Key Biodiversity Area Explained

Key Biodiversity Areas (KBA) are geographical regions that have been determined to be of international importance in terms of biodiversity conservation, using globally standardized criteria published by the IUCN as part of a collaboration between scientists, conservation groups, and government bodies across the world.[1] The purpose of Key Biodiversity Areas is to identify regions that are in need of protection by governments or other agencies. KBAs extend the Important Bird Area (IBA) concept to other taxonomic groups and are now being identified in many parts of the world. Examples of types of KBAs include Important Plant Areas (IPAs), Ecologically and Biologically Significant Areas (EBSAs) in the High Seas, Alliance for Zero Extinction (AZE) sites, Prime Butterfly Areas, Important Mammal Areas and Important Sites for Freshwater Biodiversity, with prototype criteria developed for freshwater molluscs and fish and for marine systems. The determination of KBAs often brings sites onto the conservation agenda that hadn't previously been identified as needing protection due to the nature of the two non-exclusive criteria used to determine them; vulnerability; and irreplaceability.[2]

The KBA global standard [3] was published in 2016.

Objectives

Criteria

The criteria for what can qualify as a KBA is one or more of the following:

  1. Contains a significant number of endangered species relative to the global population; contains ecosystems that are threatened on a global scale
  2. Contains species, taxonomic groups, or ecosystems that are confined to small geographic zones
  3. Is relatively untouched by human activity
  4. Holds congregations of species at important life stages, such as "breeding, feeding or during migration"[5] or the spawning of offspring; is a "refuge" where species retreat from temporary negative environmental conditions
  5. Has a high level of irreplaceability, or "how close a site is to being essential for achieving conservation targets"

Reception

The KBA standard has been applied around the globe to over 16,000 areas with a total 21,000,000 km2,[6] which can be viewed in map form.[7] It is used by scientists to assess fragmentation and habitat loss in vulnerable areas,[8] [9] [10] [11] and is generally seen as an effective method of identifying areas in need of protection.[12]

Some criticism involves the scale of KBAs, such as the use of global data to set parameters for single regions or ecosystems, as well as the lack of involvement of local governments and other authorities- especially in developing countries- in their implementation.[13] Other issues raised include the defining of conservation strictly in terms of location, and the naming of single species as important to the environment rather than the interconnectivity between species and doesn't prioritize areas that are dense in biological diversity.[14] Some argue, however, that KBAs are meant to be a "focused response to a central problem in conservation"[15]

Notes and References

  1. Book: A global standard for the identification of Key Biodiversity Areas : version 1.0 . 2016 . IUCN . 978-2-8317-1835-4 . en.
  2. Stattersfield, A J, et al. Endemic Bird Areas of the World. Priorities for Biodiversity Conservation (Cambridge: BirdLife International, 1998)
  3. Book: A global standard for the identification of Key Biodiversity Areas : version 1.0. 2016. IUCN. 978-2-8317-1835-4. en.
  4. Eken, Güven et al. Key biodiversity areas: Identifying the world's priority sites for conservation – lessons learned from Turkey The Gaps Guide: http://www.protectedareas.info/upload/document Accessed: 28 April 2011
  5. Book: A global standard for the identification of Key Biodiversity Areas : version 1.0 . 2016 . IUCN . 978-2-8317-1835-4 . en.
  6. Web site: KBA Data . 2024-04-08 . www.keybiodiversityareas.org.
  7. Web site: Map Search . 2024-04-08 . www.keybiodiversityareas.org.
  8. Kullberg . Peter . Di Minin . Enrico . Moilanen . Atte . 2019-10-01 . Using key biodiversity areas to guide effective expansion of the global protected area network . Global Ecology and Conservation . 20 . e00768 . 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00768 . 2351-9894. free .
  9. Simkins . Ashley T. . Beresford . Alison E. . Buchanan . Graeme M. . Crowe . Olivia . Elliott . Wendy . Izquierdo . Pablo . Patterson . David J. . Butchart . Stuart H. M. . 2023-05-01 . A global assessment of the prevalence of current and potential future infrastructure in Key Biodiversity Areas . Biological Conservation . 281 . 109953 . 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.109953 . 0006-3207. free .
  10. Crowe . Olivia . Beresford . Alison E. . Buchanan . Graeme M. . Grantham . Hedley S. . Simkins . Ashley T. . Watson . James E. M. . Butchart . Stuart H. M. . 2023-10-01 . A global assessment of forest integrity within Key Biodiversity Areas . Biological Conservation . 286 . 110293 . 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110293 . 0006-3207.
  11. Yang . Runjia . Dong . Xinyu . Xu . Suchen . Wang . Kechao . Li . Xiaoya . Xiao . Wu . Ye . Yanmei . 2024-02-01 . Fragmentation of Key Biodiversity Areas highlights attention to human disturbance patterns . Biological Conservation . 290 . 110428 . 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110428 . 0006-3207.
  12. Maxwell . Jessica . Allen . Simon . Brooks . Thomas . Cuttelod . Annabelle . Dudley . Nigel . Fisher . Janet . Langhammer . Penny . Patenaude . Genevieve . Woodley . Stephen . 2018-11-01 . Engaging end-users to inform the development of the global standard for the identification of key biodiversity areas . Environmental Science & Policy . 89 . 273–282 . 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.07.019 . 1462-9011. 20.500.11820/87a6cf7b-ae58-4001-ae4d-03ddd5f139dd . free .
  13. Andrew T. Knight, Robert J. Smith, Richard M. Cowling, Philip G. Desmet, Daniel P. Faith, Simon Ferrier, Caroline M. Gelderblom, Hedley Grantham, Amanda T. Lombard, Kristal Maze, Jeanne L. Nel, Jeffrey D. Parrish, Genevieve Q. K. Pence, Hugh P. Possingham, Belinda Reyers, Mathieu Rouget, Dirk Roux, Kerrie A. Wilson, Improving the Key Biodiversity Areas Approach for Effective Conservation Planning, BioScience, Volume 57, Issue 3, March 2007, Pages 256–261, https://doi.org/10.1641/B570309
  14. Farooq . Harith . Antonelli . Alexandre . Faurby . Søren . 2023-01-01 . A call for improving the Key Biodiversity Areas framework . Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation . 21 . 1 . 85–91 . 10.1016/j.pecon.2023.02.002 . 2530-0644. free .
  15. Leon Bennun, Mohamed Bakarr, Güven Eken, Gustavo A. B. Da Fonseca, Clarifying the Key Biodiversity Areas Approach, BioScience, Volume 57, Issue 8, September 2007, Page 645, https://doi.org/10.1641/B570816 rather than a catch-all solution. Criteria may also be too broad, as one analysis found that between 26% and 68% of all terrestrial land on Earth could be classified as a KBA.

    See also

    External links

    ]

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Key Biodiversity Area".

Except where otherwise indicated, Everything.Explained.Today is © Copyright 2009-2024, A B Cryer, All Rights Reserved. Cookie policy.