h0,1=\dim
1(l{O} | |
H | |
X) |
The name "irregularity" comes from the fact that for the first surfaces investigated in detail, the smooth complex surfaces in P3, the irregularity happens to vanish. The irregularity then appeared as a new "correction" term measuring the difference
pg-pa
For a complex analytic manifold X of general dimension, the Hodge number
h0,1=\dim
1(l{O} | |
H | |
X) |
X
For non-singular complex projective (or Kähler) surfaces, the following numbers are all equal:
h0,1=\dimH1(\Omega
0 | |
X) |
h1,0=\dimH0(\Omega
1 | |
X) |
pg-pa
For surfaces in positive characteristic, or for non-Kähler complex surfaces, the numbers above need not all be equal.
Henri Poincaré proved that for complex projective surfaces the dimension of the Picard variety is equal to the Hodge number h0,1, and the same is true for all compact Kähler surfaces. The irregularity of smooth compact Kähler surfaces is invariant under bimeromorphic transformations.
For general compact complex surfaces the two Hodge numbers h1,0 and h0,1 need not be equal, but h0,1 is either h1,0 or h1,0+1, and is equal to h1,0 for compact Kähler surfaces.
Over fields of positive characteristic, the relation between q (defined as the dimension of the Picard or Albanese variety), and the Hodge numbers h0,1 and h1,0 is more complicated, and any two of them can be different.
There is a canonical map from a surface F to its Albanese variety A which induces a homomorphism from the cotangent space of the Albanese variety (of dimension q) to H1,0(F). Jun-Ichi Igusa found that this is injective, so that
q\leh1,0
h1,0=h0,1=2
Alexander Grothendieck gave a complete description of the relation of q to
h0,1
h0,1