Kingston v Preston explained

Kingston v Preston
Court:Court of King's Bench
Citations:(1773) 2 Doug KB 689
Judges:Lord Mansfield
Keywords:Withholding performance

Kingston v Preston (1773) 2 Doug KB 689 is an English contract law case, concerning the right to withhold performance for a contract.

Facts

Kingston, a silk-mercer, sued Preston, a business owner for failing to convey the business to Kingston and his nephew after Kingston served for a year and a quarter. They had agreed Preston would convey the stock in trade over a period of time, in return for Kingston providing security. But Kingston never provided the security. Kingston sued.

Judgment

Lord Mansfield held that because the security was a condition precedent to Preston’s performance, Preston had been entitled to withhold conveyance. Lord Mansfield gave a judgment which was recorded as follows:[1]

See also

Notes and References

  1. 2 Douglas 690-1. 99 Eng. Rep. 437-8