| Journal of Product Innovation Management | |
| Editor: | Jelena Spanjol and Charles Henry Noble |
| Abbreviation: | J. Prod. Innov. Manag. |
| Discipline: | Business, management |
| Publisher: | Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the Product Development and Management Association |
| Frequency: | Bimonthly |
| History: | 1984-present |
| Impact: | 10.5 |
| Impact-Year: | 2022 |
| Website: | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1540-5885 |
| Link1: | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1540-5885/currentissue |
| Link1-Name: | Online access |
| Link2: | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1540-5885/issues |
| Link2-Name: | online archive |
| Coden: | JPI?DD |
| Lccn: | 84644704 |
| Oclc: | 09425135 |
| Issn: | 0737-6782 |
| Eissn: | 1540-5885 |
The Journal of Product Innovation Management is a bimonthly peer-reviewed academic journal published by Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the Product Development and Management Association. The current editors-in-chief are Jelena Spanjol (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität) and Charles H. Noble (University of Tennessee).
According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2022 impact factor of 10.5. In 2020, the journal ranked 8th out of 49 journals in the category "Engineering, Industrial",[1] 35th out of 153 journals in the category "Business",[2] and 43rd out of 226 journals in the category "Management".[3]
The journal received an "A" ranking as a marketing journal by 1100 business scholars in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.[4]
In 2022 the Journal received in access of 800 manuscripts, desk rejected 59% of submissions, and Accepted 5-8%% of the submissions. The top 10 countries submitting papers were: USA (15.5%), UK (11.5%), Germany (9.3%), China (8.1%), Taiwan (7.6%), India (4.9%), Spain and Italy (3.8%), The Netherlands (3.2%), and France (3%).[5]
In 2012, the journal published a study that ranked the Henry W. Bloch School of Management (University of Missouri-Kansas City) number 1 in the world for research in innovation management.[6] [7] However, the methodology of the study and the independence of its authors was questioned.[8] [9] In March, 2015, the journal published an "expression of concern" regarding the study. However, four independent scholars had later reviewed the article and found its methodology to be acceptable.[10]