Inverse Laplace transform explained
is the piecewise-
continuous and exponentially-restricted
real function
which has the property:
l{L}\{f\}(s)=l{L}\{f(t)\}(s)=F(s),
where
denotes the
Laplace transform.
It can be proven that, if a function
has the inverse Laplace transform
, then
is uniquely determined (considering functions which differ from each other only on a point set having
Lebesgue measure zero as the same). This result was first proven by
Mathias Lerch in 1903 and is known as Lerch's theorem.
[1] [2] The Laplace transform and the inverse Laplace transform together have a number of properties that make them useful for analysing linear dynamical systems.
Mellin's inverse formula
An integral formula for the inverse Laplace transform, called the Mellin's inverse formula, the Bromwich integral, or the Fourier–Mellin integral, is given by the line integral:
f(t)=l{L}-1\{F(s)\}(t)=
\limT\toinfty
estF(s)ds
where the integration is done along the vertical line
in the
complex plane such that
is greater than the real part of all
singularities of
and
is bounded on the line, for example if the contour path is in the
region of convergence. If all singularities are in the left half-plane, or
is an
entire function, then
can be set to zero and the above inverse integral formula becomes identical to the
inverse Fourier transform.
In practice, computing the complex integral can be done by using the Cauchy residue theorem.
Post's inversion formula
Post's inversion formula for Laplace transforms, named after Emil Post,[3] is a simple-looking but usually impractical formula for evaluating an inverse Laplace transform.
The statement of the formula is as follows: Let
be a continuous function on the interval
of exponential order, i.e.
for some real number
. Then for all
, the Laplace transform for
exists and is infinitely differentiable with respect to
. Furthermore, if
is the Laplace transform of
, then the inverse Laplace transform of
is given by
f(t)=l{L}-1\{F\}(t)
=\limk
\left(
\right)k+1F(k)\left(
\right)
for
, where
is the
-th derivative of
with respect to
.
As can be seen from the formula, the need to evaluate derivatives of arbitrarily high orders renders this formula impractical for most purposes. With the advent of powerful personal computers, the main efforts to use this formula have come from dealing with approximations or asymptotic analysis of the Inverse Laplace transform, using the Grunwald–Letnikov differintegral to evaluate the derivatives. Post's inversion has attracted interest due to the improvement in computational science and the fact that it is not necessary to know where the poles of
lie, which make it possible to calculate the asymptotic behaviour for big
using inverse
Mellin transforms for several arithmetical functions related to the
Riemann hypothesis.
Software tools
See also
Further reading
External links
Notes and References
- Book: 10.1007/978-0-387-68855-8_2. Inversion Formulae and Practical Results. Numerical Methods for Laplace Transform Inversion. 5. 23–44. Numerical Methods and Algorithms. 2007. Cohen . A. M. . 978-0-387-28261-9.
- 10.1007/BF02421315. Sur un point de la théorie des fonctions génératrices d'Abel. Acta Mathematica. 27. 339–351. 1903. Lerch . M. . Mathias Lerch. free. 10338.dmlcz/501554. free.
- Post. Emil L.. Generalized differentiation. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society. 32. 4. 1930. 723–781. 0002-9947. 10.1090/S0002-9947-1930-1501560-X. free.
- Abate . J. . Valkó . P. P. . 10.1002/nme.995 . Multi-precision Laplace transform inversion . International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering . 60 . 5 . 979 . 2004 . 2004IJNME..60..979A . 119889438 .