential equation (PDE) which serves as a mathematical model of waves on shallow water surfaces. It is particularly notable as the prototypical example of an integrable PDE and exhibits many of the expected behaviors for an integrable PDE, such as a large number of explicit solutions, in particular soliton solutions, and an infinite number of conserved quantities, despite the nonlinearity which typically renders PDEs intractable. The KdV can be solved by the inverse scattering method (ISM). In fact, Gardner, Greene, Kruskal and Miura developed the classical inverse scattering method to solve the KdV equation.
The KdV equation was first introduced by and rediscovered by Diederik Korteweg and Gustav de Vries in 1895, who found the simplest solution, the one-soliton solution. Understanding of the equation and behavior of solutions was greatly advanced by the computer simulations of Zabusky and Kruskal in 1965 and then the development of the inverse scattering transform in 1967.
The KdV equation is a partial differential equation that models (spatially) one-dimensional nonlinear dispersive nondissipative waves described by a function
\phi(x,t)
\partialt\phi+
3 | |
\partial | |
x |
\phi-6\phi\partialx\phi=0 x\inR, t\geq0,
where
3 | |
\partial | |
x |
\phi
\phi\partialx\phi
For modelling shallow water waves,
\phi
The constant
6
t
x
\phi
Consider solutions in which a fixed wave form (given by
f(X)
c
\varphi(x,t)=f(x-ct-a)=f(X)
-c | df | + |
dX |
d3f | -6f | |
dX3 |
df | |
dX |
=0,
or, integrating with respect to
X
-cf+ | d2f |
dX2 |
-3f2=A
where
A
X
f
V(f)=
| ||||
-\left(f |
cf2+Af\right)
A=0,c>0
V(f)
f=0
f(X)
-infty
infty
f(X)
0
X\to-infty
More precisely, the solution is
\phi(x,t)=-
1 | |
2 |
c\operatorname{sech}2\left[{\sqrt{c}\over2}(x-ct-a)\right]
where
\operatorname{sech}
a
c
There is a known expression for a solution which is an
N
N
\chi1, … ,\chiN>0
\beta1, … ,\betaN
A(x,t)
Anm(x,t)=\deltanm+
| |||||||||||||||||||||
\chin+\chim |
.
This is derived using the inverse scattering method.
The KdV equation has infinitely many integrals of motion, which do not change with time. They can be given explicitly as
+infty | |
\int | |
-infty |
P2n-1(\phi,\partialx\phi,
2 | |
\partial | |
x |
\phi,\ldots)dx
where the polynomials
Pn
\begin{align} P1&=\phi, \\ Pn&=-
dPn-1 | |
dx |
+
n-2 | |
\sum | |
i=1 |
PiPn-1-i forn\ge2. \end{align}
\int\phidx,
\int\phi2dx,
\int\left[2\phi3-\left(\partialx\phi\right)2\right]dx
P2n+1
The KdV equation
\partialt\phi=6\phi\partialx\phi-
3 | |
\partial | |
x |
\phi
Lt=[L,A]\equivLA-AL
L
\begin{align} L&=
2 | |
-\partial | |
x |
+\phi,\\ A&=4
3 | |
\partial | |
x |
-6\phi\partialx-3[\partialx,\phi] \end{align}
[\partialx,\phi]
[\partialx,\phi]f=f\partialx\phi
In fact,
L
\phi(x,t)
t
Setting the components of the Lax connection to bethe KdV equation is equivalent to the zero-curvature equation for the Lax connection,
The Korteweg–De Vries equation
\partialt\phi+6\phi\partialx\phi+
3 | |
\partial | |
x |
\phi=0,
l{L}
with
\phi
\phi:=
\partial\psi | |
\partialx |
.
Since the Lagrangian (eq (1)) contains second derivatives, the Euler–Lagrange equation of motion for this field is
where
\partial
\mu
A sum over
\mu
Evaluate the five terms of eq (3) by plugging in eq (1),
\partialtt\left(
\partiall{L | |
\partialxx\left(
\partiall{L | |
\partialt\left(
\partiall{L | |
\partialx\left(
\partiall{L | |
\partiall{L | |
Remember the definition
\phi=\partialx\psi
\partialxx\left(-\partialxx\psi\right)=-\partialxxx\phi
\partialt\left(
1 | |
2 |
\partialx\psi\right)=
1 | |
2 |
\partialt\phi
\partialx\left(
1 | |
2 |
\partialt\psi+3(\partialx\psi)2\right)=
1 | |
2 |
\partialt\phi+3\partialx(\phi)2=
1 | |
2 |
\partialt\phi+6\phi\partialx\phi
Finally, plug these three non-zero terms back into eq (3) to see
\left(-\partialxxx\phi\right)-\left(
1 | |
2 |
\partialt\phi\right)-\left(
1 | |
2 |
\partialt\phi+6\phi\partialx\phi\right)=0,
\partialt\phi+6\phi\partialx\phi+
3 | |
\partial | |
x |
\phi=0.
It can be shown that any sufficiently fast decaying smooth solution will eventually split into a finite superposition of solitons travelling to the right plus a decaying dispersive part travelling to the left. This was first observed by and can be rigorously proven using the nonlinear steepest descent analysis for oscillatory Riemann–Hilbert problems.
The history of the KdV equation started with experiments by John Scott Russell in 1834, followed by theoretical investigations by Lord Rayleigh and Joseph Boussinesq around 1870 and, finally, Korteweg and De Vries in 1895.
The KdV equation was not studied much after this until discovered numerically that its solutions seemed to decompose at large times into a collection of "solitons": well separated solitary waves. Moreover, the solitons seems to be almost unaffected in shape by passing through each other (though this could cause a change in their position). They also made the connection to earlier numerical experiments by Fermi, Pasta, Ulam, and Tsingou by showing that the KdV equation was the continuum limit of the FPUT system. Development of the analytic solution by means of the inverse scattering transform was done in 1967 by Gardner, Greene, Kruskal and Miura.
The KdV equation is now seen to be closely connected to Huygens' principle.
The KdV equation has several connections to physical problems. In addition to being the governing equation of the string in the Fermi–Pasta–Ulam–Tsingou problem in the continuum limit, it approximately describes the evolution of long, one-dimensional waves in many physical settings, including:
The KdV equation can also be solved using the inverse scattering transform such as those applied to the non-linear Schrödinger equation.
Considering the simplified solutions of the form
\phi(x,t)=\phi(x\pmt)
\pm\partialx\phi+
3 | |
\partial | |
x |
\phi+6\phi\partialx\phi=0
\pm\partialx\phi+\partialx
2 | |
(\partial | |
x |
\phi+3\phi2)=0
2 | |
-\partial | |
x |
\phi-3\phi2=\pm\phi
λ=1
2 | |
-\partial | |
x |
\phi-3\phiλ\phi=\pm\phi
λ=4
λ=2
λ=3
\phi
Many different variations of the KdV equations have been studied. Some are listed in the following table.
Name | Equation | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Korteweg–De Vries (KdV) | \displaystyle\partialtu+
u+6u\partialxu=0 | ||||||||||||||||||
KdV (cylindrical) | \displaystyle\partialtu+
u-6u\partialxu+\tfrac{1}{2t}u=0 | ||||||||||||||||||
KdV (deformed) | \displaystyle\partialtu+\partialx\left(
\right)=0 | ||||||||||||||||||
KdV (generalized) | \displaystyle\partialtu+
u=
u | ||||||||||||||||||
KdV (generalized) | \displaystyle\partialtu+
u+\partialxf(u)=0 | ||||||||||||||||||
KdV (modified) | \displaystyle\partialtu+
u\pm6u2\partialxu=0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gardner equation | \displaystyle\partialtu+
u-(6\varepsilon2u2+6u)\partialxu=0 | ||||||||||||||||||
KdV (modified modified) | \displaystyle\partialtu+
u-\tfrac{1}{8}(\partialxu)3+(\partialxu)(Aeau+B+Ce-au)=0 | ||||||||||||||||||
KdV (spherical) | \displaystyle\partialtu+
u-6u\partialxu+\tfrac{1}{t}u=0 | ||||||||||||||||||
KdV (super) | \displaystyle\begin{cases}\partialtu=6u\partialxu-
u+3w
w\ \partialtw=3(\partialxu)w+6u\partialxw-4
w\end{cases} | ||||||||||||||||||
KdV (transitional) | \displaystyle\partialtu+
u-6f(t)u\partialxu=0 | ||||||||||||||||||
KdV (variable coefficients) | \displaystyle\partialtu+\betatn
u+\alphatnu\partialxu=0 | ||||||||||||||||||
KdV-Burgers equation | \displaystyle\partialtu+\mu
u+u\partialxu-\nu
u=0 | ||||||||||||||||||
non-homogeneous KdV | \partialtu+\alphau+\beta\partialxu+\gamma
u=Ai(x), u(x,0)=f(x) |