Kempner function explained

In number theory, the Kempner function

S(n)

[1]

Notes and References

  1. E. . Lucas . François Édouard Anatole Lucas . Question Nr. 288 . . 3 . 232 . 1883.
  2. J. . Neuberg . Joseph Jean Baptiste Neuberg . Solutions de questions proposées, Question Nr. 288 . . 7 . 68–69 . 1887.
  3. The smallest factorial that is a multiple of (solution to problem 6674). The American Mathematical Monthly. 101. 1994. 179. Paul. Erdős. Paul Erdős. Ilias. Kastanas. 10.2307/2324376. 2324376 . .
  4. Called the Kempner numbers in the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences: see A002034 . Kempner numbers: smallest number m such that n divides m!}} is defined for a given positive integer

    n

    to be the smallest number

    s

    such that

    n

    divides the For example, the number

    8

    does not divide

    1!

    ,

    2!

    , but does

    This function has the property that it has a highly inconsistent growth rate: it grows linearly on the prime numbers but only grows sublogarithmically at the factorial numbers.

    History

    This function was first considered by François Édouard Anatole Lucas in 1883,[1] followed by Joseph Jean Baptiste Neuberg in 1887.[2] In 1918, A. J. Kempner gave the first correct algorithm for

    The Kempner function is also sometimes called the Smarandache function following Florentin Smarandache's rediscovery of the function

    Properties

    Since

    n

    S(n)

    is always at A number

    n

    greater than 4 is a prime number if and only That is, the numbers

    n

    for which

    S(n)

    is as large as possible relative to

    n

    are the primes. In the other direction, the numbers for which

    S(n)

    is as small as possible are the factorials: for

    S(n)

    is the smallest possible degree of a monic polynomial with integer coefficients, whose values over the integers are all divisible For instance, the fact that

    S(6)=3

    means that there is a cubic polynomial whose values are all zero modulo 6, for instance the polynomialx(x-1)(x-2)=x^3-3x^2+2x,but that all quadratic or linear polynomials (with leading coefficient one) are nonzero modulo 6 at some integers.

    In one of the advanced problems in The American Mathematical Monthly, set in 1991 and solved in 1994, Paul Erdős pointed out that the function

    S(n)

    coincides with the largest prime factor of

    n

    for "almost all"

    n

    (in the sense that the asymptotic density of the set of exceptions is zero).[3]

    Computational complexity

    The Kempner function

    S(n)

    of an arbitrary number

    n

    is the maximum, over the prime powers

    pe

    dividing

    n

    , of

    S(pe)

    .When

    n

    is itself a prime power

    pe

    , its Kempner function may be found in polynomial time by sequentially scanning the multiples of

    p

    until finding the first one whose factorial contains enough multiples The same algorithm can be extended to any

    n

    whose prime factorization is already known, by applying it separately to each prime power in the factorization and choosing the one that leads to the largest value.

    For a number of the form

    n=px

    , where

    p

    is prime and

    x

    is less than

    p

    , the Kempner function of

    n

    is

    p

    . It follows from this that computing the Kempner function of a semiprime (a product of two primes) is computationally equivalent to finding its prime factorization, believed to be a difficult problem. More generally, whenever

    n

    is a composite number, the greatest common divisor of

    S(n)

    will necessarily be a nontrivial divisor allowing

    n

    to be factored by repeated evaluations of the Kempner function. Therefore, computing the Kempner function can in general be no easier than factoring composite numbers.

    References and notes

    ]

    .