International Fujita scale explained

The International Fujita scale (abbreviated as IF-Scale) rates the intensity of tornadoes and other wind events based on the severity of the damage they cause.[1] It is used by the European Severe Storms Laboratory (ESSL) and various other organizations including (DWD) and State Meteorological Agency (AEMET). The scale is intended to be analogous to the Fujita and Enhanced Fujita scales, while being more applicable internationally by accounting for factors such as differences in building codes.

In 2018, the first draft version of the IF-scale, version 0.10 was published. This version was based on a 12-step rating scale. Over the next few years, dozens of tornadoes would be rated on this version of the scale. Most notably, the 2021 South Moravia tornado received a rating (IF4) and full damage survey on the IF-scale conducted by ESSL, the Czech Hydrometeorological Institute and four other organizations.[2] On May 6, 2023, version 0.99.9d was published, which changed it to a 9-step rating scale.[3] In late July 2023, the first official version of the IF scale was published.[4]

2018 version

See also: List of tornadoes rated on the 2018 International Fujita scale.

Tornado rating classifications[5]
IF0-IF0IF0+IF1-IF1IF1+IF2-IF2IF2+IF3IF4IF5
WeakStrongViolent
Significant
<-- blank -->Intense

Parameters

The 12 categories for the International Fujita scale are listed below, in order of increasing intensity. Although the wind speeds and photographic damage examples are updated, which are more or less still accurate. However, for the actual IF-scale in practice, damage indicators (the type of structure which has been damaged) are predominantly used in determining the tornado intensity. The IF-scale steps are defined by a central value and an error. The errors have been estimated to be 30% of the central value, resulting in overlapping speed ranges. The distances between the central values of the steps have been so chosen that the upper bound exceeds the central value of the next step, ensuring a balance between the resolution of the scale and the expected errors. Since ESSL required that the steps be consistent with the original Fujita scale, they introduced steps with – and + suffixes indicating steps one third higher or lower than the central value of the original scale, e.g. F1- equals "F2 - 1⁄3F2" and F2+ equals "F2 + 1⁄3F2". Above F2, such a subdivision was not introduced and only full steps are used.

ScaleWind speed
(Estimated)
mphkm/hm/s
IF0-45 ± 14 72 ± 22 20 ± 6
IF056 ± 17 90 ± 27 25 ± 7
IF0+67 ± 20 108 ± 32 30 ± 9
IF1-70 ± 24 128 ± 38 36 ± 11
IF192 ± 28 149 ± 45 41 ± 12
IF1+106 ± 32 170 ± 51 47 ± 14
IF2-120 ± 36 193 ± 58 54 ± 16
IF2135 ± 40 217 ± 65 60 ± 18
IF2+150 ± 45 241 ± 72 67 ± 20
IF3182 ± 55 293 ± 88 81 ± 24
IF4234 ± 70 376 ± 113 105 ± 31
IF5290 ± 87 466 ± 140 130 ± 39

2023 version

On May 6, 2023, version 0.99.9d was published, which changed it to a 9-step rating scale.[6] In this version, the wind speed damage indicator was introduced, which made it the first tornado intensity and damage scale to use measured wind speeds and Doppler weather radar measured wind speeds.[3] When the first official publication of the IF scale, the 9-step rating scale was kept. It was noted that each scale's wind speed is to be taken with a 20% error margin on each side of the central value.[4] This was done to ensure the lower or upper bound of the overlapping rating came close to the central value of the other rating.[4]

Tornado rating classifications
IF0IF0.5IF1IF1.5IF2IF2.5IF3IF4IF5
WeakStrongViolent
Significant
<-- blank -->Intense
ScaleWind speed
(Estimated)
(Central value; Full range of the 20% error margin)
mphkm/hm/s
IF055; 44–66 90; 72–108 25; 20–30
IF0.575; 60–90 120; 96–144 33; 27–40
IF190; 72–108 150; 130–180 40; 32–48
IF1.5110; 88–132 180; 144–216 50; 40–60
IF2135; 108–162 220; 176–264 60; 48–72
IF2.5160; 128–192 250; 200–300 70; 56–84
IF3180; 144–216 290; 232–348 80; 64–96
IF4230; 184–276 380; 304–456 105; 84–126
IF5290; 232–348 470; 376–564 130; 104–156

Damage indicators, subclasses, and degrees of damage

The IF scale currently has 23 damage indicators (DI), each with a varying number of subclasses and degrees of damage (DoD).[4] [3]

DI Abbr. Damage indicator (DI) Subclasses Degrees of damage
BS Building - structureA, AB, B, C, D, E, F0, 1A, 1B, 2
BR Building - roofA, AB, B, C, D, E, F0, 1, 2
BN Building - non-structural elementsSW, SS, TW, TS, HW, HS0, 1, 2, 3
BM Building - anchoringSM, SI, DB1
VH Road VehiclesC, E, L, T0, 1, 2, 3, 4
TR TreesW, A, S0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
TS Tree standsWA, S0, 1, 2, 3, 4
WT Wind turbinesA, S0, 1, 2, 3
GH GreenhousesW, A, S0, 1, 2, 3
TC Train carsS, F0, 1
MH Mobile homes / Static caravans - 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
PT Poles and towersW, S, T0, 1, 2
SP Solar Panels - 0, 1
FC FencesW, S0, 1
FW Free-standing wallsZ, A, AB, B, C, D, E, F1, 2
SN Signs and billboardsT, M0, 1, 2
SW Connected scaffolding - 1
CP Carports / garages - 1
SS Service Station Canopies - 0, 1, 2, 3
SC Shipping ContainersA, B, C, D, E, F1, 2, 3
CR CranesG, t1, 2
OF Outdoor FurnitureL, H0, 1, 2
WM Wind Speed MeasurementSee section belowSee section below

DI: Wind Speed Measurement

A unique feature of the International Fujita scale compared to the Fujita or Enhanced Fujita scale is a new damage indicator based on measured wind speeds. For the IF scale, only wind speeds measured at or below 10m (30feet) can be used to determine a rating. Doppler weather radar measurements are also able to be used to determine a rating if they are measured within damaging distance. For radar measurements, any readings below 60m (200feet) can be used to determine a rating.[4] [3]

Three second measurement

For three-second wind speed measurements, it is assumed to be an average of 88.8% of the three-second measurement.[4] [3]

Degree of Damage (DoD) / Measured IF# SpeedThree Second Measurement
mphkm/hm/s
DoD 0 / IF042.5 - 56 69 - 91 19 - 25
DoD 0.5 / IF0.557 - 74.5 92 - 120 26 - 32
DoD 1 / IF173.9 - 90 119 - 146 33 - 40
DoD 1.5 / IF1.591 - 109 147 - 176 40 - 49
DoD 2 / IF2110 - 129 177 - 208 50 - 57
DoD 2.5 / IF2.5129 - 156.5 209 - 242 58 - 70
DoD 3 / IF3151 - 183.9 243 - 296 68 - 82
DoD 4 / IF4184 - 231 297 - 373 83 - 103
DoD 5 / IF5≥232 ≥374 ≥104

Two second measurement

For two-second wind speed measurements, it is assumed to be an average of 90.9% of the two-second measurement.[4] [3]

Degree of Damage (DoD) / Measured IF# SpeedTwo Second Measurement
mphkm/hm/s
DoD 0 / IF043.4 - 58 70 - 94 20 - 26
DoD 0.5 / IF0.559 - 74 95 - 120 27 - 33
DoD 1 / IF175 - 93 121 - 150 34 - 40
DoD 1.5 / IF1.593 - 111.8 150 - 180 42 - 50
DoD 2 / IF2111.8 - 132 180 - 213 51 - 59
DoD 2.5 / IF2.5133 - 154 214 - 248 60 - 68
DoD 3 / IF3154 - 188 249 - 303 69 - 84
DoD 4 / IF4188 - 237 304 - 382 85 - 106
DoD 5 / IF5≥238 ≥383 ≥107

One second measurement

For one-second wind speed measurements, it is assumed to be an average of 92.5% of the one-second measurement.[4] [3]

Degree of Damage (DoD) / Measured IF# SpeedOne Second Measurement
mphkm/hm/s
DoD 0 / IF044.1 - 58 71 - 95 20 - 26
DoD 0.5 / IF0.559 - 76 96 - 123 27 - 34
DoD 1 / IF177 - 94 124 - 152 35 - 42
DoD 1.5 / IF1.595 - 113 153 - 183 43 - 51
DoD 2 / IF2114 - 134 184 - 220 52 - 60
DoD 2.5 / IF2.5135 - 156 218 - 252 61 - 70
DoD 3 / IF3157 - 191 253 - 308 71 - 85
DoD 4 / IF4192 - 241 309 - 388 86 - 107
DoD 5 / IF5≥241.5 ≥389 ≥108

Zero second measurement

For zero-second wind speed measurements, it is assumed to be an instantaneous wind speed measurement.[4] [3] This can only be used if it was 10Hz or higher sample rate.[4] [3] [7]

Degree of Damage (DoD) / Measured IF# SpeedZero Second Measurement
mphkm/hm/s
DoD 0 / IF047.8 - 64 77 - 103 22 - 28
DoD 0.5 / IF0.564 - 82 104 - 132 29 - 36
DoD 1 / IF182 - 101.9 133 - 164 37 - 45
DoD 1.5 / IF1.5102 - 123 165 - 198 46 - 55
DoD 2 / IF2124 - 145 199 - 234 56 - 65
DoD 2.5 / IF2.5146 - 169 235 - 273 66 - 75
DoD 3 / IF3170 - 207 274 - 333 76 - 92
DoD 4 / IF4208 - 260 334 - 420 93 - 116
DoD 5 / IF5≥261 ≥421 ≥117

See also

Notes and References

  1. Web site: The International Fujita (IF) Scale Tornado and Wind Damage Assessment Guide . ESSL.org . . 26 June 2022.
  2. Web site: Tomás Púcik . David Rúva . Miroslav Singer . Miloslav Stanëk . Pieter Groenemeijer . Damage Survey of the Violent Tornado in Southeast Czechia on 24 June 2021 . European Severe Storms Laboratory . 16 May 2023 . 1–31 . 23 June 2022.
  3. Web site: The International Fujita (IF) Scale . European Severe Storms Laboratory . 8 May 2023.
  4. Web site: Pieter Groenemeijer (ESSL) . Lothar Bock (DWD) . Juan de Dios Soriano (AEMet) . Maciej Dutkiewicz (Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology) . Delia Gutiérrez-Rubio (AEMet) . Alois M. Holzer (ESSL) . Martin Hubrig . Rainer Kaltenberger . Thilo Kühne (ESSL) . Mortimer Müller (Universität für Bodenkultur) . Bas van der Ploeg . Tomáš Púčik (ESSL) . Thomas Schreiner (ESSL) . Miroslav Šinger (SHMI) . Gabriel Strommer (ESSL) . Andi Xhelaj (University of Genova) . The International Fujita (IF) Scale . European Severe Storms Laboratory . 30 July 2023 . 30 July 2023.
  5. Web site: Severe Thunderstorm Climatology . 2022-07-17 . 2012-10-04 . https://web.archive.org/web/20121004084424/http://www.nssl.noaa.gov/hazard/ . dead .
  6. Web site: The International Fujita (IF) Scale . European Severe Storms Laboratory . 8 May 2023.
  7. A. C. M. Beljaars . The Influence of Sampling and Filtering on Measured Wind Gusts . Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology . 1 December 1987 . 4 . 4 . 613–626 . 10.1175/1520-0426(1987)004<0613:TIOSAF>2.0.CO;2 . 1520-0426. free . 1987JAtOT...4..613B .