Independent review of the teaching of early reading (Rose Report 2006) explained
The Independent review of the teaching of early reading was an influential report by Sir Jim Rose, former HMI director of inspection at Ofsted, into the teaching of reading in primary schools in England.[1]
Another report[2] was published in April 2009, with the name Independent Review of the Primary Curriculum: Final Report, after additional evidence was received from the Cambridge Primary Review.[3]
Both reports recommended that high quality systematic phonics "should be taught as the prime approach in learning to decode (to read) and encode (to write/spell) print". Phonics should be taught systematically and discretely, however, it should be set within a "broad and rich" "multisensory" curriculum. The reports stressed the importance of language development (including speaking and listening). The reports also recommended that the "searchlights" model of reading should be replaced with the simple view of reading.[4]
See also
Notes and References
- Web site: Independent review of the teaching of early reading, 2006. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100512233640/http://publications.teachernet.gov.uk/eOrderingDownload/0201-2006PDF-EN-01.pdf. dead. 2010-05-12. 2020-05-22.
- Web site: Independent Review of the Primary Curriculum: Final Report, DCSF-00499-2009, nationalarchives.gov.uk. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100205061400/http://publications.teachernet.gov.uk/eOrderingDownload/Primary_curriculum_Report.pdf. dead. 2010-02-05. 2020-05-22.
- Web site: Cambridge Primary Review, University of Cambridge, UK 2009.
- Web site: The Simple View Of Reading - Explained . 2011-08-24 . Dombey . Henrietta . United Kingdom Literacy Association . Teaching Times . https://web.archive.org/web/20120331044923/http://www.teachingtimes.com/articles/the-simple.htm . 2012-03-31 . dead .