Jorge Sanjinés (born 31 July 1936) is a Bolivian film director and screenwriter. He founded the production group Grupo Ukamau. He won the ALBA Prize for Arts in 2009.[1]
Born in La Paz, Bolivia, Jorge Sanjinés brings highly political films of a revolutionary aesthetic to peasant and working-class audiences in the Andean highlands. The films that characterized the 'New Latin American Cinema' or Third Cinema provided an alternative to First (Capitalist) Cinema, making the social collective act as the protagonists of these films rather than an individual hero.[2]
The 1969 film Blood of the Condor (Yawar Mallku) by Sanjinés reveals the story of the undisclosed sterilization of Andean Indian women by a "Progress Corps" (standing in for the American Peace Corps) clinic. This film is thought to have led to the expulsion of the Peace Corps from Bolivia in an act of anti-imperialist cultural nationalism by the indigenous people.[3]
After showings of Yawar Mallku, Sanjinés learned that many peasants had criticism about the difficulty of his films due to the use of flashback for narration, as his film-making was greatly influenced by European art cinema, and about the lack of attention to denouncing the causes of the indigenous peoples' issues. He took this into account when making his next film, called El coraje del pueblo (The Courage of the People), in 1971, about the Massacre of San Juan. El coraje del pueblo worked with untrained actors, many of them peasants themselves. This marked the beginning of a stage in Sanjinés's career characterized by filming "with the people."[4]
His next film, El enemigo principal (1973)[5] explores the effects of U.S. imperialism through the relationship between wealthy landowners and the indigenous peasant population.[6]
Jorge Sanjinés worked under strained film-making conditions, with limited funding, few production facilities, and little Bolivian movie tradition to draw upon.
"Problems of Form and Content in Revolutionary Cinema" is a film manifesto written by Jorge Sanjinés in 1976 as a part of the Third Cinema Latin American film movement.[7] This manifesto, along with Glauber Rocha’s “Aesthetic of Hunger” (1965), Julio García Espinosa’s "For an Imperfect Cinema" (1969), and "Toward a Third Cinema" (1969) by Fernando Solanas and Octavio Getino.[8] are accredited to creating the Third Cinema movement.
In line with other Third Cinema manifestos, Sanjinés advocates moving away from the Hollywood notion of Auteur cinema, to a revolutionary filmmaking style intended to have a political impact.[9]
In explaining the importance of revolutionary cinema, Sanjinés makes note of the importance of using film as a method of communication in expressing revolutionary concepts. He argues that film can be a good medium for these ideas because of the widespread communicability of film. Although advocating the use of film, he makes note of the importance of being careful when using such a capitalist concept.
In the argument against Hollywood's notions of cinema, Sanjinés attempts to dissuade from the use of individualism in film. As the Third Cinema is ultimately revolutionary in concept, Sanjinés says that revolutionary films must be a collective work.
The use of language and speech, as a revolutionary tool is talked about in depth in this manifesto. The idea of script is challenged, Sanjinés instead advocating using only actors qualified to act out things based on their own memory. An example of this is during the filming of The Courage of the People Sanjinés only used actors who could portray the depicted events as they themselves remember them.
Sanjinés continues to say that "Cinema and reality came together". This shows how Sanjinés views the importance of breaking free from traditional film structures to achieve a truthful and revolutionary final product
The final section of this manifesto talks about the problems of distributing revolutionary cinema, and how it might seem futile to make a film if you have no means of distribution, it is still important to make the film. Although many of these revolutionary films are undistributable where they could have the largest impact, Sanjinés tells of how there are other ways of distributing the film throughout the world and advocates the use of these channels. Although anti-imperialist, Sanjinés advocates the viewings of his films to European and American audiences for educational purposes.