Jet injector explained

A jet injector is a type of medical injecting syringe device used for a method of drug delivery known as jet injection. A narrow, high-pressure stream of liquid is made to penetrate the outermost layer of the skin (stratum corneum) to deliver medication to targeted underlying tissues of the epidermis or dermis ("cutaneous" injection, also known as classical "intradermal" injection), fat ("subcutaneous" injection), or muscle ("intramuscular" injection).

The jet stream is usually generated by the pressure of a piston in an enclosed liquid-filled chamber. The piston is usually pushed by the release of a compressed metal spring, although devices being studied may use piezoelectric effects and other novel technologies to pressurize the liquid in the chamber. The springs of currently marketed and historical devices may be compressed by operator muscle power, hydraulic fluid, built-in battery-operated motors, compressed air or gas, and other means. Gas-powered and hydraulically powered devices may involve hoses that carry compressed gas or hydraulic fluid from separate cylinders of gas, electric air pumps, foot-pedal pumps, or other components to reduce the size and weight of the hand-held part of the system and to allow faster and less-tiring methods to perform numerous consecutive vaccinations. Jet injectors were used for mass vaccination, and as an alternative to needle syringes for diabetics to inject insulin. However, the World Health Organization no longer recommends jet injectors for vaccination due to risks of disease transmission. Similar devices are used in other industries to inject grease or other fluid.

The term "hypospray", although better known within science fiction, originates from a jet injector known as the Hypospray; it has been cited within several scientific articles.[1] [2] [3]

Types

A jet injector, also known as a jet gun injector, air gun, or pneumatic injector, is a medical instrument that uses a high-pressure jet of liquid medication to penetrate the skin and deliver medication under the skin without a needle. Jet injectors can be single-dose or multi-dose.

Throughout the years jet injectors have been redesigned to overcome the risk of carrying contamination to successive subjects. To try to stop the risk, researchers placed a single-use protective cap over the reusable nozzle. The protective cap was intended to act as a shield between the reusable nozzle and the patient's skin. After each injection the cap would be discarded and replaced with a sterile one. These devices were known as protector cap needle-free injectors or PCNFI.[4] A safety test by Kelly and colleagues (2008)[5] found a PCNFI device failed to prevent contamination. After administering injections to hepatitis B patients, researchers found hepatitis B had penetrated the protective cap and contaminated the internal components of the jet injector, showing that the internal fluid pathway and patient-contacting parts cannot safely be reused.

Researchers developed a new jet injection design by combining the drug reservoir, plunger and nozzle into a single-use disposable cartridge. The cartridge is placed onto the tip of the jet injector and, when activated, a rod pushes the plunger forward. This device is known as a disposable-cartridge jet injector (DCJI).[4]

The International Standards Organization recommended abandoning the use of the name "jet injector", which is associated with a risk of cross-contamination and rather refer to newer devices as "needle-free injectors".[6]

Modern needle-free injector brands

Diabetics have been using jet injectors in the United States for at least 20 years. These devices have all been spring-loaded. At their peak, jet injectors accounted for 7% of the injector market. Currently, the only model available in the United States is the Injex 23. In the United Kingdom, the Insujet has recently entered the market. As of June 2015, the Insujet is available in the UK and a few select countries.

Researchers from the University of Twente in the Netherlands patented a Jet Injection System, comprising a microfluidic device for jet ejection and a laser-based heating system. A continuous laser beam – also called a continuous-wave laser – heats the liquid to be administered, which is launched in a droplet form across the epidermis and slows down into the tissue below.[7]

Concerns

Since the jet injector breaks the barrier of the skin, there is a risk of blood and biological material being transferred from one user to the next. Research on the risks of cross-contamination arose immediately after the invention of jet injection technology.

There are three inherent problems with jet injectors:

Splash-back

Splash-back refers to the jet stream penetrating the outer skin at a high velocity, causing the jet stream to ricochet backward and contaminate the nozzle.[8]

Instances of splash-back have been published by several researchers. Samir Mitragrotri visually captured splash-back after discharging a multi-use nozzle jet injector using high-speed microcinematography.[9] Hoffman and colleagues (2001) also observed the nozzle and internal fluid pathway of the jet injector becoming contaminated.[10]

Fluid suck-back

Fluid suck-back occurs when blood left on the nozzle of the jet injector is sucked back into the injector orifice, contaminating the next dose to be fired.

The CDC has acknowledged that the most widely used jet injector in the world, the Ped-O-Jet, sucked fluid back into the gun. "After injections, they [CDC] observed fluid remaining on the Ped-O-Jet nozzle being sucked back into the device upon its cocking and refilling for the next injection (beyond the reach of alcohol swabbing or acetone swabbing)," stated Dr. Bruce Weniger.[11]

Retrograde flow

Retrograde flow happens after the jet stream penetrates the skin and creates a hole, if the pressure of the jet stream causes the spray, after mixing with tissue fluids and blood, to rebound back out of the hole, against the incoming jet stream and back into the nozzle orifice.

This problem has been reported by numerous researchers.[12] [13] [10] [14] [15]

Hepatitis B can be transmitted by less than one nanolitre[16] so makers of injectors must ensure there is no cross-contamination between applications. The World Health Organization no longer recommends jet injectors for vaccination due to risks of disease transmission.[17]

Numerous studies have found cross-infection of diseases from jet injections. An experiment using mice, published in 1985, showed that jet injectors would frequently transmit the viral infection lactate dehydrogenase elevating virus (LDV) from one mouse to another.[18] Another study used the device on a calf, then tested the fluid remaining in the injector for blood. Every injector they tested had detectable blood in a quantity sufficient to pass on a virus such as hepatitis B.[16]

From 1984 to 1985, a weight-loss clinic in Los Angeles administered human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) with a Med-E-Jet injector. A CDC investigation found 57 out of 239 people who had received the jet injection tested positive for hepatitis B.[19]

Jet injectors have also been found to inoculate bacteria from the environment into users. In 1988 a podiatry clinic used a jet injector to deliver local anaesthetic into patients' toes. Eight of these patients developed infections caused by Mycobacterium chelonae. The injector was stored in a container of water and disinfectant between use, but the organism grew in the container.[20] This species of bacteria is sometimes found in tap water, and had been previously associated with infections from jet injectors.[21]

History

External links

Notes and References

  1. Clarke AK, Woodland J . Comparison of two steroid preparations used to treat tennis elbow, using the hypospray . Rheumatol Rehabil . 14 . 1 . 47–9 . February 1975 . 1091959 . 10.1093/rheumatology/14.1.47.
  2. Hughes GR . The use of the hypospray in the treatment of minor orthopaedic conditions . Proc. R. Soc. Med. . 62 . 6. 577 . June 1969 . 5802730 . 1811070 .
  3. Baum J, Ziff M . Use of the hypospray jet injector for intra-articular injection . Ann. Rheum. Dis. . 26 . 2 . 143–5 . March 1967 . 6023696 . 1031030 . 10.1136/ard.26.2.143 .
  4. Web site: Jet Infectors. What Is A Jet Injector?. jetinfectors.com. October 23, 2016. 2016-10-23.
  5. Kelly. K. Preventing contamination between injections with multiple-use nozzle needle-free injectors: a safety trial.. Vaccine. March 4, 2008. 26. 10. 1344–1352. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.12.041. 18272265.
  6. International Standards Organization. Needle-free injectors for medical use [draft report]]. June 3, 1999. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20000303235732/http://www.cdc.gov/nip/dev/N2Minutes1stmeeting.pdf. March 3, 2000.
  7. Web site: Rivas. David Fernandez. Galvez. Loreto Alejandra Oyarte. 2020. Jet injection system. English.
  8. Web site: Jet Infectors. Inherent Problems With Jet Injectors. Jet Infectors. July 31, 2017.
  9. Mitragotri. Samir. Current status and future prospects of needle-free liquid jet injectors. Nat Rev Drug Discov. July 2006. 5. 7. 543–548. 10.1038/nrd2076. 16816837. 11758107. free.
  10. Hoffman. Peter. Abuknesha. RA. Andrews. NJ. Samuel. D. Lloyd. JS. A model to assess the infection potential of jet injectors used in mass immunization. Vaccine. 2001. 19. 28–29. 4020–4027. 11427278. 10.1016/s0264-410x(01)00106-2.
  11. Web site: Weniger. BG. Jones. TS. Chen. RT. The Unintended Consequences of Vaccine Delivery Devices Used to Eradicate Smallpox: Lessons for Future Vaccination Methods. Jet Infectors. October 23, 2016.
  12. Kale. TR. Momin. M. Needle free injection technology – An overview. Innovations in Pharmacy. 2014. 5. 1. 10.24926/iip.v5i1.330. free. 11299/171730. free.
  13. Suria. H. Van Enk. R. Gordon. R. Mattano. LA Jr.. Risk of cross-patient infection with clinical use of a needleless injector device. American Journal of Infection Control. 1999. 27. 5. 444–7. 10511493. 10.1016/s0196-6553(99)70012-x.
  14. Web site: World Health Organization. STEERING GROUP ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF JET INJECTION FOR IMMUNIZATION. asknod.org. October 23, 2016.
  15. Kelly. K. Loskutov. A. Zehrung. D. Puaa. K. LaBarre. P. Muller. N. Guiqiang. W. Ding. H. Hu. D. Blackwelder. WC. Preventing contamination between injections with multi-use nozzle needle-free injectors: a safety trial. Vaccine. 2008. 26. 10. 1344–1352. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.12.041. 18272265.
  16. 10.1016/S0264-410X(01)00106-2. 19. 28–29. 4020–7. Hoffman. P.N . R.A Abuknesha . N.J Andrews . D Samuel . J.S Lloyd. A model to assess the infection potential of jet injectors used in mass immunisation. Population risk (Veterans and children) for another deadly virus, previously known as "non A- non B" or Chronic Hepatitis C "CHC or HCV". . Vaccine. 2001-07-16. 11427278.
  17. Web site: World Health Organization. Solutions: Choosing Technologies for Safe Injections. 2011-05-06. 2005-07-13. https://web.archive.org/web/20120921104456/https://apps.who.int/vaccines-access/injection/injection_safety/safe_injections_choosing_technologies.htm. 21 September 2012.
  18. 10.1099/00222615-20-3-393. 20. 3. 393–7. Brink. P.R.G.. M.. Van Loon. J.C.M.. Trommelen. W.J.. Gribnau. I.R.O.. Smale-Novakova. Virus Transmission by Subcutaneous Jet Injection. J Med Microbiol. 1985-12-01. 4068027. free.
  19. 10.1001/archinte.1990.00390200105020. 150. 9. 1923–1927. Canter. Jeffrey. Katherine Mackey . Loraine S. Good . Ronald R. Roberto . James Chin . Walter W. Bond . Miriam J. Alter . John M. Horan . An Outbreak of Hepatitis B Associated With Jet Injections in a Weight Reduction Clinic. Arch Intern Med. 1990-09-01. 2393323.
  20. 10.1001/jama.1990.03450030097040. 264. 3. 373–6. Wenger. Jay D.. John S. Spika . Ronald W. Smithwick . Vickie Pryor . David W. Dodson . G. Alexander Carden . Karl C. Klontz . Outbreak of Mycobacterium chelonae Infection Associated With Use of Jet Injectors. JAMA. 1990-07-18. 2362334.
  21. 100. 2. 141–7. Inman. P.M.. A. . Beck . A.E. . Brown . J.L. . Stanford. Outbreak of injection abscesses due to Mycobacterium abscessus. Archives of Dermatology. August 1969. 5797954. 10.1001/archderm.100.2.141.
  22. Web site: at . Healthfreelancing.com . 5 April 2011 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20100910122757/http://healthfreelancing.com/samples/nopainIV.php . 10 September 2010 . dmy-all .
  23. Béclard. F. Présentation de l'injecteur de Galante, Séance du 18 décembre 1866, Présidence de M. Bouchardat [Presentation of Jet Injector of Galante, H., meeting of 18 December 1866, Monsieur Bouchardat presiding].]. Bulletin de l'Académie Impériale de Médecine. 1866. 32. 321–327.
  24. Roberts. JF. Local infiltration of tissues from a machine designed to deliver high pressure, high velocity jets of fluid [Doctoral Thesis].. Columbia University. College of Physicians and Surgeons. 1935.
  25. Rees CE . Penetration of tissue by fuel oil under high pressure from diesel engine . . 109 . 11 . 866–7 . 11 September 1937 . 10.1001/jama.1937.92780370004012c .
  26. Web site: Lockhart. Marshall. Hypodermic Injector. Patent Number US 2322244. June 22, 1943.
  27. Hingson. RA. Hughes. JG. Clinical studies with jet injection. A new method of drug administration. Current Researches in Anesthesia and Analgesia. 1947. 26. 6. 221–230. 18917536.
  28. Warren. J. Ziherl. FA. Kish. AW. Ziherl. LA. Large-scale administration of vaccines by means of an automatic jet injection syringe.. JAMA. 1955. 157. 8. 633–637. 10.1001/jama.1955.02950250007003. 13232991.
  29. Rosenberg. Henry. Axelrod. Jean. Robert Andrew Hingson: His Unique Contributions to World Health as Well as to Anesthesiology. Bulletin of Anesthesia History. July 1998. 16. 3. 10–12. 10.1016/s1522-8649(98)50046-7.
  30. Benenson. AS. Mass immunization by jet injection . International Symposium of Immunology, Opatija, Yugoslavia, 28 September – 1 October 1959. 1959. 393–399.
  31. Web site: Department of the Army. Annual Report of the Surgeon General United States Army Fiscal Year 1961.. U.S. Army. July 31, 2017.
  32. Web site: Jet Infectors. Babies and Breadwinners: 1961 Mass Polio Vaccination Campaign. Jet Infectors. July 31, 2017. 2017-04-04.
  33. Web site: Ismach. A. Intradermal nozzle for jet injection devices. Patent Number US 3140713. July 14, 1964.
  34. Army Research and Development. 1968 R&D Achievement Awards Won By 18 Individuals, 5 Teams. Army Research and Development Magazine. June 1968. 9. 6. 3.
  35. Web site: Banker. Oscar. Jet Type Portable Inoculator. Patent Number US 3292621A. December 20, 1966. July 31, 2017.
  36. Web site: Lord. A. The Peace Gun. Smithsonian. July 31, 2017. 2015-08-25.
  37. Web site: The DoD order . 2007-11-28 . https://archive.today/20121212204654/http://usamma.detrick.army.mil/ftp/mmqc_messages/Q971169.txt . 2012-12-12 . dead .
  38. Web site: Veterans info page . 2007-11-28 . https://web.archive.org/web/20071205185110/http://www.hcvets.com/data/transmission_methods/jet_injection.htm . 2007-12-05 . dead .
  39. Web site: Cleveland Veterans Affairs Regional Office. There is Hope for Hepatitis C. Yahoo. July 31, 2017.
  40. 10.1063/1.3430989. A laser based reusable microjet injector for transdermal drug delivery. 2010. Han. Tae-hee. Yoh. Jack J.. Journal of Applied Physics. 107. 10. 103110–103110–3. 2010JAP...107j3110H.
  41. PharmaJet's Stratis® Needle-free Injector Receives WHO PQS Certification as a Pre-qualified Delivery Device for Vaccine Administration . FierceVaccines . 2013-02-13 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20160303223345/http://www.fiercevaccines.com/press-releases/pharmajets-stratis-needle-free-injector-receives-who-pqs-certification-pre . 2016-03-03.
  42. Web site: Weniger BG, Papania MJ. Alternative Vaccine Delivery Methods [Chapter 61]. In: Plotkin SA, Orenstein WA, Offit PA, eds. Vaccines, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier/Saunders; 2013, pp. 1200–31. ]. https://web.archive.org/web/20140420041751/http://siamlotus.com/Pubs/WenigerBG-PapaniaMJ-AlternVaccDelivMeth-Ch61-Vaccines6thEd-2013+refs_LoRes.pdf . dead . 2014-04-20 . . 2020-09-12 .
  43. Web site: Flu Vaccination by Jet Injector | CDC. 2017-10-12.
  44. FDA Updated Communication on Use of Jet Injectors with Inactivated Influenza Vaccines; FDA. FDA. 2020-02-07.
  45. Rodríguez . Carla Berrospe . Visser . Claas Willem . Schlautmann . Stefan . Rivas . David Fernandez . Ramos-García . Rubén . October 2017 . Toward jet injection by continuous-wave laser cavitation . Journal of Biomedical Optics . 22 . 10 . 105003 . 10.1117/1.JBO.22.10.105003 . 1083-3668. free .