Kala azar in India explained

Kala azar (Visceral leishmaniasis) in India refers to the special circumstances of the disease kala azar as it exists in India. Kala azar is a major health problem in India with an estimated 146,700 new cases per year as of 2012.[1] In the disease a parasite causes sickness after migrating to internal organs such as the liver, spleen and bone marrow. If left untreated the disease almost always results in the death. Signs and symptoms include fever, weight loss, fatigue, anemia, and substantial swelling of the liver and spleen.

People get the disease from the bites of sandflies which themselves got a parasite from drinking blood of another person infected with the parasite. Globally there are more than 20 different Leishmania parasites which cause the disease and 90 species of sandfly which spread those parasites.[2] In the Indian subcontinent, however, there is only one common species of parasite, Leishmania donovani and only one species of sandfly, Phlebotomus argentipes, which spreads the disease.[3] The form of the disease, the medicine for eliminating the parasite, and insecticide for preventing the insect bite varies by region, and there are recommendations in place for India.

Besides the personal cost, the disease has a great economic cost to the affected communities and India in general.

Types

A 2012 report based on 2004-8 data estimated that the number of new annual cases of kala azar was at least 146,000 in India, 12,000 in Bangladesh, and 3,000 in Nepal.[1] Among all the people the subcontinent carrying infection, 10% have kala azar, 10% have PKDL, and 80% are asymptomatic.[4]

Kala azar

See main article: Visceral leishmaniasis. Kala azar, also called visceral leishmaniasis, is a disease in which a parasite migrates to the internal organs such as the liver, spleen (hence "visceral"), and bone marrow. If left untreated, will almost always result in the death of the host. Signs and symptoms include fever, weight loss, fatigue, anemia, and substantial swelling of the liver and spleen.

Among people with kala azar, there is variation in the symptoms, and some people can have unusual symptoms.[5]

Asymptomatic kala azar

Asymptomatic kala azar (also called asymptomatic Leishmania infection) occurs when someone has the infection but does not show symptoms.[6]

For every 1 person with kala azar symptoms, 4–17 people may have asymptomatic kala azar.[6] Risk of asymptomatic kala azar is high for anyone in close contact with a person with kala azar.[6] Most people who would test positive for asymptomatic kala azar will clear the infection naturally.[6] Between 1–23% of asymptomatic people will develop kala azar within 1 year.[6]

Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis

See main article: Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) is a complication of visceral leishmaniasis (VL); it is characterised by a macular, maculopapular, and nodular rash in a patient who has recovered from VL and who is otherwise well. Despite being called "post kala azar", 29% of cases appear from people who never had kala azar, and who had an asymptomatic infection previously.[6]

Vector

In various places in the world different sandflies transmit different Leishmania parasites which cause different variations of kala azar. In the Indian subcontinent the particular sandfly is Phlebotomus argentipes and it transmits Leishmania donovani. One part of preventing the disease in India is preventing the insect bite.[3]

A challenge with preventing the insect bite is lack of ecological data and lack of information about the life of the insect. Ecological information which would predict when and where sandflies live include temperature, rain, wind speed, Relative humidity, soil moisture, pH, and total organic carbon.[7] If that information were available, then it would be easier to study when insects bite, how they choose to bite either animals or humans, and where they breed.[7] Knowing about insect life and behavior would increase efficiency and lower cost of public health programmes to prevent kala azar.[7]

Using insecticide treated nets in 90% of the households in districts with kala azar could be an effective part of controlling the spread of disease.[3]

There is no evidence that animals are a major concern for spread of kala azar.[8] Tests of cattle, buffalo, chickens, wild rats, and dogs found little or no infection.[8] There is some evidence that goats could be reservoirs of infection.[8]

Treatment

Kala azar is a community problem and requires individual and community participation in treatment. Treatment starts with healthcare workers seeking people with the disease. There is testing in clinics but also in the field. Preferred treatment is a single injection of liposomal amphotericin B at a clinic on the same day as testing and diagnosis. By doing everything in one visit, people will be able to easily complete treatment. Even after treatment, people may require a follow up including some combination therapy. Some people may require an alternative therapy and other drugs are effective.

Miltefosine is the only available oral medication available for VL and PKDL.[9] While the drug works for short term treatment of VL, PKDL would require a longer treatment of more than 28 days with this drug.[9] Miltefosine is not recommended for use as a monotherapy to treat PKDL.[9]

Elimination of disease

The eradication of kala azar in India is achievable and there are favorable circumstances for doing so.[3] Humans are the only reservoir host in this region for the parasite causing the disease.[3] The only way the disease spreads from human to human is by one insect in the region, Phlebotomus argentipes.[3] the disease only existed in 109 districts in India, Bangladesh, and Nepal.[3] The disease is easy to diagnose, even in the field and outside of a clinic.[3] When testing identifies a patient with the condition, then available drugs are completely effective in removing the parasite.[3]

The current goal for eliminating the disease is to have its rate below 1 in 10,000 people by 2020.[10]

One part of the elimination strategy was to reduce sandflies as a vector by giving mosquito nets treated with DDT along with programs for early case detection and treatment.[11] [12]

Challenges

Major challenges in eliminating kala azar is lack of access to health care, planning for drug resistance, the absence of a kala azar vaccine, and the difficulty in controlling the insect spreading the infection.[13] Progress in diagnosis, treatment, and the development of a vaccine is significant and is guiding the elimination planning.[13] A program to eliminate kala azar would only work with strong support from local communities.[13] Public health surveillance is necessary for years to identify cases as soon as possible for treatment and to prevent spread.[13]

Humans with the parasite are reservoirs of infection which could revive the disease even if it seems eliminated.[6] People with asymptomatic kala azar can still spread the disease and so can people who seem cured of kala azar, but who later development PKDL.[6]

Potential great dangers to elimination are drug resistance and pesticide resistance and a need for pharmacovigilance to ensure drug safety for using the medications.[14]

Public health programs

The India National Health Policy, 2002 set a goal to eliminate kala azar by 2010.[15] The Central Government of India started supporting states with case registration in 2003.[16] In 2005 the governments of India, Nepal, and Bangladesh started an initiative with the World Health Organization to collaborate in eliminating kala azar in the region.

India changed the target year to 2015.[15] When the year came there was uncertainty that the goal would be met.[17] In February 2015 the health ministers of India, Bangladesh, and Nepal joined with the health ministers of Thailand and Bhutan to set a new target date to eliminate kala azar by 2017.

History

India has long been involved in drug development for kala azar.[18]

William Twining, an East India Company military physician, wrote a modern medical description of kala azar in 1835.[19]

In 1903 William Boog Leishman, a British Army medical officer, reported from Dum Dum near Calcutta identifying parasites which cause kala azar.[20] [21] His report was correct, and scientists gave his name to the parasite Leishmania and to the Western name of the disease, leishmaniasis.[21]

Bengali physician and scientist Upendranath Brahmachari treated, researched, and published about kala-azar until his death in 1946.[22]

India's National Malaria Eradication Programme was using DDT between 1953 and 1964 as the insecticide to prevent malaria.[23] DDT is highly effective was banned for also being toxic to humans and the environment.[23] When India was using DDT, that effort to reduce malaria also killed sandflies and prevented kala azar.[23] [24] After 1964 and the halt of DDT use, kala azar returned, but physicians no longer recognized the disease after its absence.[23]

From about 1960–1975, there were no records of kala azar in the subcontinent.[25] In 1978 in Nepal, people reported the disease.[25] From 1980 the disease spread among many people.[25]

Special populations

Quackery is common enough to be a significant problem in treating the disease. The government seeks to make official clinics accessible, but many people take services from unlicensed medical practitioners.[14] [26]

Men are more likely than women to get kala azar.[27]

Children with kala azar have the same symptoms as adults.[28] Miltefosine is as effective and well tolerated as a treatment in children as adults and can be a first line treatment.[29] 90% of the cases of kala azar are in Bihar, and children there have the burden of 50% of the loss of disability adjusted life years.[28]

HIV-positive people have a greater risk of reinfection of kala azar.[30] [31]

Further consideration

External links

Notes and References

  1. Alvar . Jorge . Vélez . Iván D. . Bern . Caryn . Herrero . Mercé . Desjeux . Philippe . Cano . Jorge . Jannin . Jean . Boer . Margriet den . Kirk . Martyn . Leishmaniasis Worldwide and Global Estimates of Its Incidence . PLOS ONE . 31 May 2012 . 7 . 5 . e35671 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0035671. 22693548 . 3365071 . 2012PLoSO...735671A . free .
  2. Web site: World Health Organization . Leishmaniasis Fact Sheet . www.who.int . World Health Organization . en . 14 March 2019.
  3. Joshi . AB . Das . ML . Akhter . S . Chowdhury . R . Mondal . D . Kumar . V . Das . P . Kroeger . A . Boelaert . M . Petzold . M . Chemical and environmental vector control as a contribution to the elimination of visceral leishmaniasis on the Indian subcontinent: cluster randomized controlled trials in Bangladesh, India and Nepal. . BMC Medicine . 5 October 2009 . 7 . 54 . 10.1186/1741-7015-7-54 . 19804620. 2763005 . free .
  4. Le Rutte. Epke A.. Coffeng. Luc E.. Bontje. Daniel M.. Hasker. Epco C.. Ruiz Postigo. José A.. Argaw. Daniel. Boelaert. Marleen C.. De Vlas. Sake J.. Feasibility of eliminating visceral leishmaniasis from the Indian subcontinent: explorations with a set of deterministic age-structured transmission models. Parasites & Vectors. 9. 1. 24. 2016. 1756-3305. 10.1186/s13071-016-1292-0. 26787302. 4717541 . free .
  5. Thakur . L . Singh . KK . Shanker . V . Negi . A . Jain . A . Matlashewski . G . Jain . M . Atypical leishmaniasis: A global perspective with emphasis on the Indian subcontinent. . PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases . September 2018 . 12 . 9 . e0006659 . 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006659 . 30260957. 6159859 . free .
  6. Hirve . S . Boelaert . M . Matlashewski . G . Mondal . D . Arana . B . Kroeger . A . Olliaro . P . Transmission Dynamics of Visceral Leishmaniasis in the Indian Subcontinent – A Systematic Literature Review. . PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases . August 2016 . 10 . 8 . e0004896 . 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004896 . 27490264. 4973965 . free .
  7. Chowdhury . R . Kumar . V . Mondal . D . Das . ML . Das . P . Dash . AP . Kroeger . A . Implication of vector characteristics of Phlebotomus argentipes in the kala-azar elimination programme in the Indian sub-continent. . Pathogens and Global Health . May 2016 . 110 . 3 . 87–96 . 10.1080/20477724.2016.1180775 . 27376500. 4940889 .
  8. Singh . Niti . Mishra . Jyotsna . Singh . Ram . Singh . Sarman . Animal Reservoirs of Visceral Leishmaniasis in India . The Journal of Parasitology . 2013 . 99 . 1 . 64–67 . 0022-3395. 23355018 . 10.1645/GE-3085.1 . 22765517 . 41464582 .
  9. Pijpers . J . den Boer . ML . Essink . DR . Ritmeijer . K . The safety and efficacy of miltefosine in the long-term treatment of post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis in South Asia - A review and meta-analysis. . PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases . February 2019 . 13 . 2 . e0007173 . 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007173 . 30742620. 6386412 . free .
  10. Sundar . S . Singh . OP . Chakravarty . J . Visceral leishmaniasis elimination targets in India, strategies for preventing resurgence. . Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy . November 2018 . 16 . 11 . 805–812 . 10.1080/14787210.2018.1532790 . 30289007. 6345646 .
  11. Ostyn . B . Vanlerberghe . V . Picado . A . Dinesh . DS . Sundar . S . Chappuis . F . Rijal . S . Dujardin . JC . Coosemans . M . Boelaert . M . Davies . C . Vector control by insecticide-treated nets in the fight against visceral leishmaniasis in the Indian subcontinent, what is the evidence? . Tropical Medicine & International Health . August 2008 . 13 . 8 . 1073–85 . 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02110.x . 18564350. 2471946 . free .
  12. Rijal . Suman . Sundar . Shyam . Mondal . Dinesh . Das . Pradeep . Alvar . Jorge . Boelaert . Marleen . Eliminating visceral leishmaniasis in South Asia: the road ahead . BMJ . 364 . 22 January 2019 . k5224 . 10.1136/bmj.k5224. 30670453 . 6340338 .
  13. Singh . OP . Hasker . E . Boelaert . M . Sundar . S . Elimination of visceral leishmaniasis on the Indian subcontinent. . The Lancet. Infectious Diseases . December 2016 . 16 . 12 . e304–e309 . 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30140-2 . 27692643. 5177523 .
  14. Bhattacharya . SK . Dash . AP . Elimination of Kala-Azar from the Southeast Asia Region. . The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene . April 2017 . 96 . 4 . 802–804 . 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0279 . 28115678. 5392624 .
  15. Thakur . C. P. . Is elimination of kala-azar feasible by 2017? . Indian Journal of Medical Research . 1 December 2016 . 144 . 6 . 799–802 . 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_335_16 . 28474615 . 5433271 . en . 0971-5916 . free .
  16. Dhillon . GP . Sharma . SN . Nair . B . Kala-azar elimination programme in India. . Journal of the Indian Medical Association . October 2008 . 106 . 10 . 664, 666–8 . 19552101.
  17. Cousins . Sophie . India unlikely to meet goal of eliminating kala-azar by 2015, say experts . BMJ . 351 . 28 July 2015 . h4117 . 10.1136/bmj.h4117. 26220177 . 39380201 .
  18. Alves . F . Bilbe . G . Blesson . S . Goyal . V . Monnerat . S . Mowbray . C . Muthoni Ouattara . G . Pécoul . B . Rijal . S . Rode . J . Solomos . A . Strub-Wourgaft . N . Wasunna . M . Wells . S . Zijlstra . EE . Arana . B . Alvar . J . Recent Development of Visceral Leishmaniasis Treatments: Successes, Pitfalls, and Perspectives. . Clinical Microbiology Reviews . October 2018 . 31 . 4 . 10.1128/CMR.00048-18 . 30158301. 6148188 .
  19. Gupta . PCS . History of Kala-Azar in India. . The Indian Medical Gazette . May 1947 . 82 . 5 . 281–286 . 29015274. 5196405 .
  20. Leishman . WB . William Boog Leishman . On the possibility of the occurrence of trypanosomiasis in India. 1903. . The Indian Journal of Medical Research . 1903 . 123 . 3 . 1252–4; discussion 79 . 16789342.
  21. Steverding . D . The history of leishmaniasis. . Parasites & Vectors . 15 February 2017 . 10 . 1 . 82 . 10.1186/s13071-017-2028-5 . 28202044. 5312593 . free .
  22. Singh . Rajinder . Roy . Syamal . U N Brahmachari: Scientific Achievements and Nomination for the Nobel Prize and the Fellowship of the Royal Society of London . Indian Journal of History of Science . 1 March 2019 . 54 . 1 . 10.16943/ijhs/2019/v54i1/49596.
  23. Web site: Rao . Menaka . India has been talking about defeating kala azar since 1947 – and now has a good chance of doing so . . 27 October 2016.
  24. Bublitz . DC . Poché . RM . Garlapati . R . Measures to Control Phlebotomus argentipes and Visceral Leishmaniasis in India. . Journal of Arthropod-borne Diseases . June 2016 . 10 . 2 . 113–26 . 27308270. 4906751 .
  25. Joshi . AB . Banjara . MR . Pokhrel . S . Jimba . M . Singhasivanon . P . Ashford . RW . Elimination of visceral leishmaniasis in Nepal: pipe-dreams and possibilities. . Kathmandu University Medical Journal (KUMJ) . 2006 . 4 . 4 . 488–96 . 18603960.
  26. Boettcher . Jan P . Siwakoti . Yubaraj . Milojkovic . Ana . Siddiqui . Niyamat A . Gurung . Chitra K . Rijal . Suman . Das . Pradeep . Kroeger . Axel . Banjara . Megha R . Visceral leishmaniasis diagnosis and reporting delays as an obstacle to timely response actions in Nepal and India . BMC Infectious Diseases . 6 February 2015 . 15 . 1 . 43 . 10.1186/s12879-015-0767-5. 25656298 . 4335691 . free .
  27. Cloots . K . Burza . S . Malaviya . P . Hasker . E . Kansal . S . Mollett . G . Chakravarty . J . Roy . N . Lal . BK . Rijal . S . Sundar . S . Boelaert . M . Male predominance in reported Visceral Leishmaniasis cases: Nature or nurture? A comparison of population-based with health facility-reported data. . PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases . 29 January 2020 . 14 . 1 . e0007995 . 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007995 . 31995564. 7010295 . free .
  28. Bhattacharya . S.K. . Sur . Dipika . Karbwang . Juntra . Childhood visceral leishmaniasis . Indian Journal of Medical Research . March 2006 . 123 . 123 . 353–356 . 16778316 .
  29. Bhattacharya . SK . Jha . TK . Sundar . S . Thakur . CP . Engel . J . Sindermann . H . Junge . K . Karbwang . J . Bryceson . AD . Berman . JD . Efficacy and tolerability of miltefosine for childhood visceral leishmaniasis in India. . Clinical Infectious Diseases . 15 January 2004 . 38 . 2 . 217–21 . 10.1086/380638 . 14699453. free .
  30. Cota . Gláucia F. . de Sousa . Marcos R. . Rabello . Ana . Jaffe . Charles L. . Predictors of Visceral Leishmaniasis Relapse in HIV-Infected Patients: A Systematic Review . PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases . 7 June 2011 . 5 . 6 . e1153 . 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001153. 21666786 . 3110161 . free .
  31. Singh . Sarman . Changing trends in the epidemiology, clinical presentation, and diagnosis of Leishmania–HIV co-infection in India . International Journal of Infectious Diseases . December 2014 . 29 . 103–112 . 10.1016/j.ijid.2014.07.011. 25449244 . free .