Kho-Bwa languages explained

Kho-Bwa
Also Known As:Kamengic
Bugunish
Region:Arunachal Pradesh
Familycolor:Sino-Tibetan
Fam1:Sino-Tibetan?
Child1:Sherdukpen
Child2:Sartang
Child3:Chug (Duhumbi)
Child4:Lish (Khispi)
Child5:? Puroik
Child6:? Bugun
Glotto:khob1235
Glottorefname:Kho-Bwa

The Kho-Bwa languages, also known as Kamengic, are a small family of languages spoken in Arunachal Pradesh, northeast India. The name Kho-Bwa was originally proposed by George van Driem (2001). It is based on the reconstructed words *kho ("water") and *bwa ("fire"). Blench (2011) suggests the name Kamengic, from the Kameng area of Arunachal Pradesh. Alternatively, Anderson (2014)[1] refers to Kho-Bwa as Northeast Kamengic.

Both Van Driem and Blench group the Sherdukpen (or Mey), Lishpa (or Khispi), Chug (Duhumbi) and Sartang languages together. These form a language cluster and are clearly related.The Sulung (or Puroik) and Khowa (or Bugun) languages are included in the family by Van Driem (2001) but provisionally treated as language isolates, with no demonstrated genetic relationship to Kamengic, by Blench (2023).[2]

These languages have traditionally been placed in the Tibeto-Burman group by the Linguistic Survey of India, but the justification of this is open to question.The languages have certainly been strongly influenced by the neighboring Sino-Tibetan languages, but this does not necessarily imply genetic unity and may possibly be a purely areal effect.[3]

The entire language family has about 15,000 speakers (including Puroik) or about 10,000 speakers (excluding Puroik), according to estimates made during the 2000s.

Word lists and sociolinguistic surveys of Kho-Bwa languages have also been conducted by Abraham, et al. (2018).

Classification

The internal structure of the Kho-Bwa group of languages is as follows.

Lieberherr & Bodt (2017)

Lieberherr & Bodt (2017)[4] consider Puroik to be a Kho-Bwa language, and classify the Kho-Bwa languages as follows.

Tresoldi et al. (2022)

Based on computational phylogenetic analyses from Tresoldi et al. (2022), the phylogenetic tree of Kho-Bwa is roughly as follows:[5]

Vocabulary

The following table of Kho-Bwa basic vocabulary items is from Blench (2015).[6]

GlossMey (Shergaon)Mey (Rupa)Sartang (Jergaon)Sartang (Rahung)Lish (Khispi)Chug (Duhumbi)
onehǎn han hèn hân hin hin
twoɲǐt ɲik nìk ɲes niʃ
threeùŋ ùŋ ùún ʔum om
fourpʰʃì bsi psì pʰəhi psi
fivekʰù kʰu kʰù kʰu kʰa kʰa
sixʧùk kit ʧìk ʨěy ʧʰuʔ ʧyk
sevenʃìt sit sìk sǐ, sě ʃis his
eightsàʤát sarʤat sàrgè sàrʤɛ́ saɾgeʔ saɾgeʔ
ninetʰkʰí dʰikʰi tʰkʰì tɛ̀kʰɯ́ ṱʰikʰu ṱʰikʰu
tensɔ̀ ̃ sã̀ ʃan ʃan
headkʰruk kʰruk kʰrǔk kʰruʔ kʰoloʔ kʰloʔ
nosenupʰuŋ nəfuŋ nfùŋ apʰuŋ hempoŋ heŋpʰoŋ
eyekhibi kivi kábì kʰaʔby kʰumu kʰum
earkʰtùŋ gtʰiŋ gtʰìŋ ktèíŋ kʰutʰuŋ kʰutʰuŋ
tonguelaphõ lapon ? le loi loi
toothnuthuŋ tokʧe mísìŋ nitʰiŋ ʃiŋtuŋ hintuŋ
armik ik ìk ik hu hut
leglapon lɛ̌ lɛ̌ lei lai
bellyʃrìŋ sliŋ srìŋ sriŋ hiɲiŋ hiliŋ
boneskìk skik àhík skik ʃukuʃ ʃukuʃ
bloodha(a) hɛ̀ ha hoi hoi
facedòŋpù bo mi zə̀í doʔ doŋpa
toothntùŋ tokʧe mísìŋ ptə̀íŋ ʃiŋtuŋ hintuŋ
stomachàlà karbu ʧàk phriŋ hiɲiŋ hiliŋ
mouthʧàw nəʧaw so ʨʨǒ hoʧok kʰoʧu
rainʧuuma nimi nʧʰù ʧuʧuba namu namu

See also

Further reading

References

Notes and References

  1. Anderson, Gregory D.S. 2014. On the classification of the Hruso (Aka) language. Paper presented at the 20th Himalayan Languages Symposium, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
  2. https://www.academia.edu/95056998/What_is_the_evidence_that_the_isolate_languages_of_Arunachal_Pradesh_are_genuinely_Trans_Himalayan What is the evidence that the isolate languages of Arunachal Pradesh are genuinely Trans-Himalayan?
  3. Blench (2011): "Certainly, the phonology and morphology of Arunachali languages looks superficially like Tibeto-Burman, which explains their placing in the Linguistic Survey of India. Unfortunately, this is rather where matters have remained [... this paper] proposes we should take seriously the underlying presumption probably implied in Konow's statement in Linguistic Survey of India. Volume III, 1, Tibeto-Burman family, Calcutta (1909:572)
  4. Lieberherr, Ismael; Bodt, Timotheus Adrianus. 2017. Sub-grouping Kho-Bwa based on shared core vocabulary. In Himalayan Linguistics, 16(2).
  5. Book: Tiago Tresoldi . Christoph Rzymski . Robert Forkel . Simon J. Greenhill . Johann-Mattis List . Russell D. Gray . The Open Handbook of Linguistic Data Management. Managing Historical Linguistic Data for Computational Phylogenetics and Computer-Assisted Language Comparison. The MIT Press. 2022. 345–354 . 10.7551/mitpress/12200.003.0033. 978-0-262-36607-6 .
  6. Blench, Roger. 2015. The Mey languages and their classification. Presentation given at the University of Sydney, 21 August 2015.