Kerala Education Act 1958 (Act 6 of 1959) explained

The Education Bill[1] was introduced in the Kerala assembly by Professor Joseph Mundasseri, who was then the education minister for the first elected (1957) Communist Party of India government.[2] This bill was aimed at eradicating the malpractices prevalent in the private sector educational institutes, and attempted to regulate the educational institutions' function, including standardizing syllabi and pay structures.[3] The Syrian Christian church and Nair Service Society, along with opposition parties, including Indian National Congress, started the political struggle to overthrow the E. M. S. Namboodiripad government.[4]

The Education Bill sought to regulate appointments and conditions of teachers. Salaries of teachers were to be paid through the treasury. There was a provision of takeover of management of educational institutions, which arguably violated the constitution.[5] [6] Nevertheless, the Supreme Court rejected the appeal and the bill received the assent of the president of India.

Even though the Education Bill failed to pass through the Assembly, many of its provisions were later implemented by subsequent governments with amendments.[7]

References

http://firstministry.kerala.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/pdf/bills/k_edu_bl.pdf

Notes and References

  1. Web site: The Kerala Education Bill (L. A. Bill No. 14 of 1957). 30 October 2012. https://web.archive.org/web/20150924013354/http://www.firstministry.kerala.gov.in/pdf/bills/k_edu_bl.pdf. 24 September 2015. dead.
  2. Book: Raveendran, P. P.. 2002. Joseph Mundasseri. New Delhi. Sahitya Akademi. 81. 978-81-260-1535-1.
  3. Book: Mathew. A.. 2003. Education in Kerala at Cross Roads: Some Critical Aspects. Tilak, Jandhyala B. G.. Education, Society, and Development: National and International Perspectives. New Delhi. A.P.H. Pub. Corp. for National Institute of Educational Planning and Administration. 357 - 366, page 365. 978-81-7648-526-5.
  4. Book: Guha, Ramachandra. 2011. India After Gandhi: The History of the World's Largest Democracy. London. Pan Macmillan. 293. 978-0-330-39611-0.
  5. In the premises, they may, in our opinion, legitimately complain that so far as the grants under Art. 337 are concerned, the provisions of the clauses of the Bill mentioned in question 2 do in substance and effect infringe their fundamental rights under Art. 30(1) and are to that extent void. Paragraph 44 But no rule to be framed under clause 36(2)(c) can nullify the constitutional infirmity of clause 3(5) read with clause 20 which is calculated to infringe the fundamental rights of minority communities in respect of recognised schools to be established after the commencement of the said Bill. Paragraph 48Web site: Das, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of India. In Re: The Kerala Education Bill, ... vs Unknown on 22 May, 1958. 1959 1 SCR 995. https://web.archive.org/web/20101114000342/http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/161666/. 14 November 2010. live.
  6. Book: Rai, Udai Raj. 2011. Fundamental Rights and Their Enforcement. New Delhi. PHI Learning. 648 - 651. 978-81-203-4432-7.
  7. Book: Indian Planning Commission. 2008. Kerala Development Report. New Delhi. Academic Foundation. 63–64. 978-81-7188-594-7.