Kicked rotator explained

I ) in an inhomogeneous "gravitation like" field that is periodically switched on in short pulses. The model is described by the Hamiltonianl{H}(\theta,p _{\theta} ,t) = (p ^{2} _{\theta})/(2 I) + K \cos \theta \sum ^{inf ty} _{n =-inf ty} \delta \left( (t)/(T) - n\right) ,

where

\theta \in [ 0 , 2 \pi] is the angular position of the stick (\theta = \pi corresponds to the position of the rotator at rest), p _{\theta} is the conjugated momentum of \theta , style K is the kicking strength, T is the kicking period and style \delta is the Dirac delta function.

Classical properties

Stroboscopic dynamics

The equations of motion of the kicked rotator write$$\backslash frac\; =\; \backslash frac\; =\; \backslash frac\; \backslash quad\; \backslash text\; \backslash quad\; \backslash frac\; =\; -\backslash frac\; =\; K\; \backslash sin\; \backslash theta\; \backslash sum\_^\backslash infty\; \backslash delta\; \backslash left(\backslash frac-n\backslash right)$$Theses equations show that between two consecutive kicks, the rotator simply moves freely: the momentum

p is conserved and the angular position growths linearly in time. On the other hand, during each kick the momentum abruptly jumps by a quantity K T \sin \theta , where \theta is the angular position near the kick. The kicked rotator dynamics can thus be described by the discrete map$$p\_=p\_n+\; KT\; \backslash sin\; \backslash theta\_n\; \backslash quad\; \backslash text\; \backslash quad\; \backslash theta\_\; =\; \backslash theta\_n\; +\; \backslash frac\; p\_$$where \theta _{n} and p _{n} are the canonical coordinates at time t = nT ^{-} , just before the n -th kick. It is usually more convenient to introduce dimensionless momentum $p\; \backslash rightarrow\; p/\backslash frac$, time $t\; \backslash rightarrow\; t/T$ and kicking strength $K\; \backslash rightarrow\; K/\backslash frac$ to reduce the dynamics to the single parameter map$$p\_=p\_n+\; K\; \backslash sin\; \backslash theta\_n\; \backslash quad\; \backslash text\; \backslash quad\; \backslash theta\_\; =\; \backslash theta\_n\; +\; p\_$$known as Chirikov standard map, with the caveat that p _{n} is not periodic as in the standard map. However, one can directly see that two rotators with same initial angular position \theta _{0} but shifted dimensionless momentum p _{0} and $p\_0+\; 2\backslash pi\; l$ (with l an arbitrary integer) will have the same exact stroboscopic dynamics, but with dimensionless momentum shifted at any time by $2\backslash pi\; l$ (this is why stroboscopic phase portraits of the kicked rotator are usually displayed in a single momentum cell $p\; \backslash in\; [-\backslash pi,\backslash pi]$).

Transition from integrability to chaos

The kicked rotator is a prototype model to illustrate the transition from integrability to chaos in Hamiltonian systems and in particular the Kolmogorov–Arnold–Moser theorem. In the limit

K =0 , the system describes the free motion of the rotator, the momentum is conserved (the system is integrable) and the corresponding trajectories are straight lines in the (\theta,p) plane (phase space), that is tori. For small, but non-vanishing perturbation K , instabilities and chaos starts to develop. Only quasi-periodic orbits (represented by invariant tori in phase space) remain stables, while other orbits become unstables. For larger K , invariant tori are eventually destroyed by the perturbation. For the value K = K _{c ≈ 0.971635...} , the last invariant tori connecting \theta =- \pi and \theta = \pi in phase space is destroyed.

Diffusion in momentum direction

For

K>K _{c} , chaotic unstable orbits are no longer constraints by invariant tori in the momentum direction and can explore the full phase space. For K \gg K _{c} , the particle after each kicks typically moved over a large distance, which strongly modifies the amplitude and sign of the following kick. At long time enough, the particle as thus been submitted to a series of kicks with quasi-random amplitudes. This quasi-random walk is responsible for a diffusion process in the momentum direction \langle (\Delta p ^{2} _{n)} \rangle = 2 D _{cl} n (where the average runs over different initial conditions).

More precisely, after

n kicks, the momentum p _{n} of a particle with initial momentum p _{0} writes $p\_n\; =\; p\_0\; +\; K\backslash sum\_^\backslash sin\; \backslash theta\_i$^[1] (obtained by iterating n times the standard map). Assuming that kicks are randoms and uncorrelated in time, the spreading of the momentum distribution writes$$\backslash left\; \backslash langle\; ^\; \backslash right\; \backslash rangle\; =\; \backslash left\; \backslash langle\; ^\; \backslash right\; \backslash rangle\; =\; K^2\backslash sum\_^\backslash left\; \backslash langle\; ^\; \backslash theta\_i\; \backslash right\; \backslash rangle\; +\; K^2\; \backslash sum\_^\backslash left\; \backslash langle\; \backslash sin\; \backslash theta\_i\; \backslash sin\; \backslash theta\_j\; \backslash right\; \backslash rangle\; \backslash approx\; K^2\backslash sum\_^\backslash left\; \backslash langle\; ^\; \backslash theta\_i\; \backslash right\; \backslash rangle\; =\; \backslash frac\; K^2\; n$$The classical diffusion coefficient in momentum direction is then given in first approximation by $D\_\backslash text\; =\; \backslash frac$. Corrections coming from neglected correlation terms can actually be taken into account, leading to the improved expression^[2] $$D\_\backslash text\; =\; \backslash frac[1-2J\_2(K)+2J\_2^2(K)]$$where $J\_2$ is the Bessel function of first kind.

The quantum kicked rotator

Stroboscopic dynamics

The dynamics of the quantum kicked rotator (with wave function

| \psi(t) \rangle ) is governed by the time dependent Schrödinger's equationi\hbar (\partial)/(\partial t) | \psi(t) \rangle = \left[ (\hat{p)/(^{2}{2I}}) + K \cos \hat{\theta} \sum ^{inf ty} _{n =-inf ty} \delta \left( (t)/(T) - n \right)\right]| \psi(t) \rangle

with

[ \hat{\theta},\hat{p}] = i\hbar (or equivalently $\backslash langle\; \backslash theta\; |\; \backslash hat\; |\; \backslash psi\; \backslash rangle=\; i\backslash hbar\; \backslash frac$).

As for classical dynamics, a stroboscopic point of view can be adopted by introducing the time propagator over a kicking period

\hat{U} (that is the Floquet operator) so that |\psi(t + T) \rangle = \hat{U} |\psi(t) \rangle . After a careful integration of the time-dependent Schrödinger's equation, one finds that \hat{U} can be written as the product of two operators$$\backslash hat=\backslash exp\backslash left[-i\backslash frac\{\backslash hat\{p\}^2\; T\}\{2I\; \backslash hbar\}\backslash right]\; \backslash exp\backslash left[-i\backslash frac\{KT\}\{\backslash hbar\}\; \backslash cos\backslash hat\{\backslash theta\}\backslash right]$$We recover the classical interpretation: the dynamics of the quantum kicked rotor between two kicks is the succession of a free propagation during a time T followed by a short kick. This simple expression of the Floquet operator \hat{U} (a product of two operators, one diagonal in momentum basis, the other one diagonal in angular position basis) allows to easily numerically solve the evolution of a given wave function using split-step method.

Because of the periodic boundary conditions at

\theta = \pm \pi , any wave function | \psi \rangle can be expanded in a discrete momentum basis $|l\; \backslash rangle$ (with p = l \hbar , l integer) see Bloch theorem), so that\langle \theta | \psi \rangle = \sum ^{inf ty} _{l =-inf ty} \langle l | \psi \rangle e ^{i} \Leftrightarrow \langle l | \psi \rangle = \int ^{\pi} _{- \pi} (d x)/(2 \pi) \langle \theta | \psi \rangle e ^{-i}

Using this relation with the above expression of

\hat{U} , we find the recursion relation^[3] $$\backslash langle\; l|\; \backslash psi(t+T)\; \backslash rangle\; =\; \backslash exp\backslash left(-i\backslash frac\backslash right)\; \backslash sum\_^\backslash infty\; (-i)^\; J\_\; \backslash left(\backslash frac\; \backslash right)\; \backslash langle\; m|\; \backslash psi(t)\; \backslash rangle$$where style {J} _{n} is a Bessel function of first kind.

Dynamical localization

It has been discovered^[4] that the classical diffusion is suppressed in the quantum kicked rotator. It was later understood^{[5] [6] [7] [8]} that this is a manifestation of a quantum dynamical localization effect that parallels Anderson localization. There is a general argument^{[9] [10]} that leads to the following estimate for the breaktime of the diffusive behavior

t ^{*} ≈ D _{cl} /\hbar ^{2}

Where

D _{cl} is the classical diffusion coefficient. The associated localization scale in momentum is therefore style \sqrt{D _{cl} t ^{*}} .

Link with Anderson tight-binding model

The quantum kicked rotor can actually formally be related to the Anderson tight-binding model a celebrated Hamiltonian that describes electrons in a disordered lattice with lattice site state

|n \rangle , where Anderson localization takes place (in one dimension)$$\backslash hat\; =\; \backslash sum\_\; \backslash varepsilon\_n\; |n\; \backslash rangle\; \backslash langle\; n|\; +\; \backslash sum\_\; t\_\; |\; n\; \backslash rangle\; \backslash langle\; m\; |$$where the \varepsilon _{n} are random on-site energies, and the t _{n-m} are the hoping amplitudes between sites n and m .

In the quantum kicked rotator it can be shown,^[11] that the plane wave

| p \rangle with quantized momentum p = n \hbar play the role of the lattice sites states. The full mapping to the Anderson tight-binding model goes as follow (for a given eigenstates of the Floquet operator, with quasi-energy \omega )$$t\_n\; =\; -\; \backslash int\_^\; \backslash frac\; \backslash tan[K\; \backslash cos(x)/2]\; \backslash mathrm^\; \backslash quad\; \backslash text\; \backslash quad\; \backslash varepsilon\_n\; =\; \backslash tan(\backslash omega/2\; -\; n^2/4)$$Dynamical localization in the quantum kicked rotator then actually takes place in the momentum basis.

The effect of noise and dissipation

If noise is added to the system, the dynamical localization is destroyed, and diffusion is induced.^{[12] [13] [14]} This is somewhat similar to hopping conductance. The proper analysis requires to figure out how the dynamical correlations that are responsible for the localization effect are diminished.

Recall that the diffusion coefficient is

D _{cl} ≈ K ^{2/2} , because the change (p(t) - p( 0 )) in the momentum is the sum of quasi-random kicks K\sin(x(n)) . An exact expression for D _{cl} is obtained by calculating the "area" of the correlation function C(n) = \langle \sin(x(n))\sin(x( 0 )) \rangle , namely the sum D = K ^{2\sum} C(n) . Note that C( 0 ) =1 / 2 . The same calculation recipe holds also in the quantum mechanical case, and also if noise is added.

In the quantum case, without the noise, the area under

C(n) is zero (due to long negative tails), while with the noise a practical approximation is C(n)\mapsto C(n) e ^{- t/t _{c}} where the coherence time t _{c} is inversely proportional to the intensity of the noise. Consequently, the noise induced diffusion coefficient isD ≈ D _{cl} t ^{*} / t _{c} [ assuming t _{c} \gg t ^{*]}

Also the problem of quantum kicked rotator with dissipation (due to coupling to a thermal bath) has been considered. There is an issue here how to introduce an interaction that respects the angle periodicity of the position

x coordinate, and is still spatially homogeneous. In the first works ^{[15] [16]} a quantum-optic type interaction has been assumed that involves a momentum dependent coupling. Later^[17] a way to formulate a purely position dependent coupling, as in the Calderia-Leggett model, has been figured out, which can be regarded as the earlier version of the DLD model.

Experimental realization with cold atoms

The first experimental realizations of the quantum kicked rotator have been achieved by Mark G. Raizen group^{[18] [19]} in 1995, later followed by the Auckland group,^[20] and have encouraged a renewed interest in the theoretical analysis. In this kind of experiment, a sample of cold atoms provided by a magneto-optical trap interacts with a pulsed standing wave of light. The light being detuned with respect to the atomic transitions, atoms undergo a space-periodic conservative force. Hence, the angular dependence is replaced by a dependence on position in the experimental approach. Sub-milliKelvin cooling is necessary to obtain quantum effects: because of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, the de Broglie wavelength, i.e. the atomic wavelength, can become comparable to the light wavelength. For further information, see.^[21] Thanks to this technique, several phenomena have been investigated, including the noticeable:

• quantum Ratchets;^[22]
• the Anderson transition in 3D.^[23]

See also

• Circle map

External links

• Scholarpedia entry

Notes and References

1. Zheng. Yindong. Kobe. Donald H.. Anomalous momentum diffusion in the classical kicked rotor. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals. 28. 2. 2006. 395–402. 0960-0779. 10.1016/j.chaos.2005.05.053. 2006CSF....28..395Z.
2. Book: Ott, Edward . Chaos in dynamical systems . 2008 . Cambridge Univ. Press . 978-0-521-81196-5 . 316041428.
3. Zheng. Yindong. Kobe. Donald H.. Momentum diffusion of the quantum kicked rotor: Comparison of Bohmian and standard quantum mechanics. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals. 34. 4. 2007. 1105–1113. 0960-0779. 10.1016/j.chaos.2006.04.065. 2007CSF....34.1105Z.
4. G. Casati, B.V. Chirikov, F.M. Izrailev and J. Ford,in Stochastic Behaviour in classical and Quantum Hamiltonian Systems, Vol. 93 of Lecture Notes in Physics, edited by G. Casati and J. Ford (Springer, N.Y. 1979), p. 334
5. Fishman. Shmuel. Grempel. D. R.. Prange. R. E.. Chaos, Quantum Recurrences, and Anderson Localization. Physical Review Letters. 49. 8. 1982. 509–512. 0031-9007. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.509. 1982PhRvL..49..509F.
6. Grempel. D. R.. Prange. R. E.. Fishman. Shmuel. Quantum dynamics of a nonintegrable system. Physical Review A. 29. 4. 1984. 1639–1647. 0556-2791. 10.1103/PhysRevA.29.1639. 1984PhRvA..29.1639G.
7. Fishman. Shmuel. Prange. R. E.. Griniasty. Meir. Scaling theory for the localization length of the kicked rotor. Physical Review A. 39. 4. 1989. 1628–1633. 0556-2791. 10.1103/PhysRevA.39.1628. 9901416. 1989PhRvA..39.1628F.
8. Fishman. Shmuel. Grempel. D. R.. Prange. R. E.. Temporal crossover from classical to quantal behavior near dynamical critical points. Physical Review A. 36. 1. 1987. 289–305. 0556-2791. 10.1103/PhysRevA.36.289. 9898683. 1987PhRvA..36..289F.
9. B.V. Chirikov, F.M. Izrailev and D.L. Shepelyansky, Sov. Sci. Rev. 2C, 209 (1981).
10. Shepelyansky. D.L.. Localization of diffusive excitation in multi-level systems. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena. 28. 1–2. 1987. 103–114. 0167-2789. 10.1016/0167-2789(87)90123-0. 1987PhyD...28..103S.
11. Fishman . Shmuel . Grempel . D. R. . Prange . R. E. . 1982-08-23 . Chaos, Quantum Recurrences, and Anderson Localization . Physical Review Letters . 49 . 8 . 509–512 . 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.509. 1982PhRvL..49..509F .
12. Ott. E.. Antonsen. T. M.. Hanson. J. D.. Effect of Noise on Time-Dependent Quantum Chaos. Physical Review Letters. 53. 23. 1984. 2187–2190. 0031-9007. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.2187. 1984PhRvL..53.2187O.
13. Cohen. Doron. Quantum chaos, dynamical correlations, and the effect of noise on localization. Physical Review A. 44. 4. 1991. 2292–2313. 1050-2947. 10.1103/PhysRevA.44.2292. 9906211. 1991PhRvA..44.2292C.
14. Cohen. Doron. Localization, dynamical correlations, and the effect of colored noise on coherence. Physical Review Letters. 67. 15. 1991. 1945–1948. 0031-9007. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.1945. 10044295. chao-dyn/9909016. 1991PhRvL..67.1945C.
15. Dittrich. T.. Graham. R.. Quantization of the kicked rotator with dissipation. Zeitschrift für Physik B. 62. 4. 1986. 515–529. 0722-3277. 10.1007/BF01303584. 1986ZPhyB..62..515D. 189792730.
16. Dittrich. T. Graham. R. Long time behavior in the quantized standard map with dissipation. Annals of Physics. 200. 2. 1990. 363–421. 0003-4916. 10.1016/0003-4916(90)90279-W. 1990AnPhy.200..363D.
17. Cohen. D. Noise, dissipation and the classical limit in the quantum kicked-rotator problem. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General. 27. 14. 1994. 4805–4829. 0305-4470. 10.1088/0305-4470/27/14/011. 1994JPhA...27.4805C.
18. Moore . F. L. . Robinson . J. C. . Bharucha . C. F. . Sundaram . Bala . Raizen . M. G. . 1995-12-18 . Atom Optics Realization of the Quantum $\ensuremath$-Kicked Rotor . Physical Review Letters . 75 . 25 . 4598–4601 . 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.4598. 10059950 .
19. Klappauf. B. G.. Oskay. W. H.. Steck. D. A.. Raizen. M. G.. Observation of Noise and Dissipation Effects on Dynamical Localization. Physical Review Letters. 81. 6. 1998. 1203–1206. 0031-9007. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1203. 1998PhRvL..81.1203K.
20. Ammann. H.. Gray. R.. Shvarchuck. I.. Christensen. N.. Quantum Delta-Kicked Rotor: Experimental Observation of Decoherence. Physical Review Letters. 80. 19. 1998. 4111–4115. 0031-9007. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4111. 1998PhRvL..80.4111A.
21. M. Raizen in New directions in quantum chaos, Proceedings of the International School of Physics Enrico Fermi, Course CXLIII, Edited by G. Casati, I. Guarneri and U. Smilansky (IOS Press, Amsterdam 2000).
22. Gommers. R.. Denisov. S.. Renzoni. F.. Quasiperiodically Driven Ratchets for Cold Atoms. Physical Review Letters. 96. 24. 2006. 240604. 0031-9007. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.240604. 16907228. cond-mat/0610262. 2006PhRvL..96x0604G. 36630433.
23. Chabé. Julien. Lemarié. Gabriel. Grémaud. Benoît. Delande. Dominique. Szriftgiser. Pascal. Garreau. Jean Claude. Experimental Observation of the Anderson Metal-Insulator Transition with Atomic Matter Waves. Physical Review Letters. 101. 25. 2008. 0031-9007. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.255702. 0709.4320. 19113725. 255702. 2008PhRvL.101y5702C. 773761.